University of Sheffield [November/2013] School Of Health And Related.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christine Baldwin Department of Medicine & Therapeutics
Advertisements

Confidential Inquiry into the deaths of people with learning disabilities Dr Pauline Heslop Manager of the Confidential Inquiry Senior Research Fellow.
Hip fracture NICE quality standard March 2012 ABOUT THIS PRESENTATION:
What makes a good NIHR application? 9 February 2012 Professor Jonathan Michaels.
Ruth Breidenbach Roe Partnerships and Public Services National Council for Voluntary Organisations.
Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care for South Yorkshire (CLAHRC SY). ‘THE BENEFITS & CHALLENGES OF.
© Safeguarding public health Expert Group on Innovation in the Regulation of Healthcare products Adaptive Licencing workshop at the Wellcome Trust October.
Dangerous Omissions: The Consequences of Ignoring Decision Uncertainty Karl Claxton Centre for Health Economics*, Department of Economics and Related Studies,
Challenges in evaluating social interventions: would an RCT design have been the answer to all our problems? Lyndal Bond, Kathryn Skivington, Gerry McCartney,
NICE and national clinical audit
Investigating the prevalence and distribution of views across the UK population Helen Mason ECHE Dublin 14 th July 2014 Extending life for people with.
Implementation of new technologies Dr Keith Cooper Southampton Health Technology Assessments Centre University of Southampton.
Sophie Whyte 1, Simon Dixon 1,Rita Faria 2, Simon Walker 2, Mark Sculpher 2, Stephen Palmer 2 1 ScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK; 2 CHE,
Making Decisions in Health Care: Cost-effectiveness and the Value of Evidence Karl Claxton Centre for Health Economics, Department of Economics and Related.
Accounting for Psychological Determinants of Treatment Response in Health Economic Simulation Models of Behavioural Interventions A Case Study in Type.
The Cost-Effectiveness of Providing DAFNE to Subgroups of Predicted Responders J Kruger 1, A Brennan 1, P Thokala 1, S Heller 2 on behalf of the DAFNE.
TRAINING FOR ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP PROGRAMMES IN HOSPITALS JUNE 2014.
Health Insurance October 19, 2006 Insurance is defined as a means of protecting against risk. Risk is a state in which multiple outcomes are possible and.
A METHODOLOGY FOR MEASURING THE COST- UTILITY OF EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENTAL INTERVENTIONS Quality of improved life opportunities (QILO)
Economic evaluation considers assessment of intervention effects in economic terms, which is often of greatest interest to fund allocators Intervention.
Cost-Effectiveness Analyses in the UK - Lessons from the National Institute for Clinical Excellence Mark Sculpher Professor of Health Economics Centre.
Departing from the health maximisation approach Social value judgements made by NICE’s advisory committees Koonal K. Shah Office of Health Economics, UK.
Áiseanna Tacaíochta Realising Equality through Active Participation 3 rd December 2014 Supporting Innovation and Change through the AT Model Sheila Marshall.
University of Southern California Department of Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy 1540 E. Alcazar Street, CHP 140 Los Angeles, CA
How is place of death for cancer patients changing and what affects it? UKACR Conference September 28 th 2004 Elizabeth Davies Karen Linklater Ruth Jack.
Abstract 213 ICIUM: Antalya, Turkey. November 14-18, 2011.
Standards Debate at the Centre for Better Managed Health Care, Cass Business School, City University London, 26 th October Professor Mike Kelly Director.
The National Institute for Clinical Excellence in the UK – Experience and Impact Mark Sculpher Professor of Health Economics Centre for Health Economics.
MAPPING THE DIABETES HEALTH PROFILE (DHP-18) ONTO THE EQ-5D AND SF-6D GENERIC PREFERENCE BASED MEASURES OF HEALTH Brendan Mulhern 1, Keith Meadows 2, Donna.
Extending life for people with a terminal illness: a moral right or an expensive death? Empirical and methodological issues Rachel Baker, Helen Mason &
The cost-effectiveness of providing a DAFNE follow- up intervention to predicted non-responders J Kruger 1, A Brennan 1, P Thokala 1, S Heller 2 on behalf.
Summary of measures of population Health Farid Najafi MD PhD School of Population Health Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences.
NICE Decision Making Dr Katherine Payne North West Genetics Knowledge Park The University of Manchester
1 OECD Handbook on Measuring Volume Output of Education and Health Chapter 3: Health Sandra Hopkins OECD Health Division June 2007.
IMPROVING DIABETES MANAGEMENT IN PRIMARY CARE
Cost-Effectiveness Thresholds Professor of Health Economics
The return of the 5 year plan Mathematical programming for allocation of health care resources David Epstein, Karl Claxton, Mark Sculpher (CHE) Zaid Chalabi.
DH PRICE CONTROLS Implications for the Future Pricing and Supply of Branded Medicines within NHS Hospitals.
What’s on the Horizon Anita Corrigan Nurse Director
Margarit MELIKYAN Drug Utilization Research Group PO, Armenia, National Institute of Health Access to and Use of Medicines by Households in Armenia: Impact.
