Sexual Harassment Seminar Mechanisms in Lingnan University to deal with sexual harassment Presented by Li Kam-kee, Director of Administration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedural Safeguards
Advertisements

HIPAA Privacy Practices. Notice A copy of the current DMH Notice must be posted at each service site where persons seeking DMH services will be able to.
ECU Ombudsman Office We are here for you…. And you….. And you……
Rule-Making Book II EU Administrative Procedures – The ReNEUAL Draft Model Rules 2014 Brussels, May th Herwig C.H. Hofmann University of Luxembourg.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
Faculty Forum: March 5, 2008 Shall the Collected Rules and Regulations be revised to adopt the revised Pilot Faculty Grievance Procedure recommended by.
CSAIO13 Dispute settlement at the ECB 4 October 2012 Tillmann Frommhold Deputy Spokesperson 8th Staff Committee of the European Central Bank.
SCHOOL GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE (D EP E D O RDER N O. 35, S. 2004) Division Executive Meeting April 25, 2014.
SITUATION RESPONSE FLOW CHART SUPERVISORS’S ACTIONS SITUATION OCCURS Direct observation, complainant reports, third party reports Document initial knowledge.
What are my child’s rights under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act? Randy Chapman The Legal Center for People with Disabilities and Older.
HARASSMENT, INTIMIDATION AND BULLYING POLICY AND PR0CEDURES Irvington Public Schools Staff Training School Year.
Ombudsman UMKC SOM GME. Ombudsman Objective: The position of Ombudsman for Graduate Medical Education (GME) was developed to promote a positive climate.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS NONDISCRIMINATION POLICY LEP Civil rights.
Sexual Harassment Policies at the University of Northern Colorado Office of Employee Relations Carter
EORC CHAPTER 5 PROCESSING& REPORTING COMPLAINTS. EORC Overview Define protected communication Explain methods to address inappropriate behavior Explain.
B. Proposed Revisions to UT HOP 3.16 Threatened Faculty Retrenchment (D )— Janet Staiger (professor, radio- television-film and committee chair).
Data Protection Recruitment Process
Gender Sensitization. Vishaka Guidelines Outcome of the Case filed by 5 NGOs against the State of Rajasthan Famously known as the Vishaka Vs State of.
Example - Human Rights Case. Case Citation Formats Criminal Law:R v. Jones prosecution v. defense Civil Law:Smith v. Jones plaintiff v. defendant Human.
The Martha’s Vineyard Public Schools Civil Rights Policy {Adoption Date}
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
1 Effective Internal Workplace Investigations Best Practices.
Reporting Requirements POLICY DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT, AND SEXUAL MISCONDUCT FACULTY SENATE CONSULTATION, JANUARY 26, 2015.
USD Sexual Harassment You may not know what it is………. You may not know what it is………. But you know how it makes you feel!!! But you know how it makes you.
Equal Opportunity and Compliance Renisha Gibbs, SPHR Assistant Vice President for Human Resources/ Finance and Administration Chief of Staff August 17,
Sexual Harassment for Managers. Definition: According to the EEOC, sexual harassment is defined as: Any unwelcome sexual advances, Requests for sexual.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. 2 Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due.
Sexual Harassment – What do I need to do? Administrators/Management must:
1 Farm Service Agency FY2010 Annual Civil Rights Training “FSA No Fear Act Training Required Every Two Years” and“Understanding/Navigating FSA EEO Complaint/ADR/Mediation.
Doc.: IEEE /1129r1 Submission July 2006 Harry Worstell, AT&TSlide 1 Appeal Tutorial Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
FILING AND DECIDING A HUMAN RIGHTS CASE PART A: DEFINITIONS PART A: DEFINITIONS PART B: FILING A CASE/DISMISSAL PROCESS PART B: FILING A CASE/DISMISSAL.
Complaints The Policy Company Limited ©. Policy Complaints are encouraged and welcomed as a way of ensuring that any dissatisfaction with the quality.
UMBC POLICY ON ESH MANAGEMENT & ENFORCEMENT UMBC Policy #VI
1 A decade of revisions at UNCITRAL Special Course 6 – James Castello Lecture 3 Arbitration Academy PA R I S SUMMER COURSES
DRAFT Proposed Sexual Harassment Policy Office of General Counsel Southern Illinois University September 2008.
Uniform Complaint Procedure Memorandum # MEM-560 October 10, 2003 By: Jaime Morales.
Local Assessment of Code of Conduct Complaints. Background  On 08 May 2008 – the local assessment of Code of Conduct complaints was implemented due to.
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
1 Intake 2 Initial Report 3 Title IX Interview 4 Title IX Investigation 5 Findings of Fact 6 Final Report 7 Appeal.
 Canada Occupational Health and Safety Regulation 20 (Part XX) was proclaimed dealing with Violence Prevention in the Work Place.  Work Place Violence.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
What Is Police Misconduct? Any action performed by a law enforcement officer that is criminal, unconstitutional, or against established rules, regulations,
1. On a blank sheet of paper… Write down one reason why you may be disciplined (written up) at work.
Investigations Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.) authorizes the Inspector General to conduct.
Performance Management – Part 3 BCUHB Capability Procedure (WP3A) 69.
Public sector whistleblowing: Ombudsman Victoria’s experience 10 June 2010 Glenn Sullivan, Director Ombudsman Victoria.
Annual Mandatory Bully/Harassment Training Melvin F. Blackwell Chief of Student Services Division of Student Services.
GRIEVANCES AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES
Procedure for the resolution of grievances in the ILO
Code of Ethics and Ethics Panel
Protecting the Educational Environment
Sexual Harassment Seminar
UAH Discrimination/Harassment Policy and Procedures
Title IX: Discrimination
GUKEYEH GUK’EH GU’SANI Kaska Dena Good Governance Act
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
CHAPTER 5 PROCESSING & REPORTING COMPLAINTS.
Harassment and Discrimination
Whistleblower Program
SIMAD UNIVERSITY Keyd abdirahman salaad.
Harassment/Discrimination Located Under Personnel
WHAT TO EXPECT: A CROWN CORPORATION’S GUIDE TO A SPECIAL EXAMINATION
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
Administering Human Rights Legislation
The Halton District School Board expects that everyone associated with the Board has a right to be treated with respect and dignity and to teach, learn.
Harassment and Discrimination
Flagler College Student Disability Grievance Procedure
Ombudsman UMKC SOM GME.
Presentation transcript:

Sexual Harassment Seminar Mechanisms in Lingnan University to deal with sexual harassment Presented by Li Kam-kee, Director of Administration

1.Position of the University on the issue  The University is committed to equal opportunity in academic pursuit and employment, and hence to the elimination of any form of discrimination by members of the University community, including members of staff and students. Since sexual harassment degrades the harassee and inhibits his/her academic and work performance, it will be taken very seriously whenever it is known to occur.

2.Promotion and Education  In order to promote the awareness on the issue of sexual harassment, the University will organize publicity and education programmes for all staff and students through seminars and talks. The Equal Opportunities Commission 平等機會委員會 (EOC) will organize training seminars for tertiary institutions to develop and administer educational programmes and will also act as an information centre for exchange of information on the progress of the educational programmes.

3.Mediation and Complaint Processes 3.1 Mediation and complaint investigation processes are available to students, academic staff and other employees through the Sexual Harassment Investigation Panel (SHIP) which will be appointed by the President. The SHIP will be designated to carry out the responsibilities. For each allegation/complaint, the SHIP will conduct mediation and/or investigation.

Sexual Harassment Investigation Panel (SHIP)  Staff members of different genders, preferably of different ranks, appointed by the President on an ad hoc basis, with one Panelist appointed as the Convenor. Persons taking part in the mediation should not be appointed as Panelists. SHIP shall consist of:

Responsibilities of SHIP: 1. Informing individuals of available options, including but not limited to mediation and compliant investigation. 2. Informing all parties involved or alleged to be involved in a complaint of available formal disciplinary procedures if the complaint is not resolved through the processes on Mediation.

