Western Washington Hydrology Model Version 3 AWRA Washington Section January 2007 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Infiltration Trenches Dave Briglio, P.E. MACTEC Mike Novotney Center for Watershed Protection.
Advertisements

UW LID Workshop Permeable Pavement Modeling June 2008 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Simplified Sizing Tool for LID Practices in western Washington Alice Lancaster, PE Herrera Environmental Consultants.
LID Development Multiple Systems
LID and Stormwater Technical Resource Center Update County Road Administration Board November 3,
& Community Design LSU Green Laws Research Project Green Laws Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry EBR Parish Tree And Landscape Commission Louisiana.
UW LID Workshop Bioretention Flow Control Modeling May 2008
Leah Johanson, Water Environment Services
INLAND EMPIRE ASCE & APWA LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) SEMINAR INLAND EMPIRE ASCE & APWA LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT (LID) SEMINAR LID FACILITY DESIGN Prepared.
Seattle Stormwater Runoff Remediation by Jimmy Mounivong.
Low Impact Development Overview  Alternative to end of pipe approach to SWM  Maintain hydrologic function of local ecosystem  Treat stormwater close.
Using Rainwater to Grow Livable Communities Sustainable Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs)
Stormwater Management
SLIDE 1 Sustainable Stormwater Management May 6, 2015 Blue Highways: Transportation and Stormwater Management in Virginia Ginny Snead, PE Richmond Office.
Wake County Stormwater Workshop Guidance on the New Stormwater Ordinance and Design Manual August 29, 2006.
Green Roof Hydrology by Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Joe Brascher Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. Mill Creek, WA.
Western Washington Hydrology Model Version 3 Vancouver, WA, Workshop October 17, 2007 PM.
HYDROLOGIC COMPUTER MODELING Washington Hydrology Society March 2006 Joe Brascher, President Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
SDHM Hydromodification Overview
Western Washington Hydrology Model Version 3
Stormwater Infrastructure for Water Quality Management Dr. Larry A. Roesner, P.E. CE 394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology University of Texas, Austin April 8,
Things that Happened Before You were Born (The earth and SWMM were created) a story by Dr. Larry A. Roesner, Ph.D.,P.E. based (loosely*) on biblical quotes.
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
Bernie Engel Purdue University. Low-Impact Development (LID) An approach to land development to mimic the pre-development site hydrology to: 1)Reduce.
SUSTAIN Pilot Study April 25, 2012 Curtis DeGasperi King County
HYDROMODIFICATION: AN INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW Presented by Jeffrey Haltiner, Ph.D., P.E. Philip Williams & Associates, Ltd. San Francisco, CA May2006.
Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. Providing software and consulting services to solve hydrology and stormwater problems throughout the world.
STEP 3: SITING AND SIZING STORM WATER CONTROLS Section 6.
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods by Marty Wanielista, Josh Spence, and Ewoud Hulstein Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
Bay Area Hydrology Model Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Joe Brascher Shanon White Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Stormwater 101 Ohio Lake Erie Commission Best Local Land Use Practices Kirby Date, AICP.
ODOT 2015 Geo-Environmental Conference
Department of Public Works NPDES Low Impact Development and Green Streets Resolutions City Council August 17, 2015.
Discussion of Proposed MS4 Permit Design Standards Language.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Dan Cloak, P.E. Presentation to the San Diego Region Co-permittees Hydromodification Workgroup December 6, 2006 Contra.
Urban Stormwater Retrofit Friendship Park – Winchester, VA K. Choi, K. Davis, and D. Laird Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech Introduction Exposed.
Application of GIS and Terrain Analysis to Watershed Model Calibration for the CHIA Project Sam Lamont Robert Eli Jerald Fletcher.
Seattle’s Testing and Application of Low Impact Development BMPs in WWHM3 July 2006 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Why are we here today? To discuss the challenges we face in meeting NPDES Phase II minimum requirements for stormwater control. The NPDES program requires.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Dan Cloak Presentation to the Citizens Advisory Committee November 13, 2006 Options for implementing new Phase II.
VOLUME CONTROL using Inter-Event Dry Periods Stormwater Management Academy UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA.
Hydrograph Modification Management in Contra Costa County Dan Cloak, P.E. Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
Term Project Presentation CE 394K.2 Hydrology Presented by Chelsea Cohen Thursday, April 24, 2008.
Horsley Witten Group, Inc. Stormwater Management and Elements of Low Impact Development Protecting Our Water Resources – An Ecological Approach to Land.
Low impact development strategies and techniques jennifer j. bitting, pe the low impact development center, inc. june 2008.
Low Impact Development for Compliance with NPDES Treatment and Hydrograph Modification Management Requirements in Contra Costa County Tom Dalziel, Assistant.
Why Single-Event Modeling Doesn’t Work for LIDs presented at Stormcon 2009 Anaheim, CA August 2009 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
PSGB Ecosystem Conference The Effectiveness of LIDs in Reducing Stormwater Runoff February 9, 2009 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Western Washington Hydrology Model 2005 AWRA Annual Conference Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Joe Brascher Shanon White Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
State Board Modeling Needs and Interests Eric Berntsen, PH, CPESC, CPSWQ State Water Resources Control Board CWEMF Hydrology and Watershed Modeling Workshop.
Lisa Hair, PE, USEPA 2012 USACE Silver Jackets Workshop.
Kitsap County Department of Public Works CRAB – November 04, 2015 Bioretention Stormwater BMP Benson Burleson Design Engineer
Hydromodification Compliance in the Bay Area
Clear Creek Solutions, Inc. LID Hydrology and Hydraulics Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
ASCE LID Conference LID Analysis Considerations in Western Washington November 17, 2008 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
WWHM3 LID Stormwater Modeling Snohomish County August 2006 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Gar Creek in Huntersville LID Requirements in Mecklenburg County What Is The Goal? Why Is It Necessary? Where Is It Required? How Does It Work?
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
SWPPP: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Creating/Implementing a Plan for Compliance.
Low Impact Development Practices. What is Low Impact Development (LID)? LID is an approach to land development (or re- development) that works with nature.
Construction of On-Site Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Facilities Dan Cloak, P.E. Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
L-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation
L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller
PENNSYLVANIA STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MANUAL
Northern California LID Hydrology and Hydraulics
Kickoff example Create a new file
Intro MIDS Calculator Use
Reducing Stormwater with Trees and Native Plants
Doug Beyerlein, P.E., Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

