Antideg and Municipal Stormwater Discussion Sept. 23, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mission: Mission: To protect human health and the environment Primary services: Expertise DEC brings to the ACMP Primary services: Expertise DEC brings.
Advertisements

WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
LOCAL IPP REGULATIONS SEWER USE ORDINANCES Sandra Diorka Director of Public Services Delhi Charter Township.
1 Stormwater Program Videoconference April 23, 2013 Bill Cole, Water Quality Standards Unit.
To response to litigation, thirty Minnesota Cities were directed to perform antidegradation reviews or Loading Assessments for two time periods: (1) (1)
To response to litigation, thirty Minnesota Cities were directed to perform antidegradation reviews or Loading Assessments for two time periods: (1) (1)
Post-construction rates and volume of stormwater runoff on-site will be equal to or less than that of pre-development rates and volume of stormwater runoff?
Presented to: Minnesota Chamber of Commerce October 1, 2012.
Watershed Staff Videoconference October 17, 2012.
A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012.
Antidegradation Demonstration: Alternatives Analysis Analysis WHAT IS IN THIS PAPER- Distinguish between need and necessity Recognize three general types.
1 Overview of Regulations for Water Quality Protection in South Carolina n Federal Clean Water Act/ NPDES Storm Water Program n South Carolina Pollution.
Stormwater Rulemaking Briefing US Environmental Protection Agency.
Ministry of Environment Environmental Protection Division Presentation to CRD Sewage Forum, Sept. 26, 2005 Sewage is regulated in British Columbia by the.
EPA CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS GUIDELINES Tim Ryan, P.E. Water Resources Engineer Water Resources Engineer Wisconsin Department of.
Environmental Policy Water Pollution Air Pollution State & Local Issues Global Environment.
The WQCD Permitting Perspective Janet Kieler Permits Section Manager.
Stormwater Management/ MS4 Permitting International Municipal Lawyers Association 2014 Annual Conference Baltimore, Maryland Gene Tanaka
Water Quality Standards and MS4 Storm Water Permitting.
1 Europe’s water – an indicator-based assessment Niels Thyssen.
What is NPDES? “National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System”
Chapter 5 Water. Point Source Pollution Comes from a specific source Can be monitored and controlled by a permit system.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
Reuse, Water Quality Standards, and Sensitive Public and Private Water Supplies Derek Smithee Chief, Water Quality Programs Division Oklahoma Municipal.
The purpose of the San Dieguito Union High School District’s stormwater management plan is to comply with applicable stormwater regulations, educate.
NPDES Compliance. NPDES Water Quality Issues for the Precast Concrete Industry.
Implementation of Antidegradation Policies for Indiana Waters.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Clean Water Act (CWA) (1977, 1981, 1987). Description and Affects This Act was put into place in order to regulate the amount of pollutants that were.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Lake Erie HABs Workshop Bill Fischbein Supervising Attorney Water Programs March 16, 2012 – Toledo March 30, Columbus.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Background and Overview Stormwater NPDES Compliance For New Developments.
City of Palm Coast Proposed Stormwater Ordinance September 28, 2010.
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
1 IDEM Overview of March 14, 2008 Draft Antidegradation Rule Presented at the April 29, 2008 Antidegradation Stakeholder Meeting.
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Brock Tabor Nancy Sonafrank Alaska Forum on the Environment 2013.
1 Stormwater Phase II Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems and Act 167 Doug Brennan PA DEP September, 2002.
Department of Public Works NPDES Low Impact Development and Green Streets Resolutions City Council August 17, 2015.
EPA’s Stormwater Rulemaking: How Potential Changes in the NPDES Stormwater Regulations Could Impact the Design of Stormwater Controls Rachel Herbert USEPA/OW/OWM/WPD.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow-Control Requirements in Phase I and Phase II Municipal NPDES Permits Dan Cloak, Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
WATER QUALITY TOPICS ENFORCEMENT – ARE FINES BECOMING A WAY OF LIFE AT THE DEQ By:Donald D. Maisch Supervising Attorney, Water Quality Division Office.
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
LEGAL ASPECT OF WASTE MANAGEMENT (INTERNATIONAL) NURUL MAISYARAH BINTI SAMSUDIN NORAINI BINTI ABD RAHMAN NOR AINI OTHMAN NUR NAZNIN BINTI ISHAK.
MWCOG Water Resource Workshop “Preparing for Regulatory Change” February 20, 2004 Track 2: Panel #4 - Storm Water MS4 Regulation Paula Estornell, USEPA,
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
Notebook Ref Summary of the Issue Part of a Tier II antidegradation review should incorporate the consideration of feasible alternatives, some of.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
EPA Storm Water Run Off Review and Reading Assignments.
Resourceful. naturally. Protecting Non-Impaired Resources West Metro Water Alliance September 21, 2011 Greg Wilson, Barr Engineering Company.
Stormwater Management William Taylor New Hampshire Wastewater Control Association June 13, 2013.
Antidegradation and Alternatives Analysis Mary E. Gardner Regulatory Programs Administrator Littleton/Englewood WWTP Colorado.
ANTIDEGRADATION and THE BENEFITS OF PUMP LOGS FOR BATCH DISCHARGES Given by: Dan Murray, Terrell Hendren and Josh Frazier.
One Water LA is a collaborative approach to develop an integrated framework for managing the City’s watersheds, water resources, and water facilities in.
1 Water Quality Antidegradation: Guidance to Implement Tier II Summary of Discussion: Review the Tier II Rule requirements. Clarify what feedback we are.
Water Resources Workshop Standards, Use Attainability, Impairments and TMDLS Richard Eskin Maryland Department of the Environment February 20, 2004.
Katherine Antos, Water Quality Team Leader Water Quality Goal Implementation Team Coordinator U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Chesapeake Bay Program.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
The Clean Water Act (1977, 1981, 1987) By: Jonas Szajowitz.
CLEAN WATER ACT AND MUNICIPAL STORMWATER CALIFORNIA STORMWATER WORKSHOP David W. Smith, Manager NPDES Permits Section EPA/Region 9.
1. Wolfeboro’s Tool Kit Implemented tools for water quality protection Municipal Watershed District Ground Water Protection Overlay District Steep Slope.
Canal Restoration Regulatory Background The Clean Water Act, an introduction: Basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into U.S. waters,
LP Examples Wastewater & Water Quality
Permitting Requirements for Lagoons
The Clean Water Acts of 1977, 1981, & 1987
Protecting Non-Impaired Resources
Alternative Compliance for New Developments
Incorporating metal bioavailability into permitting – UK experience
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Presentation transcript:

Antideg and Municipal Stormwater Discussion Sept. 23, 2009

Guiding principles Tier 2 Protection: Where water quality exceeds the applicable standard, water quality may not be lowered unless there is a demonstrated need for important economic or social development in the area where the waters are located. Antidegradation requirements are implemented and enforced through CWA control documents (e.g. NPDES permits). Antidegradation requirements that are specified in general permit conditions must maintain the quality of receiving waters. In future MS4 general permits, a determination will need to be made whether the MS4 is an expanded discharge.

Antidegradation Review Process 1. Application to discharge into waters of the state 2. Will water quality be lowered? 3. Are there reasonable non-degrading alternatives? 4. If not, are there reasonable minimally- degrading alternatives? 5. Where water quality will be lowered, it must be justified based on the need for important economic or social development

Determination an expanded discharge Step 1. Determine the “raw” loading Question: For stormwater, can surrogate measures be used to estimate pollutant loading? Surrogate measures may include: land use, impervious surfaces, population Step 2. Is there an increase in “raw” loading? Step 3. Will control measures mitigate increased loading? (Will water quality be lowered?)

Baselines “lowering of water quality” = “new or expanded discharges” Implies a starting point or baseline from which actions are measured. Baselines may be defined in at least one of two ways: 1. Water quality conditions of the receiving water at a specific point in time. Based on monitoring and or modeling, includes loading contributions from non- regulated sources 2. Permitted loading at a specific point in time (For wastewater discharges this is based on flow and numeric effluent limits)

Adjustment of baselines If water quality is allowed to be lowered as a result of a demonstrated need for important economic or social development, then a new baseline is set (is adjusted downward). If water quality improves as a result of decreased loading then the baseline is adjusted upward.

Maintaining water quality Question: Can we develop antidegradation requirements (control measures) in the permit that will maintain water quality? –Control measures may be: i. Performance objectives, e.g. infiltration requirements, percent TSS removal ii. Evidence-based mandatory control measures, e.g. use of a particular treatment system under certain conditions What are our best options? Level of confidence? Adaptive management – assessment of control measure effectiveness –Ambient monitoring of receiving water –Discharge monitoring –Validation that control measures are designed, constructed and maintained to meet objectives