Insert strapline Developing quality incentives Cemil Altin Head of European Gas Policy November 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gender Perspectives in Introduction to Tariffs Gender Module #5 ITU Workshops on Sustainability in Telecommunication Through Gender & Social Equality.
Advertisements

1 PERFORMANCE GOALS AND TARGETS AS PART OF ECONOMIC REGULATION OF ANSPs The UK experience of economic regulation Presented by Harry Bush CB Group Director.
Local Government Finance BUSINESS RATES AND POOLING.
Allocating Risks Among Market Participants: Lessons from the Insurance Industry Presentation to: Rethinking Credit and Collection for Gas and Electric.
Review of NTS entry charge setting arrangements - IA 1 July 2010.
Using IFRS Based Financial Statements In Corporate Governance Gareth Davies Local Authority (Scotland) Accounts Advisory Committee secretary CIPFA Policy.
Application of User Pays Principles to Existing Service Lines 22nd November 2006.
Chapter 20 CONTROLLING FOR ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE
Carbon Reduction Commitment AEA is the Government adviser contracted to develop the CRC scheme Stephen Boyle, Principal Consultant, Climate Change and.
Making markets work for consumers Retail Competition in the UK Iain Osborne Director of Consumer Markets, Ofgem.
Creating Competitive Advantage
Energy regulation and quality of service Eric Groom FEU, World Bank 4 th Poverty Reduction Strategy Forum Athens, June
The Australian Energy Regulator Public Forum April 29 Expenditure incentive guidelines Presentation on key issues.
1 A Review of Potential Gains from Reforms ECRA Workshop 6 November 2006 Dr Brian Wharmby Independent Consultant, former Technical Director of Ofgem
EXTERNAL ENVIRONMENTS OF REAL ESTATE MARKET
Pricing Strategy Considerations for a New Business A Macro Overview of Setting & Influencing Prices Class 26 Marketing Pricing Strategies Tuesday November.
Amount and cost of losses June 11 th Florence School of Regulation Jose Luis Mata.
Lloyd’s Strategy January © Lloyd’s2 Lloyd’s vision Key Characteristics A subscription market backed by mutual security A broker market;
Determining Prior Period Tax Exposure for Veterinary Businesses Do you owe Illinois Sales Taxes for Prior Periods?
Chapter 20 CONTROLLING FOR ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE © 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.20.1.
The economic regulation of gas processing services Key issues and initial thoughts Ofgem presentation 18 June 2007.
1 The Regulatory Approach to Fostering Investment David Halldearn Ofgem 28 September 2006.
ENTREPRENEURSHIP Lecture No: 26 BY CH. SHAHZAD ANSAR.
Context and Rationale for Pay for Performance in SUD Treatment NIATx-SI State Call April 2010.
The Challenges of the Medicaid Modernization Mandate – Part 1 Joel L. Olah, Ph.D., LNHA Executive Director Aging Resources of Central Iowa Iowa Assisted.
20 September 2015 GAZ DE FRANCE ESS Introduction of Gas Reserve Arrangements Mark Bailey Gaz de France ESS.
SO Incentives from April 2010 John Perkins. 2 Gas System Operator (SO) Incentives National Grid operates the high pressure Gas Transmission System in.
CMUA 2004 Statewide Survey of California Residential Customers Served by Municipal Utilities City of Palo Alto Public Utilities April 2005.
Forecasting Process Sales and Operation Planning.
Confidential. This presentation is provided for the recipient only and cannot be reproduced or shared without Fair Isaac Corporation's express consent.
© British Gas Trading Limited 2011 DNO Losses Incentive- Summary.
Consumer Empowerment Consumer Empowerment May 15, 2012 Presented by: Alparslan Bayraktar Commissioner Energy Market Regulatory Authority of Turkey (EPDK)
Marketing Channels: Delivering Customer Value
Review of the UNC Post-emergency Arrangements Workshop 1 March 2009.
2014 Reports to the Minister Markets Team Ken Michael Room, 25 September 2014 Ensuring quality services for a reasonable price 1 Workshop.
Guidelines of Good Practice on customer cost surveys as an input for infrastructure development and its regulation Riccardo Vailati Co-chair CEER/ERGEG.
Advise | Design | Integrate | Deliver Subcontractor fee structure – FND Phase 1 Manchester 8 th June 2009.
ARODG - 2 An overview of transmission access arrangements Mark Copley & Colin Sausman 1 st and 2 nd February 2007.
Energy Efficiency Action Plan Kathleen Hogan Director, Climate Protection Partnerships Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency NARUC Winter Meetings.
DN Interruption Reform Distribution Workstream 23 rd July 2009.
A sustainable approach to procurement Martin Garry Energy Services Manager.
Marketing Quality Circle
Managing Exceeded Capacity. 10 September The Issue of Exceeded Capacity DNO Connection Charging Methodologies: customers who increase Maximum Capacity.
Chapter 7 Selecting the Channel Members. 7 Major Topics for Ch. 7 1.Channel Structure and Selection Issue** 2.Selection Process 3.Selection Criteria*
Profit and Loss Account. Introduction The Profit and loss account is one of the thee most important financial statements The Profit and loss account is.
Electronic Commerce Semester 1 Term 1 Lecture 25.
Facilitating Release of Non-obligated Entry Capacity Draft – for discussion purposes only 22 November 2007.
Energy Market Issues for Biomethane Projects Workshop - 31 October 2011 RIIO-GD1 Environmental Incentives.
Credit Cover Seminar The Proposed Way Forward Peter Bucks 25 April 2003.
Marketing Plan.
Financial Hardship Provisions. Utility Consumer Protection in WA.
Economic regulation of electricity and gas network businesses Mark Feather, Acting Executive Director 23 November 2011.
Energy Best Deal Gas and electricity prices are rising but there are ways to cut the cost of your energy bills: Make sure you’re getting the best energy.
Provisional view of the Procurement Strategy Phil Bennett Commercial Director.
Ofgem’s decision on UNC modification proposal 044 Sonia Brown.
Agenda Do I have to file? When do I file? What are the penalties? How can I reduce my tax bill? Rental property issues Who are TaxAssist Accountants?
CIRED presentation Improving Quality of Service – Information and Incentives in the GB Electricity Industry Alan Friday (ERA Technology Ltd), Chris Watts.
ENTREPRENEURSHIP SABIR MALIK LECTURE 07. The Marketing Plan.
Economic Benchmarking vs Financial Incentives – an alternative to incentivising performance in the gas industry? Ashley Muldrew, Gas Speak 2015.
Distribution Commercial Group Billing & Collection Management and Remedies Richard Smith Chair- EA Distribution Commercial Group.
Place your chosen image here. The four corners must just cover the arrow tips. For covers, the three pictures should be the same size and in a straight.
Ofwat – Protecting consumers, promoting value and safeguarding the future Water and Regulation Improving the value from statistics Gordon Allan Engineering.
Quality Framework Proposal
Transitional offtake arrangements – Ofgem Initial Proposals on transitional incentives 6 October 2005.
Presentation at REEEP Regulatory Forum, 28 September 2004
Chapter 20 CONTROLLING FOR ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE
SO Incentives from April 2010
Distributed Solar Generation: Value and Pricing
Applications of quality assurance to administration and managed care
April High Holborn, WCIV6DA
Presentation transcript:

Insert strapline Developing quality incentives Cemil Altin Head of European Gas Policy November 2006

Insert strapline The situation in 1999  Ofgem are undertaking a price control of electricity distribution companies  There is concern (industry, academic, and at Ofgem) that the strong efficiency incentives under RPI-X may be discouraging good quality of service to consumers  There is some quality of service “protection” in place BUT it is targeted payments to individual customers (guaranteed standards of performance) and non-financial overall standards of performance  The industry have their own approach to reporting on network performance (e.g. number and duration of interruptions to supply)

Insert strapline What should we do?  Impose incentives to deliver better quality of service?  Do nothing?  Assess customers’ preferences  Reduce efficiency incentives to redress the balance?

Insert strapline The first step  Assess customers’ preferences and willingness to pay (using extensive survey) –Customers’ preferences – what aspects of quality of service are important/valued –Customers’ willingness to pay – how much are they willing to pay for improvements  Result: –customers value number and duration of interruptions and receiving a good response when they contacted the company in the event of an interruption –they are willing to pay a modest amount for improvements in quality of service – not an “open-ended cheque”

Insert strapline What should we do now?  Set targets for the areas that customers’ value  Look at past performance and understand the data  Set a financial incentive – e.g. £10 per unit improvement

Insert strapline Review data and performance  We reviewed the data on number and duration of interruptions to supply –Found that companies using significantly different definitions and ways of measuring number/duration of interruptions –Up to 40% of differences in performance could be attributed to these factors  What do we do now? –Set incentives anyway (but keep the financial exposure very low to overcome data problems)? –Develop better reporting arrangements?

Insert strapline Developing better reporting  Ofgem developed standard reporting arrangements – detailed definitions  Ofgem developed accuracy reporting requirements – and began to audit companies’ data  Begin to build confidence in the data and therefore confidence in any incentive – allows greater financial exposure and therefore ability to change behaviour

Insert strapline Now we have better data – what do we do?  Develop the incentive arrangements –What type do we want? Just set a £/unit improvement Set targets and incentivise delivery  Remember – not an open-ended cheque  What about the quality of response when customers contact companies?

Insert strapline The incentive arrangements  Targets for number and duration of interruptions to supply – a rate of improvement over 5 years (with annual targets)  A monthly survey of customers that had contacted companies to assess the quality of their response  Now…..how strong to make the incentives? –The data on customers’ willingness to pay was not ideal/differed across companies

Insert strapline The strength of the incentives  Decided that 2% of price control revenue was appropriate level of exposure given it was a new scheme (and remaining worries about data) and also overall risk profile  The 2% was “divided” between the 3 measures based on customers’ relative preferences  Companies received a symmetric penalty/reward for beating targets on number/duration of interruptions  Companies received a fixed reward for improving performance under the customer survey to assess their quality of response

Insert strapline Did it work?  Yes – improvements in performance across all 3 measures for most companies  Yes – a real change in behaviour – directors’ pay linked to performance and attitudes in call centres  Yes – provided a balance against the strong efficiency incentives on costs  No – targets possibly not hard enough – but can be reviewed with experience

Insert strapline Promoting choice and value for all gas and electricity customers