Doc.: IEEE 802.11-02/594r0 Submission September 2002 M. Benveniste & D. Chen, Avaya Labs ResearchSlide 1 PF Differentiation and EDCF/RR Mathilde Benveniste.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Doc.: IEEE /402r0 Submission July 2001 Baruch Altman, CommPrize Inc.Slide 1 H²CF: Hiperlan2 Hybrid Coordination Function; Ideas on coexistence.

Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /144 Submission March 2001 Mathilde Benveniste, AT&T Labs - ResearchSlide 1 An E-DCF Proposal Using TCMA Mathilde Benveniste AT&T Labs,

Doc.: IEEE /037 Submission January 2001 Khaled Turki et. al,Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Simulation Results for p-DCF, v-DCF and Legacy DCF Khaled.

Doc.: IEEE /037r1 Submission March 2001 Khaled Turki et. al,Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Simulation Results for p-DCF, v-DCF and Legacy DCF Khaled.

Doc.: IEEE /0338r1 Submission March 2012 Hung-Yu Wei, National Taiwan UniversitySlide 1 DeepSleep: Power Saving Mode to Support a Large Number.

Submission Page 1 August 2002 doc.: IEEE /503r0 Daryl Kaiser, Cisco Systems Radio Measurement: A Candidate Approach Daryl Kaiser (Cisco Systems)

Doc.: IEEE /214r0 Submission March 2002 Wentink, IntersilSlide 1 A simpler and better EDCF Menzo Wentink Ron Brockmann Maarten Hoeben Intersil.

Doc.: IEEE /375 Submission November 2000 Mathilde Benveniste, AT&T Labs - ResearchSlide 1 Tiered Contention, A QoS-Based Distributed Medium Access.

Doc.: IEEE /413r0 Submission S. Choi, Philips Research July 2001 Slide 1 Can EDCF Support QoS? Sunghyun Choi Philips Research-USA Briarcliff Manor,

Doc.: IEEE /214r1 Submission March 2002 Wentink, IntersilSlide 1 A simpler and better EDCF Menzo Wentink Ron Brockmann Maarten Hoeben Intersil.

Doc.: IEEE /011r1 Submission January, 2001 Wim Diepstraten, Agere Systems Slide 1 Comparing V-DCF with other EDCF proposals Wim DiepstratenAgere.

Speaker Fu-Yuan Chuang Advisor Ho-Ting Wu Date

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0xxx March 2014 Giwon Park, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Discussion on power save mode for real time traffic Date: Authors:

Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0802r0 Consideration on UL MU transmission Date: Slide 1Jinyoung Chun et. al, LG Electronics July 2014 Authors:

Doc.:IEEE /525Ar0 Submission September 2002 Mathilde Benveniste, Avaya Labs Slide 1 Simplifying Polling Mathilde Benveniste

Doc.:IEEE /223r1 Submission March 2002 J. del Prado and S. Choi, Philips Slide 1 CC/RR Performance Evaluation - Revisited Javier del Prado and.

Doc.: IEEE /080r1 Submission January 2001 Jie Liang, Texas InstrumentsSlide 1 Jie Liang Texas Instruments Incorporated TI Blvd. Dallas,

Doc. :IEEE /314r0 Submission Sai Shankar et al., Philips ResearchSlide 1 May 2002 TXOP Request: in Time vs. in Queue Size? Sai Shankar, Javier.

Doc.: IEEE /630r1a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research November 2001 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.

Doc.:IEEE /321r0 Submission May 2002 Y. Liu, et al Slide 1 CC/RR Performance Evaluation Yonghe Liu, Jin-meng Ho, Matthew B. Shoemake, Jie Liang.

Doc.: IEEE /571r0 CC/RR Model and Simulations November, 2001 Matthew Sherman & Wei Lin, AT&T Labs - ResearchSlide 1 CC/RR Model and Simulations.

Doc.: IEEE /0665r1 Submission May 2012 Anh Tuan Hoang et al (I2R) Slide 1 Prioritized PS-Polls Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0324r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel March 2010 DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0567r0 Submission Slide 1Michelle Gong, Intel May 2010 DL MU MIMO Analysis and OBSS Simulation Results Date: Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /630r4a Submission S. Choi, Philips Research January 2002 Slide 1 HC Recovery and Backoff Rules Sunghyun Choi and Javier del Prado.

Doc.: IEEE /289r0 Submission Bobby Jose,Slide 1 March 2002 CC/RR Alternatives HCF Adhoc Discussion Work Sheet V00.04 Bobby Jose, et.al

Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /1092r0 Submission Simone Merlin, Qualcomm Incorporated September 2010 Slide 1 ACK Protocol and Backoff Procedure for MU-MIMO.

Doc.: IEEE /0606r1 Submission Uplink Channel Access Date: Authors: May 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.

Achieving Quality of Service in Wireless Networks A simulation comparison of MAC layer protocols. CS444N Presentation By: Priyank Garg Rushabh Doshi.

Improving IEEE WLAN: QoS and Throughput Perspective Sunghyun Choi, Ph.D. Assistant Professor School of Electrical Engineering Seoul National University.

Doc.: IEEE /1019r1 Submission July 2011 MediaTek, Inc Slide 1 Supporting Large Number of STAs in ah Date: Authors:

WiFi Models EE 228A Lecture 5 Teresa Tung and Jean Walrand

QoS of Voice over with NS simulator Prepared by: Yoshpa Benny Shraer Alexander Vainer Albert Instructors: Prof. Reuven Cohen Mr. Itai Dabran.

Voice Traffic Performance over Wireless LAN using the Point Coordination Function Wei Supervisor: Prof. Sven-Gustav Häggman Instructor: Researcher Michael.

Providing QoS in Ad Hoc Networks with Distributed Resource Reservation IEEE802.11e and extensions Ulf Körner and Ali Hamidian.

Voice Capacity analysis over Introducing VoIP and WLans IEEE based Wireless Local Area Networks (WLANs) are becoming popular While WLANs.

More about channels In b/g, there are 11 channels, starting at 2.412GHz at a spacing of 5MHz. Each channel owns a bandwidth of 22MHz.

IEEE EDCF: a QoS Solution for WLAN Javier del Prado 1, Sunghyun Choi 2 and Sai Shankar 1 1 Philips Research USA - Briarcliff Manor, NY 2 Seoul National.

Doc.: IEEE /065r0 Submission January 2001 Brockmann, Hoeben, Wentink (Intersil) g MAC Analysis Menzo Wentink Ron Brockmann.

Submission doc.: IEEE /569r1 November 2001 M. Benveniste -- AT&T Labs, ResearchSlide 1 An Access Mechanism for Periodic Contention-Free Sessions.

Copyright © 2003 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Confidential, not for distribution to third parties. Quality of Service(QoS) in IEEE Wireless LANs: Evaluation.

Doc.: IEEE /243r1 Submission May 2001 Mathilde Benveniste, AT&T Labs - ResearchSlide 1 Proposed Changes to the e D1.0 Draft Mathilde Benveniste.

Quality of Service Schemes for IEEE Wireless LANs-An Evaluation 主講人 : 黃政偉.

Doc.: IEEE /171 Submission July 2001 Mathilde Benveniste, AT&T Labs - ResearchSlide 1 HCF Access through Tiered Contention Mathilde Benveniste.

Doc.: IEEE /457 Submission December 2000 Mathilde Benveniste, AT&T Labs - ResearchSlide 1 An Enhanced-DCF Proposal Based on ‘Tiered Contention’

Submission doc.: IEEE /599r1 November 2001 M. Benveniste -- AT&T Labs, ResearchSlide 1 ‘Cyclic Prioritized Multiple Access (CPMA): An Access Mechanism.

Copyright © 2003 OPNET Technologies, Inc. Confidential, not for distribution to third parties. Wireless LANs Session

doc.: IEEE /409r0 Submission March 2002 Mathilde BenvenisteSlide 1 Persistence Factors in EDCF Mathilde Benveniste

AIFS – Revisited Mathilde Benveniste

Balancing Uplink and Downlink Delay of VoIP Traffic in WLANs

IEEE e Performance Evaluation

An Access Mechanism for Periodic Contention-Free Sessions

September 2005 Performance Evaluation of the CCC MMAC Protocol for s Mesh Networks Date: Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared.

EDCF TXOP Bursting Simulation Results

AIFS – Revisited Mathilde Benveniste

CC/RR Performance Evaluation - Revisited

802.11e features for the enterprise

Speaker：Fu-Yuan Chuang Advisor：Ho-Ting Wu Date：

Simulation for EDCF Enhancement Comparison

EIFS Correction Mathilde Benveniste Dongyan Chen

EDCA Backoff Rules Mathilde Benveniste

QoS Provisioning for IEEE MAC Protocols

EDCF / EPCF Comparisons

Remedy to the Lost Ack Problem while Power Saving

802.11e features for the enterprise

DL MU MIMO Error Handling and Simulation Results

November 2007 Effect of Contention Window Size on ‘Express Forwarding’ Performance for Single-Channel Mesh Date: Authors: Name Address Company.

Enhanced-DCF Wireless MAC Protocol: Some Simulation Results

Infocom 2004 Speaker : Bo-Chun Wang

‘Shield’: Protecting High-Priority Channel Access Attempts

Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /594r0 Submission September 2002 M. Benveniste & D. Chen, Avaya Labs ResearchSlide 1 PF Differentiation and EDCF/RR Mathilde Benveniste Dongyan Chen Avaya Labs - Research

doc.: IEEE /594r0 Submission September 2002 M. Benveniste & D. Chen, Avaya Labs ResearchSlide 2 Our Objective Re-introduce persistence factors to help improve EDCF performance [01/409r2] RRs [QoS-Null frames] can have their own EDCF priority class with parameters: –AIFS = PIFS (with backoff >= 1) shared with other TCs –CWmin shorter than that of other TCs with same AIFS –PF smallest of all TCs

doc.: IEEE /594r0 Submission September 2002 M. Benveniste & D. Chen, Avaya Labs ResearchSlide 3 Simulation Results for PF Differentiation Related Reference: 02/525r0 Three loads considered on 11Mbps DS channel: Load1 is transmitted by polling with EDCF/RR - 8 stations engaged in two-way exchange with AP of time-sensitive bursty traffic Payload=120 bytes; inter-arrival fixed at 10 ms when ON; exponential 342 ms ON /650 ms OFF (example: silence suppressed voice) Load2 contends for the channel through EDCF – 6 stations sending high priority data uplink Payload=724 bytes; inter-arrival exponential at 8.2 ms Load3 contends for the channel through DCF – 5 stations sending low priority data uplink Payload=724 bytes; inter-arrival exponential at 8.2 ms

doc.: IEEE /594r0 Submission September 2002 M. Benveniste & D. Chen, Avaya Labs ResearchSlide 4 Simulation Scenarios The performance of EDCF/RR is compared under two scenarios that differ with respect to their PFs No PF differentiation (NPF) TC1 [for RRs] – AIFS=PIFS; CWmin=8; CWmax=8; (PF=1) TC2 [for Load 2] – AIFS=PIFS; Cwmin=16; CWmax=16; (PF=1) TC3 [for Load 3] – AIFS=DIFS; Cwmin=32; CWmax=1024; (PF=2) With PF differentiation (WPF) TC1 [for RRs] – AIFS=PIFS; CWmin=8; CWmax=2; PF=0.5 TC2 [for Load 2] – AIFS=PIFS; Cwmin=16; CWmax=1024; PF=1.5 TC3 [for Load 3] – AIFS=DIFS; Cwmin=32; CWmax=1024; PF=2 Uplink and downlink transmission through HCF in CP the two reservation mechanisms –CC/RR: CCI period=5 ms; CCOPS=50 –EDCF/RR: PF=0.5 [01/409r2]; AIFS=PIFS; Cwmin=8 is compared under two scenarios Under low load (LL) The load consists of time-critical bursty traffic (Load1, p 8) With heavy DCF load (HL) A best effort load of 5 Mpbs is added (Load2, p 8)

doc.: IEEE /594r0 Submission September 2002 M. Benveniste & D. Chen, Avaya Labs ResearchSlide 5 Load1 uplink end-to-end delay (sec) NPF without PF differentiation WPF with PF differentiation PF differentiation helps RR & uplink transmission EDCF/RR becomes more effective Without optimization

doc.: IEEE /594r0 Submission September 2002 M. Benveniste & D. Chen, Avaya Labs ResearchSlide 6 Load1 downlink end-to-end delay (sec) NPF without PF differentiation WPF with PF differentiation PF differentiation reduces contention It helps HCF channel access for downlink transmission

doc.: IEEE /594r0 Submission September 2002 M. Benveniste & D. Chen, Avaya Labs ResearchSlide 7 Load2 end-to-end delay (sec) NPF without PF differentiation WPF with PF differentiation PF differentiation reduces collisions between TC1 and TC2 It reduces delays for both TCs

doc.: IEEE /594r0 Submission September 2002 M. Benveniste & D. Chen, Avaya Labs ResearchSlide 8 Load3 end-to-end delay (sec) Without PF differentiation, low-priority traffic gets through sooner, while TC1 and TC2 transmissions collide WPF with PF differentiation NPF without PF differentiation

doc.: IEEE /594r0 Submission September 2002 M. Benveniste & D. Chen, Avaya Labs ResearchSlide 9 Conclusions PF differentiation helps EDCF/RR get the RRs out sooner and thus improves HCF performance PF differentiation reduces contention among EDCF TCs and improves EDCF performance PFs are simple to implement [01/409r2]