Doc.: IEEE 802.11-14/0552r1 Submission May 2014 Slide 1 IEEE 802.11 WG responses to SC6 on FDIS ballots on 802.11aa/ad/ae 13 May 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhoneemail.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0006r0 Submission March 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Intel CorporationSlide 1 What is a CA document? Notice: This document has been prepared.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0953r1 Submission November 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide TGmb Editor Report - Nov 2009 Date: Authors:
March 2010 Plenary Session Slides for Governance Review IEEE 802 Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: ec EC Date Submitted:
1 Balloting/Handling Negative Votes September 11, 2006 ASTM Training Session Bob Morgan Brynn Iwanowski.
1 Balloting/Handling Negative Votes September 22 nd and 24 th, 2009 ASTM Virtual Training Session Christine DeJong Joe Koury.
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
Doc.: VC1_ _EC_P&P_Update-opening_r0.ppt Submission EC Update on LMSC Governance Date: November 16 th, 2009 Author: Matthew Sherman 1 st Vice Chair,
Doc.: IEEE /XXXr0 Submission March, 2004 Matthew Sherman, BAE SystemsSlide 1 LMSC Policy and Procedures Update Date: March 14 th, 2005 Author:
The IEEE and International Standards Steve Mills July 2006 IEEE 802 Plenary.
High Rate 60 GHz PHY, MAC and HDMI PAL Standard Invitation to ETSI BRAN, WiMedia and JTC 1/SC 06 open review For Ecmas comments and dispositions to DISs.
Harmonized implementation of CDM Accreditation CDM-Accreditation Panel.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
The UEA House of Delegates Directing YOUR Association through the democratic process. 1.
ABC Technology Project
Doc.: IEEE /0908r1 Submission July 2013 Andrew Myles, CiscoSlide 1 IEEE 802 JTC1 SC closing report (July 13) Date: Authors:
WG Agenda and Opening Report Beijing Interim May 2014
Chapter 5 Microsoft Excel 2007 Window
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Doc.: IEEE /0144r3 Submission January 2014 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide January 2014 WG Motions Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0144r2 Submission January 2014 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide January 2014 WG Motions Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0849r1 Submission July 2014 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide 1 July Items for the LMSC EC Agenda Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0674r0 Submission June 2009 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell; Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation Slide 1 P802.11n report to EC on request for.
Doc.: ec INTL Submission to SC6 January 2014 IEEE 802Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to FDIS comments on IEEE 802.1AE and IEEE 802.1X 16 January 2014.
Doc.: Submission1 IEEE Motions in November Plenary DCN: Title: Request for EC Conditional Approval Date Submitted:
Doc.: IEEE /0564r0 Submission May 2014 Marc Emmelmann, SelfSlide 1 Results of LB 201 on TGai D2.0 Date: Authors:
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Doc.: IEEE /0054r00 Submission March 2013 Apurva N. Mody, BAE SystemsSlide 1 IEEE P Motions at the March Plenary EC Meeting IEEE P
Page 1 of 30 This process involves authorizing a company to act on behalf of the designated representative for a Crown petroleum and natural gas licence.
Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to Submission comments on IEEE 802.1AEbn 20 March 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0075r1 Submission January 2009 Jesse Walker, Intel CorporationSlide 1 JTC1 Ad Hoc January 2009 Agenda Date: Authors:
March 2015 Doc.: IEEE NNN Submission Karen Randall, Randall Consulting Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to comments on IEEE 802.1Q-2014 and IEEE 802.1Xbx-2014.
Doc.: IEEE /1454r7 Submission March 2013 IEEE 802 JTC1 Standing Committee Proposal for SC6 contribution process 20 March 2013 Haasz et al, IEEESlide.
Submission February 2014 Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to FDIS comments on IEEE 802.1AR 20 March 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhone .
Submission February 2014 Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to FDIS comments on IEEE 802.1AR 19 February 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhone .
Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to FDIS comments on IEEE 802.1AS 20 March 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhone .
Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to FDIS comments on IEEE 802.1AS 18 March 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhone .
DICOM to ISO-DICOM Report to joint ISO TC215/WG2 – DICOM WG10 meeting January 24, 2004, San Diego.
March 2015 Submission Proposed IEEE 802 Response to comments on IEEE 802.1AE/FDAmd 1 and FDAmd 2 ballots Berlin, March 2015 Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0795r2 Submission July 2014 The China NB contributed a variation on the “usual comment” on IEEE China NB comment on
Doc.: IEEE /0456r0 Submission April 2008 Jesse Walker, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Geneva JTC1/SC6 Liaison Report Date: Authors:
Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to FDIS comments on IEEE 802.1AB 20 March 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0858r0 Submission July 2008 Jesse Walker, Intel CorporationSlide 1 IEEE 802 Presentation for Xi’an Meeting Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE a Submission Sept 2004 Tom Siep, TMS Assoicates, LLCSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /1454r0 Submission Jan 2013 IEEE 802 JTC1 Standing Committee Proposal for SC6 contribution process 15 January 2013 Haasz et al, IEEESlide.
Relevant Rules on Recirculation
September Session Chair’s Supplementary Material
IEEE 802 JTC1 Standing Committee Proposal for SC6 contribution process
EC Motions Package Authors: Date: October 2016
EC Motions Package Authors: Date: October 2016
July Plenary EC Closing Motions Package
IEEE 802 JTC1 Standing Committee Proposal for SC6 contribution process
Working Group November Plenary EC Closing Motion
Working Group November Plenary EC Closing Motion
IEEE 802 JTC1 Standing Committee Proposal for SC6 contribution process
July Plenary EC Closing Motions Package
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0xxxr0 Responses to JTC1 NBs to comments made on FDIS ballots on IEEE ac & IEEE af 17 July 2015 Authors: Name.
Procedural review of initial WG ballot on P802.1CF
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0xxxr0 Responses to JTC1 NBs to comments made on FDIS ballots on IEEE ac & IEEE af 17 July 2015 Authors: Name.
IEEE 802 JTC1 Standing Committee Proposal for SC6 contribution process
September Session Chair’s Supplementary Material
July 2010 doc.: IEEE /0xxxr0 Proposed liaison presentation to SC6 in relation to liaisons between IEEE WG and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC 9 May 2011.
January 2014 IEEE 802 Response to comments on ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 FDIS ballot of IEEE 802.1Xbx January 2016 Authors: Name Company Phone Karen.
Sponsor Ballot Comment Resolution
Overview of WG Letter Ballot Process
IEEE 802 JTC1 Standing Committee Proposal for SC6 contribution process
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 Slide 1 IEEE WG responses to SC6 on FDIS ballots on aa/ad/ae 13 May 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhone

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 This document contains the IEEE WG’s responses to the FDIS ballots on IEEE aa/ad/ae The following pages contain the IEEE WG’s responses the SC6 NBs to the FDIS ballots, undertaken according to the PSDO agreement between IEEE and ISO, on –IEEE aa –IEEE ad –IEEE ae SC6 NBs are welcome to provide any additional comments on these amendment to IEEE by sending comments to IEEE TGmc –For further details please contact the Chair of IEEE TGmc, Dorothy Stanley Individual associated with SC6 NBs are always encouraged to participate directly in the activities of the IEEE WG –For further details please contact the Chair of IEEE WG, Adrian Stephens Slide 2

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 The following pages contain the IEEE WG’s responses to the FDIS ballot on IEEE aa The FDIS ballot, undertaken according to the PSDO agreement between IEEE and ISO, on IEEE aa passed on 28 January 2014 The voting results are contained in 6N15884, and included comments from the China NB The following pages contain the IEEE WG’s responses to those comments, satisfying the process defined in 6N15606 Slide 3

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 The China NB provided comment CN.1 on IEEE aa China NB comment CN.1 on IEEE aa Since the procedural and technical concerns China NB proposed in 6N15602 still haven’t been reasonably disposed in this FDAM text, and referencing issues mentioned below exist in this text, so China NB has to vote against on this FDAM ballot. If these issues could not be disposed reasonably and this proposal would have been passing the FDAM ballot, it is regretful for China to be obliged to lose the responsibility and obligation of complying with and adopting the standard. Furthermore, China NB wishes to state for the record. Slide 4

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 IEEE WG offers a response to CN.1 on IEEE aa IEEE 802 response to CN.1 on IEEE aa IEEE 802 thanks the China NB for its carefully considered comments on the aa FDIS ballot We note that the IEEE 802 responded in 6N15647 to all comments submitted by the China NB in 6N Per the agreement in 6N15606, China NB representatives are invited to participate in the IEEE 802 comment resolution process. We have noted the comment that the China NB is “obliged to lose the responsibility and obligation of complying with and adopting the standard”. It is out of scope for IEEE 802 and therefore we will forward it to ISO Central Secretariat. Slide 5

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 The China NB provided comment CN.2 on IEEE aa China NB comment CN.2 on IEEE aa The referenced RFC 5869 is informational standard. The referenced RFC 2409, RFC 3376 are proposed standards. All of above listed RFC standards are unqualified for normative references in ISO standards. Delete the referenced RFC and related technology from the document. Slide 6

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 IEEE WG offers a response to CN.2 on IEEE aa IEEE 802 response to CN.2 on IEEE aa We note that ISO and JTC1 referencing rules allow references to informational, proposed standard and draft standard IETF RFCs IEEE 802 standards are developed according to the IEEE SA standards development process and IEEE-SA Standards Style Manual, and the PSDO agreement accepts the formatting and referencing rules of the IEEE-SA. The IEEE-SA referencing rules also allow references to informational, proposed standard and draft standard IETF RFCs As part of the normal maintenance process for IEEE 802 standards, the relevant 802 WG reviews the references to ensure that only required RFC references are included, RFC references are up to date, and normative RFC references have an appropriate status. Slide 7

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 The following pages contain the IEEE WG’s responses to the FDIS ballot on IEEE ad The FDIS ballot, undertaken according to the PSDO agreement between IEEE and ISO, on IEEE ad passed on 28 January 2014 The voting results are contained in 6N15885, and included comments from the China NB and the Switzerland NB The following pages contain the IEEE WG’s responses to those comments, satisfying the process defined in 6N15606 Slide 8

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 The China NB provided comment CN.1 on IEEE ad China NB comment CN.1 on IEEE ad Since the procedural and technical concerns China NB proposed in 6N15601 still haven’t been reasonably disposed in this FDAM text, and referencing issues mentioned below exist in this text, so China NB has to vote against on this FDAM ballot. If these issues could not be disposed reasonably and this proposal would have been passing the FDAM ballot, it is regretful for China to be obliged to lose the responsibility and obligation of complying with and adopting the standard. Furthermore, China NB wishes to state for the record. Slide 9

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 IEEE WG offers a response to CN.1 on IEEE ad Proposed IEEE 802 response to CN.1 on IEEE ad IEEE 802 thanks the China NB for its carefully considered comments on the ad FDIS ballot We note that the IEEE 802 responded in 6N15647 to all comments submitted by the China NB in 6N15601 Per the agreement in 6N15606, China NB representatives are invited to participate in the IEEE 802 comment resolution process. We have noted the comment that the China NB is “obliged to lose the responsibility and obligation of complying with and adopting the standard”. It is out of scope for IEEE 802 and therefore we will forward it to ISO Central Secretariat. Slide 10

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 The China NB provided comment CN.2 on IEEE ad China NB comment CN.2 on IEEE ad The referenced RFC 4017 is informational standard, which is unqualified for normative references in ISO standards. Delete the referenced RFC and related technology from the document. Slide 11

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 IEEE WG offers a response to CN.2 on IEEE ad IEEE 802 response to CN.2 on IEEE ad We note that ISO and JTC1 referencing rules allow references to informational, proposed standard and draft standard IETF RFCs IEEE 802 standards are developed according to the IEEE SA standards development process and IEEE-SA Standards Style Manual, and the PSDO agreement accepts the formatting and referencing rules of the IEEE-SA. The IEEE-SA referencing rules also allow references to informational, proposed standard and draft standard IETF RFCs As part of the normal maintenance process for IEEE 802 standards, the relevant 802 WG reviews the references to ensure that only required RFC references are included, RFC references are up to date, and normative RFC references have an appropriate status. Slide 12

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 The Swiss NB provided comment CH.1 on IEEE ad Swiss NB comment CH.1 on IEEE ad In a conventional DIS or DIS fast-track ballot, the sub-sequent comments would be issued with a DISAPPROVE vote, which would be turned into APPROVAL if the comments were satisfactorily resolved. The FDIS fast-track however postpones, by 2.7 of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1, such resolution to the next review of the standard. Furthermore, affirmative votes to an FDIS cannot be made conditional on the resolution of any comments. However, we wish ISO/IEC to endorse this standard and to subjugate it under its maintenance procedures as set forth in F.2.4 of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1, and Sc6 Graz Resolution Therefore our vote is APPROVE, unconditionally. Our comments are submitted under the late option of 6N15606 to be processed by the IEEE (sic) WG as soon as possible, i.e. either during comment resolution on any subsequent draft or during normal maintenance. Slide 13

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 IEEE WG offers a response to CH.1 on IEEE ad IEEE 802 response to CH.1 on IEEE ad IEEE 802 thanks the Switzerland NB for its carefully considered comments on the IEEE ad FDIS ballot, and assures the Switzerland NB that its comments will be processed in a timely manner by the IEEE WG using the mechanisms defined and agreed in N Swiss NB representatives are invited to participate in the maintenance process for IEEE ad. Slide 14

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 The Swiss NB provided comment CH.2 on IEEE ad Swiss NB comment CH.2 on IEEE ad As an Amendment to ISO/IEC/IEEE this specification must comply to the ISO Directives, Part 2, “Rules for the structure and drafting of International Standards” as well as the JTC 1 Supplement and the relevant JTC 1 Standing Documents. It is desirable that the next revision of the specification be in line with the applicable requirements. This is a major aim of our comments. We will be pleased to find resolutions in fruitful collaboration with the IEEE WG. Slide 15

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 IEEE WG offers a response to CH.2 on IEEE ad IEEE 802 response to CH.2 on IEEE ad IEEE 802 standards are developed according to the IEEE SA standards development process and IEEE-SA Standards Style Manual, and the PSDO agreement accepts the formatting and referencing rules of the IEEE-SA. Slide 16

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 The Swiss NB provided comment CH.3 on IEEE ad Swiss NB comment CH.3 on IEEE ad NIST is not an ARO, therefore the reference does not comply with JTC1 Standing Document N5. Chose one of the following alternative actions: –Produce an RER according to JTC1 Standing Document N5. –Reference published standards, preferably ISO/IEC standards –Incorporate technical requirements into the standard text. Slide 17

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 IEEE WG offers a response to CH.3 on IEEE ad IEEE 802 response to CH.3 on IEEE ad IEEE 802 standards are developed according to the IEEE SA standards development process and IEEE-SA Standards Style Manual, and the PSDO agreement accepts the formatting and referencing rules of the IEEE-SA. This comment has been referred to IEEE TGmc for further consideration. Slide 18

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 The Swiss NB provided comment CH.4 on IEEE ad Swiss NB comment CH.4 on IEEE ad The reference to FIPS 140 does not comply with JTC1 Standing Document N5. Choose one of the following alternative actions: –Produce an RER according to JTC1 Standing Document N5. –Reference ISO/IEC and incorporate a generic PP (Protection Profile) into the standard text. Slide 19

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 IEEE WG offers a response to CH.4 on IEEE ad IEEE 802 response to CH.4 on IEEE ad IEEE 802 standards are developed according to the IEEE SA standards development process and IEEE-SA Standards Style Manual, and the PSDO agreement accepts the formatting and referencing rules of the IEEE-SA. This comment has been referred to IEEE TGmc for further consideration Slide 20

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 The Swiss NB provided comment CH.5 on IEEE ad Swiss NB comment CH.5 on IEEE ad The phrasing of most definitions does not conform to the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2. Discard articles (“a”, “the”) at the beginning of the definition. Avoid two or more sentences. Discard Notes. Do not re-define terms (such as OID) in the scope of existing standards, but include them by normative reference. Slide 21

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 IEEE WG offers a response to CH.5 on IEEE ad IEEE 802 response to CH.5 on IEEE ad IEEE 802 standards are developed according to the IEEE SA standards development process and IEEE-SA Standards Style Manual, and the PSDO agreement accepts the formatting and referencing rules of the IEEE-SA. Slide 22

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 The following pages contain the IEEE WG’s responses to the FDIS ballot on IEEE ae The FDIS ballot, undertaken according to the PSDO agreement between IEEE and ISO, on IEEE ad passed on 28 January 2014 The voting results are contained in 6N15883, and included comments from the China NB The following pages contain the IEEE WG’s responses to those comments, satisfying the process defined in 6N15606 Slide 23

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 The China NB provided comment CN.1 on IEEE ae China NB comment CN.1 on IEEE ae Since the procedural and technical concerns China NB proposed in 6N15599 still haven’t been reasonably disposed in this FDAM text, so China NB has to vote against on this FDAM ballot. If these issues could not be disposed reasonably and this proposal would have been passing the FDAM ballot, it is regretful for China to be obliged to lose the responsibility and obligation of complying with and adopting the standard. Furthermore, China NB wishes to state for the record. Slide 24

doc.: IEEE /0552r1 Submission May 2014 IEEE WG offers a response to CN.1 on IEEE ae IEEE 802 response to CN.1 on IEEE ae IEEE 802 thanks the China NB for its carefully considered comments on the ae FDIS ballot We note that in 6N15647 the IEEE 802 responded to all comments submitted by the China NB in 6N15599 Per the agreement in 6N15606, China NB representatives are invited to participate in the IEEE 802 comment resolution process. We have noted the comment that the China NB is “obliged to lose the responsibility and obligation of complying with and adopting the standard”. It is out of scope for IEEE 802 and therefore we will forward it to ISO Central Secretariat. Slide 25