Noise in Radiographic Imaging

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: The Linear Prediction Model The Autocorrelation Method Levinson and Durbin.
Advertisements

ECE 472/572 - Digital Image Processing Lecture 8 - Image Restoration – Linear, Position-Invariant Degradations 10/10/11.
EE322 Digital Communications
Images. Pinhole Lens Photons from a source can be focused by a small aperture. –Aperture radius a –Magnification m –Image is inverted Image is blurry.
3F4 Power and Energy Spectral Density Dr. I. J. Wassell.
Digital Image Processing Chapter 5: Image Restoration.
PERFORMANCE OF THE DELPHI REFRACTOMETER IN MONITORING THE RICH RADIATORS A. Filippas 1, E. Fokitis 1, S. Maltezos 1, K. Patrinos 1, and M. Davenport 2.
Lecture 4 Measurement Accuracy and Statistical Variation.
DIGITAL IMAGE PROCESSING Instructors: Dr J. Shanbehzadeh M.Gholizadeh M.Gholizadeh
Lecture 16 Random Signals and Noise (III) Fall 2008 NCTU EE Tzu-Hsien Sang.
Matched Filters By: Andy Wang.
EE513 Audio Signals and Systems Wiener Inverse Filter Kevin D. Donohue Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Kentucky.
lecture 2, linear imaging systems Linear Imaging Systems Example: The Pinhole camera Outline  General goals, definitions  Linear Imaging Systems.
Review of Probability.
EE513 Audio Signals and Systems Statistical Pattern Classification Kevin D. Donohue Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Kentucky.
Detecting Electrons: CCD vs Film Practical CryoEM Course July 26, 2005 Christopher Booth.
ELE 488 F06 ELE 488 Fall 2006 Image Processing and Transmission ( ) Wiener Filtering Derivation Comments Re-sampling and Re-sizing 1D  2D 10/5/06.
Probability Theory and Random Processes
Random Process The concept of random variable was defined previously as mapping from the Sample Space S to the real line as shown below.
D EDICATED S PECTROPHOTOMETER F OR L OCALIZED T RANSMITTANCE A ND R EFLECTANCE M EASUREMENTS Laetitia ABEL-TIBERINI, Frédéric LEMARQUIS, Michel LEQUIME.
© by Yu Hen Hu 1 ECE533 Digital Image Processing Image Restoration.
TELECOMMUNICATIONS Dr. Hugh Blanton ENTC 4307/ENTC 5307.
Random Processes ECE460 Spring, Power Spectral Density Generalities : Example: 2.
BMME 560 & BME 590I Medical Imaging: X-ray, CT, and Nuclear Methods Introductory Topics Part 2.
Chapter 21 R(x) Algorithm a) Anomaly Detection b) Matched Filter.
Chapter 3: Image Restoration Introduction. Image restoration methods are used to improve the appearance of an image by applying a restoration process.
lecture 4, Convolution and Fourier Convolution Convolution Fourier Convolution Outline  Review linear imaging model  Instrument response function.
ENEE631 Digital Image Processing (Spring'04) Image Restoration Spring ’04 Instructor: Min Wu ECE Department, Univ. of Maryland, College Park  
Image Restoration.
Performance of Digital Communications System
CHEE825 Fall 2005J. McLellan1 Spectral Analysis and Input Signal Design.
EE513 Audio Signals and Systems
8-1 Chapter 8: Image Restoration Image enhancement: Overlook degradation processes, deal with images intuitively Image restoration: Known degradation processes;
Chapter 4: Baseband Pulse Transmission Digital Communication Systems 2012 R.Sokullu1/46 CHAPTER 4 BASEBAND PULSE TRANSMISSION.
CHAPTER 5 SIGNAL SPACE ANALYSIS
Robotics Research Laboratory 1 Chapter 7 Multivariable and Optimal Control.
Chapter 11 Filter Design 11.1 Introduction 11.2 Lowpass Filters
revision Transfer function. Frequency Response
Basic Image Processing February 1. Homework Second homework set will be online Friday (2/2). First programming assignment will be online Monday (2/5).
ECE 4710: Lecture #31 1 System Performance  Chapter 7: Performance of Communication Systems Corrupted by Noise  Important Practical Considerations: 
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: Normal Equations The Orthogonality Principle Solution of the Normal Equations.
Modulation Transfer Function (MTF)
Discrete-time Random Signals
Chapter 5 Image Restoration.
Outline Transmitters (Chapters 3 and 4, Source Coding and Modulation) (week 1 and 2) Receivers (Chapter 5) (week 3 and 4) Received Signal Synchronization.
Baseband Receiver Receiver Design: Demodulation Matched Filter Correlator Receiver Detection Max. Likelihood Detector Probability of Error.
Geology 6600/7600 Signal Analysis 28 Sep 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Last time: Energy Spectral Density; Linear Systems given (deterministic) finite-energy.
Geology 6600/7600 Signal Analysis 23 Oct 2015
EEE Chapter 6 Random Processes and LTI Huseyin Bilgekul EEE 461 Communication Systems II Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Eastern.
Performance of Digital Communications System
Geology 6600/7600 Signal Analysis 26 Oct 2015 © A.R. Lowry 2015 Last time: Wiener Filtering Digital Wiener Filtering seeks to design a filter h for a linear.
ARENA08 Roma June 2008 Francesco Simeone (Francesco Simeone INFN Roma) Beam-forming and matched filter techniques.
RECONSTRUCTION OF MULTI- SPECTRAL IMAGES USING MAP Gaurav.
Chapter 6 Random Processes
Introduction to Basics on radiation probingand imaging using x-ray detectors Ralf Hendrik Menk Elettra Sincrotrone Trieste INFN Trieste Part 2 Introduction.
UNIT-III Signal Transmission through Linear Systems
SIGNALS PROCESSING AND ANALYSIS
Degradation/Restoration Model
Outline Introduction Signal, random variable, random process and spectra Analog modulation Analog to digital conversion Digital transmission through baseband.
Lecture 1.30 Structure of the optimal receiver deterministic signals.
Image Analysis Image Restoration.
Random Process The concept of random variable was defined previously as mapping from the Sample Space S to the real line as shown below.
Image Restoration and Denoising
EE513 Audio Signals and Systems
Digital Image Processing
8.6 Autocorrelation instrument, mathematical definition, and properties autocorrelation and Fourier transforms cosine and sine waves sum of cosines Johnson.
COSC 4214: Digital Communications
Chapter 6 Random Processes
For a deterministic signal x(t), the spectrum is well defined: If
Presentation transcript:

