Creating an IRB Proposal Human Research Protection Program 357 Administration Building 806-742-2064 Donna Peters Esther Lucey Rick Shupe.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

IRB SUBMISSION PROCESS FOR SHB STUDIES Version 9/18/2013.
Introduction to Human Subjects Research at the University of Michigan – Dearborn. Debra Schneider IRB Administrator (313)
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Human Subjects Protections, Concepts, and Procedures Office of Research and Sponsored Programs Tom Lombardo, Ph.D., Director, Research Integrity & Compliance.
Criteria For Approval 45 CFR CFR Minimized risks Reasonable risk/benefit ratio Equitable subject selection Informed consent process Informed.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
Submission to Approval What happens to my protocol once I submit it to the HIC office.
TODAY’S TOPIC: Ethics – deconstructing consent and participation with “vulnerable” populations.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
Exempt Research Mary Banks BS, BSN IRB Director CRC IRB and BUMC IRB.
Protecting Human Participants in Research syr
IRB Basics Helen Panageas New York University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board Portion of slides courtesy of Suzanne M. Smith, University.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Human Subject Research by Students at William Paterson University March 2015.
Human Subject Research by Students at William Paterson University May 2011.
How to Obtain Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval Richard Wagner Associate Director UCSF Human Research Protection Program August 14, 2008.
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
International Research & Research Involving Children K. Lynn Cates, MD Assistant Chief Research & Development Officer Office of Research & Development.
The Goals and Principles of Human Participant Protection Part 4: Vulnerable Populations.
 Understanding the IRB Process University of Tennessee Health Science Center Institutional Review Board.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) Human Subject Dr. John N. Austin, Director and Ms. Renee S. Jones, Associate Director Delaware State University Office.
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
Regulatory criteria for approval Bob Craig, July 2007.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
 The WP IRB is concerned with Social- Behavioral and Biomedical research that is: A systematic investigation Designed to develop or contribute to generalizable.
IRB 101 for Students Kristen Kenny, BFA Research Compliance Specialist, IRB, IACUC and IBC Administrator Office of Research and Sponsored Programs.
Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.
The Human Subjects Institutional Review Board Workshop Part 1: An Introduction to Human Subjects Research Ethics and the IRB Process Presented by Alena.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
University of North Carolina at Greensboro Protecting Research Participants.
 The IRB: Why, what and how  Core Concerns: Subject selection, subject consent to participate, confidentiality  IRB Protocol Forms  Contact Information.
HUMAN SUBJECTS PROTECTION PROGRAM Office Location: 1350 N. Vine Ave. (one block west of Cherry Ave. & three blocks north of Speedway) PO Box Phone:
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.
Alyssa Speier, MS, CIP QA/QI Education Specialist Stanley Estime, MSCI QA/QI Specialist Interview, Survey, and Focus Group Research: IRB Processes and.
Best reference starting point for student newbies grity/irb/upload/IW-Preparing-an-IRB- Submission-FINAL.pdf.
Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Institutional Review Board Protecting Human Research Subjects.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
TUN IRB: The Basics February 26, IRB Function Review human-subject research Ensure the rights & welfare of human subjects are adequately protected.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Senta Baker Sharon Moran IU Human Subjects Office Human Subjects Office IRB Submissions and KC Demostration School of Music November 13, 2015.
Conducting Research at Lincoln IRB/HRPP Policies, Procedures & Good Clinical Practices B Kanna MD, MPH, FACP Associate Program Director of Internal Medicine.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited.
 The purpose of IRB is to ensure the rights of research subjects are protected  In accordance with the ethical standards of the U.S. Department of Health.
 Empowered by the University to insure we are in compliance with Federal regulations  Guided by the standards in the Belmont Report and regulations.
Protecting Human Subjects Overview of the Issues Applications to Educational Research The IRB Process.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
Principal Investigator Responsibilities
Amendments A how-to Prepared by: Christine Melton-Lopez, IRB Associate.
Research with human participants at Carnegie Mellon University
Dining with Diabetes IRB Training 2017.
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
Introduction to the Institutional Review Board
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
Human Participants Research
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

Creating an IRB Proposal Human Research Protection Program 357 Administration Building Donna Peters Esther Lucey Rick Shupe

The Belmont Report The guiding principles behind human subjects research Respect for persons (Consent) ▫informed enough to make a decision to participate? Beneficence (Risk/Benefit Assessment) ▫what are the risks? the benefits? Justice (Selection of Subjects) ▫people must be treated equally and fairly

Proposal Levels of Review Exempt:Exempt: An IRB review category that does not require annual renewal, poses no more than minimal risk to human subjects, and usually involves anonymous data (no identifiable information) ▫Examples  Teaching strategies  Surveys  Taste testing and food quality  Program evaluations

Proposal Levels of Review Expedited Review Expedited Review - An IRB category that involves no more than minimal risk but may include identifiers and data that needs to be protected and kept confidential Examples Children (2 reviewers) Focus groups Blood draws Collection of data from voice, video, digital or image recordings

Proposal Levels of Review Full Board Review:Full Board Review: An IRB category that involves a higher degree of potential risk to human subjects ▫Examples  Genetics (identifiable information, future use)  Medical procedures  Vulnerable populations  Prisoners  Exercise and sports activity

HRPP Website Guidance Training Proposals

Proposal Levels of Review

The Cover Sheet Standard for every submission Proposal Title List the PI and C0-investigators Requires signatures Department information Type of Review ▫Determines other forms required Special Populations Funding (Sponsored) Can be filled out online

Claim for Exemption (Criteria)

Expedited Review Form Please Underline

The Proposal The heading should include: ▫The name of the PI ▫The name(s) of the co-investigators ▫The title of the research proposal Follow the format sequence Use Roman numerals Insert page numbers Submit single-sided only Do not use staples

The Rationale Describe: ▫The problem or purpose of the research; ▫The present knowledge relevant to the problem (cite your sources in the body); ▫The aims of the proposed study; ▫Clearly state the potential benefits of the work to the subjects involved; and, ▫The importance of the knowledge to be obtained. Rationale narrative should be at least 2-3 paragraphs but no more 2-3 pages.

