Radiation Long Term Effects II

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiation safety in CT.
Advertisements

Radiation biology and protection in dental radiology
Multiple Choice Questions
Radiation Safety Course: Biological Effects
“Emery’s Elements of Medical genetics”
Pregnancy and Medical Radiation
Module Medical IX - Types of radiation effects
Radiation Biology. Radiation Safety Training Biological Effects Washington State University Radiation Safety Office.
7. RADIATION AND RADIATION PROTECTION
Radiation Protection in Paediatric Radiology
Radiation safety in CT.
Genetic Susceptibility Can we identify cells, individuals or subpopulations that are genetically susceptible to radiation?
Modifiers of cell survival: Linear Energy Transfer Lecture Ahmed Group
By. RADIATION & PREGNANCY Diagnostic & Therapeutic procedures causing exposure of the abdomen of women likely to be pregnant should be avoided unless.
Ninth lecture.
INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION —————————————————————————————————————— Pregnancy and Medical Radiation.
ALLOIMMUNIZATION IN PREGNANCY
Module 4 Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation
Pregnancy Module  Objectives  To understand the effects of radiation on the fetus in doses greater than 10 Rem.  To understand the reason for “Declaring.
Radiation Carcinogenesis Martin Brown. Two types of late effects of irradiation Deterministic (non-stochastic) effects –Severity increases with dose.
Case-Control Studies (Retrospective Studies). What is a cohort?
Ahmed Group Lecture 27 Hereditary Effects of Radiation Lecture 27.
Ethical AND legal issues in GENETICS. objective 1- introduction. 2-major needs in study of ethics. 3-Ethical Principles in Medicine. 4-The Special Position.
Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence May-June 2006.
Science: How to Do it Right A Research in Ecology Primer.
Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation Stochastic Somatic Effects Radiation induction of cancer Lecture IAEA Post Graduate Educational Course Radiation.
Genomic Instability Delayed Genetic Effects. What is Genomic Instability? Often, after being damaged by radiation, cells are able to repair DNA damage.
Dose Response.
SEX DETERMINATION The sex of an individual is determined by the sex chromosomes contributed to the zygote by the sperm and the egg.
Nuclear Medicine. International Atomic Energy Agency Part 2: Radiation units and dose quantities Topic 1: Exposure and exposure rate.
Chapter 14: Genetic Screening and Counselling. Higher Human Biology Unit 1: Cell Function and Inheritance 07/09/20151Mrs Smith: Ch14: Genetic Screening.
Prospective Study Cohort Study Assis.Prof.Dr Diaa Marzouk Community Medicine.
National Committee for the Certification of Radiation Protection Officer BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION.
Radiation Dosimetry of the Patient
1 Mendelian genetics in Humans: Autosomal and Sex- linked patterns of inheritance Obviously examining inheritance patterns of specific traits in humans.
Adaptive Response to Low Dose Radiation
EARLY NONSTOCHASTIC EFFECTS/LATE STOCHASTIC EFFECTS Sherer Chapter 7 and 8 Reference: Bushong, Chapter 36 and 37.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY L14: Radiation exposure in pregnancy IAEA Training.
Radiation Health Effects
ANALYTICAL X-RAY SAFETY User Training Centre for Environmental Health, Safety and Security Management.
HUMAN GENETICS. Objectives 2. Discuss the relationships among chromosomes, genes, and DNA. 2.8 Examine incomplete dominance, alleles, sex determination,
Human Genetics.
Chapter 3 Normal Growth and Development Dr. Areefa Albahri.
Genetic Analysis of Human Diseases Chapter Overview Due to thousands of human diseases having an underlying genetic basis, human genetic analysis.
Ahmed Group Lecture 28 Effects of Radiation on the Embryo and Fetus Lecture 28.
1 WEEK 7 RADIATION BIOLOGY & PROTECTION Part 1 FINAL.
CHAPTER 9 Patterns of Inheritance Part 3. Human Genetic Analysis  Since humans live under variable conditions, in different places, and have long life.
Basic Biologic Interactions of Radiation IONIZATION.
Ethical AND legal issues in GENETICS. objective 1- introduction. 2-major needs in study of ethics. 3-Ethical Principles in Medicine. 4-The Special Position.
Keynote Lecture: Effects on Tissues and Organs (including hereditary and prenatal effects) Wolfgang-U. Müller Institute of Medical Radiation Biology University.
BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION
Case control & cohort studies
Lesson Overview Lesson Overview The Work of Gregor Mendel Lesson Overview 11.1 The Work of Gregor Mendel.
Louisiana State University Radiation Safety Office
The Law of Bergonie & Tribondeau
Hereditary Effects of Radiation
RTMR 284 Chapter 30 : Fundamental Principles of Radiobiology
Biological Effects of Radiation.
Genetic Susceptibility
For healthcare professionals
Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts
Adaptive Response to Low Dose Radiation
The Chromosomal Basis of Inheritance
Effects of Radiation on the Embryo and Fetus
RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY
Late Effects of Radiation
Health and Biological Effects of Radiation
Health and Biological Effects of Radiation
RAD 315 RADIOBIOLOGY AND RADIATION PROTECTION
Presentation transcript:

