QI project or research? Thomas F. Byrd M.D. HRRC Chair Subcommitees 2 and 4 December 3, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IRB Issues in Medical Education Research – OHRP Perspective American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine 2 nd Annual Meeting – June 24-26,
Advertisements

Human Investigation Committee  Is It Research?  Is It Human Subjects Research?  Is It Human Subjects Research that requires IRB review?
THE UW HEALTH SCIENCES IRB S OVERVIEW PRACTICAL REGULATORY ISSUES IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Exempt Research Mary Banks BS, BSN IRB Director CRC IRB and BUMC IRB.
Research, Program Evaluation, and Quality Improvement or Assurance: What’s in a Name? Ivor Pritchard, Ph.D. Senior Advisor to the Director of OHRP
 Federal regulations specify “engagement” at the institutional level  Cornell has a Federalwide Assurance specifying its commitment to comply with regulations.
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
Request For Exemption RFE. A Review of Penn’s Commitment to Research Research is a substantial and esteemed enterprise at Penn. The research community.
IRB Monthly Investigator Meeting Columbia University Medical Center IRB October 11, 2005.
Human Investigation Committee  Is it research?  If yes, does it involve human subjects?  If yes, can it be exempt?  If no, will a Request for.
Determinations of Research, Human Subjects Research, Exemptions, and Expedited Review Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Tasha Osafo, CIP Assistant Director IRB Office Exempt Review.
Quick Facts about Exempt Research No continuing review required IRB Reviewer makes Exempt determination 6 OHRP & 4 FDA categories(1 category overlaps)
Conducting Exempt Research An Overview of Human Subjects Protections Issues and the Review Process at ASU Office of Research Integrity and Assurance Institutional.
Dana Evans 1 1 Exempt & Expedited Human Subjects Research.
Expedited vs Exempt by Richard R. Riker MD Vice-Chair, IRB Maine Medical Center.
April 2011 Conducting Research at SPC Approval Process and Procedures Center of Excellence for Teaching and Learning.
BRI Institutional Review Board (IRB) Does your project require IRB oversight? By Chris Weir, CIP BRI IRB Manager April 18 th, 2011.
ORAL HISTORIES AND HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS April 18, 2012.
Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.
Research Ethics The Protection of Human Subjects.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Stanley Estime, MSCI, CIP Senior QA/QI Specialist Lisa Gabel, CIP QA/QI Specialist IRB Determinations: What type of Review will your study receive?
1 Ethics of Working with Human Subjects (BIOL/CHEM 397 ) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.
Conducting Exempt Research: An Overview of Human Subjects Protections Issues and the Review Process at ASU.
SLCL Human Subjects Review Committee. Who we are Four faculty from SLCL: – Melissa Bowles, Chair (SIP) – José Ignacio Hualde (Linguistics/SIP) – Jennifer.
Privacy and Confidentiality. Definitions n Privacy - having control over the extent, timing, and circumstances of sharing oneself (physically, behaviorally,
The Linguistics Department Institutional Review Board Committee Silvina Montrul, chair Fred Davidson Irene Koshik Ryan Shosted September 22, 2008.
Investigators’ Responsibilities in Conducting Human Subjects Research Dept. of Regulatory Affairs April 18, 2012.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Determining the Appropriate IRB Application for Your Research August 10, 2015.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
UD IRB Guidelines for Applications for: Registrations of exempt research, Expedited IRB review, Full IRB review.
Determinations of Research, Human Subjects Research, Exemptions, and Expedited Review Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for.
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
HRPP Policies & Forms Chapter Two Created/Revised for AAHRPP June 1, 2007.
Regulations 201: Thorny Issues What is Research? Exempt and Expedited Reviews.
 Epidemiology -- Research – or Not Research? Medical Research Summit March Tom Puglisi, PhD.
© 2015 Marketo, Inc. Marketo Proprietary and Confidential Page 1 Investigators’ Responsibilities in Conducting Human Subjects Research Office of the Vice.
Human Subjects Research at Mines Colorado School of Mines New Faculty Orientation November 20, 2015.
Susan Loess-Perez, MS, CIP, CCRC Director of Research Compliance Office of Research Services Graduate Thesis and Dissertation Conference February 6, 2016.
Levels of Review of Research and Quality Improvement Walter Kraft, MD Associate Director, Office of Human Subjects Protection Department of Pharmacology.
Exempt Unless otherwise required by Department or Agency heads, research activities in which the only involvement of human subjects will be in one or more.
Human Research Protection Program 101 March 20, 2007 Cincinnati, OH.
0 Ethics Lecture Research. ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY Disclosures  The speaker has no financial interest in the subject matter of this.
Created by Steve Martin, PA-C IRB Application Received Exempt Complete Yes No Mississippi College IRB Application Process Determine Review Category Expedited.
Presentation prepared for GCSU ENGAGE INSTITUTION REVIEW BOARD (IRB): FUNCTION AND SERVICE Tsu-Ming Chiang, Chair Whitney Heppner, Vice Chair Qiana Wilson,
What is exempt research? Angela Bain, IRB Administrator
Submitting human subjects research
Tarleton State University
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations and Types of Review
Submitting human subjects research
Multichannel Learning System (MLS) Research Protocol Requirements
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
Is it Quality Improvement or Research ?
What types of research are exempt and ohrp guidance on exemptions
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. Associate Dean,
2018 Revised Common Rule: Exemptions
Common Rule Update: Exempt categories UT IRB
Common Rule Changes Effective date is January 21, 2019
BRI Institutional Review Board (IRB)
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
What the IRB is looking for when reviewing your protocol
Human Participants Research
Current IRB at DMACC September 2018.
Does my Research need IRB Review?
Presentation transcript:

QI project or research? Thomas F. Byrd M.D. HRRC Chair Subcommitees 2 and 4 December 3, 2013

US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) definition of research Research means a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge. Activities which meet this definition constitute research for purposes of this policy, whether or not they are conducted or supported under a program which is considered research for other purposes. For example, some demonstration and service programs may include research activities

Differences between QI projects and research QI is designed to bring about immediate improvements in healthcare delivery QI is designed to have its findings applicable only to the local institution QI is designed to sustain the improvements QI does not require rigid, fixed protocols; within QI activities it is acceptable to adapt the project over time

QI Projects It is a given that QI is a necessary activity for institutions taking care of patients There is an institutional responsibility (clinical and administrative leadership) to insure that QI projects do not expose patients to more than minimal risk “..there is a responsibility that health care providers improve quality” and that patients are responsible to “cooperate with improvement efforts”* “..patients must be kept safe from harms and violations of their rights”* *Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(9):

Possible publication of QI project – considerations at the outset Would publication of the project’s findings be desirable? Dissemination of information outside the project’s institution has implications for demonstration of oversight. If no upfront desire is expressed to publish the project’s findings, the internally situated work is considered QI and the oversight deemed necessary falls at the level of routine internal oversight of good clinical and management practice. When there is no perceived extra risk to patients, IRB approval may be excluded

Possible publication of QI project – considerations at the outset Examine the project’s safety for patients. QI activity implies that the intervention is at least as safe as routine care. If there is more risk, IRB oversight is required at the outset to demonstrate to the internal and external medical community that the project is a thoughtful and well-designed research study

Possible publication of QI project For publication purposes there is a need to demonstrate how oversight was conducted When a QI project is an intervention and the manuscript contains patient data (even if averaged and de-identified), it can be argued that the bar for demonstrable oversight is increased One important consideration will be confidentiality of data ie, whether HIPAA guidelines were maintained during the study An HRRC review is indicated to ensure that patient safety was upheld and that HIPAA guidelines were followed

Exempt research activities Research conducted in established or commonly accepted educational settings, involving normal educational practices, such as (i) research on regular and special education instructional strategies, or (ii) research on the effectiveness of or the comparison among instructional techniques, curricula, or classroom management method Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview procedures or observation of public behavior, unless: (i) information obtained is recorded in such a manner that human subjects can be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects; and (ii) any disclosure of the human subjects' responses outside the research could reasonably place the subjects at risk of criminal or civil liability or be damaging to the subjects' financial standing, employability, or reputation Research involving the use of educational tests (cognitive, diagnostic, aptitude, achievement), survey procedures, interview procedures, or observation of public behavior that is not exempt under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, if: (i) the human subjects are elected or appointed public officials or candidates for public office; or (ii) federal statute(s) require(s) without exception that the confidentiality of the personally identifiable information will be maintained throughout the research and thereafter(b)(2)

Exempt research activities Research involving the collection or study of existing data, documents, records, pathological specimens, or diagnostic specimens, if these sources are publicly available or if the information is recorded by the investigator in such a manner that subjects cannot be identified, directly or through identifiers linked to the subjects Research and demonstration projects which are conducted by or subject to the approval of department or agency heads, and which are designed to study, evaluate, or otherwise examine: (i) Public benefit or service programs; (ii) procedures for obtaining benefits or services under those programs; (iii) possible changes in or alternatives to those programs or procedures; or (iv) possible changes in methods or levels of payment for benefits or services under those programs Taste and food quality evaluation and consumer acceptance studies, (i) if wholesome foods without additives are consumed or (ii) if a food is consumed that contains a food ingredient at or below the level and for a use found to be safe, or agricultural chemical or environmental contaminant at or below the level found to be safe, by the Food and Drug Administration or approved by the Environmental Protection Agency or the Food Safety and Inspection Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture

References Am J Crit Care 2007;16: Ann Intern Med 2007;146(9):