Western Washington Hydrology Model Version 3 AWRA Washington Section January 2007 Doug Beyerlein, P.E. Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.

Western Washington Hydrology Model Version 3 This presentation was given by Doug Beyerlein at the AWRA Washington Section meeting at Pyramid Ale House restaurant in Seattle on January 24, © 2007 Clear Creek Solutions, Inc.

Clear Creek Solutions’ Hydrology Expertise Clear Creek Solutions, Inc., provides complete range of hydrologic and stormwater modeling services. Clear Creek specializes in continuous simulation hydrologic modeling. We have 30+ years of experience modeling complex hydrologic and stormwater problems. We created WWHM3 for Washington State Department of Ecology and are adapting it to model San Francisco Bay Area watersheds and facilities. We teach WWHM and HSPF workshops.

Presentation Introduction WWHM Background and Theory WWHM and HSPF WWHM3 Standard and PRO WWHM3 LID Modeling Applications in Other Regions of the Country Questions & Answers

WWHM Introduction Developed for the State of Washington Department of Ecology. Project Manager: Dr. Foroozan Labib Department of Ecology PO Box Olympia, WA (360)

WWHM Introduction Developed for the 19 counties of western Washington. Part of Ecology’s Stormwater Management Manual

WWHM Introduction WWHM3 Standard is available free from the Washington State Department of Ecology web site:

WWHM Background and Theory Washington State Department of Ecology’s Stormwater Management Manual updated in 2005 to comply with:  Federal Clean Water Act (NPDES Phase I and II)  Federal Endangered Species Act  State Water Pollution Control Act

WWHM Background and Theory Ecology’s Stormwater Management Manual  Specifies a flow duration standard  Requires the use of Western Washington Hydrology Model (WWHM) or equivalent

WWHM Background and Theory Flow duration standard: based on erosive flows. Erosive flow range: ½ of the 2-year to the 50-year

WWHM Background and Theory Flow Duration Analysis: Percent of time the flow exceeds a specific value. Requires continuous simulation hydrology to compute flow duration.

WWHM Background and Theory Continuous simulation hydrology models the entire hydrologic cycle for multiple years. Stormwater runoff = surface runoff + interflow.

Where the rain goes: Forest Impervious Evapotranspiration 0% 100% Surface Runoff Interflow Groundwater/Base Flow Land use development

WWHM Capabilities WWHM uses continuous simulation hydrology to compute stormwater runoff for both predevelopment and post-development conditions. Predevelopment Post-development

WWHM Capabilities  WWHM continuous simulation computations from HSPF (included in WWHM software).  HSPF runs in the background with calibrated parameter values and local meteorological data.  HSPF sponsored and funded by EPA and USGS.

How WWHM/HSPF works  Drainage areas are divided into pervious land segments based on soil, vegetation, and land slope and impervious land segments.  Pervious and impervious segments are linked to conveyance pathways (pipes, ditches, ponds, streams, rivers, lakes, etc.)  Historic rainfall and evaporation are used as input.

