Inhibition of Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) by ABT-888 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies: Results of a Phase 0 Trial Shivaani Kummar, MD National.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation of Oral Azacitidine Using Extended Treatment Schedules: A Phase I Study Garcia-Manero G et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 603.
Advertisements

Nimotuzumab and radiotherapy in children and adolescents with brain stem glioma: Preliminary results from a Phase II study. T. Crombet 1, R. Cabanas 2,
Design of Dose Response Clinical Trials
Tolerability of a novel bone-seeking radionuclide, the alpha emitter radium-223, in patients with skeletal metastases from breast and prostate cancer S.
Martin E. Gutierrez, MD Recruitment Experience in a Phase 0 Trial of ABT-888, an Inhibitor of Poly (ADP- ribose) Polymerase (PARP), in Patients With Advanced.
Optimizing Tissue Collection for PD Assays Using Non-Clinical Models Melinda Hollingshead, DVM, PhD.
Small Molecule PD and Imaging – Models and Assay Development DCTD Phase 0 Primer, September 5, 2007 Ralph E Parchment, PhD SAIC-Frederick, Inc., NCI-Frederick,
Presentation of BE data in a product dossier Drs. Jan Welink Training workshop: Training of BE assessors, Kiev, October 2009.
Biostatistics Dr. Larry Rubinstein, National Cancer Institute.
The Preclinical Pathway to a Phase 0 Clinical Trial Accelerating Cancer Diagnosis and Drug Development DCTD Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 290.
AbstractSchema Conclusion Pharmacokinetic profile of the base-excision repair inhibitor Methoxyamine-HCl (TRC102; MX) given as an one-hour intravenous.
Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Clinical Trial Design, Biostatistics, Ethics, and Recruitment Clinical Trial Design  Anthony J. Murgo, MD.,MS; NCI/DCTD Biostatistics  Larry Rubinstein,
AbstractSchema Treatment Toxicities Conclusion First in human phase 1 clinical trial of the base-excision repair inhibitor Methoxyamine-HCl (TRC102; MX)
Inhibition of Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) by ABT-888 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies: Results of a Phase 0 Trial Shivaani Kummar, MD National.
SARC023 Phase I/II trial of ganetespib, an heat shock protein 90 inhibitor in combination with the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus for patients with unresectable.
Modified Megestrol The Clinical Trials by : Carolina R. Akib
Richardson PG et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 535.
Roberts AW et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 325.
Title, in bold style Subtitle, in regular Max 3 lines of text totally NB! The graphic outside the slide will not show in “Slide Show” or on print WntResearch.
Re-Examination of the Design of Early Clinical Trials for Molecularly Targeted Drugs Richard Simon, D.Sc. National Cancer Institute linus.nci.nih.gov/brb.
Novel Trial Designs for Early Phase Drug Development Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, PhD Associate Professor Director of Biostatistics Hollings Cancer Center.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
1 Phase 0 Trials Role in Radiation Mitigation Agent Development? Anthony J. Murgo, M.D., M.S. Office of Oncology Drug Products Center for Drug Evaluation.
Phase 1b Study of Iniparib (BSI-201) Combined with Irinotecan for Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer 1 Cell Cycle Effects of Iniparib plus Gemcitabine.
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Toxicity of Sparing Radiation to the Pathologic N0 Side of the Neck in Squamous Cell.
Stem Cells In Clinical Practice: STELLA Experience Manolo D’Arcangelo Department of Oncology Ospedale Civile di Livorno.
SARC015: Phase II study of R1507 in wild-type GIST Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center Katie Janeway, Dana Farber Cancer Institute.
1 Kepivance™ (Palifermin) Basis for Approval and Pediatric Studies Kepivance™ (Amgen) Approved 12/15/04 Joseph E. Gootenberg, M.D. Office of Oncology Drug.
ACRIN 6685 Overview ACRIN 6685 A Multi-center Trial of FDG-PET/CT Staging of Head and Neck Cancer and its Impact on the N0 Neck Surgical Treatment in Head.
ESP1/SARC025 Global Collaboration: A Phase I Study of a Combination of the PARP inhibitor, Niraparib and Temozolomide in Patients with Previously Treated,
The Investigational Agent MLN9708, an Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Results from the Expansion.
1 I4E-MC-JXBA and JXBB Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the PK and Drug-Drug Interaction of Cetuximab and Cisplatin (JXBA) Cetuximab and Cisplatin (JXBB)
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
FDA Case Studies Pediatric Oncology Subcommittee March 4, 2003.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
Ibrutinib, Single Agent or in Combination with Dexamethasone, in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Preliminary Phase.
A First-in-human, First-in-class, Phase I Study of Systemic Hedgehog Pathway Antagonist, GDC-0449, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors P.M. LoRusso,
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Updated Results of a Phase I First-in-Human Study of the BCL-2 Inhibitor ABT-199 (GDC-0199) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic.
Pharmacodynamic Response in Phase I Combination Study of Veliparib (ABT-888) and Topotecan in Adults with Refractory Solid Tumors and Lymphomas J. Ji,
Locatelli F et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4378.
Audeh MW et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Clinical Science Symposium)
1 Presented at the March 13, 2003 Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee meeting By Stephen Howell, M.D. Skyepharma, Inc.
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
A Phase I Study of MEK162 and FOLFOX in chemotherapy-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer May Cho, Dean Lim, Timothy Synold, Paul Frankel, Lucille Leong,
May 29 - June 2, 2015 TIGER-X: Rociletinib Activity in EGFR T790M Mutant NSCLC CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting* *CCO.
MM-005: A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Determine the Maximum Tolerated Dose for the Combination of Pomalidomide, Bortezomib,
Certinib in ALK-Rearranged Non- Small-Cell Lung Cancer Alice T. Shaw, M.D., Ph.D., Dong-Wan Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Ranee Mehra, M.D., Daniel S.W. Tan, M.B.,
Evaluation of CD19 specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells (CAR19 T-cells) as an optimal bridge to allogeneic transplantation. Phase I trial for patients.
Immunotherapy with CD19 CAR redirected T-cells for high risk, relapsed paediatric CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and other haematological malignancies.
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
A phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of weekly MK-0646, an Insulin Like Growth Factor-1 Receptor (IGF-1R) monoclonal antibody in patients.
Nivolumab in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (R/R cHL): Clinical Outcomes from Extended Follow-up of a Phase 1 Study.
Phase I/II Study of Lorlatinib in Advanced ALK+ or ROS1+ NSCLC
University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) Clinical Trials Portfolio
Myeloproliferative Neoplasm (MPN) Clinical Trials Portfolio
Intervista a Angelo Delmonte
Jakubowiak AJ et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 862.
MTN-037 Protocol Overview
Seymour JF et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 872.
LV5FU2-cisplatin followed by gemcitabine or the reverse sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Preliminary results of a randomized phase III trial (FFCD.
MITO 26 PHASE II TRIAL ON TRABECTEDIN IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED UTERINE AND OVARIAN CARCINOSARCOMA (CS)
Phase II trial of erlotinib in advanced pancreatic cancer
Clinical IIT Pancreatic Studies.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 265.
Presentation transcript:

Inhibition of Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) by ABT-888 in Patients With Advanced Malignancies: Results of a Phase 0 Trial Shivaani Kummar, MD National Cancer Institute September 5, 2007

Objectives  Primary: ¬Determine a non-toxic dose range at which ABT-888 inhibits PARP in tumor samples and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). ¬Determine the pharmacokinetics of ABT-888. ¬Determine the time course of PARP inhibition in PBMCs by ABT-888.  Secondary: ¬Determine the safety of administering one dose of ABT-888.

Eligibility Criteria  Participants with solid tumors must have advanced disease refractory to at least one line of standard therapy or for which no standard therapy is available. ¬Participants with CLL or lymphoma may be enrolled if they have disease for which standard therapy is currently not indicated or disease that has failed at least one line of standard therapy.  Any prior therapy must have been completed ≥ 2 weeks prior to protocol enrollment.  Adequate organ function.

Study Schema ABT-888 Tumor Biopsies 3-6 Hr PBMC Samples 0, 2, 4, 7, 24 hr PK Samples 10 Tumor biopsies planned:  Significant PARP inhibition in PBMCs from at least 1 of the 3 participants at a given dose level, OR  Plasma C Max of 210 nM achieved in at least 1 participant

Study Schema  The level of PARP expression in both tumor and PBMCs was determined using an ELISA assay prior to proceeding with drug administration and further sampling.  The required minimum level of PAR expression was defined as 31 pg PAR per mL of PBMC extract (allows for demonstration of a 50% reduction in PARP activity) prior to proceeding with sampling for PD studies.  All participants received drug and had sampling for PK studies.

Dose Escalation 3 patients at each dose level The objective of dose escalation was to investigate a PD endpoint, i.e., inhibition of PARP activity, and not to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Dose escalation continued with the goal to achieve significant PARP inhibition in tumor samples in 3 out of 3 participants at 2 dose levels. Dose LevelDose Level 110 mg Level 225 mg Level 350 mg Level 4100 mg Level 5150 mg

Trial Statistics  Endpoints are PARP inhibition in tumor tissue and in PBMCs. For either endpoint:  Significant PARP inhibition for a dose level is defined as 2-fold reduction in PAR level for at least 2 patients out of the 3 accrued  If there is 80% likelihood of 2-fold reduction in PAR level for the patients, then there is 90% power to declare significant inhibition for the dose level, by the binomial distribution.

Trial Results (To Date)  14 patients enrolled on study, 11 are evaluable  3 patients (10 mg); 3 patients (25 mg); 8 patients (50 mg- 3 NE: tumor biopsy negative for PAR levels at baseline (1), 1 pt withdrew prior to receiving drug due to personal reasons, 1 pt currently being evaluated)  Age (range): years  Diagnoses: carcinoid (1), colorectal cancer (3), small cell lung cancer (1), low grade lymphomas (3), CTCL (3), adenocarcinoma of the external auditory canal (1), SCC head and neck (1), melanoma (1)  Patients monitored by serial bloodwork, EKGs, physical exams

Mean Plasma Concentration of ABT-888 Following a Single Oral Dose

Cohort 1Cohort 2 Cohort 3 Pt 10 Pt 2 Pt 3Pt 4 Pt 6Pt 7 Pt 8 Pt 1 PAR Inhibition in PBMCs Pt 11

PAR Inhibition in Tumor Biopsies 3-6 Hours Post Dose

PAR Inhibition in PBMC and Tumor Biopsies 24 Hours Post 50-mg Dose PAR levels in PBMC samples from Patient 12 (levels in Patient 13 below defined minimum for continued sampling) PAR levels in tumor biopsy samples from Patients 12 and 13

First Phase 0 - Timelines and What We Have Achieved

First Phase 0 - What Have We Achieved?  Established that ABT-888 inhibits the target of interest at clinically achievable concentrations.  Established target assay feasibility in human samples after qualification in animal models. Assay validated in preclinical models using clinical procedures.  Developed SOPs for human tissue acquisition, handling and processing.  Performed real-time PK and PD analyses (results received within 72 hours of obtaining sample).  PK and PD data, including timing of tumor and PBMC sampling, available well before planned Phase I combination studies.

The Next Speaker is: Dr. Steve Larson