An Introduction to Health Promotion Policy, Programming and Approaches Sue Thompson Lecturer in Adult Nursing University of Nottingham.
Basic Economic Analysis David Epstein, Centre for Health Economics, York.
انواع ارزيابي های اقتصادي سيدرضا مجدزاده مرکز تحقيقات بهره برداری از دانش سلامت و دانشکده بهداشت دانشگاه علوم پزشکي و خدمات بهداشتي درماني تهران.
Governance and Public Policy: a NICE example John Brazier Professor of Health Economics, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, UK With thanks to Matt Stevenson.
Current Challenges and Future Developments in HTA in the UK Frances Macdonald, 23 rd September 2008 (A personal, Industry View)
USING ECONOMIC EVIDENCE AND STAKEHOLDER'S PARTICIPATION IN DECISION MAKING ON BENEFIT PACKAGE OF UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE SCHEME IN THAILAND RESULTS:
1 Centre for Sport and Exercise Science, Sheffield Hallam University, U. K. 2 York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, U. K.
Vicky Copley, PHE Risk Factor Intelligence
Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) and Patient- Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy.
Making Economic Evaluation Fit for Purpose to Support Decisions Mark Sculpher, PhD Centre for Health Economics University of York, UK The Third Annual.
PROMs Martin Orton – NHS Information Centre. Overview PROMs Overview IC’s central role in implementation –Matching & linking to HES & NJR –Applying the.
The journey to sustainable and widespread improvement – medicines matter Prof Dyfrig Hughes PhD MRPharmS Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation.
Health and Wellbeing Impacts of Green and Blue Infrastructure: Critical Issues for Application of Cost Benefit Analysis for Policy Appraisal Dr Tim Taylor.
Understanding Health Economics Nicola Cooper, PhD Professor of Healthcare Evaluation Research Department of Health Sciences University of Leicester
Approaches used in Health Promotion Campaigns. Choice and Justification of Approaches Level of Achievement 4: Research and make a detailed analysis of.
Cost effectiveness Analysis: Valuing Health; Valuing Research!
HEALTH ECONOMICS BASICS
Global burden of diseases
Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy
DY6 Core Component & Sustainability Reporting
Making NICE research nicer Involving patients, carers and the public
The NICE Citizens Council and the role of social value judgements
Approaches used in Health Promotion Campaigns
Performance Framework
College of Public Health and Human Sciences
ESTIMATING THE LIFETIME COST OF CHILDHOOD OBESITY: MAIN CONCLUSIONS
Modelling the “bigger picture” Using Service-Level Modelling to support consistent resource allocation decisions across whole disease areas HTAi 2008.
VCS Neighbourhoods Pilot
Professor of Health Economics
Measuring outcomes Emma Frew October 2012.
Presentation transcript:

University of Sheffield [November/2013] School Of Health And Related Research From 2014 the English Department of Health are proposing to negotiate the price of pharmaceuticals directly with the companies through their proposed value-based pricing (VBP) scheme. The new mechanism will assess the cost-effectiveness of medicines taking into account a broader scope of value, including the severity and burden of the condition, unmet need, wider social benefits, therapeutic improvement and innovation. Although wider social benefits are considered implicitly in NICE committee decisions, the current system of appraisal does not capture these issues in any formal manner. The proposed approach, currently being finalised by NICE, was informed by a large programme of research conducted by academics at the University of Sheffield via the Policy Research Unit in Economic Evaluation of Health and Care Interventions (EEPRU) programme of work. The methods and results of the research are described in detail on the EEPRU webpages ( and the individual VBP projects include: Eliciting societal preferences for end of life, burden of illness, and therapeutic improvement Using an online survey of 3669 members of the general population and a discrete choice experiment, societal preferences for quality adjusted life year (QALY) gains from health care interventions were elicited across three characteristics. Support was found for end of life (defined by NICE as expected survival of less than 2 years and expected survival gain of 3 months or more) Modest support was found for burden of illness from a medical condition (defined as QALY loss due to premature mortality and morbidity) No support was found for therapeutic improvement (defined as preferences for large QALY gains that are disproportionately larger than the size of gain). Wider social benefits were explored in terms of Productivity Losses, Informal Care and Formal Care Productivity loss: Using data from the general population and patients with different health conditions, absence from work was linked to health related quality of life scores (EQ-5D) controlling for age and condition (ICD code). The results enable aggregate condition specific probabilities of absence from work to be determined from quality of life outputs generated from existing economic models. Informal care: Using patient data, informal care usage was linked to health related quality of life scores (EQ-5D) controlling for age and condition (ICD code). The results enable informal care associated with the health of the patient to be determined using quality of life outputs generated from existing economic models. Formal care: Using the Adult Social Care Survey supplemented with patient data, the costs of social care use (residential and non-residential) were estimated by EQ-5D scores and age groups. The research described in this article was funded by the Department of Health in England under the Policy Research Unit in Economic Evaluation of Health and Care Intervention (EEPRU) based at the University of Sheffield and University of York. The sponsors had no involvement in the analysis or interpretation of the data or findings described here.