Noise in Radiographic Imaging

Review: Sources of Noise 1) Systematic Geometric distortion Non-linearity of detector Sampling error Computation (eg Reconstruction) error 2) Random Photon noise Film grain noise Electronic Noise Scattered Radiation

Noise Characterization Objective physical Characterization Probability density SNR Power Spectrum DQE Subjective Characterization Measure of performance or Psychophysical evaluations or correctness of Diagnosis TP TN FP FN

Wiener Spectrum with a Film-Screen system Assuming Stationary process means: x-ray exposure has an average flux of density which is constant over area of the screen. Therefore, Fluctuation in film exposure and film optical density is described by Power Spectral Densities (or Wiener Spectrum) It is also called Noise Transfer Properties of the Film-Screen

Film-Screen Response The input is an x-ray flux and the output is a fluctuating density distribution. Overall system Response is thus: 1) Converting from x-ray to an input irradiance distribution 2) performing a filtering process which is spreading of a flush of light from a point source (where x-ray is absorbed in phosphor) 3) Converting the filtered exposure fluctuation to optical density fluctuations on film (where light is absorbed to the emulsion grains)

Film-Screen Interaction Model

input irradiance distribution I Considering phosphor screen as M slabs of thin thickness Δz, the mean number of randon x-ray photons absorbed within mth slab located at z=zm:

Input irradiance distribution II Each photon absorption of Φm creates a flash of optical low energy lights g. Therefore, average optical photon (Energy) density per unit area of layer zm is: <Em(r)> = g Φm

Methods for Measuring Noise Power Spectra (Wiener) Using Fourier Transform of Autocovariance (Autocorrelation) function of the photon Fluctuation Recall: <Em(r)> = g Φm The Autocorrelation function of the photon distribution is: REm(L) = <Em(r)Em(r+L)> = g2[Φm δ(L)+ Φ2m]