Radiation Long Term Effects II

Substantial animal data are available to describe fairly completely the effects of relatively high doses of radiation delivered during various periods of gestation. Because the embryo is a rapidly developing cell system, it is particularly sensitive to radiation. With age, the embryo (and then the fetus) becomes less sensitive to the effects of radiation, and this pattern continues into adulthood. After maturity has been reached, radiosensitivity increases with age

All observations point to the first trimester during pregnancy as the most radiosensitive period.

The effects of radiation in utero are time related and dose related The effects of radiation in utero are time related and dose related. They include prenatal death, neonatal death, congenital abnormalities, malignancy induction, general impairment of growth, genetic effects, and mental retardation. The preceeding figure has been redrawn from studies designed to observe the effects of a 200-rad (2-Gyt) dose delivered at various stages in utero in mice. The scale along the x-axis indicates the approximate comparable time in humans. Within 2 weeks of fertilization, the most pronounced effect of a high radiation dose is prenatal death, which manifests as a spontaneous abortion. Observations in radiation therapy patients have confirmed this effect, but only after very high doses. On the basis of animal experimentation, it would appear that this response is very rare. Our best estimate is that a 10-rad (100-mGyt) dose during the first 2 weeks will induce perhaps a 0.1% rate of spontaneous abortion. This occurs in addition to the 25% to 50% normal incidence of spontaneous abortions. Fortunately, this response is of the all-or-none variety: Either a radiation-induced abortion occurs, or the pregnancy is carried to term with no ill effect.

The first 2 weeks of pregnancy may be of least concern because the response is all-or-nothing.

During the period of major organogenesis, from the 2nd through the 10th week, two effects may occur. Early in this period, skeletal and organ abnormalities can be induced. As major organogenesis continues, congenital abnormalities of the central nervous system may be observed if the pregnancy is carried to term.

If radiation-induced congenital abnormalities are severe enough, the result will be neonatal death. After a dose of 200 rad (2 Gyt) to the mouse, nearly 100% of fetuses suffered significant abnormalities. In 80%, this was sufficient to cause neonatal death.

Irradiation in utero at the human level has been associated with childhood malignancy by a number of investigators. The most complete study of this effect was conducted by Alice Stewart and coworkers in a project known as the Oxford Survey, a study of childhood malignancy in England, Scotland, and Wales. Nearly every such case of childhood malignancy in these countries since 1946 has been investigated. Each case was first identified and then investigated by interview with the mother, review of the hospital charts, and review of the physician records. Each “case” of childhood malignancy was matched with a “control” for age, sex, place of birth, socioeconomic status, and other demographic factors. The control subject was a child who matched with the “case” in all respects, except that the control did not have cancer or leukemia. The Oxford Survey is being continued at this time and has now considered more than 10,000 cases and a like number of matched control subjects

The relative risk of childhood leukemia after irradiation in utero is 1.5 A relative risk of 1.5 for the development of childhood leukemia after irradiation in utero is significant. This indicates an increase of 50% over the nonirradiated rate. The number of cases involved, however, is small

Other effects after irradiation in utero have been studied rather fully in animals and have been observed in some human populations. An unexpected finding in the offspring of atomic bomb survivors is mental retardation. Children of exposed mothers performed poorly on IQ tests and demonstrated poor scholastic performance compared with unexposed Japanese children.

Radiation exposure in utero does retard the growth and development of the newborn. Irradiation in utero, principally during the period of major organogenesis, has been associated with microcephaly (small head) and, as discussed, mental retardation.

The incidence of childhood leukemia in the population at large is approximately 9 cases per 100,000 live births. According to the Oxford Survey, if all 100,000 had been irradiated in utero, perhaps 14 cases of leukemia would have resulted

Human data bearing on these effects have been obtained from patients irradiated medically, atomic bomb survivors, and residents of the Marshall Islands who were exposed to radioactive fallout in 1954 during weapons testing. For instance, heavily irradiated children at Hiroshima are, on average, 2.25 cm (0.9 in) shorter, 3 kg (6.6 lb) lighter, and 1.1 cm (0.4 in) smaller in head circumference than members of nonirradiated control groups. These effects, as well as mental retardation, have been observed principally in those receiving doses in excess of 100 rad (1 Gyt) in utero. The lack of appropriate and sensitive tests of mental function makes it impossible to draw similar conclusions at doses below 100 rad (1 Gyt).

