Spherical Aberration Post Bilateral Implantation of Two Prevalent Aspheric IOLs DR. ROBERT A. KAUFER, MD MARTINEZ, BUENOS AIRES ARGENTINA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Un percorso realizzato da Mario Malizia
Advertisements

C) between 18 and 27. D) between 27 and 50.
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Fill in missing numbers or operations
Long-term Outcomes of Photorefractive Keratectomy for Anisometropic Amblyopia in Children Evelyn A. Paysse, MD, David K. Coats, MD, Mohamed A. W. Hussein,
& dding ubtracting ractions.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
Fraction IX Least Common Multiple Least Common Denominator
We need a common denominator to add these fractions.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
CALENDAR.
1 1  1 =.
1  1 =.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt ShapesPatterns Counting Number.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Robert G. Martin, MD Donald R. Sanders, MD, PhD Following Implantation of 4 Foldable Lens Designs Higher Order Aberration Higher Order Aberration.
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
1 Prediction of electrical energy by photovoltaic devices in urban situations By. R.C. Ott July 2011.
15. Oktober Oktober Oktober 2012.
Effects on UK of Eustatic sea Level rise GIS is used to evaluate flood risk. Insurance companies use GIS models to assess likely impact and consequently.
We are learning how to read the 24 hour clock
Fraction IX Least Common Multiple Least Common Denominator
Least Common Multiples and Greatest Common Factors
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
25 seconds left…...
Subtraction: Adding UP
: 3 00.
VisTor The new Toric IOL by Hanita Lenses
Clock will move after 1 minute
& dding ubtracting ractions.
RAY TRACING & WAVEFRONT ANALYSIS USING THE TRACEY SYSTEM Donald R. Sanders, M.D., Ph.D. Center For Clinical Research.
Using Lowest Common Denominator to add and subtract fractions
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Murach’s OS/390 and z/OS JCLChapter 16, Slide 1 © 2002, Mike Murach & Associates, Inc.
0 x x2 0 0 x1 0 0 x3 0 1 x7 7 2 x0 0 9 x0 0.
Diffractive Multifocal IOL Prof. Dr. Daniel H. Scorsetti
Visual outcome & subjective visual symptoms of the Tecnis ZM900 multifocal intraocular lens in Asian eyes Dr Colin S.H. Tan MBBS, MMed (Ophth), FRCSEd.
Aspheric IOL’s: clinical benefits and customizing cataract surgery Bojan Pajic, MD, PhD, FEBO Swiss Eye Research Foundation, ORASIS, Reinach, Switzerland.
Ocular Aberrations and Quality of Vision with Aspheric Single-Piece and Spherical Multi- Piece IOL: Contra lateral Comparative Study Ahmed Assaf MD, FRCSEd.
A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Evaluation of Patients with Contralateral Implantation of Two Aspheric Acrylic Intraocular Lenses R. Cionni, MD.
Ruth Lapid-Gortzak MD PhD 1,2, Jan Willem van der Linden BOpt 2, and Ivanka J. van der Meulen MD 1,2 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Medical Center,
Retrospective Comparison of 3177 Eyes Implanted with Presbyopic IOLs Carlos Buznego MD Elizabeth A. Davis MD, FACS Guy M. Kezirian MD, FACS William B.
Evaluation of Corneal Parameters and Spherical Aberration After DSAEK Measured with Pentacam System Orkun Muftuoglu, Pawan Prasher, R. Wayne Bowman, Steven.
Unilateral multifocal lens implantation in patients with a contralateral monofocal or phakic eye is a viable presbyopic correction option Robert J. Cionni,
A Fellow Eye Comparison of Aberrations, Modulation Transfer Function and Contrast Sensitivity After AcrySof IQ and AcrySof Natural IOL Implantation. Mayank.
ASCRS 08 Changes Of Higher Order Aberrations After Excimer Laser Treatment For Moderate Myopia by Means of Preoperative Wavefront Aberration Levels using.
Clinical and simulation outcomes of a multifocal intraocular lens with rotational asymmetry and two different levels of near addition Jorge Alió, MD,PhD.
P91: Clinical Performance of Phakic Angle-Supported Investigational IOL in Prospective Global Trials, ASCRS 2010, Boston P91: Clinical performance of phakic.
Preoperative and Postoperative Glarometer Measurements in Patients Having Cataract Extraction with Placement of Posterior Chamber and Accommodating IOLs.
Department of Ophthalmology Rudolf Foundation Clinic Vienna Head: Prof. Dr. Susanne Binder YEWHI-Study - A Comparison Between Blue Light Filtering and.
AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Aspheric IOL. Aspheric IOL AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® 2 AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Aspheric IOL SN6AD3 Add Power: +4 D Spectacle Plane: 3.2 D Range:
Influence of IOL optic material on posterior capsule opacification and visual function Ken Hayashi, MD Hideyuki Hayashi, MD Hayashi Eye Hospital, Fukuoka,
S. Lee/M.Kim 2010 M. Kim 1, H. Lee 1, S. Lee 1,, S.D. Lee 1 1 ASA-Vision Clinics Seoul Comparative Analysis Preliminary Results of.
Financial Disclosure: Medical Director–Galilei R&D Consultant, Ziemer Group AG, Port, Switzerland Consultant & Territory Manager for.
Comparative Study of the Aspheric Akreos Adapt AO IOL Versus the Spherical Akreos Adapt IOL Maghizh Anandan Martin Leyland.
Comparison of 2 Models of Aspheric Diffractive Multifocal IOL
Preliminary Results after Cataract Surgery with the Aspheric Acrysof ReSTOR IOL to Correct Presbyopia Meeting of the ASCRS Chicago 8-10 February 2007 R.M.M.A.
Inadvertent Insertion of an Opposite- Side Tecnis ZM900 Multifocal IOL Wilson Takashi Hida, M.D. Celso Takashi Nakano; Jonathan Lake;
F.I. Camesasca, MD Zeiss Invent ZO Aspheric IOL: Long-Term Results of Refractive and Aberrometric Analysis F. I. Camesasca* P. Vinciguerra.
Vinohrady Teaching Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic Vinohrady Teaching Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic M. Vokrojova MD, M. Vokrojova MD, D. Sivekova MD,
FreeVis LASIK Zentrum Universitätsklinikum Mannheim
Eye clinic of the 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic
Thomas Kohnen, MD Department of Ophthalmology
Comparison of vision with an accommodating IOL versus a multifocal IOL
Preoperative Distribution of Higher Order Aberrations in Patients Undergoing LASIK Perry S. Binder, MS MD.
Presentation transcript:

Spherical Aberration Post Bilateral Implantation of Two Prevalent Aspheric IOLs DR. ROBERT A. KAUFER, MD MARTINEZ, BUENOS AIRES ARGENTINA This research funded by Alcon Laboratories.

To determine the aspheric lens with the best clinical outcomes in a real-world setting where preoperative wavefront analysis for aspheric lens customization is not the standard of care. Purpose

Final enrollment 37 bilateral patients 18 SN60WF 19 Z9000 Healthy eyes Postop exam 3 months after surgery Spherical Aberration (SA) Trace aberrometer/topographer (Tracey Technologies) Non-dilated 4.5mm scan VA Contrast Methods

SN60WFZ9000 DesignSingle PieceMulti-Piece Optic Zone6.0 mm Central Optic Thickness 0.61 mm0.50 mm ChromophoreBlue Light FilterNone Aspheric Surface Posterior Anterior Lens SA-0.21 μm-0.27 μm Residual SA by Design 0.1 μm0.0 μm Residual SA by Design 0.1 μm0.0 μm IOL Specifications

72% 68% Lens had no apparent effect on amount of postoperative SA n=74 eyes SN60WFZ9000 Lens Model Percent <= >0.2 Percent Distribution of Postop Spherical Aberration (μm)

If lens model had no effect on postop SA distribution… Does lens model have an effect on performance at a specified SA range? Patients broken into 3 groups <0.1μm postop SA OU >0.1μm postop SA OU Mixed (one eye 0.1 μm) Results Analysis

<0.1μm>0.1μmMixed 20/20 20/16 Snellen LogMAR (n=22)(n=9)(n=6) Binocular BCVA with Three Postop SA Groups

20/20 Snellen 20/25 20/30 20/40 20/50 20/63 20/ PhotopicMesopic LogMAR <0.1 OUMixed>0.1 OU (n=22)(n=9)(n=6) 12.5% Low Contrast Acuity with Three Postop SA Groups

Cycles/Degree Log Units <0.1 OU>0.1 OUMixed (n=22)(n=9)(n=6) Photopic Contrast Sensitivity with Three Postop SA Groups

Cycles/Degree Log Units <0.1 OU>0.1 OUMixed Mesopic Contrast Sensitivity with Three Postop SA Groups

Cycles/Degree Log Units <0.1 OU>0.1 OUMixed Mesopic with Glare Contrast Sensitivity with Three Postop SA Groups

A slight positive postoperative SA (>0.1 μm) appears to enhance visual acuity. Larger populations are likely required to evaluate the modest impact of SA on contrast. Postoperative SA alone was not a predictor of contrast sensitivity. Postoperative analysis should include coma and total HOA to account for all residual aberrations of the eye. Conclusions