Wind Committee Updated Recommendation On February 9, 2010 the Wind Energy Committee formally voted 5-0: To recommend that Jamestown construct two 1.65.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NET METERING & FEED IN TARIFF REVIEW IURC Technical Conference
Advertisements

Investing in Connecticuts Energy Future Connecticuts $3b+ Long-Term Investment in Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Over the Next Decade State of Connecticut.
Utility Planning Perspective For A Solar Feed In Tariff (FIT) February 3, 2009 Gainesville Regional Utilities.
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Energy in the U.S. - Why Wind? Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy Institute for Professional and Executive Development Santa Fe, N.M. July 25,
IPED Financing Solar Energy Conference Leveraging the Solar Tax Credit Virginia ARRA Example Stephen A. Walz Senior Advisor for Energy Policy.
State Policy Initiatives Financing Wind Power: The Future of Energy May 7-9, 2008 Richard Cogen.
1 An Overview of Small Wind Energy Today Shawn Shaw The Cadmus Group, Inc. Sierra Club Northeast Committee Fall Energy Conference 10/12-10/14/2007.
Opportunities from ‘Dynamic Demand Control’
Regional responses to the Europe 2020 Strategy with particular focus on energy efficiency – Hungarian case.
Solar Power Savings Potential For 12.6 MW Installation District enjoys a long history as a resource conservation leader ( early 1980s DOE and CEC grants/loans,
1 Conservation Program Cost-Effectiveness Tests Presentation to the: Florida Public Service Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency Initiatives November.
1100 CORNWALL INFO HANDOUT Bellingham Public Development Authority 1.
1 Energy Efficiency and Iowa Utilities Presentation to the Energy Policy Advisory Forum, convened by Governor-Elect Chet Culver January 4, 2007 Presented.
New Jersey Board of Public Utilities and New Jerseys Clean Energy Program Mike Winka.
Building a Better Future Stretch Building Code October 15, 2009.
The three most important considerations for development of wind farms are: LAND with good to excellent wind resource CONTRACT to sell electricity produced.
Solar Water Heating as a Green House Gas Reduction and Energy Conservation Strategy Florida Solar Energy Industries Association and Florida Solar Energy.
IAS 11 - Revenue recognition for construction contracts
Financing Renewable Energy: an introduction to FITs and RHI Andrej Miller Renewable Financial Incentives Office of Renewable Energy Deployment
Local Renewables Freiburg 2007 June 14, 2007 Tobias Kelm Centre for Solar Energy and Hydrogen Research Renewable Energy Law: Stimulating Investment in.
The Role of ESCO in Wholesale Trade of Electricity (Capacity) ( REVIEW OF WHOLESALE TRADE OF ELECTRICITY) KUTAISI September,
POTOMAC WIND ENERGY Presents: Small Wind Turbines for residential and business use. May 2008.
California Roundup: Summary of DR Activity in California John Goodin Lead, Demand Response 2008 National Town Meeting on Demand Response June 3, 2008.
First Solar FuelSmart™: Powering Energy Security
15 MW Geothermal Energy Plant Stephen Mc Loughlin Stephen Devlin Paul O Reilly Mark Flanagan.
Brownfields to Brightfields Revitalizing Brockton by Converting a Former Manufactured Gas Plant to a Solar Energy Generating Station Jack Yunits, Former.
City of Miami PROPOSED Fiscal Year 2009 BUDGET. 2 Budget Focus To prepare a structurally balanced general operating budget. To provide a budget, which.
BRICK Township Landfill Superfund Site Solar panel field reuse
Financial Incentives to Encourage Wind Power System Production Sasha Kemmet Iowa State University.
Progressive 15 Energy and the Economy Summit June 26, 2013 Geoffrey Hier CREA Director of Government Relations.
“State of Solar” Energy in the U.S. Kathy Jack Environmental Science University of North Texas October 4, 2014.
