Physics First Also Called “Biology On Top” or “Right Side Up” Presented by: Karen Jo Matsler

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Marylands Technology Education Voluntary State Curriculum 2007 Bob Gray Center for the Teaching of Technology & Science (ITEA-CATTS) and the University.
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Putting Together The Standards-Based Puzzle
SCIENCE & TESTING. CMT-SCIENCE Given for the first time in Spring 2008 in grades 5 & 8 Consists of multiple choice and open ended questions Based on student.
Implementing the Tech Standards Presenter: Eric Curts eTech|OHIO Tech Conference 2006.
Principal Professional Development Mathematics KCAS June 13 and June 16, 2011 Analytical and Applied Sciences June/July
Southern Regional Education Board 1 Preparing Students for Success in High School.
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
When Students Can’t Read…
Making the Connection to Assessment. Three components: Common Core State Standards Excellent Matches to State Curriculum Essential Skills and Knowledge.
Leading Australian Curriculum: Science Day 1. Australian Curriculum PURPOSE OF 4 DAY MODULES Curriculum leaders develop capacity to lead change and support.
Teacher Education & Induction in the US Johnny Lott & John Carter.
Common Core at CPS Scope and Sequence Implementation Plan
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS INITIATIVE December
Regional Working Session
“Learning is finding out what we already know. Doing is demonstrating that we know it. Teaching is reminding others that they have the answers to their.
Australian Curriculum: Science Day 1. Australian Curriculum PURPOSE OF MODULES Develop capacity to lead change and support schools and network of schools.
Update on Strategic Plan Inquiry Based Learning Grades 9-12 Minnetonka Public Schools 2011/12.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Provisions for Training and Professional Development 1 Florida Digital Instructional Materials Work Group November 13, 2012.
1 Literacy Leadership Teams December 2004 Common High-Quality Differentiated Instruction for Achievement for All within The Cleveland Literacy System Module.
Action Plan Mr. Ahmed Zaki Uddin Mathematics O-Level.
Issues Surrounding the Evaluation of Teacher Internship Programs Donna Barrett Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics & Computing Georgia.
Secondary Science: A Proposed Change: A Logical, Coherent & Effective Sequence that has Physics First Dr. Timothy C. Burgess McGill-Toolen High School.
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
Principles & Standards for School Mathematics & Group Presentation Overview NCTM, 2000.
STAAR Overview Webinar 1 of 2 Recorded July 6, 2011 Jennifer Drumm Coordinator, Teaching and Learning Ed Vara, Deputy Executive Director, Academic Services.
A Mathematics Specialist Program: Its Structure and Impact on Practicing Elementary Teachers Nadine Bezuk & Susan Nickerson.
District Teacher Leaders and School Teacher Leaders Workshop April 29, 2004 Tallassee High School.
MATHEMATICS Support for Single Plan for Student Achievement.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Integrating the Life Sciences from Molecule to Organism The American Physiological Society Transform a Cookbook Lab Moving Toward More Student-Centered.
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
Common Core State Standards Initiative A Fundamental Shift Toward College and Career Readiness in K-12 Education.
Next Generation Science Standards Update Cheryl Kleckner Education Specialist.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Tim Wagner, MYP Coordinator
Getting More Students to Meet Standards: Research-based Practices That Work Southern Regional Education Board.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Prepared and presented by Reda Saad El-Mahdy Ahmed Bin Hanbal Independent Secondary School for Boys And “SEC Curriculum Standards”
The Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum January 29, 2013 Karen M. Beerer, Ed.D.
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
K-12 Mathematics in Rapid City Longitudinal Findings from Project PRIME Ben Sayler & Susie Roth November 5, 2009.
Crawford Central School District Math and ELA PA Core Alignment Project Created by Cheryl Krachkowski.
The Next Generation Science Standards From Awareness to Transition
Science Update Florida Association of Science Supervisors May 5, 2006 Sally Sanders VieVie Baird Science Environmental Education
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Chris DeWald Science Instructional Coordinator Montana Office of Public Instruction.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
+ Getting Started: Projects Based Learning Wando High School PD – October 28, 2015 Chris Turpin H222/H230.
Science Understanding the Transition from TAKS to STAAR An Opportunity to Focus on Transitions from Elementary to Middle School Science (and Math)
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District Program Evaluations A summary of recommendations from the completed program evaluations March 6, 2009.
What is Forward? Forward K-5 Instructional System Consultative Services Progress Monitoring Integrated Curriculum and Assessment Professional Development.
Casimir Middle School TUSD Transition to the Common Core.
West Campus Science Electives
Board on Science Education Draft released 15 July 2011
Welcome to 2nd Grade.
All Standards All Students
Southern Regional Education Board Annual Leadership Forum
Advanced Academics in Middle School
Concord High School Science Department.
Program Evaluation Leading & Learning Spring 2016
Leading the Way in Science
Presentation transcript:

Physics First Also Called “Biology On Top” or “Right Side Up” Presented by: Karen Jo Matsler

Why do we teach the Biology, Chemistry and Physics sequence? 1893 Recommendation by Committee of Ten Biology was zoology and botany (macro- level) Purpose to train students to observe, describe, and draw for purpose of categorization Biology did not require lab equipment (physics and chemistry did)

What has changed in the past 115 years? Biology is no longer merely study of physical characteristics. Biology probes into chemistry and is more complex (micro-level) DNA Cell functions Enzymes, reactions Molecular structures

Advantages of PCB Sequence: Physics deals with concepts that can be and typically have been experienced Physics teaches HOW science works Physics empowers predictions Allows for inquiry based teaching Less safety risks Physics provides key concepts for all of chemistry Physics provides 90% of biology, astronomy, earth science, medical science Atoms are first described in physics Physics is considered the “cornerstone” by BSCS (C-to-C) cornerstone to capstone

Issues for Cornerstone to Capstone Lack of math sophistication for 9th grade Impact of state assessments Availability of highly qualified physics teachers Lack of appropriate curriculum materials Reluctance of teacher to embrace approach (Note: all but one of these can be addressed. The main reason San Diego was not successful was the state test was not changed)

Benefits of C-to-C (According to BSCS) Increased coherence across science courses Increased enrollment in science courses Increased science achievement More positive attitudes toward science

BSCS Recommendations for Curriculum Changes Make explicit story lines and connections across disciplines Curriculum framework (rows = 4 years, columns = concepts) Focus on conceptual development Invoke appropriate teaching strategies

Models of Implementation (Timeline Options) As proposed by BSCS mmary.pdf mmary.pdf Option 1: Sweeping change Occurs over 3 year period Years 1 and 2 –offer both 9th and traditional (11th) physics, biology is not offered Chemistry offered every year, but must change in year 2 to accomodate sequence

Models of Implementation (Timeline Options) Advantages: Accomplished in 3 years Students and teachers experience changes together (cohesive, less fragmentation) Nonphysics teachers are more aware of content in physics, use prior knowledge

Models of Implementation (Timeline Options) Disadvantages: Increase need for physics teachers Increase need for materials, classrooms

Option 2: Permanent Two-Program Model Implements C-to-C while maintaining traditional sequence Provides students 2 options Completed in 3 years Fewer enroll in biology in 9th, some in physics Year 3=half of 9th and half of 11th take biology Year 2=two different chemistry courses

Option 2: Permanent Two-Program Model Advantages Accomplished in 3 years Every discipline is offered every year Less strain on teacher preparation (in disciplines) Provides time for teachers to increase content areas Disadvantages Assumes resources are available Must decide who can enroll in programs

Option 3: Phased-In Model Cornerstone to Capstone accomplished in 6 years Begins with small cohort of students Resembles 3 years of Two–Program and 3 years of Sweeping Change Model

Option 3: Phased-In Model Advantages Slow implementation allows resources to be focused on need Provides time to acclimate to change Provides targeted evaluation of change process Small adjustments can occur in ongoing manner More cost effective during years 4-6, some of teachers in first half can become leads and coaches Particularly advantageous where there is resistance to change

Examples of Physics, Chemistry, Biology Success Glastonbury (1995) moved physics to 8th grade Increased number of females in upper level (AP) physics Upper level physics enrollment increased dramatically Increase in AP scores Increase in number of students in all AP science courses Fred Myers (Farmington, CT) Started in school year and affected freshman class of 1998 Changed sequence to “reflect more logical sequence” Biology discusses principles of chemistry and physics in DNA and photosynthesis

Examples of Physics, Chemistry, Biology Success Chemistry discusses electrons, energy levels, electric forces Enrollment in AP science tripled (Received Siemen’s Award for outstanding enrollment and achievement in AP science exams) Enrollment in honors level courses increased Highest score in state on experiment portion of exam Gene Ewald (Ohio) Taught sequence for 18 years Met weekly on Saturdays; biggest changes were in biology Physics starts with a little math/measuring and ends with atomic structure Chemistry starts with review of physics texts, structure of reactions, organic/bio Biology starts with conservations, acids/bases, gas laws, organic, then processes. “they are as ready in 9th grade as they are as seniors”