How WWHM/HSPF works  The entire water cycle is modeled on an hourly or shorter time step for multiple years.  The model computes changes in soil moisture, evapotranspiration, and runoff every time step.  Three types of runoff:  surface runoff  interflow  groundwater/base flow

How WWHM works  Calibrated parameter values are built into WWHM (different calibrated parameter values are used for different climatic regions).  Local precipitation and evaporation data are included in WWHM.

How WWHM works  User locates project on county map, inputs pre- and post-development land use, and proposed mitigation measure(s).  Predevelopment and mitigated flows are compared at Point of Compliance (POC).  Mitigated flows are not allowed to exceed flow duration standards.

How WWHM works  User outputs report file and project file.  Output files can be submitted to the permitting agency for approval.  Permitting agency can load project file and rerun analysis, if needed.  Report file summarizes input data and output results.

How WWHM works  Guidance/help is provided by  User Manual  Training Workshops  CCS Project Book*  Tech Support* * Go to for more details.

WWHM Version 3: Goal: give the user greater flexibility and options:  High groundwater element  Lateral flow between basins  More elements  More output options  New LID options

WWHM Version 3: Version 3 projects have no drainage area size limitations: entire watersheds can be modeled. Version 3 can be customized to local jurisdictions (e.g., City of Bellingham, City of Seattle)

WWHM3 Standard: 14 elements: 1.basin 2.trapezoidal pond 3.tank 4.lateral pervious basin (NEW) 5.high groundwater/wetland (NEW) 6.vault 7.open channel (NEW) 8.time series (NEW) 9.lateral impervious basin (NEW) 10.gravel trench bed (NEW) 11.sand filter 12.flow splitter (IMPROVED) 13.irregular-shaped pond 14.stage-storage-discharge table

WWHM3 PRO: WWHM3 Standard plus:  user selected time step (5 minutes to one hour)  tagged flow routing  additional elements  culverts  green roofs  landscape swales/bioretention/ rain gardens  SWMM routing connection  GIS land use connection

WWHM3 PRO: SWMM routing connection

WWHM3 PRO: GIS connection

WWHM3 LID Modeling Green/vegetated/eco-roof

WWHM Green Roof Modeling Study performed for Seattle Public Utilities Green roof modeled: Portland Hamilton Building Data provided by Portland BES

WWHM Green Roof Modeling Seattle Green Roof Frequency Reduction Return Period (years)Reduction 224% 520% 1018% 2516% 5015% 10015%

WWHM Green Roof Modeling Seattle Roof Flow Duration Comparison Conventional Runoff Green Roof Runoff

WWHM Green Roof Modeling Seattle Roof Peak Runoff Comparison

WWHM Rain Garden Modeling Seattle Bioretention Swales

WWHM Rain Garden Modeling Seattle Bioretention Swales

WWHM Rain Garden Modeling Native Soil Amended Soil (1-3 layers) Weir and vertical orifice outlet Underdrain (optional)

Rain Garden Modeling Seattle Rain Garden Frequency Reduction Return Period (years)Reduction 266% 563% 1064% 2566% 5067% 10069%

WWHM Rain Garden Modeling Stormwater volume reduction:

Applications in Other Regions of the County Bay Area Hydrology Model (BAHM), California Edwards Aquifer Hydrology Model, Texas

Bay Area Hydrology Model Developed for: Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program San Mateo Countywide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program

BAHM Residential development:

BAHM – WWHM Differences: Flow control standard: BAHM: 10% of 2-yr to 10-yr WWHM: 50% of 2-yr to 50-yr Pre-development standard: BAHM: existing land use WWHM: forest Water quality standard: BAHM: 48-hr retention WWHM: 91% treatment

Edwards Aquifer: Major water supply for San Antonio-Austin, TX Watersheds:  Blanco  Frio-Dry Frio  Sabinal  Sabinal-Medina  Medina  Medina-Cibolo  Cibolo  Guadalupe  Nueces

Edwards Aquifer Watershed Topography

Edwards Aquifer Sabinal watershed: Compute recharge (based on 50-year historic precipitation record)

Edwards Aquifer Evaluate changes in annual recharge:

Edwards Aquifer Evaluate: Vegetation management impacts Precipitation augmentation Additional in-stream recharge structures Software to be completed in 2007.

Acknowledgements Seattle Public Utilities and Washington State University provided the funding for this modeling of green roofs and rain gardens. The City of Portland, Oregon, Bureau of Environmental Services (BES) provided the Hamilton green roof monitoring data.

WWHM Future Enhancements  additional low impact development/ source BMPs  HSPF water quality  3-D graphical interface  your ideas?

WWHM3 Questions? Contact: Doug Beyerlein Joe Brascher Or go to: