FC-PI-5, FC-FS-3, and 16GFC bob.nixon@emulex.com T11/09-506v2 - 10/27/2009 FC-PI-5, FC-FS-3, and 16GFC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEA-ME-WE 4 Prepaired By Md. Faisal Copyright © Md. Faisal 2009
Advertisements

Composition Program 09 Grading Workshop Conclusion Ellen Barton Director of Composition
COMP 110: Introduction to Programming Tyler Johnson Mar 23, 2009 MWF 11:00AM-12:15PM Sitterson 014.
COMP 110: Introduction to Programming Tyler Johnson Feb 4, 2009 MWF 11:00AM-12:15PM Sitterson 014.
Covert Barcodes handle on-the-spot Brand and Document Authentication Information Management Institute Conference on Security Printing 11/18/2009 Read what.
1 UNIT I (Contd..) High-Speed LANs. 2 Introduction Fast Ethernet and Gigabit Ethernet Fast Ethernet and Gigabit Ethernet Fibre Channel Fibre Channel High-speed.
Tax Year TYPES OF PAYMENTS 1040 PG 2 Line & 68 Federal income tax withheld from W-2s, 1099s Estimated payments & $ applied from prior year.
Virtual Trunk Protocol
Ethernet Switch Features Important to EtherNet/IP
Information Security of Embedded Systems : Embedded Systems Design Prof. Dr. Holger Schlingloff Institut für Informatik und Fraunhofer FIRST.
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission July Cyber Security and Reliability Standards Regis F. Binder Director, Division of Logistics & Security Federal.
Joe Kwak, InterDigital 1 Submission PSNI: New PHY Measurement a subjective, comparative measurement to support network management Joe Kwak InterDigital.
9/15/03IEEE Singapore Meeting1 FER: Do We Need It? Joseph Cleveland Anna Tee Jin Weon Chang Samsung Spetember 15, 2003 IEEE C /83r1.
802.1H Kevin Nolish Michael Wright H Project The reason for the update of 802.1H is, primarily, mandated reaffirmation of the standard. As part.
Submission Page 1 January 2002 doc.: IEEE 802.RR-02/018A-d1 Andrew Myles, Cisco Systems Report of ad hoc group relating to DFS and JPT5G proposal Andrew.
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
Power Control. Objectives –Understand the purpose of Power Control in CDMA. –Identify the different types of Power Control mechanisms used in CDMA »Reverse.
Satoshi NARIKAWA NTT (G.8032 Acting Co-editor)
Vithala R. Rao Cornell University UTD-FORMS Conference, /15/20091.
Distributed Information System December 7, 20091Alvin MACCHIONE - Rémy JAVELLE.
Click to continue Network Protocols. Click to continue Networking Protocols A protocol defines the rules of procedures, which computers must obey when.
1 Cathay Life Insurance Ltd. (Vietnam) 27/11/20091.
Doc.: IEEE /1125r0 Submission September 2010 Marc Emmelmann, Fraunhofer FOKUSSlide 1 How does the (new) Fast Initial Link Set- Up PAR address.
Doc.: IEEE /0785r0 Submission July 2009 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Investigation of PA Model Sample Rate for TGac Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0578r0 Submission 2008 May Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Forwarding in mesh containing MPs in power save Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0657r1 May 2012 Panasonic Slide 1 Target PER at receiver sensitivity power level for use case 1g Date: Authors:
X.25 PROTOCOL Presented by : EFA, Daniel Jr. G. VERGARA, Jonvon.
SM-HBA-2: Integrating FCoE T11/09-530v0 1 October 2009 NOTE: The pdf is unclear on a few slides. Please use the ppt if possible.
Draining the Virtualization Swamp T11/08-554v0 2 October 2008 Bob Nixon
FC-PI-5, FC-FS-3, and 16GFC T11/09-506v0 - 8/27/2009 FC-PI-5, FC-FS-3, and 16GFC.
Doc.: IEEE /1123r0 Submission September 2010 Zhu/Kim et al 1 Date: Authors: [TXOP Sharing for DL MU-MIMO Support]
Transmission of IP Packets over Ethernet over IEEE draft-riegel-16ng-ip-over-eth-over Max Riegel
Slide 1 VCL-SafeComm 16 T1 Links (48 T1 Ports) Copyright : Valiant Communications Limited Slide 1 Updated: April, 2010 Telecom Transmission Solutions.
Panel 3D = XML file pointer 08/09/20091 LHCb calorimeter meeting (jean-luc PANAZOL)
LAN Protocol Architecture
CompTIA Network+ Chapter 2
Protocols and the TCP/IP Suite Chapter 4 (Stallings Book)
CSCI 4550/8556 Computer Networks Comer, Chapter 5: Local Asynchronous Communication (RS-232)
Local Asynchronous Communications. Bit-wise data transmission Data transmission requires: Encoding bits as energy Transmitting energy through medium Decoding.
Introduction to IT and Communications Technology Justin Champion C208 – 3292 Ethernet Fundamentals CE
Protocols and the TCP/IP Suite
Chapter 5: Local Asynchronous Communication 1. Bit-wise data transmission 2. Asynchronous communication 3. Sending bits with electric current 4. Standard.
CWNA Guide to Wireless LANs, Second Edition Chapter Four IEEE Physical Layer Standards.
Network Layer: Internet Protocol.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public ITE PC v4.0 Chapter 1 1 Ethernet Network Fundamentals – Chapter 9.
1 Layer 2 Technologies Honolulu Community College Cisco Academy Training Center Semester 1 Version
Communication Architecture and Network Protocol Layering Networks and Protocols Prepared by: TGK First Prepared on: Last Modified on: Quality checked by:
TCP/IP Protocol Suite Suresh Kr Sharma 1 The OSI Model and the TCP/IP Protocol Suite Established in 1947, the International Standards Organization (ISO)
Powerpoint Templates Data Communication Muhammad Waseem Iqbal Lecture # 07 Spring-2016.
Coding and Error Control
Lecture 4 Error Detecting and Correcting Techniques Dr. Ghalib A. Shah
Chapter 13 Wired LANs: Ethernet
Protocols and the TCP/IP Suite
A Wireless LAN technologies IEEE
SB1000 CID 6304 PHY-CCARESET.request
Configuring EtherChannels and Switch Troubleshooting
Local Asynchronous Communication (RS-232)
Direct Attached Storage and Introduction to SCSI
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
Chapter 3: Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) Model
Network Protocol Layers
ECEN “Internet Protocols and Modeling”
A function f is increasing on an open interval I if, for any choice of x1 and x2 in I, with x1 < x2, we have f(x1) < f(x2). A function f is decreasing.
SU-MIMO Type for Group Addressed Frames
Mapping the Bluetooth Specification to IEEE
SAS-3 Transmitter Training Review
Controller Area Networks (CAN)
SAS-3 Transmitter Training Review
Presentation transcript:

FC-PI-5, FC-FS-3, and 16GFC bob.nixon@emulex.com T11/09-506v2 - 10/27/2009 FC-PI-5, FC-FS-3, and 16GFC

Some have been handled in FC-PI-x for years. Some are new for 16GFC. Hot Potatoes An earlier version of this presentation described several things for which FC-FS-3 references details or specific values in FC-PI-x. Some have been handled in FC-PI-x for years. Some are new for 16GFC. This presentation attempts to clarify the new ones. It also corrects some names to better match IEEE 802.3:2008 terminology T11/09-506v2 - 10/27/2009 FC-PI-5, FC-FS-3, and 16GFC

Selection of Transmission Code “An FC-0 standard (e.g., FC-PI-5) may specify the use of the 8B/10B transmission code as its frame transfer transmission code.” (FC-FS-3 5.2.1) “An FC-0 standard (e.g., FC-PI-5) may specify the use of the 64B/66B transmission code as its frame transfer transmission code.” (FC-FS-3 5.3.1) This is new, there was never a choice before. An implementation of a variant shall use 8B/10B if an FC-0 standard (e.g., FC-PI-4) does not specify a frame transfer transmission code for that variant. T11/09-506v2 - 10/27/2009 FC-PI-5, FC-FS-3, and 16GFC

If Transmission Code is 64B/66B “An FC-0 standard (e.g., FC-PI-5) may specify the use of the Transmitter Training Signal….” (FC-FS-3 5.4.1) FC-PI-5 should select or reject for each 64B/66B physical variant Transmitter Training Signal Or it may simply say that all 64B/66B variants shall use the Transmitter Training Signal. T11/09-506v2 - 10/27/2009 FC-PI-5, FC-FS-3, and 16GFC

