Moving Forward!. Let’s C.H.A.T. (Children, High Expectations, Academic Achievement, Teacher Growth) Missouri School Boards’ Association Annual Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

APS Teacher Evaluation
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Response to Instruction and Intervention Process Presentation.
SEED – CT’s System for Educator and Evaluation and Development April 2013 Wethersfield Public Schools CONNECTICUT ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION Overview of.
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
A District’s Journey Implementing Assessment For Learning Practices With Fidelity Missouri School Boards’ Association Annual Conference September 26, 2014.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Creating District C.I.P. And Building S.I.P. Making Sure The Canaries Don’t Die While You Are Data Mining.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
World’s Largest Educational Community
Annual UMES Summer Institute “Making the Adjustment” Student Learning Objectives :
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation August 20, 2014 Elizabeth M. Osga, Ph.D.
Using Data Effectively or Why Weigh the Hog If You Aren’t Going To Feed It? Presented by Ronni Ephraim, Chief Instructional Officer Los Angeles Unified.
ABC Board of Education Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Valencia Mayfield, Assistant Superintendent Academic Services Mike McCoy, Director of Child.
Beyond The Numbers To Student Success. Rainey Knight, Ph.D Superintendent since 1999.
Dr. Denise P. Gibbs, Director Alabama Scottish Rite Foundation Learning Centers PST RtI STUDENT SUCCESS Christine R. Spear, Education Administrator Alabama.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Waldon Elementary School Everyone Learning Everyday Tamara Skordahl Principal – Implementation of Professional.
CREC Spotlight on Plainville: Elementary SRBI Math Maureen Brummett – Assistant Superintendent Tom Cannata – Math/Science Instructional Leader December,
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Upper Perkiomen School District August 2013.
School District of University City Jackson Park Elementary School SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Joylynn Wilson, Superintendent Monica Hudson, Principal.
RtI Assessment CED 613. Universal Screening What is it and what does it Evaluate? What is the fundamental question it is asking? What is the ultimate.
11 STUDENT SUCCESS 2020 Felicia Patterson Vice President, Learner Support Services Anne Arundel Community College ACCT New and Experienced Trustees Governance.
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Overdale Primary School TALLMADGE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN Initial Plan: November 1999 Revised: May 2003 Revised: September 2004.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
Silas Deane Middle School Steven J. Cook, Principal Cynthia Fries, Assistant Principal October 22, 2013 Wethersfield Board of Education.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction The Migrant Education Program State Plan.
Tallmadge High School TALLMADGE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PLAN Initial Plan: February 1999 Revised: May 2003 Revised: September 30, 2004.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Boston Public Schools Elementary Math Plan: District-Wide Reform in Math Teaching and Learning Presented by: Linda Ruiz Davenport, Director of Elementary.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
SB : The Great Teachers and Leaders Act State-wide definition of “effective” teacher and principal in Colorado Academic growth, using multiple measures.
MIDWAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HIGHLINE SCHOOL DISTRICT USING DATA DIRECTOR TO INFORM PROGRESS TOWARDS STATE ASSESSMENT.
CHOLLA HIGH MAGNET SCHOOL Plc Workshop
AWMLP BOARD MEETING JANUARY 26, 2014 MIKE HUBERT.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Scholastic Inc.1 Navigating Waves of Change: Driving Academic Improvement Through Challenging Times Sam Howe November 2010.
Rochester Area Math Science Partnership Our Mission: To support high student achievement through world class standards in math and science Continuous.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
American Association of School Administrators The Principal as Leader May 9,
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Moving Forward!. District’s School Safety Response Missouri School Boards’ Association Annual Conference Moving Forward! September 26,
The Importance of Professional Learning in Systems Reform AdvancED Performance Accreditation Bev Mortimer Concordia Superintendent
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Center School District Joe Nastasi,President Beverly Cunningham,Vice President Steve Stricklin, Member Charles Quinn,
Math + SRBI: Adding It Up Robin Moore Math Coordinator, Regional School District 6 & Clare Wurm, SERC Consultant.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
Unbridled Learning: CSIP Development and Delivery Targets November/December 2014 Primary School Ann Taylor, Principal.
Santa Fe Public Schools Our Common Commitments Improving our lives through education.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building the Capacity of Principals to Lead the Improvement of Instruction A Presentation by the Charlotte.
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Response to Intervention
The New Educator Evaluation System
The New Educator Evaluation System
The New Educator Evaluation System
Success for All Prairie Elementary Schools
Tom Bean High School Targeted Improvement Plan Summary
Presentation transcript:

Moving Forward!

Let’s C.H.A.T. (Children, High Expectations, Academic Achievement, Teacher Growth) Missouri School Boards’ Association Annual Conference September 26, 2014

Introductions Dr. Grayling Tobias – Superintendent, Hazelwood School District Mr. Karlton Thornton, Master CBM* – Secretary, Hazelwood Board of Education

Learning Targets We will be able to: –define “chatting” with stakeholders –explain the purpose for conducting “chats” –analyze the connection between all levels

The Hazelwood School District 32 schools –3 high schools –6 middle schools –20 elementary schools –3 early childhood centers Approximately 2400 employees 18,183 students 1441 teachers –65.1% with advanced degrees

The Hazelwood School District 23.9% Caucasian population 75.1% Minority population –71.9 % African American –2.1% Hispanic –1.1% Asian 57.8% Students eligible for free/reduced lunch 2.8% Dropout rate 92.8% Graduate and attend higher education

Compelling Conversations

Let’s C.H.A.T. THEY ARE… Monitored frequently In-time staff development Based on authentic evidence Student-centered measures Predictive of state outcomes THEY ARE NOT… End of year Final/one shot only Terminal diagnoses Surprising outcomes A “gotcha” One size fits all Optional

Why C.H.A.T.? Schools can’t keep starting over every school year! Discussions, with fidelity, results in learning that is measurable LEARNING, for students and teachers, is what CHANGES student achievement

Embracing Accountability Conversations (“chats”) are trusted Focus is student-centered Capable of guiding instructional decisions Based on researched principles Intentional about students’ progress and learning

Let’s C.H.A.T. Instruction Professional Development Frequent Progress Monitoring Student Achievement

Purpose Helps all take ownership of student growth Increases accountability Increases expectations of student learning Monitors what is working and not working Provides structured time for reflection on student learning and the effects of instruction on student learning Strengthens relationships

Levels of Accountability

Let’s C.H.A.T. with Students Goal setting opportunities Ongoing feedback for students –I know where I am. –I know where I want to be. –I know how I want to get there. Students create visual for progress monitoring Focused on classroom and district assessments

Examples of Questions Teacher with Students Let’s look at your graph; what did you score on your last math test? Where are you right now in math? Where do you want to be with learning your multiplication facts? How are you going to learn your 9’s? Let’s set a goal to help you master your 9’s.

Let’s C.H.A.T. with Teachers Connection to progress monitoring Focuses on progress of each student in reading and math –Diagnostic Reading Assessment –Scholastic Reading Inventory –AIMSweb –eValuate –Missouri Assessment Program/End of Course Exam –USA Test Prep Monitoring tool Instructional strategies Professional Growth Plan

Elementary School Monitoring Tool

Examples of Questions Principal with Teacher What does the data indicate in regards to the progress of your students as a classroom and/or as individuals? –What evidence do you have to illustrate this progress? –What patterns or trends are evident in the data? What instructional practices were most effective for you? Least effective? What is your plan to address the needs of our Tier 1 students and challenge them academically? What should I look for as indicators of this when I visit your classroom? Review your current professional growth goal and share progress towards meeting your goal.

Let’s C.H.A.T. with Principals Topics: –Level of delivery of instruction by teachers –Students one or more years below grade level –Patterns, trends and/or building structures hindering academic progress –Instructional interventions and effectiveness –Proof to support what is discussed –Leadership strategies to move staff forward

Examples of Questions Assistant Superintendent with Principal What is your process for identifying and providing support for students who struggle? Are there students that are not on track to make a minimum of a year’s growth? What are you doing specifically to ensure that students on grade level and above are also making a minimum of a year’s growth?

Let’s C.H.A.T. with Asst. Superintendent Topics –Instructional focus of school –Academic results/trends –Structures in place for principal and/or staff –Research-based strategies and practices in place –Monitoring process

Examples of Questions Superintendent with Assistant Superintendent Are students learning? How do you know? What is the evidence? What is going to make the difference this month at this school? What are the interim benchmarks? What structures do you have in place for principals who need more support? What specific research-based strategies or practices are responsible for the improvement?

Connections with Achievement

Lessons Learned Begin slow; better to do it right than fast Share questions prior to meeting Use questions that build upon previous “chats” What gets monitored gets done It’s not an easy challenge, but a worthwhile one It’s about moving teachers forward, who then move our kids above and beyond

Results

2013 District Highlights Four schools earned between 70% – 79% of the points Ten schools earned between 80% – 89% of the points Seven schools earned between 90% – 98.6% of the points *** Three schools earned 100% of the points *** District: 82.9%

Review of Learning Targets Define “chatting” with stakeholders Explain the purpose for conducting “chats” Analyze the connection between all levels

Questions

Ms. Desiree D. Whitlock, Master CBM*, President Dr. Brenda C. Youngblood Ph.D., Advanced CBM*, Vice President Mr. Karlton Thornton, Master CBM*, Secretary Mr. Mark Behlmann, Master CBM*, Treasurer Mrs. Ann Gibbons, Master CBM*, Director Mrs. Cheryl Latham, Advanced CBM*, Director Mr. Chuck Woods, Master CBM*, Director

Let’s C.H.A.T. (Children, High Expectations, Academic Achievement, Teacher Growth) Missouri School Boards’ Association Annual Conference September 26, 2014

Moving Forward!