Designing and Evaluating Mobile Interaction: Challenges and Trends Authors: Marco de Sa and Luis Carrico.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Specific hardware and software products identified in this report were used in order to perform the evaluations described. In no case does such identification.
Advertisements

Situation in which I need UX evaluation Product E.g. a smart phone; an e-commerce site; a lamp; a health self-monitoring system for elderly Design stage.
Each individual person is working on a GUI subset. The goal is for you to create screens for three specific tasks your user will do from your GUI Project.
1 TAPSENSE ENHANCING FINGER INTERACTION ON TOUCH SURFACES In proceedings of 24 th ACM UIST symposium, 2011, Santa Barbara, CA.
At What Cost Pervasive? A social computing view of mobile computing systems By: D.C.Dryer, C. Eisbach, and W.S. Ark IBM Systems Journal, online Presentation.
Gerhard Dueck -- CS3013Capturing Requirements as Use Cases 1 Capturing the Requirements as use Cases  Requirements Description  We need to describe –The.
Extension of the computer centre – mobile devices in the classroom Dr Nellie de Crom Dr Annette de Jager
Human Computer Interaction
User-Interface Design Process Lecture # 6 1Gabriel Spitz.
Page16/2/2015 Sirlan Usage and usability considerations for SIRLAN solution success.
Nanja Smets Evaluation in Virtual Environmen 21 May 2008.
Semester in review. The Final May 7, 6:30pm – 9:45 pm Closed book, ONE PAGE OF NOTES Cumulative Similar format to midterm (probably about 25% longer)
Experiments and statistics. QNT, Paul Cairns, University of York2 Classic “lab” study  Studying cause and effect – “novel navigation for faster task.
Brent Dingle Marco A. Morales Texas A&M University, Spring 2002
1 Overview of Usability Testing CSSE 376, Software Quality Assurance Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology April 19, 2007.
Teaching Multimedia. Multimedia is media that uses multiple forms of information content and information processing (e.g. text, audio, graphics, animation,
Course Wrap-Up IS 485, Professor Matt Thatcher. 2 C.J. Minard ( )
SIMS 213: User Interface Design & Development Marti Hearst Thurs, Jan 20, 2005.
SIMS 213: User Interface Design & Development Marti Hearst Thurs, Jan 22, 2004.
Human-Computer Interaction for Universal Computing James A. Landay EECS Dept., CS Division UC Berkeley Endeavor Mini Retreat, 5/25/99 Task Support.
From Controlled to Natural Settings
Olli Kulkki Markus Lappalainen Ville Lehtinen Reijo Lindroos Ilari Pulkkinen Helsinki University of Technology S Acceptability and Quality.
Toolkit Support for Usability Evaluation Spring 2013 – Karin Tsai 1.
Web Design Process CMPT 281. Outline How do we know good sites from bad sites? Web design process Class design exercise.
In the PLACE approach, field pointers are connected to physical objects. Using a standard QR code reader on a mobile device, users are directed to web.
Computer –the machine the program runs on –often split between clients & servers Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) Human –the end-user of a program –the.
Prof. James A. Landay Luke Vink Cornell Tech Spring 2014 May 14, 2014 HCI+DESIGN: USER INTERFACE DESIGN + PROTOTYPING + EVALUATION Cornell Tech HCI+Design.
+ Interaction Design User Centred Design. + Does the Interface Make sense? Characteristics of successful ID Products makes sense to the users when they.
Interaction Design Process COMPSCI 345 S1 C and SoftEng 350 S1 C Lecture 5 Chapter 3 (Heim)
Overview of the rest of the semester Building on Assignment 1 Using iterative prototyping.
Human Computer Interaction
1 COMPSCI 110 Operating Systems Who - Introductions How - Policies and Administrative Details Why - Objectives and Expectations What - Our Topic: Operating.
Virtual Cockpit: Terbu Alexander Institute for Computer Graphics and Vision Graz University of Technology An Alternative Augmented Reality User Interface.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Pearson Addison-Wesley The Resonant Interface HCI Foundations for Interaction Design First Edition.
Hiding in the Mobile Crowd: Location Privacy through Collaboration.
New Media Research Methods- Part 1 Planning stage: Using Methods, Data and Tools to explore User’s Experience. How methods relate to research questions?
ONLY A DRAFT WIREFRAME FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES. NOT FINAL ART 1 OLS workflow sketch This slide deck represents major segments of the workflow for Online.
CS2003 Usability Engineering Human-Centred Design Dr Steve Love.
INTERACTION DESIGN PROCESS Textbook: S. Heim, The Resonant Interface: HCI Foundations for Interaction Design [Chapter 3] Addison-Wesley, 2007 February.
Introduction Infrastructure for pervasive computing has many challenges: 1)pervasive computing is a large aspect which includes hardware side (mobile phones,portable.
5 PR Praktikum aus Informatik Gabriele Kotsis Summer Term 2009.
1 User Interfaces for Pervasive Computing Devices Prof. James A. Landay January 7, 1999
Human-Computer Interaction & Usability Unit HCI & Usability Unit ICT&S Center, University of Salzburg.
Welcome to CPS 210 Graduate Level Operating Systems –readings, discussions, and programming projects Systems Quals course –midterm and final exams Gateway.
Project Sharing  Team discussions (15 minutes) –Share results of your work on the Project Scope Proposal –Discuss your choice of methods and results –Prepare.
1 Human-Computer Interaction Usability Evaluation: 2 Expert and Empirical Methods.
Design and Evaluation of an Ambient Display to Support Time Management during Meetings Valentina Occhialini, Harm van Essen, Berry Eggen Intelligent Lighting.
Evaluating VR Systems. Scenario You determine that while looking around virtual worlds is natural and well supported in VR, moving about them is a difficult.
June 5, 2007Mohamad Eid Usability Testing Chapter 8.
User Participation in the System Development Process Chapter 3 SD/TI/PI/2015_Chapter 31.
User Interface Lab. ISIE Jeong, Seok-Hyun Using the experience sampling method to evaluate ubicomp applications.
Prof. James A. Landay Richard Davis Kate Everitt University of Washington Autumn 2004 UW Undergraduate HCI Projects A CSE 490jl Overview December 9, 2004.
Master thesis spring Anders Gimmestad Gule Calendars as User Context Providers in an E-learning Environment Supervisor: Rune Hjelsvold Apropos-Internett:
William H. Bowers – Requirements Torres 9.
Click to edit Master subtitle style USABILITY and USER INTERFACE DESIGN.
Prototyping Creation of concrete but partial implementations of a system design to explore usability issues.
SE 431 Human Computer Interactions Jamal Nasir. How to design & build good UIs UI Development process Usability goals User-centered design Design discovery.
Cognitive Informatics for Biomedicine – Chapter 5
Practical information
StudiDroid: Mobile Android Application
Connecting Interface Metaphors to Support Creation of Path-based Collections Unmil P. Karadkar, Andruid Kerne, Richard Furuta, Luis Francisco-Revilla,
CIS 376 Bruce R. Maxim UM-Dearborn
ESTABLISHING REQUIREMENTS
Intelligent Database Systems Lab. Seungseok Kang
From Controlled to Natural Settings
Evaluation of Mobile Interfaces
Usability Techniques Lecture 13.
Human Computer Interaction International 2007
eCareTaker: Context Aware Web Services
CSE 490ra Projects.
Presentation transcript:

Designing and Evaluating Mobile Interaction: Challenges and Trends Authors: Marco de Sa and Luis Carrico

Significance Review the current approaches and recent advances in the design, evaluation of mobile interaction and mobile user interfaces. Address the challenges, the most significant results and the upcoming research directions.

Outline Understanding the Real World Prototyping the concepts Evaluating the Results The Future of Mobile Design and Evaluation

Understanding the Real World The Mobile Dynamics – Ubiquity and portability.

Understanding the Real World

Prototyping the concepts Low-fidelity Prototypes High-fidelity Prototypes

Evaluating the Results Commonly Used Methods – User testing. – Think-aloud evaluations. – User observation. – Scenario-based reviews. – Questionnaire-based evaluation.

Evaluating the Results The Challenge of Mobile Evaluation – Users behavior and their perception, efficiency, and use of the mobile applications are influenced by the number of contexts and the constant changing from one to another. – The main challenge with mobile evaluation is the ability to obtain data and find issues within real scenarios and especially while changing between contexts, considering the mobility factor.

Evaluating the Results Active Data Gathering – The main advantage for these approaches is that given that users can capture information by themselves, designers can minimize the effect of observers on their studies and participants. – For example, Experience Sampling Method (ESM). Users were equipped with PDAs that prompted questionnaires at specific times.

Evaluating the Results Passive Data Gathering – Passive data gathering approaches require no intervention from the user/participant. – For example, the users are requested to interact with the mobile device using different colored pens for different tasks. Researchers can review the sketches and prototypes and detect the number of taps and locations of these taps for each task and activity.

The Future of Mobile Design and Evaluation Cooperation and group activities also assume a greater role as target services for mobile devices. Creating personalized application. The use of sensors. The evaluation of mobile software and UIs.