Supporting Research (from O’Brian) 9th graders seem equally ready for physics as College Prep 12th graders Majority of students have misconceptions and few understand Newton’s second law conceptually Existing instructional methods are not very effective at addressing student difficulty with concepts If taught in 9th grade: Needs to have strong conceptual emphasis with less focus on math manipulation Environment needs to be strongly student centered, not teacher centered

Supporting Research Keys to success Focused professional development throughout year (Loucks-Horsley, 2003) Content Pedagogy Spiral concepts Well-defined and planned implementation process (Understanding by Design, 1998 and/or CBAM) Needs assessment (Stages of concern (CBAM, Hall & Hord, 2001) Leadership team should involve all representative stakeholders Careful selection of instructional materials (Analyzing Instructional Materials, WestEd and BSCS, 2002)

Challenges Some physics concepts are difficult (acceleration) Number of available physics teachers: A few hours “won’t cut it” to retool them

Objections/Concerns Based on Role Parent (not the way I learned, has to be difficult to be real...) Teacher (novel approach, want best students, physics isn't for everyone...) Principal (I'm backing my teacher since I don't know anything about Physics or science...) Supervisor (see all the above, not confident enough to lead the way...)

Quotes Bernard Khoury (AAPT): “Physics is not just for the best and brightest, it is for everyone”. Leon Lederman (Nobel Laureate) “Physics is overarching discipline. To take chemistry before physics is like taking calculus before algebra”.

Textbook Options Text is resource for teachers Text is a tool, the way it is taught is paramount Active Physics; CPO; Conceptual Physics (Hewitt) new book out in July Physics Concepts and Connections, Art Hobson San Diego (2001) Only had one year of transition Did not educate the public for buy-in Had to hire 10 physics and 25 biology/chemistry teachers Did not change the state exam to match the course (you value what you assess) Exam needed more inquiry Exam was targeting 12th graders, not 9th

Plan of Action Study research from other districts/states Think outside the box Prepare teachers for a paradigm shift Solicit input from stakeholders Equip classrooms Professional development for all areas Curriculum focus

Professional Development Opportunities Physics Teaching Resource Agents (PTRA) Texas Regional Collaboratives (TRC) July Lee College, Baytown July 30-Aug University of Dallas, Irving Handout with information visit web.mac.com/kmatsler and go to Physics for All

Important Discussion Findings from the Texas Physics Task Force: All students deserve and should have a full year course of physics. AAPT encourages the Physics first movement. The physics/mathematics coordination is very important. The TEKS for Physics do not include mathematical computation beyond Algebra I. However, the mathematics/science correlation should be strengthened in the elementary and secondary science courses.

Important Discussion Findings from the Texas Physics Task Force: A good foundation K-8 is essential to the learning of physics concepts. The TEKS K-8 should be strengthened, clear, and strong all the way through a student’s science education. The integration of physics concepts in all disciplines is to be encouraged. Conceptual physics requires depth of understanding. The conceptual approach to science is encouraged and acceptable for all students.

Important Discussion Findings from the Texas Physics Task Force: Conceptual physics should not be a “watered down” version of science but rather a deeper understanding of the concepts through demonstrations, hands on activities, and correlations to everyday life examples. All students should have a coherent sequence of science study in high school that should include physics. If a student takes Physics they should not take PT1.

Important Discussion Findings from the Texas Physics Task Force: A good sequence for Physics first, if students choose to take this course, is Physics, Chemistry, Biology and either Earth and Space Science (which should include a strong physics strand since it has a pre- requisite of Biology, Chemistry, and Physics)or AP Physics “Failure is not an option”

Resources/Websites Fred Myers. The Right-Side-Up High School Science Sequence: 10 year report Lederman, L. M. (1998). ARISE: American Renaissance in Science Education (FERMILABTM-2051). Batavia, IL: Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory. Retrieved June 15, 2002, from pdf G.E. Hall, Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes Loucks-Horsley, Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics, 2nd edition Love, N Using data/getting results: A practical guide for school improvement in mathmatics and science Bybee, R. Learning Science and the Science of Learninghttp://fnalpubs.fnal.gov/archive/1998/tm/TM pdf

Resources/Websites Wiggins, G.P Understanding by Design Curriculum Update, Summer 2004, Shaking Up Science O’Brien, M An Investigation into the Effectiveness of Physics First in Maine. BSCS complete monograph Or 7&id=0|capstone_pdfswww.ascd.org 7&id=0|capstone_pdfs

Resources/Websites BSCS Cornerstone-to-Capstone Conclusion (has several pages of references) BSCS Executive Summary ft/vol_43/iss_5/319_1.html