Responsibilities of SHIP (Cont’d): 3. Informing the individual wishing to initiate an investigation that a written complaint will be required and that the complaint, including the identity of the complainant, will be disclosed to the complainee. 4. Informing all parties involved or alleged to be involved in a complaint that the written report will be submitted via the President to the Ethics and Discipline Committee.

Responsibilities of SHIP (Cont’d): 5. Conducting mediation or investigation on receipt of allegation/complaint. 6. Maintaining records of complaints, reports, and subsequent management action in conformance with the privacy and confidentiality requirements of applicable laws.

3.2 Mediation Process  The SHIP will offer to facilitate mediation of the dispute upon the request of any person involved or alleged to be involved in the dispute. Under normal circumstances, attempts at mediation do not require the filing of a written complaint.

3.3 Complaint Investigation Process Investigation  Upon receipt of a signed complaint or referral from Head/Director, the SHIP will conduct a full and impartial investigation. At least two Panelists from different genders shall be appointed on a roster basis to investigate a complaint. Under special circumstances as deemed necessary by the Convenor of the SHIP, a non-staff Council member will join the investigation team to ensure that justice is upheld and seen to be upheld in the process of investigation.

In the course of the investigation, the following standards are observed: 1. The complainee will be provided with a copy of the complaint by the investigation team and an opportunity to respond to the allegation. 2. The complainee may appear by counsel or solicitor(s) at the proceedings. The SHIP may also retain the services of a counsel or solicitor(s). Alternatively, the complainee may request that he/she be accompanied by a Committee Member of the University’s Staff Association. 3.3 Complaint Investigation Process (Cont’d)

3. Witnesses and concerned parties will be interviewed individually and in conformance with the privacy requirements of applicable laws. The rule of confidentiality will be observed and the rights of both the complainant and complainee respected. 4. The written complaint and relevant documents, if any, will be considered, and will be provided to the parties concerned. 3.3 Complaint Investigation Process (Cont’d)

a) A statement of the issues under investigation. b) The positions of the parties as presented. c) The results of the investigation Report of the SHIP The SHIP will submit a written report to the President or his/her designated officer. The report shall contain the following information: 3.3 Complaint Investigation Process (Cont’d)

3.3.3 Time Limits a) The filing of a written complaint should be made within (i) ninety (90) days from the time of the occurrence which is known or should have been known to the complainant of an act(s) of sexual harassment or action taken as a result of alleged sexual harassment or (ii) thirty (30) days after mediation has been completed, whichever is later. 3.3 Complaint Investigation Process (Cont’d)

b) The total time period for the investigation, from the filing of a written complaint to submission of the report and recommended action to the President, will not normally exceed sixty(60) days. c)The President will within six (6) days after receiving the report refer it to the Ethics and Discipline Committee (EDC) for consideration Time Limits (Cont’d)

d)The decision of the EDC will be made within sixty (60) days of receipt of the report. e)The time limits set forth herein may be extended by the EDC if appropriate. 3.3 Complaint Investigation Process (Cont’d)

3.4 Confidentiality 1) In the processes of mediation/ investigation every reasonable effort is made to protect the privacy of all parties involved and the confidentiality of all information and documents used in accordance with existing University policies and applicable laws. 2) In the mediation process, no record kept in relation to the case shall include the names of individuals or other information which would permit identification.

3.5 The University encourages the use of the mediation process as the initial step to resolve complaints relating to sexual harassment. If it can be demonstrated prima facie that the conduct of a student or employee of the University warrants disciplinary investigations, formal disciplinary procedures may be invoked.

4. All the provisions herein contained or any part thereof are subject to any variations or amendments which the University Council may consider necessary. Such variations and amendments made by the Council will be announced to members of the University as soon as possible.