An Adaptive System for User Information needs based on the observed meta- Knowledge AKERELE Olubunmi Doctorate student, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria;

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
High Resolution studies
Advertisements

TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
1 Entering through the same door - Universal design put simple Soren Ginnerup Danish Building Research Institute Consultant to the COE group on Universal.
Substitution.
1 Knowledge Representation Introduction KR and Logic.
Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
STATISTICS Sampling and Sampling Distributions
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Michael R. Smith, Mark Clement, Tony Martinez, and Quinn Snell
1 Probability and the Web Ken Baclawski Northeastern University VIStology, Inc.
Slide 1 of 18 Uncertainty Representation and Reasoning with MEBN/PR-OWL Kathryn Blackmond Laskey Paulo C. G. da Costa The Volgenau School of Information.
Mirror Mirror on the wall does your repository reflect it all? Peter West and Timothy Miles-Board EPrints Services University of Southampton Southampton,
Information Literacy Instruction in Libraries
ASYCUDA Overview … a summary of the objectives of ASYCUDA implementation projects and features of the software for the Customs computer system.
1 ESTIMATION IN THE PRESENCE OF TAX DATA IN BUSINESS SURVEYS David Haziza, Gordon Kuromi and Joana Bérubé Université de Montréal & Statistics Canada ICESIII.
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
Some ideas …. Task XBRL as a business performance and financial reporting standard (with its various taxonomies). 2.
Universität Innsbruck Leopold Franzens Copyright 2006 DERI Innsbruck LarCK Workshop, ISWC/ASWC Busan, Korea 16-Feb-14 Towards Scalable.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
0 - 0.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
MULTIPLICATION EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 3. WHAT EVER YOU DO TO ONE SIDE YOU HAVE TO DO TO THE OTHER 2. DIVIDE BY THE NUMBER IN FRONT OF THE VARIABLE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Active database concepts
1 Term 2, 2004, Lecture 9, Distributed DatabasesMarian Ursu, Department of Computing, Goldsmiths College Distributed databases 3.
Assumptions underlying regression analysis
BALANCING 2 AIM: To solve equations with variables on both sides.
Micro Focus Research 1 As far as youre aware, how does your organization plan to drive business growth over the next three years? (Respondents' first choices)
Trusted Data Sharing over Untrusted Cloud Storage Provider Gansen Zhao, Chunming Rong, Jin Li, Feng Zhang, and Yong Tang Cloud Computing Technology and.
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
Copyright Pearson Prentice Hall
Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm
Plan Recognition in Virtual Laboratories Ofra Amir and Yaakov (Kobi) Gal Ben-Gurion University of The Negev Department of Information Systems Engineering.
Ontology-based User Modeling for Web-based Information Systems Anton Andrejko, Michal Barla and Mária Bieliková {andrejko, barla,
Virtual COMSATS Inferential Statistics Lecture-3
CHAPTER 6 Introduction to Graphing and Statistics Slide 2Copyright 2012, 2008, 2004, 2000 Pearson Education, Inc. 6.1Tables and Pictographs 6.2Bar Graphs.
1 Kerberos Anita Jones November, Kerberos * : Objective Assumed environment Assumed environment –Open distributed environment –Wireless and Ethernetted.
© S Haughton more than 3?
1 Directed Depth First Search Adjacency Lists A: F G B: A H C: A D D: C F E: C D G F: E: G: : H: B: I: H: F A B C G D E H I.
Energy & Green Urbanism Markku Lappalainen Aalto University.
Points on a Line Topic
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
Modelling uncertainty in 3APL Johan Kwisthout Master Thesis
2009 – E. Félix Security DSL Toward model-based security engineering: developing a security analysis DSML Véronique Normand, Edith Félix, Thales Research.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
What is research? Lecture 2 INFO61003 Harold Somers.
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
CSE 473/573 Computer Vision and Image Processing (CVIP) Ifeoma Nwogu Lecture 27 – Overview of probability concepts 1.
1 Ke – Kitchen Elements Newport Ave. – Lot 13 Bethesda, MD.
Discrepancies Between National and International Data By Shelton Kanyanda (Chief Statistician Malawi)
Lecture 15 Functions CSCI – 1900 Mathematics for Computer Science Fall 2014 Bill Pine.
University of Malta CSA3080: Lecture 11 © Chris Staff 1 of 20 CSA3080: Adaptive Hypertext Systems I Dr. Christopher Staff Department.
DETC ASME Computers and Information in Engineering Conference ONE AND TWO DIMENSIONAL DATA ANALYSIS USING BEZIER FUNCTIONS P.Venkataraman Rochester.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
Ch. 13: Supply Chain Performance Measurement: Introduction
Introduction Distance-based Adaptable Similarity Search
Improving System Safety through Agent-Supported User/System Interfaces: Effects of Operator Behavior Model Charles SANTONI & Jean-Marc MERCANTINI (LSIS)
Davide Mottin, Senjuti Basu Roy, Alice Marascu, Yannis Velegrakis, Themis Palpanas, Gautam Das A Probabilistic Optimization Framework for the Empty-Answer.
Data Model for ICT-Based Environment for Collaborative Learning and Research By OGUNTUNDE Toyin OSOFISAN O. Adenike Computer Science Department University.
International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, p.p ,July 2011.
Inconsistent Constraints
Presentation transcript:

An Adaptive System for User Information needs based on the observed meta- Knowledge AKERELE Olubunmi Doctorate student, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria; DICEN-IDF laboratory, France OSOFISAN Adenike Professor,Department of Computer Science University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

Plan  Introduction  Aim  Model for capturing activities of the user  Proposal for the adaptive system  Statistical reasoning  Conclusion 2

Introduction 3 User interacts with information retrieval system everyday, but having access to relevant document to their information needs has been the source of concern

Introduction……  Its being observed and proved that the better one can formulate his information needs the better the search result  Which means is not a question of information overload or overkill  Its all about the knowledge that the user has on his information needs 4

Aim  The aim of this work is to provide an efficient adaptive approach for information retrieval based on users’ past experiences 5

Two kinds of users David & Bueno 1999 identified two kinds of users  Casual and regular user  Casual user are users for which there is little or no information concerns about their particularities  Regular users are users that use the system regularly for similarity. Their past experiences and the user’s choices on the past solutions are to be integrated while proposing new solution for these kinds of users 6

Provide adaptation effect Collect information on the regular user His identity His activities His preferences Adaptive System 7

Structure of model 8 Application { User { (Domain { Activity { (activity_id, Type of activity, Concept, Time)}})}}

CBR for inferring element of certainty 9  Represent the user’s activities  Keep record of the user’s activities  Keep record of the elements of knowledge employed by the user

Proposal  In order to provide an adaptive result, considering the user knowledge  Resolving an information retrieval problem from a user perspective in competitive intelligence system, we propose a model for an information retrieval system that consists of :  Set of document in the repository D = {d 1, d 2, d 3,.,.,., d n }  A subset R d of D containing relevant information that satisfy the user objective 10

Experience/Case 11

Experience  Experience = {objective, User, Activities, Concept, Time}  Experience = {O, U, A, C, T}  f : ({O,U.A,C,T}, D)  R d  Based on the above equation the document retrieved R d has put into consideration the experience of the user 12

 Objective: is the problem or the information need of the user  Activities: are ways of demonstrating his objective to the system and which will lead to the resolution of his information need  Concepts: are terms used in the process of performing any of the activities  Timestamp: is the time at which that particular activity takes place using that particular concept 13

 The concept used in performing an activity depends on whom the user is or his experience in that domain. A dependent relation can be established on paired users and concept to a decisional problem (objective) at a particular time 14

Graphical Representation of IR framework proposed 15

Statistical Reasoning  A possible approach for modelling the user of this kind of system is using statistical reasoning  Each element of P(D) possible set of information,has an associated value representing the probability that the set of information satisfies the objectives of the user  The probability value is updated as time passes on the basis of interaction between the user and the IR system.  The IR system uses all the knowledge gathered from the user and determine which element R d of set P(D) satisfies the user’s objectives 16

Dynamic Bayesian Network  It can be used to represent random variable and it also allows the state of the system to be represented as a hidden variable and observed states in terms of state variable among which there can be complex dependencies (Torres and Parkes, 2000), (Afolabi and Thiery, 2006)  For our proposal, given the observed user activities and using a prior graphical model, objective is to infer user’s need and ultimately to calculate R d – set of relevant information. User’s need / objective is a time dependent hidden variable that must be known in order to be able to compute R d 17

Conclusion  This work is an on-going research, not yet fully implemented  The model when fully implemented will assist users in obtaining information relevant to their needs 18

 Thank you 19