Online Rubric Assessment Tool for Marine Engineering Course

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Requirements Engineering Processes – 2
The 1 st National Quality Assurance Conference November 17-18, 2011 Student Feedback on Teaching and Learning at The University of the West Indies, St.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
1 Chapter 40 - Physiology and Pathophysiology of Diuretic Action Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
1 of 21 Information Strategy Developing an Information Strategy © FAO 2005 IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Strategy Developing.
NCATS REDESIGN METHODOLOGY A Menu of Redesign Options Six Models for Course Redesign Five Principles of Successful Course Redesign Four Models for Assessing.
Aviation Security Training Module 4 Design and Conduct Exercise II 1.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
Copyright © 2012 California Department of Education, Child Development Division with WestEd Center for Child & Family Studies, Desired Results T&TA Project.
Human Performance Improvement Process
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
Training for Teachers and Specialists
My Alphabet Book abcdefghijklm nopqrstuvwxyz.
0 - 0.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
ZMQS ZMQS
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE A full transcript of this presentation can be found under the Notes Tab. 35 USC 112 (f)*: Identifying Limitations.
IAEA Training in Emergency Preparedness and Response Module L-051 General Concepts of Exercises to Test Preparedness Lecture.
1 Implementing Internet Web Sites in Counseling and Career Development James P. Sampson, Jr. Florida State University Copyright 2003 by James P. Sampson,
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
[ 1 ] © 2011 iParadigms, LLC Benefits for Teaching. Impact on Learning. Introduction to Turnitin.
7 Developing Employees Human Resources Management and Supervision
Trustee Gough Ward 3 Forum TDSB/Provincial Report Card
1 Title I Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session May 23, 2011.
ECTS grade system in the curricula of Ruse University Principal Assist. Dr Desislava Atanasova.
1 FORMULATING PRIORITY & SENIORITY LISTS Los Angeles Southwest College July 2008.
ABC Technology Project
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
© S Haughton more than 3?
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
Mesa County Valley School District #51 STANDARDS - BASED GRADING AND REPORTING
What is Pay & Performance?
Southeastern Association of Educational Opportunity Program Personnel 38 th Annual Conference January 30 – February 3, 2010 Upward Bound Internal & External.
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
The Mid-Semester Review – Bridge the Gap Barbara Vohmann, Dean Bowyer, Debbie Philipson, Pauline Start, Mark Tree, Dr. Julian Priddle.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
SIMOCODE-DP Software.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
E-Transcripts – Electronic procedure for the exchange of curriculum data of exchange students.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
1. 2 The San Jacinto Unified School District presents: Strategic Plan For
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
Flexible Assessment, Tools and Resources for PLAR Get Ready! Go! Presenter: Deb Blower, PLAR Facilitator Red River College of Applied Arts, Science and.
1. 2 Easy-to-Use Administrator Features 3 Customisable Screen Cutoff Scores.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
New Rubrics? Create Assignment and Project Templates and Send the Assignments in Tk20 Must do before you can use updated rubrics Theresa Dorn.
Training objectives & notes to the presenter… This training module is designed for an administrative commissioner ( Council Commissioner, Assistant Council.
The tool that could change everything 1 The Tool that could for Employees Change Everything.
What is… Learner-Centered Instruction. What Is The Goal For A Learner-Centered Course? Making the student more responsible for his/her learning. 1.
5th International CDIO Conference Singapore, June , The Role of Peers in the Assessment of Students’ CDIO Skills Ivan D’haese Johan D’heer.
Introduction and Development. Authentic Assessment – used to measure student work Scoring guide evaluates student’s performance on full range of criteria.
Presentation transcript:

Online Rubric Assessment Tool for Marine Engineering Course Dr. Cheng CHIN Newcastle University (in Singapore Campus)

Scopes Introduction Proposed Methodology Application Software Discussions Conclusion

Introduction Assessing marine engineering module becomes more challenging as differences arise from the gaps in experience and skills among academic staff and students. They come from a different backgrounds in mechanical, electrical, naval architecture, marine and offshore engineering.

But the challenges can be successfully overcome through careful and thoughtful planning, using a rubric. The rubric (Goodrich, 1996) is an authentic assessment tool used to assess students' work. It contains assessment criteria for assessing the students.

It is usually handed out before the assignment begins in order to get students to think about the criteria on which their works will be judged. It encourages bilateral communication between the students and instructors. We will cover how we applied an online rubric form at Newcastle University.

Proposed Methodology The rubric is a scoring guide which seeks to evaluate a student's performance based upon the sum of a full range of criteria rather than a single numerical score.

A typical rubric in a hard copy format.

The rubric assessment was used for Marine Engineering Design module. The rubric will be handed out to students before the assignment begins. In this module, a group design project has to be completed within one semester.

This project constituted 40% of the total marks for the module. The feedback to the students was structured in accordance with the rubric’s criteria. Instructors had to complete the online rubric forms after each project presentation made by the students.

Instructors informed the students on how they had performed in the assessment. When doing so, students should receive feedback so they can improve their performance next time

Application Software A software called Form Builder was used.

Repeat the procedure for the remaining group.

After each presentation, the instructors sent email notifications to the students.

Both instructors and students received the email notifications.

Discussions The impacts were evaluated based upon the results from the project marks before and after the implementation. As compared with the previous semester, the marks have improved. The survey results also found that the students were satisfied with the online feedback channel.

In summary, the rubrics offer several common advantages. The rubric: forces teachers to clarify his/her criteria in specific terms. improves the consistency in evaluating the student works. improves students’ performance by clearly showing the students how their works will be evaluated and what are expected.

Conclusion The online rubric assessment was proposed for assessing the Marine Engineering Design module at Newcastle University. The survey results found that the students were satisfied with the feedback system.

The rubric allows the students to be involved through the online feedback from the instructors. However, there is a need to assign more credit to these activities to improve engagement. The workloads of the instructors need to be adjusted.

Although, the proposed method was mainly conducted in Newcastle University, it can be applied to others institutions. But general guidance for the staff – they have to be trained in using these online tools prior to the implementation. Further educational research into this area is recommended.

Thanks For Your Attention!