Relative Risk of Childhood Leukemia After Irradiation In Utero by Trimester Time of X-Ray Examination Relative Risk First trimester 8.3 Second trimester 1.5 Third trimester 1.4 Total

Summary of Effects After 10 Rad In Utero Time of Exposure Type of Response Natural Occurrence Radiation Response 0-2 wk Spontaneous abortion 25% 0.1% 2-10 wk Congenital abnormalities 5% 1% 2-15 wk Mental retardation 6% 0.5% 0-9 mo Malignant disease 8/10,000 12/10,000 Impaired growth and development Nil Genetic mutation 10%

Four responses of concern to radiology have been identified: spontaneous abortion, congenital abnormalities, mental retardation, and childhood malignancy.

Spontaneous abortion causes the least concern of the four because it is an all-or-none effect. Congenital abnormalities, mental retardation, and childhood malignancy are of real concern, but it should be recognized that the probability of such a response after a fetal dose of 10 rad (100 mGyt) is nil. Furthermore, 10 rad (100 mGyt) to the fetus very rarely occurs in radiology. No evidence in humans or animals indicates that the levels of radiation exposure currently experienced occupationally and medically are responsible for any such effects on growth and development

Genetic Effects Unfortunately, our weakest area of knowledge in radiation biology is the area of radiation genetics. Essentially all the data indicating that radiation causes genetic effects have come from large-scale experiments with flies or mice

In 1927, the Nobel prize–winning geneticist H. J In 1927, the Nobel prize–winning geneticist H.J. Muller from the University of Texas reported the results of his irradiation of Drosophila, the fruit fly. He irradiated mature flies before procreation and then measured the frequency of lethal mutations among the offspring. The radiation doses used were thousands of rad, the dose-response relationship for radiation-induced genetic damage is linear, nonthreshold. On the basis of Muller's studies, other conclusions were drawn. Radiation does not alter the quality of mutations but rather increases the frequency of those mutations that are observed spontaneously. Muller's data showed no dose rate or dose fractionation effects. Hence, he concluded that such mutations were single-hit phenomena.

Irradiation of flies by H. J Irradiation of flies by H.J. Muller showed the genetic effects to be linear, nonthreshold. Note that the doses were exceedingly high.

It was principally on the basis of Muller's work that the National Council on Radiation Protection in 1932 lowered the recommended dose limit and acknowledged officially for the first time the existence of nonthreshold radiation effects. Since then, all radiation protection guides have assumed a linear, nonthreshold dose-response relationship and have been based on the suspected genetic, as well as somatic, effects of radiation.

The only other experimental work of any significance is that of Russell. Beginning in 1946, he began to irradiate a large mouse colony with radiation dose rates that varied from 0.001 to 90 rad/min (0.01 to 900 mGyt/min) and total doses up to 1000 rad (10 Gyt). These studies are ongoing, and observations now have been reported on more than 8 million mice! The experiment requires the observation of seven specific genes that control readily recognizable characteristics, such as ear shape, coat color, and eye color. Russell's data show that a dose rate effect does exist; this would indicate that the mouse has the capacity to repair genetic damage. He has confirmed the linear, nonthreshold form of the dose-response relationship and has not detected any types of mutations that did not occur naturally. The average mutation rate per unit dose in the mouse is approximately 15 times that observed in the fruit fly. Whether an increased sensitivity exists in humans relative to the mouse is unknown.

We do not have any data that suggest that radiation-induced genetic effects occur in humans Observations of the atomic bomb survivors have shown no radiation-induced genetic effects, and descendants of survivors are now into the third generation. Other human populations have likewise provided only negative results. Consequently, in the absence of accurate human data, there is no choice but to rely on information from experimental laboratory studies.

The doubling dose is that dose of radiation that produces twice the frequency of genetic mutations as would have been observed without the radiation The doubling dose in humans is estimated to lie in the range between 50 and 250 rad (0.5 and 2.5 Gyt).

• Radiation-induced mutations are usually harmful. • Any dose of radiation, however small, to a germ cell results in some genetic risk. • The frequency of radiation-induced mutations is directly proportional to dose, so that a linear extrapolation of data obtained at high doses provides a valid estimate of low-dose effects. • The effect depends on radiation protraction and fractionation. • For most pre-reproductive life, the woman is less sensitive than the man to the genetic effects of radiation. • Most radiation-induced mutations are recessive. These require that the mutant genes must be present in both the male and the female to produce the trait. Consequently, such mutations may not be expressed for many generations. • The frequency of radiation-induced genetic mutations is extremely low. It is approximately 10−7 mutations/rad/gene.

The incidence of radiation-induced genetic mutations after the levels of exposure experienced in diagnostic radiology is essentially zero