II. Subjects Describe the target population (i.e., Pregnant mothers with children under 3 years of age, TTU students, faculty/staff, etc.) ▫Provide a specific age range if all ages are not included and explain ▫Describe any exclusions (i.e., non-English speaking, females only, etc.) and explain why other groups are not being used (Belmont - Justice) Describe the recruitment procedure ▫What media will be used to recruit (TechAnnounce, social networks, TV/radio ads, SONA, organizational websites, fliers, ings etc.) ▫Include copies of each recruiting document ( ▫Information sheet/Consent form (Belmont – Respect) – consent forms are not used for Exempt reviews ▫Each document should be a separately labeled attachment (i.e., Attachment A – TechAnnounce Ad; Attachment B – Recruiting ; Attachment C – Information Sheet, etc.) and placed in order of the chronological steps in section III. Procedures Example ▫The participants for this study are persons considered successful small business owners in towns with populations between 15,000 and 35,000 in eastern Arizona. Names, phone numbers and addresses of potential participants for this study will be compiled through information taken from public industry websites.

III. Procedures This section should be a step-by-step, chronological sequence (beginning with recruitment) of the manner and order you will conduct your research and the Attachments/Appendices should follow that specific order. Cite the attachments in the body of this section. Identify and assess any risks (physical, psychological, social, legal, and economic) to participants. (Belmont – Beneficence) ▫If there are no risks, clearly state. ▫If there are risks, include any precautions that will be taken to avoid negative outcomes. ▫If there are risks, provide an estimate of their frequency, severity, and reversibility. How is the risk to vulnerable populations (infants, fetuses, pregnant mothers, prisoners, children) being minimized? How are privacy and confidentiality being protected? Where is the data being stored and who has access to it? Describe any benefits and/or compensation to the subjects. Include the amount of time participation will take.

IV. Adverse Events and Liability If the risk to subjects is more than minimal, specify the steps to deal with unexpected, adverse events. If risk to subjects is more than minimal, specify arrangements for handling liability of unexpected injuries (physical, psychological, social, legal, and economic). If no liability plan is offered, state such. NOTE: If the research includes no more than minimal risk and no liability plan is offered, insert, “The research does not pose any more than minimal risk to the participant beyond that of everyday life and therefore no liability plan is offered.” MUSTNOTE: Any adverse events, unanticipated problems, injuries or deviations from the protocol MUST be reported to the HRPP immediately (TTU IRB 5.3).

V. Consent Forms Consent forms are not required for exempt reviews. If the review is “Exempt” enter N/A (an information sheet would commonly be attached). If the review is ‘Expedited’ or ‘Full Board’ enter “See Attachment C.” Attach a consent form covering all the relevant elements of informed consent (See HRPP website for the template). There are circumstances that exist where consent may be waived. In such cases, attach the blank Waiver of Written Consent form.

Beyond the Proposal Format Page Reference Page Attachments or Appendices arranged in order per III. Procedures and labeled accordingly. ▫Recruiting Documentation (use templates)  Oral Scripts – Are you recruiting live?  Ads – TechAnnounce, newspaper, TV, radio  Internet – Social media, organization websites  Fliers  s, written communication Information Sheet Consent Form(s) Assent Forms Surveys, interview questions, etc.

Recruiting Human Subjects Incentive and Rewards ▫Subjects are reimbursed for their time; not paid for their participation Coercion and Undue Influence ▫Coercion occurs when an overt or implicit threat of harm is intentionally presented by one person to another in order to obtain compliance. (An instructor recruiting members of his/her own class for research). ▫Undue influence often occurs through an offer of an excessive or inappropriate reward or other overture in order to obtain compliance. (Example: $ for filling out a simple 5 minute questionnaire)

Forms and Examples

IRB Review Process Researchers (Principal Investigators) send proposals to the HRPP office (in person, Tech mail, ). NOTE:Typically a 3-5 day administrative process before the proposal is assigned and sent to an IRB reviewer. (NOTE: During peak months and semester breaks the process may take longer.) ▫Letter of acknowledgement to PI ▫Assigned a number ▫Scanned into the HRPP tracking system NOTE: ▫Pre-screened by HRPP to cut down on reviewer time – (NOTE: The amount of time it takes to forward for review depends on how long it takes the PI to submit the revisions) Once assigned the proposal, the IRB Reviewer has a minimum of 10 working days to begin the review process. There is no IRB review time limit once the review process begins. All is dependent on communication and revisions between reviewer and PI. Most revisions are handled by . Approval is granted by the IRB Reviewer and commonly the PI told they can begin collecting data. A formal approval letter is sent to the researcher(s) by .

Research Understanding The primary concern of the IRB is the protection of human subjects in research. The HRPP/IRB does not and will not dictate how you conduct your research. Your success is our success.

Contact Information Donna Peters HRPP Manager Esther Lucey Program Coordinator Rick Shupe Program Coordinator 357 Administration Building

QUESTIONS?

Bye now. Ya’ll come back. Thank you And Good Luck!