Michigan’s Transportation Funding Act

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WELCOME BUDGET MANAGERS AND CHIEF FISCAL OFFICERS
Advertisements

Michigan Department of Transportation Michigans Infrastructure Needs and Funding 2013.
New Public Transit Alliance (NuPTA) RIPEC Study: Transportation at a Crossroads (2002) Growing Smart with Transit: A Report of the Transit 2020 Working.
Property Tax Relief and Reform: Plan Overview Joint Select Committee on Property Tax Relief and Reform June 11, 2007.
Potential Federal and State Funding for a Madison New Start Transport 2020 Implementation Task Force June 28, 2004 Rod Clark WisDOT Bureau of Transit &
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation 1 Transportation Funding and Improving Roadway Services Delivery Transportation Advisory Commission.
County of Fairfax, Virginia 1 Department of Transportation Bus Stop Improvement Program Fairfax County Department of Transportation Transit Services Division.
Federal Grant Reimbursement System 1. Welcome In this webinar, we are going to address the following issues: Phase One: Cash Management Close-out Phase.
State Aid Programs An Introduction to: Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement.
Introduction to MnDOT Finances Transportation Finance Advisory Committee May 18,
State Aid Programs Legislative Issues - Bonding Local Bridge Replacement Program Local Road Improvement Township Sign Replacement Program.
R O A D U S E R F E E T A S K F O R C E 1 OREGONS TRANSPORTATION FUNDING CHALLENGE.
Public Transit Division Discretionary Programs Overview January 2011.
1 MAXIMIZING PUBLIC INVESTMENT Ohio Department of Transportation Highway Funding Overview Julie Ray, Deputy Director Division of Finance & Forecasting.
Chairman Charles A. Murphy June 24, FY10 GAA$27.20 Billion Governors House 2$28.20 Billion House Final$27.82 Billion Senate Final$27.94 Billion.
Issuance of the Series 2014 Capital Projects Revenue Bonds John W. Lawson Chief Financial Officer April 16, 2014.
OBJECTIVES Reduce the amount of proposed tax increase we are asking from our citizens from.35 to.25 while maintaining current service levels. Where possible.
City of Miami PROPOSED Fiscal Year 2009 BUDGET. 2 Budget Focus To prepare a structurally balanced general operating budget. To provide a budget, which.
1 Town of Colchester FY 12 Budget. 2 Current Financial Challenges Vermont and the nation are coming out of a recession Expenses rarely go down.
Municipal State Aid (MSA) Forest Lake, MN May 7, 2013.
Statewide Local Streets & Roads Needs Assessment Moraga Town Council February 24, 2010 RTPA RCTF Left click to continue.
Review of Budgeting Process. State General Fund Revenues.
Wisconsin Transportation Finance and Policy Commission Freight Rail Day 2012 October 26, 2012.
Blue Ribbon Committee on Highway Finance Act 374 of 2009.
Michigan’s Road Commissions January 25, 2006 Legacy And Mission Michigan Townships Association.
County Transportation System Governor’s Transportation Advisory Committee September 14, 2012 Abbey Bryduck, AMC Policy Analyst.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.
Iowa State Association of Counties 2013 Fall School of Instruction November 14, 2013 Stu Anderson Iowa Department of Transportation.
Current as of: Feb.06, New Economic Recovery Package: Not the Cure Federal government is working on a one-time economic recovery package Package.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan Randell Iwasaki California Department of Transportation.
2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Final Approval GVMC Board May 7, 2015.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Howard Glassman Executive Director MPOAC.
Funding the Future of Our Transportation Infrastructure Juva Barber Executive Director.
Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.
State and Federal Funding Programs for Local Agency Projects Alan Lively Local Government Section Project Delivery Specialist.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Transportation Funding Act HB Up date Radney Simpson, Assistant State Transportation Planning Administrator Presented to Georgia Association of Metropolitan.
Brenda O’Brien, P.E. Engineer of Construction Field Services.
Funding Your Journey Florida Transportation Economics 101 Presenter’s Name Organization.
Highway Program Financing July Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment.
Michigan Infrastructure and Transportation Association A STATE IN NEED.
Michigan’s Roads Crisis: Study Findings, Conclusions and Where Do We Go From Here? Best Practices Conference Rick Olson, State Representative, 55 th District.
1 North Carolina Department of Transportation Financial Overview Mark L. Foster April 20, 2010.
Metro Cities Transportation Policy Committee August 10, 2015 Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance.
MML Capital Conference MML Capital Conference Director Kirk T. Steudle, P.E. Michigan Department of Transportation March 4, 2009.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Spring 2001 Lecture 11: State and Local Funding Programs for Transit.
Finance and Infrastructure Subcommittee Financing Recommendations.
Greater Minnesota Transit. Greater MN Transit Service (2010) 59 transit agencies –6 Large Urban (more than 50,000 population) –13 Small Urban –40 Rural.
Central Kentucky Regional Policy Group Juva Barber Executive Director.
Grant Levi, NDDOT Director 1. SB Early funding passed in February  Western North Dakota  State Highways $450 million  Counties $240 million 
Transportation Funding Workshop Nova Southeastern University December 10, 2012.
Virginia Transportation Finance A Primer Presented by: Tom Boyd VDOT Asst Commissioner for Finance.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues for aviation, highways and transit Uncertain.
FY 2014 Budget / Actual Performance through November 2013 John W. Lawson Chief Financial Officer January 9, 2014.
Division of Budgets January 25, 2012 Budget and Allocation Capacity Update Presented to the California Transportation Commission Tab 13.
House Transportation Policy and Finance April 13, 2016 Tracy Hatch Deputy Commissioner Chief Financial Officer / Chief Operating Officer.
State Legislative Update and Local Projects Overview Collin County Day March 27, 2012 The Honorable Larry Phillips Chairman, House Committee on Transportation.
Intercity Passenger Rail: Legislative Policy Recommendations Astrid Glynn Chair ASC Intercity Passenger Rail Legislative Team AASHTO Standing Committee.
Transportation Management and Policy Spring Colloquium.
Pasco County “Budget 101” OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET.
Auditor of State’s Office Presentation Settlement Director Dan Bastin
Transportation Funding Deal Explained
Minnesota’s Municipal Transportation System
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Transportation Funding
Genesee County Road Commission Use of Transportation Funding
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Presentation transcript:

Michigan’s Transportation Funding Act PA 51 of 1951 Michigan’s Transportation Funding Act

Thanks & Credit House Fiscal Agency (HFA) Senior Analyst William Hamilton Author of “Act 51 Primer, A Guide to 1951 Public Act 51 and Michigan Transportation Funding” “Act 51 Primer” available on internet: http://www.house.mi.gov/hfa/PDFs/act51.pdf Full Act available on internet: http://www.michiganlegislature.org

What is PA 51 of 1951 (Act 51) Governs appropriations for Michigan’s transportation programs Directs state restricted revenue: Motor Fuel Taxes (19-cent per gallon gas tax and 15-cent per gallon diesel tax) Vehicle Registration Taxes Why restricted Motor Fuel taxes and vehicle registration taxes are constitutionally restricted to transportation purposes “after payment of necessary collection expenses” Article IX, Section 9, Michigan Constitution of 1963

PA 51 “Funds” Michigan Transportation Fund (MTF) The main collection and distribution fund for transportation revenue. State Trunkline Fund (STF) For construction/preservation of state trunkline roads, bridges, and MDOT operations. Comprehensive Transportation Fund (CTF) For public transportation agencies and operations (buses, ferries, aeronautics, AMTRAK). Local Road Agencies Local road/street programs for 83 county road commissions and 533 cities and villages

Other PA 51 Items Directs how STF and CTF funds are spent How much operating subsidy is available for transit agencies Internal Formulas for local road agencies How much can we spend on major roads vs. local roads Allocates federal highway funds between MDOT and local road agencies Requires 75% of federal highway funds to be allocated to MDOT and 25% to local road agencies Reporting and compliance requirements for MDOT and local road agencies

Historical Transportation Appropriation Levels

Transportation Revenues (FY 06-07)

Transportation Budget (FY 06-07)

Transportation Share of State Budget $3.4 Billion appropriated for state transportation programs Represents approximately 8% of the $42.4 billion total state budget There is no state General Fund (GF/GP) revenue in the transportation budget

Michigan Transportation Fund (MTF) Created in Section 10 of PA 51 90% of state generated transportation revenue is first credited to the MTF “Off the top” deductions

“Off the Top” Deductions $3 million for Rail Grade Crossing program $3 million for Local Bridge Fund debt service $.03 of gas tax for MDOT, county road commissions, cities and villages (approx. $150 million) ½ cent of gas tax for state bridges ½ cent of gas tax for Local Bridge Fund

“Off the Top” Deductions (cont.) $43 million for STF debt service 10% for CTF $5 million for Local Bridge Fund $36.775 million for Transportation Economic Development Fund (TEDF) $3.5 million for TEDF Category A grants (targeted industries) $33 million for Local Program Fund (64.2% to counties; 35.8% to cities/villages)

“Off the Top Deductions” Funds to cover the “Cost of Collection” for gas tax, diesel tax, vehicle registrations, etc Up to $20 million for Secretary of State Unlimited amount for Department of Treasury $7.25 million for FY ‘08 Unlimited amount for Department of Environmental Quality $1.24 million for FY ‘08 Unlimited amount for Legislative Auditor General $204,000 for FY ’08 AFTER ALL OF THAT: 39.1% to MDOT; 39.1% to counties road commissions; 21.8% to cities/villages

State Transportation Fund (STF) Supports MDOT administration, state trunklines, and bridges Covers 9,696 miles of roads—8% of total road miles in Michigan Carries 51% of traffic Requires 90% of STF funds are expended on preservation of the road system Requires five-year warranties on state trunkline construction projects when possible Limits MDOT administrative expense to 10% of STF funds received

County Road Commissions Receive 39.1% of MTF balance (approximately $600 million after deductions) Divided among the 83 counties based on formula (based on combination of miles owned, population, and amount vehicle registrations) Responsible for 88,961 miles of roads—74% of total road miles in Michigan Carries 31% of state’s traffic Supports county primary roads and county local roads

City & Village Roads Receive 21.8% of MTF balance (after deductions— approximately $350 million) Divided among 533 cities/villages based on formula (based on combination of population and road miles) Cities and villages are responsible for 20,914 road miles (17% of Michigan’s roads) Carries 18% of traffic

Major Roads/Local Roads & Asset Management Two types of roads with our units: Major Roads and Local Roads Initial designations were made by cities with approval by MDOT—in 1951 Streets may be moved from Major to Local by council and approval of MDOT 75% of what you receive must be used on Major Roads. You may transfer 50% of the Major Road funds to the local system if you have adopted an ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

(entire state system and 23,000 of local roads) Asset Management Was a recommendation of the Act 51 Transportation Funding Study Committee Involves the following components: Identification of performance goals—such as pavement condition Inventory of assets—such as roads and bridges Recording measurable condition assessment—such as pavement condition—in relation to goals Performance modeling—such as forecast of pavement deterioration Analysis of alternatives—which is most cost effective to repair or replace A statewide system is being implemented for the federal-aid eligible system (entire state system and 23,000 of local roads) Important to know because once city/village has adopted an Asset Management system, you can transfer more Major/Local funds between the two systems

Comprehensive Transportation Fund (CTF) Supports mass transit operations throughout the state (bus, train, airport, ferry) Allows 50% match for urban system operations (population of 100,000 +) Allows 60% match for non-urban system operations (population of less than 100,000) 10% must support intercity passenger/freight $3.6 million support “specialized services” (elderly and disabled) $8 million support Local Bus Capital matching support (used to match federal grants). MDOT is required to pay 66 2/3% of non-federal share AFTER ALL OF THAT: the balance remaining, if greater than $50 million, shall go towards Local Bus Capital matching grants

To contact Dave Worthams email dworthams@mml.org or call 517-908-0303 Questions? To contact Dave Worthams email dworthams@mml.org or call 517-908-0303