Charlie Salamone Cape Power Systems Consulting Presented at the Northeast Sustainable Energy Association’s Wind Project Development Strategies for New.
Community Choice Aggregation Renewable Energy for your Home and Business July 16, 2013.
SolarCurrents TM Rebuild Ypsilanti Julie Londo August 26, 2010.
Net Metering and Interconnection Stakeholder Discussion Net Metering and Interconnection Stakeholder Meeting September 21, 2012 Discussion of.
University of Pittsburgh School of Law 2013 Energy Law & Policy Institute October 14, 2012 Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future (PennFuture). A statewide.
1 EERMC Public Meeting on Combined Heat and Power September 17, 2013.
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
Take A Load Off, Texas SM is provided by Oncor Electric Delivery LLC as part of the company’s commitment to reduce energy consumption and demand. Frontier.
Small Farm Profitability: Is Wind Energy the Answer? 1
Greening The Grid Through Community Choice Aggregation US EPA Webinar March 6, 2012.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
Contributions In-Aid and Development of Fees Utility Financial Solutions Mark Beauchamp, CPA, CMA, MBA President
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
Renewable Energy in New Jersey’s Clean Energy Program Scott Hunter Renewable Energy Program Administrator, Office of Clean Energy in the New Jersey Board.
Incentives and Tax Credits Federal, state, and private incentives and tax credits exist to encourage the use of renewable energies. Federal, state, and.
How to deliver a Renewable Energy Project Jemma Benson CO2Sense Yorkshire.
Town Of Douglas A Review of the Town’s Proposed Tax Incentive Financing (TIF) Agreement With American Pro Wind, LLC Presented To The Douglas Finance Committee.
Creating A Greener Energy Future For the Commonwealth Procurement of Renewable Energy on Landfills January 19, 2010 Courtney Feeley Karp, Esq.
Submitted to Southeast Symposium on Contemporary Engineering Topics (SSCET) New Orleans, LA - August 31.
CCA For Monterey Bay Powering your future through Community Choice Aggregation.
1 Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills June 17, 2009 Jim Christo Massachusetts Renewable Energy Trust.
COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION: TECHNICAL STUDY RESULTS Peninsula Clean Energy September 24,2015.
Net Metering and Embedded Generation NB Climate Action Change Hub Advisory Committee Meeting – October 1, 2008 Saint John, NB Linda Berthelot.
The Greening of the Rooftop Why Roof Green? Dr. James L. Hoff Research Director Center for Environmental Innovation in Roofing Washington, DC.
Colorado Harvesting Energy Network Jonathan Moore Director, Renewable Energy Development
California Solar Initiative Dian M. Grueneich, Commissioner California Public Utilities Commission March 30, 2006.
SELF-GENERATION INCENTIVE PROGRAM (SGIP) Website:
UTC STUDY OF DISTRIBUTED GENERATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Presentation for the Washington Future Energy Conference October 19, 2011.
Solar Market Pathways Leadership Academy
Wind Energy in Iowa Lori McDaniel
Narragansett Electric Rate Classes
Phase 3 Solar Feasibility Study Findings and Recommendations
The Greening of the Rooftop
Forging Sustainable Solar (and Storage) Incentives for New England
Future Energy Jobs Act: Public Sector Impacts
Arizona Public Service Company 2012 Renewable Energy Standard Implementation Plan Arizona Corporation Commission Open Meeting August 17, 2011.
Photovoltaic Systems Engineering Application to PV Systems
How Small Developers and EPC Contractors Can Add PPA Financing to their Arsenals John Langhus, VP Business Development Midwest Solar Expo 2019 New Energy.
Presentation transcript:

Wind Committee Updated Recommendation On February 9, 2010 the Wind Energy Committee formally voted 5-0: To recommend that Jamestown construct two 1.65 megawatt wind turbines, with one to be located at Ft. Getty and one to be located at Taylor Point.

