EU/Switzerland Competition Law Cooperation Agreement David Mamane, LL.M. European Parliament ECON Briefing Session, 6.11.2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Co-operation between the Swiss Competition authorities and other Competition authorities concerning concentration activities Presented by Dr. Patrick Krauskopf.
Advertisements

1 Large research and medical databases in clinical and research multi-centres trials A Swiss Perspective June 19, 2012 European Commission International.
1 Enforcement Powers of National Data Protection Authorities and Experience gained of the Data Protection Directive Safe Harbour Conference Washington.
Getting hold of the documents: Legal principles for disclosure in the anti-trust context Kassie Smith QC 22 May 2013.
LEGAL 101 – Two Favourite Concepts: 1.Without Prejudice and 2.Client Legal Privilege THINK.CHANGE.DO.
1 Parallel proceedings in international arbitration Day 3 Arbitration AcademySpecial course Session 2012Prof. Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler.
1 International Law Commission An Overview Laos October 2003 Brad Smith.
8 th IG-Meeting Coordinated Auctioning, Auction Office and Organisational Issues Christian Todem Vienna
Vincent Nkhoma Manager- Enforcement & Exemptions COMESA Competition Commission.
Common Leniency Waiver Template and Waiver-less Information Sharing
Jaeho Moon Director, International Cartel Division Korea Fair Trade Commission.
National implementation of REMIT Henrik Nygaard, Wholesale and transmission (DERA)
Enforcing Settlement Agreements in Arbitration Proceedings Limassol, 18 November 2014 Speaker: Athina Papaefstratiou Fouchard.
Forum Selection in Attorney-Client Agreements Anita Schläpfer.
1 ¿QUÉ ES LA COLUSIÓN EN LICITACIONES? COLOMBIAN LENIENCY PROGRAMME Superintendence of Industry and Commerce
China on the way to a high-technology country: The legal policy perspective Stefan Luginbuehl Lawyer, International Legal Affairs.
Class action in The Netherlands Mr. Bertjan de Lange Mr. Tessa Havekes.
International Treaty in EU PIL
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITY IN GREECE THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK & THE ROLE OF FINANCIAL GUARANTEES/ INSURANCE PRODUCTS TO COVER OPERATORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER.
The Sixth Annual African Consumer Protection Dialogue Conference
Regulation of Personal Information Daniel Pettitt, Leon Sewell and Matthew Pallot.
Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Brussels, 10 February 2011 How to apply: Legal Framework – Beneficiaries – Application and Selection Procedure.
Privacy Codes of Conduct as a self- regulatory approach to cope with restrictions on transborder data flow Dr. Anja Miedbrodt Exemplified with the help.
Implications of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (“MIFID”) Richard Thompson.
Bilateral and Plurilateral Cooperation in Competition Cases Russell W. Damtoft United States Federal Trade Commission Sao Paulo, Brazil April, 2003 The.
Conducting Cross-Border International Internal Investigations Association of Corporate Counsel International Legal Affairs Committee Jeffrey D. Clark Willkie.
Tax Information Exchange Agreements Formal Ratification 2011.
Moving Forward With the African Dialogue Cross-Border Principles By Mary Gurure Manager, Legal Services and Compliance COMESA Competition Commission Lilongwe,
GRAHAM WILKINSON National Offender Management Service TRANSFER OF SENTENCED PERSON COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 909: A UK PERSPECTIVE.
International Cooperation and Capacity Building on Competition: A Swiss Perspective 7up2 Project Final Meeting Bangkok, June 28, 2006 Dr. Patrick Krauskopf.
Experience of Trade in Services: EU Member‘s perspective Brigitte Lüth Attachée, Permanent Delegation of Austria to the WTO.
INTERNATIONAL E-DISCOVERY: WHEN CULTURES COLLIDE Alvin F. Lindsay Hogan & Hartson LLP.
The Framework for Privacy Policies in the UK: Is telling people what information is gathered about them part of the framework? Does it need to be? Emma.
Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating circumstances. Relevant changes to the amount of fine. Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating.
International Cooperation in Cartel Investigations Regional Cooperation Hanna Witt Head of Cartel Enforcement, Swedish Competition Authority 2013 ICN Cartel.
LISTINGS BY TALIBAN AND AL-QAIDA SANCTIONS COMMITTEE Briefing to the Select Committee on Security and Justice 12 Augustus
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU THE CAPACITY TO SUE IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT REDRESS PROCEDURES.
New Rail Market Access Rules Directive 2012/34/EU (recast) EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
Presentation to the Symposium on the ICC that Africa Wants 9-10 November 2009 By Dr Athaliah Molokomme Attorney General of Botswana.
Mediation with the Information Commissioner’s Office Cory Martinson Appeals and Policy Analyst 25 November 2009.
Case Study based on Case C-416/10 Krizan Workshop on EU Law on Industrial Emissions Budapest, 3 June 2013 Dr. Christoph Sobotta, Chambers of Advocate General.
INVESTIGATION KAROLINA KREMENS, LL.M. (Ottawa), Ph.D. International Criminal Procedure.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign, Security and.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 9 – Financial Services Bilateral.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 5 – Public Procurement Bilateral screening:
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 29 – Customs union Bilateral screening:
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
CROSS BORDER GATHERING EVIDENCE “BEST PRACTICES” IN MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE EUROPEAN JUDICIAL TRAINING NETWORK BRUSSELS, 15 – 16 March 2016 David J Dickson.
ICC roundtable Istanbul, 30 April 2010 Procedural Fairness: Update on Recent OECD Activities Antonio Capobianco OECD Competition Division
Enhancing international cooperation in the investigation of cross-border competition cases
GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation)
Competition Law and its Application: European Union
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
Complainant's rights within the competition proceedings Access to file
Conflicts of Criminal Jurisdiction: Roadmap to Legislation at EU Level Vertical Mechanism Prof. J.A.E. Vervaele EPRS & ELI Roundtable Brussels, 4.
SPCs and the unitary patent package
U.S. Department of Justice
the antitrust administrative proceedings
ICN | The interplay between private enforcement and leniency policy
European actions.
ICN Cartel Working Group SG-1
Commissioner’s Legal Advisor - Italian Competition Authority
EUROPEAN PUBLIC PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE
National remedies and national actions
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) IN FP7
European Labour Law Jean Monnet Chair of EU Labour Law Academic Year Silvia Borelli:
Presentation transcript:

EU/Switzerland Competition Law Cooperation Agreement David Mamane, LL.M. European Parliament ECON Briefing Session,

EU/Switzerland cooperation agreement competition policy enforcement6 November 2013 Page 2/7 General remarks >The following presentation is made from a practitioner's point of view and will focus on the specific novelty of the 2 nd generation agreements: Exchange of confidential information >Generally there can be a legitimate interest to coordinate cross-border investigations in order to prevent diverging results (insofar as a diverging result is not the consequence of different legal conditions) >Already done today on the basis of individual waivers in merger control and leniency procedures >EU/Switzerland: Similarity (not identity) of the competition law rules  equivalence of the outcome in many cases, but differences remain

EU/Switzerland cooperation agreement competition policy enforcement6 November 2013 Page 3/7 Potential issues (1/3) >Judicial protection in case of information exchange without consent of the affected parties >Possibility to exchange information upon a formal request >The Cooperation Agreement does not include any rules on the possibility to appeal the information exchange >Is the possibility to appeal against the collection of the information/evidence and against the final decision sufficient? >The courts will have to decide on the appeals possibility based on the applicable (national) procedural law  diverging results possible? >Will the affected parties be informed regarding the request for information by the other authority?  Unclear based on article IX(1) of the Cooperation Agreement, but affected parties should be informed

EU/Switzerland cooperation agreement competition policy enforcement6 November 2013 Page 4/7 Potential issues (2/3) >Protect effectiveness of leniency procedures: >Information obtained within leniency procedures may not be disclosed (except with written consent of the party) >Which “information” is protected: Only the leniency application or also the evidence submitted together with the leniency application? >Cooperation obligation of leniency applicant: Leniency applicant should not be obliged to agree to an information exchange based on his obligation to cooperate >Ensure attractiveness of settlement procedures: >Information obtained within settlement procedures may not be disclosed (except with written consent of the party) >How to deal with information that has been exchanged prior to the settlement  claw-back mechanism? >Relevant time for cutting-off the information exchange: start of the settlement negotiations or final confirmation of the settlement?

EU/Switzerland cooperation agreement competition policy enforcement6 November 2013 Page 5/7 Potential issues (3/3) >Exchange of protected data / data protection rules: >Protection of personal data must be ensured >Equivalence of data protection rules, e.g. regarding legal entities? Possibly Swiss protection goes further in some cases. >Necessity of additional safeguards? >Specific confidentiality laws : Admissible to exchange such information? >Exchange of Diplomatic Notes on the notification of acts of public authority in the area of competition policy >Only for acts by the European Commission >Issues of blocking statutes remain

EU/Switzerland cooperation agreement competition policy enforcement6 November 2013 Page 6/7 Considerations for future agreements >To be assessed whether there is sufficient similarity/equivalence between the involved competition law regimes >Rules regarding judicial protection could be determined in the context of the agreement  ensure coherent and foreseeable application in both jurisdictions >Procedural steps in the context of settlement/leniency procedures could be clarified and possibly extended in order to maintain the attractiveness of these procedures >Assess the bilateral application of the possibility to notify acts of public authority

EU/Switzerland cooperation agreement competition policy enforcement6 November 2013 Page 7/7 David Mamane Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd / Attorneys at Law Löwenstrasse 19 P.O. Box Zurich / Switzerland T F Thank you for your attention.