Student Experiences with Information Technology and their Relationship to Other Aspects of Student Engagement Thomas F. Nelson Laird and George D. Kuh.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research
Advertisements

ANDREA BROWN DIRECTOR, PROGRAM ASSESSMENT AND INSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH How to Use Student Survey Data (NSSE) to Improve Your Teaching.
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
2008 National Survey of Student Engagement – SUNY Oneonta Patty Francis Steve Perry Fall 2008.
Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
Gary Whisenand Director, Institutional Research August 26, 2011.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: Annual Campus Climate Survey: 2010 Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty Senate.
DATA UPDATES FACULTY PRESENTATION September 2009.
2012 National Survey of Student Engagement Jeremy D. Penn & John D. Hathcoat.
GGC and Student Engagement.  NSSE  Overall: 32%  First Year: 30%  Seniors: 33%  GGC  Overall: 28%  First Year: 26% (381)  Seniors: 38% (120)
Presentation to Student Affairs Directors November, 2010 Marcia Belcheir, Ph.D. Institutional Analysis, Assessment, & Reporting.
Global Awareness and Student Engagement Allison BrckaLorenz Jim Gieser Program presented at the 2011 ASHE Annual Conference in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Finding Time: An Examination of How Much Time Faculty of Color Spend on Work and Other Activities by Rank John A. Kuykendall Susan D. Johnson Thomas F.
General Education Courses and the Promotion of Essential Learning Outcomes Thomas F. Nelson Laird Amanda Suniti Niskodé George D. Kuh Center for Postsecondary.
Urban Universities: Student Characteristics and Engagement Donna Hawley Martha Shawver.
Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Using What Faculty Say about Improving Their Teaching Thomas F. Nelson Laird, IUB Jennifer Buckley, IUB Megan Palmer,
BENCHMARKING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE IN COMMUNITY COLLEGES What We’re Learning. What Lies Ahead.
Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Getting Faculty Involved in the Student Engagement Conversation: The Faculty Survey of Student Engagement Thomas.
Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.
Assessing College Wide SLOs using a Student Perception Survey: A Tale of Two SLOs Jeanne Edman and Brad Brazil Cosumnes River College.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
1 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2013 Tiffany Franks Assistant Director, Office of Planning & Analysis October 25, 2013.
Updating the National Survey of Student Engagement: Analyses of the NSSE 2.0 Pilots Allison BrckaLorenz Bob Gonyea Angie Miller.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement CCSSE 2014.
The Students Said… (pt.2) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – August 29, 2006.
NSSE – Results & Connections Institutional Research & Academic Resources California State Polytechnic University, Pomona October 2, 2013 – Academic Senate.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
Adding Challenge to Challenge and Engagement Assessment Committee February 7, 2006.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
CCSSE 2013 Findings for Cuesta College San Luis Obispo County Community College District.
Note: CCSSE survey items included in benchmarks are listed at the end of this presentation 1. Active and Collaborative Learning Students learn more when.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Gallaudet Institutional Research Report: National Survey of Student Engagement Pat Hulsebosch: Executive Director – Office of Academic Quality Faculty.
APSU 2009 National Survey of Student Engagement Patricia Mulkeen Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Maryland Consortium Findings from the 2006 CCSSE Survey.
2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.
Assessing SAGES with NSSE data Office of Institutional Research September 25 th, 2007.
National Survey of Student Engagement 2009 Missouri Valley College January 6, 2010.
CCSSE 2010: SVC Benchmark Data Note: Benchmark survey items are listed in the Appendix (slides 9-14)
National Survey of Student Engagement 2007 Results for Students in Graduate and Professional Studies.
2009 Pitt Community College CCSSE Results September 21, 2009 Report to the Campus College CCSSE Results Pitt Community College Dr. Brian Miller, Assistant.
David Torres Dean, Institutional Research Riverside Community College District.
Student Engagement as Policy Direction: Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Skagit Valley College Board of Trustees Policy GP-4 – Education.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate February 28, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
De Anza College 2009 Community College Survey of Student Engagement Presented to the Academic Senate January 10, 2011 Prepared by Mallory Newell Institutional.
1 NSSE Results Fort Lewis College (2010) Richard A. Miller Exec. Dir – OIRPA.
Diversity at Stetson: Perspectives of Students and Faculty John Tichenor Associate Professor of Decision and Information Science.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, April 2010.
The Academic Library Experiences & Information Seeking Behavior of Undergraduates Ethelene Whitmire Assistant Professor University of California – Los.
CCSSE 2015 Findings for Merced College Spring 2016 Flex Thursday, 14 January 2016 Presented by the Office of Student Services, Office of Student Equity.
Today’s Topic Student Satisfaction and Engagement Hosted by IEPR.
RESULTS OF THE 2009 ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMUNITYCOLLEGE SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT Office of Institutional Effectiveness, September 2009.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Results & Recommendations Presented by: November, 2005 S. J. Sethi, Ph.D.
Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness 1 The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2007.
Faculty Senate Pat Hulsebosch, Office of Academic Quality 11/17/08.
The University of Texas-Pan American
Dissertation Findings
The University of Texas-Pan American
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Helping US Become Knowledge-Able About Student Engagement
GGC and Student Engagement
2013 NSSE Results.
Indiana University Bloomington
Presentation transcript:

Student Experiences with Information Technology and their Relationship to Other Aspects of Student Engagement Thomas F. Nelson Laird and George D. Kuh Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research

Purpose Expand our understanding of the relationships between student uses of information technology and several indicators of student engagement in educationally effective practices

Data Source  National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)  2003 administration  Annual survey of college students at four-year institutions that measures students’ participation in educational experiences that prior research has connected to valued outcomes  In 2003, NSSE tested items on information technology with those students who took the survey online

Sample  60% female  56% are first-year students  16% transfer students  72% live on campus  94% are full-time students  74% are white  5% African American  6% Asian  4% Hispanic  1% Native American  11% other racial/ethnic background  Male  White or Asian American  Younger  Full-time Over 60,000 students from over 420 four-year institutions  Living on campus  Students with higher parental education  Transfer students  Engaged Compared to paper completers, web completers are more likely to be…

Measures  Information Technology Items  5 Engagement Scales  Academic challenge (  = 0.71)  Active & collaborative learning (  = 0.63)  Student-faculty interaction (  = 0.76)  Enriching educational experiences (  = 0.56)  Supportive campus environment (  = 0.76)  Items from question 1 on the core survey

Information Technology Items  How often do your instructors require you to use information technology (WWW, internet, computer conferencing, online testing, multimedia, etc.), other than word processing, to complete course assignments?  Used computer and information technology when making class presentations?  Communicated with classmates online to complete academic work?  Worked in teams during class using information technology?  Worked in teams outside of class using information technology to complete course assignments?  Used to ask an instructor to clarify an assignment?

Information Technology Items  Expressed ideas to a professor via that you did not feel comfortable saying in class?  Used your institution’s library website to obtain resources for your academic work?  Used another library (local library, another institution’s library) website to obtain resources for your academic work?  Used the WWW to obtain resources for your academic work?  Made judgments about the quality of information you find on the WWW for use in your academic work?  How often do your instructors use information technology in the classroom?

Analyses  Track 1  Descriptive comparisons at the item-level  Construction of an engagement with IT scale  Partial correlations between IT scale and 5 engagement scales  Track 2  Factor analysis with IT and core survey items

Descriptive Results

Descriptive Results (cont.)  Technology and higher order thinking  Of those students who frequently communicated with classmates online, 84% said courses regularly emphasized applying theories or concepts (compared to 70%)  Instructors use/assignment of IT and group work  Of those students who report that their faculty frequently use information technology in class, 59% indicate that they frequently work in groups outside of class (compared to 41%)

Information Technology Scale

Partial Correlations

Factor Analysis with Technology and Core Survey Items  In both analyses, four factor solution preferred  Factors:  F1: Student-faculty interaction  F2: Collaborative learning  F3: Diverse interactions  F4: Academic Effort  Same factors as in analyses done in past years

Factor Analysis with Technology and Core Survey Items

Implications  Engaging IT for academic purposes is effective educational practice  Measurement question: Do student uses of IT constitute a separate form of engagement, an avenue to existing forms of engagement, or both?  Measurement challenge: Can measures of student engagement be improved by tapping student uses of information technology?

For More Information   NSSE website: Copies of the paper and presentation as well as other papers and presentations are available through the website