MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -1- Ivo Kabelka, 1 Jakub Štěpán, 1,2 Jaroslav Koča 1,2, and Petr Kulhánek 1,2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

LEUCEMIA MIELOIDE AGUDA TIPO 0
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
QUALITY CONTROL TOOLS FOR PROCESS IMPROVEMENT
Chapter 6 Cost and Choice. Copyright © 2001 Addison Wesley LongmanSlide 6- 2 Figure 6.1 A Simplified Jam-Making Technology.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 38.
1 Chapter 40 - Physiology and Pathophysiology of Diuretic Action Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Effective Change Detection Using Sampling Junghoo John Cho Alexandros Ntoulas UCLA.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
and 6.855J Cycle Canceling Algorithm. 2 A minimum cost flow problem , $4 20, $1 20, $2 25, $2 25, $5 20, $6 30, $
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
0 - 0.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
MULTIPLICATION EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 3. WHAT EVER YOU DO TO ONE SIDE YOU HAVE TO DO TO THE OTHER 2. DIVIDE BY THE NUMBER IN FRONT OF THE VARIABLE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING Think Distributive property backwards Work down, Show all steps ax + ay = a(x + y)
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions Numbers and number system Numbers and the number system, fractions, decimals, proportion & probability.
ZMQS ZMQS
Objectives Uncertainty analysis Quality control Regression analysis.
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
Plan Recognition in Virtual Laboratories Ofra Amir and Yaakov (Kobi) Gal Ben-Gurion University of The Negev Department of Information Systems Engineering.
Test on Input, Output, Processing, & Storage Devices
ABC Technology Project
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
© S Haughton more than 3?
“Start-to-End” Simulations Imaging of Single Molecules at the European XFEL Igor Zagorodnov S2E Meeting DESY 10. February 2014.
Twenty Questions Subject: Twenty Questions
Linking Verb? Action Verb or. Question 1 Define the term: action verb.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Energy & Green Urbanism Markku Lappalainen Aalto University.
Atom atom atom atom atom 1.True or false? Protons are in the nucleus.
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
This, that, these, those Number your paper from 1-10.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
1 First EMRAS II Technical Meeting IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, 19–23 January 2009.
Event 4: Mental Math 7th/8th grade Math Meet ‘11.
“Be An Example” Introduction 1st Timothy 4:12 Matthew 5:16
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
11 = This is the fact family. You say: 8+3=11 and 3+8=11
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Ke – Kitchen Elements Newport Ave. – Lot 13 Bethesda, MD.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
How Cells Obtain Energy from Food
MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -1- Ivo Kabelka, 1 Jakub Štěpán, 1,2 Jaroslav Koča 1,2, and Petr Kulhánek 1,2
22/5/2006 EMBIO Meeting 1 EMBIO Meeting Vienna, 2006 Heidelberg Group IWR, Computational Molecular Biophysics, University of Heidelberg Kei Moritsugu MD.
Molecular Dynamics Simulation
Enrico Spiga 1,2 Andrea Scorciapino 1, Arturo Robertazzi 1, 2, Roberto Anedda 2, Mariano Casu 2, Paolo Ruggerone 1 and Matteo Ceccarelli 1 1 University.
A Computational Study of RNA Structure and Dynamics Rhiannon Jacobs and Harish Vashisth Department of Chemical Engineering, University of New Hampshire,
Jason Chiang Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Experimental Overview
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Restriction Enzyme BsoBI–DNA Complex
Presentation transcript:

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -1- Ivo Kabelka, 1 Jakub Štěpán, 1,2 Jaroslav Koča 1,2, and Petr Kulhánek 1,2 1 National Centre for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, Brno, Czech Republic 2 CEITEC – Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, Brno, Czech Republic Study of BsoBI Endonuclease By Molecular Dynamics

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -2- BsoBI Nuclease  type II restriction endonuclease from Geobacillus stearothermophilus  optimal cleavage at 65 ˚C  recognizes short palindromatic sequence C|PyCGPuG  cofactor - 2 Mg 2+ atoms Ruan, H.; Lunnen, K. D.; Scott, M. E.; Moran, L. S.; Slatko, B. E.; Pelletier, J. J.; Hess, E. J.; Benner, J., 2nd; Wilson, G. G.; Xu, S. Y. Cloning and sequence comparison of AvaI and BsoBI restriction-modification systems. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1996, 252, 695–699.  homodimeric enzyme - both in free form and in complex with DNA (2x323 AA)  capable of cleaving both linear and circular DNA molecules  20 Å long tunnel for DNA recognition  complete encirclement of DNA helical domains catalytic domains monomer A monomer B DNA

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -3- Experimental study Dikić, J. The conformational dynamics of BsoBI, analyzed by fluorescence spectroscopy down to the single molecule level. Thesis, University of Justus Liebig, Giessen, fluorescent probes: acceptor and donor FRET – Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer efficiency is proportional to acceptor-donor distance single molecule level (diluted solution) Proposed conformational changes

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -4- Motivation  find structure of "opened" state(s)  find pathways how DNA enters to the active site  confirm FRET experiments  find structure of pre-reaction complex

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -5- Molecular Dynamics - complex  input structure PDB ID: 1DC1  pmemd from AMBER v12  parm99SBbsc0 + TIP3P water  c(NaCl) ~ 0.15 M  298 K and 1 bar  apo-enzyme (no ion cofactors)  CPU/GPU protein + DNA

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -6- Molecular Dynamics – no DNA only protein DNA removed with DNA (150 ns) no DNA

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -7- Molecular Dynamics – no DNA only protein DNA removed d1

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -8- Metadynamics history dependent biasing potential converge to the free energy reaction (collective) variables 1 CV – distance between catalytic domains  pmemd v10/PMFLib v4.0  h=0.1 kcal/mol   =0.5 Å  t s =2 ps  CPU only Laio, A.; Parrinello, M. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 12562–12566.

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -9- MTD - Collective Variable Evolutions

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -10- MTD - Free Energy Estimates

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -11- Principal Component Analysis no DNA MTD Index EigenValue Å2Å Fluctuation matrix Diagonalization Projectionsmode #1mode #2

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -12- PCA Projections 0 ns (start) 16 ns (end) no DNA MTD

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -13- Opened Enzyme Average distance 16 Å closed with DNA 7Å

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -14- Contradictions Dikić, J. The conformational dynamics of BsoBI, analyzed by fluorescence spectroscopy down to the single molecule level. Thesis, University of Justus Liebig, Giessen, In the apo-enzyme (no cofactor present) both distances are shorter than in the complex.

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -15- Contradictions Dikić, J. The conformational dynamics of BsoBI, analyzed by fluorescence spectroscopy down to the single molecule level. Thesis, Giessen, In the apo-enzyme (no cofactor present) both distances are shorter than in the complex. MD simulations

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -16- Donor/Acceptor Structures Alexa594 CC 19 Å

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -17- Donor/Acceptor Dynamics E153C E290C "closed""open" protein restrained implicit solvent 600 K

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -18- Conclusions  Main outcomes

MIB VI, 16 th – 19 th September 2013, Mariánské lázně -19- Acknowledgements  Financial support  CEITEC  GACR  Computational resources  MetaCentrum  CERIT-SC