If Speed Negotiation is supported… “For any variant that does not specify a Transmitter Stabilization Time, including those specified in FC-PI-2, FC-PI-3, FC-PI-4, 10GFC, the Transmitter Stabilization Time shall be one millisecond.” (FC-FS-3 8.6.6) “For any variant that does not specify a Receiver Stabilization Time, including those specified in FC-PI-2, FC-PI-3, FC-PI-4, 10GFC, the Receiver Stabilization Time shall be one millisecond.” (FC-FS-3 8.6.6) FC-PI-5 should specify for each physical variant that can not stabilize a signal in one millisecond: Receiver Stabilization Time Transmitter Stabilization Time T11/09-506v2 - 10/27/2009 FC-PI-5, FC-FS-3, and 16GFC

If Transmitter Training Signal is supported “Transmitter training negotiates either or both of two capabilities between the transmitters and receivers connected by a link: a) values of transmitter equalizer coefficients that result in most reliable signal reception across the link; and b) use of FEC.” (FC-FS-3 9.2) FC-PI-5 should select, reject, or make optional for each physical variant that supports the Transmitter Training Signal training of transmitter equalizer coefficients Forward Error Correction (FEC ) T11/09-506v2 - 10/27/2009 FC-PI-5, FC-FS-3, and 16GFC

If training of transmitter equalizer coefficients is supported “The use of each coefficient is specified by FC-PI-x for each FC-0 variant that supports transmitter training. Each coefficient in the model has a minimum value, a maximum value, a preset value, an initialize value, and a step size by which it may be adjusted. These values are specified by FC-PI-x for each FC-0 physical variant that supports transmitter training.” (FC-FS-3 9.2) This author has recently been enlightened: the protocol for 16GFC Transmitter Training was intended to be based on the IEEE 802.3:2008 specification for the Physical Medium Dependent Sublayer and Baseband Medium, Type 10GBASE-KR PMD control function (IEEE 802.3:2008 subclause 72.6.10). T11/09-506v2 - 10/27/2009 FC-PI-5, FC-FS-3, and 16GFC

If training of transmitter equalizer coefficients is supported FC-PI-5 should specify for each physical variant that supports coefficient training, the following for coefficients 0, 1, and 2: What it does (if anything) Its minimum value Its maximum value The preset value, to which it will be set for a Preset command The initialize value, to which it will be set for an Initialize command Its step size, by which it will be adjusted for an Increment or Decrement command FC-PI-5 may decide how closely these follow IEEE 802.3. FC-PI-5 may even say some (or all?) of these parameters are vendor specific. T11/09-506v2 - 10/27/2009 FC-PI-5, FC-FS-3, and 16GFC

FC-PI-5 should specify for each variant or group of variants: Summary If: FC-PI-5 should specify for each variant or group of variants:   Whether speed negotiation is required, forbidden, or optional If Speed Negotiation is performed and Transmitter Stabilization Time is greater than 1 millisecond Transmitter Stabilization Time (see FC-FS-3 subclause 8.6.6) If Speed Negotiation is performed and Receiver Stabilization Time is greater than 1 millisecond Receiver Stabilization Time (see FC-FS-3 subclause 8.6.6) If transmission code is not 8B/10B Transmission code to use Whether to use Training Signal during link initialization If Training Signal is to be used during link initialization Whether FEC is required, forbidden, or optional Whether training of transmitter coefficients is required, forbidden, or optional If training of transmitter coefficients is performed The effects of coefficients 0, 1, and 2 The maximum values for coefficients 0, 1, and 2 The minimum values for coefficients 0, 1, and 2 The step size for adjusting the values for coefficients 0, 1, and 2 (see IEEE 802.3:2008 subclause 72.6.10.2.3.3 for guidance) The preset values for coefficients 0, 1, and 2 (see IEEE 802.3:2008 subclause 72.6.10.2.3.1 for guidance) The initialize values for coefficients 0, 1, and 2 (see IEEE 802.3:2008 subclause 72.6.10.2.3.2 for guidance) T11/09-506v2 - 10/27/2009 FC-PI-5, FC-FS-3, and 16GFC

That ought to do it Questions? T11/09-506v2 - 10/27/2009 FC-PI-5, FC-FS-3, and 16GFC