Generic marks – proofs demonstrating that the activity of the holder is preventing the trade mark from becoming a generic term M.Radulova R.Trenkova Patent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Latest Developments in Ukraines Intellectual Property Laws and Data Protection.
Advertisements

Genuine Use of Trademarks Proper Reasons for Non-use
4th LIAISON MEETING ON TRADEMARKS BETWEEN OHIM AND EXPERTS FROM THE NATIONAL OFFICES ( Alicante, June 2009) REPRESENTATION OF SOUND MARKS Presented.
5th Liaison Meeting on Trade Marks
PATENT OFFICE OF REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA. Introduction The provision in Article 108 (1) Council Regulation (EC) 40/94 on the Community trade mark (CTMR)
Use of a mark in a form differing in elements which do not alter its distinctive character - practice and examples - Мр Мирела Бошковић
TRADEMARKS CONTAINING A NATIONAL FLAG
Trademark enforcement in Belarus AIPPI Baltic, Vilnius, 2013 Darya Lando, Head of Legal Department LexPatent, Minsk, Belarus.
IP Border Detention with a Patent Topping Jasper Helder Severin de Wit.
Should the names of the States be included in Article 6ter of the Paris Convention?
Practice with regards to the meaning of indications in foreign languages Liaison meeting Alicante 2009 German Patent and Trade Mark Office.
Genuine Use in inter partes cases 4th Liaison Meeting on Trade Marks June 2009.
Roundtable: Fight against Piracy and Counterfeiting in Developing Countries and LDCs: Progresses and Challenges – National Strategy: Cambodia’s activities.
The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases
Lobbying and interest representation EU institutions must operate in an OPEN fashion (principle stated in article 1 of the Treaty on EU) Lobbying and.
Understanding Trademarks A Global Perspective. Types of Intellectual Property Copyright Patent Industrial Design Utility Model Trademark Trade Name Trade.
Understanding Trademarks A Global Perspective. Types of Intellectual Property Copyright Patent Trademark Service Mark Trade Name Trade Dress Trade Secret.
VIVIEN CHAN & CO. SOLICITORS & NOTARIES, AGENTS FOR TRADE MARKS & PATENTS 1 INTERNATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND 2004 INTERNET IMBROGLIO.
DESIGN AND EUROPEAN LAW Two texts - Firstly a directive 98/71 in order to create a convergence between national laws - secondly a european protection :
Maintaining Trademark Rights: Policing and Educational Efforts April 7, 2011.
Strengthening the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Ukraine Activity October 2014.
8th WIPO Advanced Research Forum on Intellectual Property Rights, WIPO- Geneva, May 26-28, 2014 The need for a fair referential trademark use from the.
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
7-1 Session #17B Legal Issues For The Entrepreneur.
® ® From Invention to Start-Up Seminar Series University of Washington The Legal Side of Things Invention Protection Gary S. Kindness Christensen O’Connor.
GENERAL ALBANIAN PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS OFFICE Sub-regional seminar on the commercialization and enforcment of intellectual property rights.
PATENT OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA Experience, Good Practices and Examples of Successful Nation Branding PATENT OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
SAREE AONGSOMWANG Foundation for Consumers, Thailand.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. AN OVERVIEW TRADEMARKS DESIGNS COPYRIGHT UTILITY PATENT UTILITY MODEL IP & ENFORCEMENT - HOW SWAROVSKI HANDLES CONTENT.
Linking Intellectual Property Rights to Drug Registration: Practices and Experiences Jose Maria A. Ochave, Esq. Philippine Judicial Academy Seminar on.
Baker & McKenzie Presented by Gabriela Vendlova 3 December 2002 Intellectual Property Rights: Importance of Trademark Protection in the Digital World.
INTERNATIONAL PATENT, TRADEMARK & LAW OFFICE
Yoon-Sun Cho, Protection of IP Brand & Technology May 29, Global Summit of Women.
THE UK EXPERIENCE RELATED TO ESCITALOPRAM seeking clarity in the EU interest IS THE UK’S REFERRAL TO CHMP UNDER ARTICLE 31 OF DIRECTIVE 2001/83 LEGITIMATE?
Oppositions and enforcement related to the European Community Trademarks - practical issues Markpatent Seminar, Ahmedabad, February 2010.
2013 IP Scholars Roundtable Drake University, April 12-13, 2013 Trademark Law and the Public Domain Prof. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird.
Practical Aspects of IP Arbitration: Improving the negotiating position Olav Jaeger September 14, 2009.
Chapter 17-Intellectual Property Protection Intellectual Property Rights  There are various forms of Intellectual property rights (IP rights) and they.
Appeals in patent examination and opposition in Germany Karin Friehe Judge, Federal Patent Court, Munich, Germany.
Chinese Foreign Trade Law Jiaxiang Hu Professor of Law, School of Law, SJTU.
MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF TRADEMARKS.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Objective Intellectual Property Defined A product resulting from human creativity, an original work fixed in a tangible medium.
Trademark Prosecution Luncheon August 21, USPTO – Enhanced Assignment Filing New Conveyance Types –Entity conversion –Merger and change of name.
TRADE MARKS: LATEST EU CASE LAW ON ENFORCEMENT By Annick Mottet Haugaard Attorney at law, 2nd Vice President ECTA International Baltic Conference on Intellectual.
© Melanie Fiedler, Attorney at law 2005 Sofia The Community Trade Mark The functions of a trade mark distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking.
FABRIZIO MONCALVO Case analysis. Case Analysis  Where the services of an intermediary, such as an operator of a website, have been used by a third party.
Prentice Hall © PowerPoint Slides to accompany The Legal Environment of Business and Online Commerce 4E, by Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 8 Intellectual.
The Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks Kiev March Noëlle Moutout Assistant Legal Officer.
WELCOME TO ALL DELEGATES WELCOME TO ALL DELEGATES By Dr. S. N. Maity Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks Office of The Controller General.
1 LETTER of C ONSENT in JA P AN Fumihiko HIROSE HIROSE Int’l Patent & Trademark.
1 Session 1 Perspective for More National Space Legislation - Report of the Rapporteur - Dr. Michael Gerhard, DLR Project 2001 Plus Symposium, Cologne,
SMEs Division Intensive Presentation of IP PANORAMA Eusloo Seo Counsellor Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Division World Intellectual Property Organization.
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
AIPLA ANNUAL MEETING Joint Committee Meeting (Corporate Practice) (International & Foreign Law)
Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Officewww.ipo.gov.uk UK EXAMINATION SYSTEM: RELATIVE GROUNDS EXAMINATION Mark Jefferiss.
Keep Secure Your Creative Work with Copyright Registration.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 29 – Customs union Bilateral screening:
creativecommons.org/Version4
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
“GOODS IN TRANSIT - THE EUROPEAN (EU) EXPERIENCE”
INFORMATION SESSION ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
Disclosure of designs under the CDR
International IP Roundtable UNLV, 8 April Seizure of Goods in Transit
The OHIM Sabina Rusconi, institutional affairs and external relations department, OHIM Roving Seminar on the Conmunity Trade Mark System in China,
بسمه تعالی کارگاه ارزشیابی پیشرفت تحصیلی
Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Presentation transcript:

Generic marks – proofs demonstrating that the activity of the holder is preventing the trade mark from becoming a generic term M.Radulova R.Trenkova Patent Office of the Republic of Bulgaria Alicante, June 2009

National law provision Art. 25 (1) 2 Any party may request revocation of a registration if in consequence of acts or inactivity of the proprietor the mark has become a common name for the product or service in respect of which it is registered. Art. 25 (1) 2 Any party may request revocation of a registration if in consequence of acts or inactivity of the proprietor the mark has become a common name for the product or service in respect of which it is registered.

Request for revocation TRADEMARK TRADEMARK ФАСАГЕН ФАСАГЕН (FASAGEN) (FASAGEN) GOODS External wall paints (class 2)

Proofs by the holder Printed advertisements accompanied by the indication that it is a registered trade mark Printed advertisements accompanied by the indication that it is a registered trade mark Advertisements in the Internet Advertisements in the Internet Measures for preventing infringement of the mark by third parties (warning letters, invitations for suspension of the infringement) Measures for preventing infringement of the mark by third parties (warning letters, invitations for suspension of the infringement) Administrative procedures against the infringement before the BPO Administrative procedures against the infringement before the BPO

Decision of the Office Request for revocation rejected The Office found out that the presented proofs were enough to demonstrate the lack of cause- consequence correlation between the becoming of the mark a common name and the activity or inactivity of the holder

Request for revocation TRADEMARKASPIRIN GOODS A pharmaceutical product (class 5)

Proofs by the holder Product packagings bearing the mark with circled letter R alongside it Product packagings bearing the mark with circled letter R alongside it Printed advertisements Printed advertisements Dictionaries of foreign words in Bulgarian language containing the word “aspirin” with warning that it is a registered trade mark Dictionaries of foreign words in Bulgarian language containing the word “aspirin” with warning that it is a registered trade mark Newspaper articles containing explanation that ASPIRIN is a registered trade mark but not a common name Newspaper articles containing explanation that ASPIRIN is a registered trade mark but not a common name

Decision of the Office Request for revocation rejected The Office concluded that in this case the holder has proved his adequate activities to prevent the mark for becoming generic The Office concluded that in this case the holder has proved his adequate activities to prevent the mark for becoming generic

Questions - national offices practice What kind of proofs are relevant and demonstrating that the activity of the trademark holder has directed to prevent the mark from becoming a generic term? What kind of proofs are relevant and demonstrating that the activity of the trademark holder has directed to prevent the mark from becoming a generic term? Do the other offices have a list of relevant and acceptable proofs concerning that kind of cases? Do the other offices have a list of relevant and acceptable proofs concerning that kind of cases?

Thank you for your kind attention!