Contrasting Geodynamics of Small Cold and Giant Hot Orogens C. Beaumont R. Jamieson P. Fullsack Dalhousie University, Canada B.Lee M. Nguyen Susan Ellis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPP 1257 Modelling of the Dynamic Earth from an Integrative Analysis of Potential Fields, Seismic Tomography and other Geophysical Data M. Kaban, A. Baranov.
Advertisements

Do Plumes Exist? Gillian R. Foulger Durham University GEOL 4061 Frontiers of Earth Science.
1 Iceland: What we know and what we don’t Gillian R. Foulger Durham University, U.K. Rift to Ridge ‘07 meeting, June 2007 National Oceanography Centre,
Class 9. Mid-Ocean Ridges Dax Soule OCEAN/ESS 410.
Introduction to Planet Earth
The Cordilleran Orogen of western North America
Subduction Zone Observatory Big Geodynamics-Related Science Questions Magali Billen Department of Earth & Planetary Sciences UC Davis Collaborators & Students:
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 10 Oct 2014 Last Time: RHEOLOGY
Rheology II.
Constraints on the LAB from Seismology, Petrology and Geodynamics/Mineral Physics fundamentals/10h.html A. Bengston, M. Blondes,
Constraining crustal rheology and lower crustal flow in the Tibetan plateau Update from CIDER 2011: Dynamics of Mountain Building Marianne Karplus 1,2,
Earth’s Interior and Geophysical Properties Chapter 17.
Lecture 1-2 continued Material balance and properties Uplift and subsidence. Topography, crustal and lithospheric thicknesses, 1)LATERAL TRANSPORT OF MATERIAL.
4. Formation and Deformation of the Continental Crust
Scaling of viscous shear zones with depth dependent viscosity and power law stress strain-rate dependence James Moore and Barry Parsons.
Lecture 1-2 continued Material balance and properties Uplift and subsidence. Topography, crustal and lithospheric thicknesses, 1)LATERAL TRANSPORT OF MATERIAL.
3-D Finite Element Modeling of the Rise and Fall of the Himalayan-Tibetan Plateau Mian Liu and Youqing Yang Dept. of Geological Sciences, University of.
Active Folding within the L.A. Basin with a focus on: Argus et al. (2005), Interseismic strain accumulation and anthropogenic motion in metropolitan Los.
Geology of the Lithosphere 2. Evidence for the Structure of the Crust & Upper Mantle What is the lithosphere and what is the structure of the lithosphere?
Strength of the lithosphere: Constraints imposed by laboratory experiments David Kohlstedt Brian Evans Stephen Mackwell.
Strength of the Lithosphere
GreatBreak: Grand Challenges in Geodynamics. Characteristics of a Desirable Geodynamic Model Ties together observational constraints on current state.
Feedbacks between lithospheric stress and magmatism in incipient continental rift zones Erin Beutel *(1), Jolante van Wijk (2), Cindy Ebinger (3), Derek.
Dynamic Earth Class 17 7 March Homework, Chapter 5 Why do some rock layers fold and others break into faults when they are subjected to crustal.
Rheology rheology What is rheology ? From the root work “rheo-” Current: flow Greek: rhein, to flow (river) Like rheostat – flow of current.
Why North China is seismically active while South China remains largely aseismic? Youqing Yang & Mian Liu, Dept. of geol. University of Missouri-Columbia.
(Chapter 10 in D & R) Geometry and Kinematics: Plates.
Integrated 2-D and 3-D Structural, Thermal, Rheological and Isostatic Modelling of Lithosphere Deformation: Application to Deep Intra- Continental Basins.
Past, Present and Future What have we learned? -Mantle and Plates are an intimately coupled system -Deep mantle structure is important for the surface.
1 Rocks and the Earth’s Interior GLY Summer 2015 Lecture 6.
THE OTTAWAN OROGENY Himalayan style crustal channel?
GLOBAL TOPOGRAPHY. CONTINENTAL & OCEANIC LITHOSPHERE.
Earth's Internal Structure → Layers core mantle crust These are identified using seismic waves p-waves & s-waves.
Lab # 6 – Pg. 121 Earthquakes and the Earth’s Interior
Influence of Magma on Rift Evolution: A Modeler’s Perspective Mark D. Behn Department of Geology & Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Roger.
LATE- TO POST-OROGENIC TECTONIC PROCESSES
Rheological Controls on Strain Partioning during Continental Extension (When does E=MC 2 ?) Chris Wijns, Klaus Gessner, Roberto Weinberg, Louis Moresi.
S. Sobolev, GFZ Potsdam “Geodynamic modeling and integrative interpretation” group in the GFZ Potsdam S. Sobolev, GFZ Potsdam.
Continental Faults at Depth: the roots of the debate Ge Summary: How continents deform is a much debated question. Whether surface strain is localized.
Initiation and preservation of localized deformation in the mantle
Fault Mechanics and Strain Partitioning Session Axen, Umhoefer, Stock, Contreras, Tucholke, Grove, Janecke.
What’s Inside?. The Earth’s Core – Almost as hot as the surface of the sun (due to radioactive decay) Escape of this inner heat drives geological activity.
Testing Models for Basaltic Volcanism: Implications for Yucca Mountain, Nevada Eugene Smith, UNLV Clinton Conrad, University of Hawaii Terry Plank, Lamont.
The role of water on lithospheric strength Chester et al., 1995, A rheologic model for wet crust applied to strike-slip faults Hirth et al., An evaluation.
Laurent G. J. Montési Maria T. Zuber ASME, 1999 The importance of localization for the development of large-scale structures in the Earth’s crust.
Understanding kinematic displacement rate effects on transient thermal processes: A comparison of analytical (Ti-diffusion) and numerical (finite-element)
I. Introduction to Structural Geology -Ge106- Instructor: Jean-Philippe Avouac (301NM; caltech.edu) Teaching Assistant: Erika Swanson
Colloquium Prague, April, A Numerical Approach to Model the Accretion of Icelandic Crust Gabriele Marquart and Harro Schmeling.
2008 Bi-Lateral Workshop, under the Sino-US Earthquake Studies Protocol Boulder, Colorado, USA, November 11-14, 2008 Peter Molnar Department of Geological.
Mountain Building Orogenesis – factors that produce a mountain belt.
Eric H. Christiansen Brigham Young University
Prepared by Eric H. Christiansen Brigham Young University
Lecture Outlines Physical Geology, 12/e Plummer & Carlson Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
GEO 5/6690 Geodynamics 03 Dec 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Read for Fri 5 Dec: T&S Last Time: Buoyancy (Tectosphere) vs Rheology The isopycnic hypothesis.
PLATE TECTONICS: “SLIP SLIDIN’ AWAY”.
Earth’s Dynamic Crust and Interior
Shear heating in continental strike-slip shear zones:
CCFS-Macquarie University, University of WA, Geological Survey WA
Carla Braitenberg Department of Mathematics and Geosciences
Numerical Models of the Formation of Extensional Sedimentary Basins:
Chapter 7.
CERI/Dept. of Earth Sciences
Roland Bürgmann and Georg Dresen
Example: Polymer Extrusion
Moho line, Lithosphere, Aesthenosphere,
Accomplishments First continent-to-continent conjugate margin images.
N.Petford, A.R.Cruden, K.J.W.McCaffrey & J.-L.Vigneresse
Geophysics/Tectonics
Title: 19.1 Forces Within Earth Page #: Date: 6/6/2013
Environmental Science
Presentation transcript:

Contrasting Geodynamics of Small Cold and Giant Hot Orogens C. Beaumont R. Jamieson P. Fullsack Dalhousie University, Canada B.Lee M. Nguyen Susan Ellis New Zealand Adrian Pfiffner University of Bern, Switzerland Institute of GEOLOGICAL & NUCLEAR SCIENCES limited

GLOBE project (NOAA) 1. Indentation (3D) 2. Pre-existing weakness 3. Lower lithosphere dynamics

Orogen wavelength vs. convergence HT VA NZ, EA Modified from Ellis (1995)

Eastern Swiss Alps NARROW -- < 250 km moderate crustal temperatures (< 700  C) little crustal melting most intense crustal deformation  intense mantle lithosphere deformation three-dimensionality generally not a first-order control on wavelength “Small Cold (SC) Orogens” New Zealand Southern Alps Wellman, 1979

high crustal temperatures and extreme crustal thickening crustal melting most intense crustal deformation  most intense mantle lithosphere deformation three-dimensionality may be a first-order control on wavelength “Giant Hot (GH) Orogens” WIDE  --  > 1000 km X

Small vs. giant orogens: (1) strength of ductile lower crust?  x=100 km Viscosity

Ellis et al, 2000 Small vs. giant orogens: (2) localisation by strain weakening?

Ellis et al, 2000 Small vs. giant orogens: (3) localisation by erosion?

Tectonic processes affecting the Himalayan-Tibetan System “Giant Hot” (GH) orogens:

Beaumont et al, 2001

Channel flow only occurs for cases where partial melt (   Pa.s) is present Extrusion only occurs for cases with high erosion Beaumont et al, 2001

Beaumont et al, submitted

“Small Cold (SC) Orogens” New Zealand Southern Alps Walcott, 1998

Extrusion of mid-lower crust (Grapes, 1995; Walcott, 1998) Batt and Braun, 1999 Felsic crust Total erosion Convergence 10mm/a 6 Ma Retro shear zone Secondary pro-shear Primary pro- shear 0  C 600  C 30 km

shortening = 40 km Vertical velocity 20  C/km geotherm 1 cm/yr Gerbault and Ellis, submitted x

Structural Geology Transect Little et al. in press

Arthur’s Pass: Campaign data sets Beavan and Ellis, in prep.

Post-seismic signal VISCOELASTIC MODEL: Lower crustal channel  =10 18 Pa s OBSERVATIONS

“Small Cold (SC) Orogens”“Giant Hot (GH) Orogens” High non-linear viscosities make extrusion less likely Inherited material heterogeneities can influence dynamics Low linear viscosities (partial melt)+erosion can cause extrusion

Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams for stars

Excess volume H-R diagram for orogens