Rationale for Recommending Ft. Getty Potential to generate millions of additional dollars of revenue for the Town, thereby avoiding substantial future tax increases to residents A single turbine at Ft. Getty would be compatible with campers – Initial survey shows campers would not object to a turbine – Profits from turbine could fund Ft. Getty infrastructure improvements beneficial to camping experience – Minimal “footprint”, does not prevent other uses – Minimal noise

Ft. Getty Rationale (2) Committee felt that if the Town only does one site now, that it will likely be the only site ever, due to the complexity of the undertaking and current green initiatives and funding

Possibility of $750,000 of extra stimulus funding available now, not later. Huge impact on profitability due to decreased costs. Doing two turbines at once reduces: – Mobilization Costs – Project Management Costs – Transportation, Rigging and Crane Costs – Financial Savings are significant Estimated in the Hundreds of Thousands of $ – These savings are not even factored into the Committee’s present financial projections Ft. Getty Rationale (3)

Ft. Getty Rationale (4) Ft. Getty Road power cables would be buried under roadway utility easement – Improved Infrastructure for Ft. Getty Plan – Removal of overhead lines improves visual experience – Total Approximate cost $377, Consists of: 4/10ths of a mile run (2200ft) at $135 per foot 2 Pad Mount each 3 service Drops $10K each Funding could be from Dual Project economies (slide 4)

Side-by-Side Comparison All scenarios assume that funding is based on $3M 15 year CREB and balance + 20 year Bond at 5% interest + $750,000 ARRA + $500,000 RIEDC LocationTurbine Size Estimated Gross Installed Cost Estimated Cumulative Net Profit (over 20 years) Taylor Pt. & Ft MW $10,085,000 $6,400,000 Taylor 1.65 MW $4,962,000 $4,500,000 Taylor 2 MW $6,177,000 $3,630,000 Fort 1.65 MW $5,122,000 $4,500,000 Fort 2 MW $6,177,000 $4,000,000

Calculating Project Costs & Benefits Calculating the Project’s Net Profit : (Electricity Generated x Wholesale Electricity Price) + (Electricity Generated x REC Price) + ARRA Grant + RI EDC Grant - Gross Project Costs = Net Profit Project CostsSources of Project Revenue Equipment & Installation costs Financing costs; bankers fees, legal fees and due diligence Operating and maintenance costs, including service contract Decommissioning cost Value of electricity generated ($0.114) REC value of electricity generated

State:Rhode Island Incentive Type:Net Metering Eligible Renewable/Other Technologies: Solar Thermal Electric, Photovoltaics, Wind Applicable Sectors:Commercial, Industrial, Residential, Nonprofit, Schools, Local Government, Agricultural, Institutional Applicable Utilities:Investor-owned utilities System Capacity Limit:3.5 MW for municipalities and Narragansett Bay Commission; 2.25 MW for certain systems serving municipalities; 1.65 MW for all other systems Aggregate Capacity Limit: 2% of utility's peak load (1 MW reserved for systems under 25 kW) Net Excess Generation:Customers have an option to either accumulate excess generation to the next bill (for 12-months) or receive monthly compensation (via check) for excess generation. Certain customer classes have a third option to apply excess generation to up to 10 other accounts during a billing period. REC Ownership:Not addressed Meter Aggregation:Allowed for certain customer classes Summary: Authority 1: R.I. Gen. Laws § Date Enacted: 2006 Date Effective: 2006 Authority 2: R.I. Gen. Laws § Date Enacted: 7/2/2007 (subsequently amended) Date Effective: 7/2/2007 Authority 3: Rhode Island PUC Order 19821, Docket No Date Enacted: 11/4/2009 Date Effective: 09/30/2009 Net Metering Interpretation From the Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency. Updated 12/15/09 Available from: es/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Cod e=RI01R&re=1&ee=1 es/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Cod e=RI01R&re=1&ee=1