REfm(L) = <Efm(r)Efm(r+L)> = REm(L)*pm(L)•pm(L) = filtering process I Spreading of light from a point source (where x-ray is absorbed in phosphor) is described by Point Spread Function Pm(r) Therefore the film exposure is defined by random process: Efm(r) = Em(r)*pm(r) The Autocorrelation function of filtered photon distribution is: REfm(L) = <Efm(r)Efm(r+L)> = REm(L)*pm(L)•pm(L) = g2Φm pm(L) • pm(r) + g2 Φ2m Because (see section 3.5.1): Rout(τ)= p(τ)•p(τ)*Rin(τ)

RΔEfm(L) = g2Φm pm(L) • pm(r) filtering process II Recall: REfm(L) = g2Φm pm(L) • pm(r) + g2 Φ2m g2 Φ2m = Square of mean exposure Autocorrelation function of exposure fluctuation is: RΔEfm(L) = g2Φm pm(L) • pm(r) Wiener Spectrum is given by FT of the fluctuation RΔEfm(L): SΔEfm(u) = g2Φm |Pm(u)|2 Where Pm(u) is FT of PSF; pm(r), the optical transfer function of mth layer.

Autocorrelation of the Fluctuation and Wiener of whole Screen of thickness MΔz=ds

Measurable density fluctuation Optical density fluctuation ΔD is related to exposure fluctuation ΔE by: ΔD = 0.434γΔE/Eavg Therefore Wiener spectrum of density fluctuation is: Since the Average exposure is given by:

Measuring NPS (conceptually) Measure change in the variation in the amplitude of sine waves with noise (Variable signal)

Measuring NPS (theoretically) A uniform x-ray exposure contains noise at all spatial frequencies

Measuring NPS (experimentally)

Typical NPS of Film-Screen system

Paradox

Imaging concepts used to model imaging system performance.

Optimum Filters for noise It depends on: The purpose of system usage The nature of input to the filter The definition of the best Two main filters: Wiener filter Matched filter

Wiener filter The aim is to extract a signal from additive, signal-independent noise Spectral information or autocorrelation of signal or/and noise is known The signal is tried to be estimated so that the difference between this estimation and the original signal (random process) property is minimized

<|Ŝ(t) - S(t)|2> = minimum Wiener filter The input to filter is random process y(t) comprising the real signal contaminated by noise: y(t) = S(t)+n(t) An estimated signal ŝ(t) is obtained by filtering y(t) with wiener filter p(t): ŝ(t) = y(t)*p(t) Then the mean Square error should be minimized by: <|Ŝ(t) - S(t)|2> = minimum

Wiener filter It can be shown that the p(t) that minimizes <|Ŝ(t) - S(t)|2> makes the error e(t) = Ŝ(t)-S(t) orthogonal to the data y(t). <[Ŝ(t) - S(t)] y(t’)> = 0 Also signal and noise are uncorrelated: <s(t)n(t’)> = 0 Therefore: <{[s(t)*p(t)] + [n(t)*p(t)] – s(t)} {s(t’)+n(t’)}> = ∫<s(t”)s(t’)>p(t-t”)dt” + ∫<n(t”)n(t’)>p(t-t”)dt” - <s(t)s(t’)> = 0

Wiener filter Since each term is an autocorrelation function: Rs(t-t’)*p(t-t’) + Rn(t-t’)*p(t-t’) – Rs(t-t’) = 0 Fourier Transform of this equation gives: Ss(u)P(u) + Sn(u)P(u) = Ss(u) Where Ss and Sn are power spectral density of s and n, and P(u) is optimum filter with transfer function given as: P(u) = Ss(u)/[Ss(u)+Sn(u)] This means P(u) should be large for frequencies at which the signal power is larger than noise power, and vise versa

[SNR(t)]2 = [s(t)*p(t)]2 / [n(t)*p(t)]2 = Maximize Matched filter Wiener filter was optimal for estimation problem based on an unknown random variable as input signal, therefore the estimated filtered output resemble the input. Matched filtering is based on a known input signal which should be detected using an optimum filter. An optimized filter is the one which maximize SNR of the output. eg; [SNR(t)]2 = [s(t)*p(t)]2 / [n(t)*p(t)]2 = Maximize