WP4 : Beam Line Design Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory On behalf of WP1.1+ WP1.2 (LC-ABD1) + WP4.1 (LC-ABD2) team LC-ABD2 Plenary Meeting,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
4.1/9.1m L* Optics & Performance Glen White, SLAC SiD Meeting, SLAC Jan 13, 2015.
Advertisements

1 Collimation Simulations and Optimisation Frank Jackson ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
Overview of Beam Delivery System Final Focus Optics Collimator Final Doublet Extraction/Dump Others S.Kuroda ( KEK ) MDI meeting at SLAC 1/6/2005.
Summary of wg2a (BDS and IR) Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Shigeru Kuroda, Andrei Seryi October 21, 2005.
ATF2 FB/FF layout Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group FONT meeting January 11, 2007.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project  IR background issues and plans for Snowmass Jeff Gronberg/LLNL Linear Collider Workshop October 25, 2000.
BDS GDE context LC-ABD2 : WP4 - Beam Line Design 12 th April 2007, LC-ABD Plenary, RHUL Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, The Cockcroft Institute.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.
ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Working Group Summary Tom Markiewicz LC R&D Workshop, UCSC June 29, 2002.
European Design Study Towards a TeV Linear Collider WP 2 : Beam Delivery System Co-ordinator: Deepa Angal-Kalinin CCLRC, Daresbury Laboratory.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
EM background tests of IP feedback hardware Christine Clarke Oxford University 24 th September 2007 Oxford (P. Burrows, C. Perry, G. Christian, T. Hartin,
BDSIM simulations/results: Synchrotron Radiation and Muons Motivation and History Tracking results Synchrotron Radiation Tracking of Halo Muons News from.
1 ATF2 Tuning and its application to ILC and CLIC FFS/IR region ASTeC and MAN : working together on tuning methods for the ATF2 and ILC IR/extraction design.
Beam Delivery System Review of RDR(draft) 1.Overview 2.Beam parameters 3.System description 3.1 diagnostic, tune-up dump, machine protection MPS.
ILC Beam Delivery System Layout and Lattice Design Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, Cockcroft Institute Cockcroft Institute SAC th November 2006.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.
ATF2 Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group 5th ATF2 project meeting, KEK December 19-21, 2007.
Relative Error on Parameter Pessimistic Estimate Optimistic Estimate β function at the LW 3% 1% LW readout error 2% 1% Laser spot waist 10% Laser Pointing.
ATF2 optics … 1 3 rd Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF ATF2 optics, tuning method and tolerances of initial alignment, magnets, power supplies etc.
UK/EU Plans for ATF2 G.A. Blair ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-0ff meeting, Annecy, 8 th October 2006 Overview EUROTeV UK.
ILC BCD Crossing Angle Issues G. A. Blair Royal Holloway Univ. London ECFA ILC Workshop, Vienna 14 th November 2005 Introduction BCD Crossing Angle Rankings.
January 10, 2007M. Woodley (SLAC)1 ILC Beam Delivery System “Interim Working Assumption” 2006e Release European LC Workshop, January , Daresbury.
D. Angal-KalininEUROTeV Annual Meeting, DESY WP2 : Beam Delivery System D. Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, STFC, Daresbury Laboratory 4 th EUROTeV Annual.
ILC BDS Static Beam-Based Alignment and Tuning Glen White SLAC 1.Aims. 2.Error parameters and other assumptions. 3.Overview of alignment and tuning procedure.
ILC Beam Delivery System / MDI Issues for LCC-phase (~
11th December 2007 LET workshop, SLAC 1 Beam dynamics issues in Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.
19 July 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit (via Eric Torrence) VLCW06 19 July 06.
1 Overview of Polarimetry Outline of Talk Polarized Physics Machine-Detector Interface Issues Upstream Polarimeter Downstream Polarimeter Ken Moffeit,
BDS Andrei Seryi, Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Emmannual Tsesmelis, Rogelio Tomas, Andrea Latina, Daniel Schulte Detectors Civil engineering.
Global Design Effort ILC Crab Cavity Overview and requirements Andrei Seryi SLAC on behalf of ILC Beam Delivery and Crab-Cavity design teams Joint BNL/US-LARP/CARE-HHH.
Design status 2 mrad IR Current plan for finalization in 2008 Philip Bambade LAL-Orsay On behalf of: D.Angal-Kalinin, R.Appleby, F.Jackson, D.Toprek (Cockcroft)
17 th November, 2008 LCWS08/ILC08 1 BDS optics and minimal machine study Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC & The Cockcroft Institute Daresbury Laboratory.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Global Design Effort CLIC-ILC BDS & MDI work Materials for discussion Daniel Schulte, Rogelio Tomas and Emmanuel Tsesmelis for CLIC team Andrei Seryi for.
September 17-21, 2007Workshop on ILC Interaction Region Engineering Design, SLAC IR Vacuum Systems first thoughts Oleg Malyshev ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory.
ILC luminosity optimization in the presence of the detector solenoid and anti-DID Reine Versteegen PhD Student CEA Saclay, Irfu/SACM International Workshop.
BDS Lattice Design : EDR plans GWP03 Meeting 04/12/2007.
LET in the ILC DRs with Minimal Tuning Knobs and other assorted information James Jones Deepa Angal-Kalinin and Frank Jackson.
COMPENSATION OF DETECTOR SOLENOID FIELD WITH L*=4.1M Glen White, SLAC April 20, 2015 ALCW2015, KEK, Japan.
Beam-beam Simulation at eRHIC Yue Hao Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory July 29, 2010 EIC Meeting at The Catholic University.
IWLC10, 18 th -22 nd October10, CERN/CICG 1 Global Design Effort Updates to ILC RDR Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin & James Jones ASTeC, STFC.
G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
1 RTML Emittance Measurement Station Yuri Kubyshin (1), Robert Apsimon (2), Hector García (1,2) (1) Technical University of Catalonia (UPC) (2) CERN CLIC.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Baseline BDS Design Updates Glen White, SLAC Sept. 4, 2014 Ichinoseki, MDI/CFS Meeting.
Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.
The design of the 2mrad extraction line Rob Appleby Daresbury Laboratory On behalf of the SLAC-BNL-UK-France task force ILC European Regional Meeting and.
1 April 1 st, 2003 O. Napoly, ECFA-DESY Amsterdam Design of a new Final Focus System with l* = 4,5 m J. Payet, O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Collimation Simulations and Optimisation
In collaboration with P. N. Burrows, A. Latina and D. Schulte
Large Booster and Collider Ring
E. Paloni, S. Bettoni, R. Pantaleo, M Biagini, et al.
CLIC-ILC BDS & MDI work.
The small crossing angle layout - where are we and what do we do now?
AD & I : BDS Lattice Design Changes
ILC BDS Emittance Diagnostics: Design and Requirements
Beam Optics Set-Up at SLAC End Station A
Background study plans : from to ILC
Updates on IR and FF for super-B factory
The 2mrad horizontal crossing angle IR layout for the ILC
Design status 2 mrad IR Current plan for finalization in 2008
The 2mrad crossing angle alternative
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Crab Crossing Named #1 common technical risk (p. 6 of the report)
ILC Beam Switchyard: Issues and Plans
Presentation transcript:

WP4 : Beam Line Design Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory On behalf of WP1.1+ WP1.2 (LC-ABD1) + WP4.1 (LC-ABD2) team LC-ABD2 Plenary Meeting, 24 th September 2007, Liverpool

LC-ABD2 WP4 : Beam Line Design 4.1 BDS Lattice Design and Simulations (distribution of simulations) 4.2 BDS Collimator design LC-ABD1 WP1.1 +WP1.2 + WP Lattice Design & Beam Simulations 1.2 BDS beam transport simulations (lattice design, laser wire, feedback, beam halo, collimator wakefields and electromagnetic backgrounds) 5.3 Collimation Luis

BDS Lattice Design Pre-technology decision –Efforts concentrated on TESLA BDS Design Final focus Collimation and diagnostics Difficulties to extract the disrupted beam at 800 GeV CM Post-technology decision –NLC BDS design dominated –ILC with two IRs was the baseline, no design for small IR –NLC lattice adapted for survivable collimators Efforts mainly concentrated on developing the small crossing angle IR and extraction line design Lattice optimisation study for collimation performance Evaluation of BDS collimation depths with evolving machine configurations and machine parameters Development of beam diagnostics optics for laser wire Optics support for beam tests at ESA

BDS configuration changes : First ILC workshop(Nov’04) till July’06 BDS layout configuration till July 2006 RDR BDS configuration with 1 IR 14 mrad

BDS Collimation Optics Design Lattice optimisation demonstrates significant improvement in collimation efficiency Collimation depths for different detector concepts, different L* covering all the parameter ranges of the ILC Collimated halo before optimisation Collimated halo after optimisation Collimation depths : ILC reference design report F. Jackson

Emittance Tuning Simulations Developed a robust integrated simulation environment for analysis of various methods of beam tuning simulations. Simulation structure works for both ILC and ATF2 with minimal changes. Investigated traditional and more novel methods of beam tuning on ILC and ATF2. Analysis shows viable methods can be created to remove the emittance dilution effects as seen at the IP, using only the final 5 sextupole magnets. Performed further investigations into the linearity of such tuning knobs, and the limits with position and field errors on the tuning magnets. Performed tolerance studies on both the ILC and ATF2 including the effects of trajectory correction. J. Jones, A. Scarfe

BDSIM Development Beamlines are built of modular accelerator components Full simulation of EM showers All secondaries are tracked BDSIM was used extensively for the ILC BDS simulations. Benchmarking tests were performed for particle tracking, electromagnetic and hadronic physics processes The BDSIM distribution was deployed on the GRID to increase the performance Screenshot of an IR Design in BDSIM Full IR Geometry modelled in BDSIM Includes a full Solenoid Field Map I. Agapov, J. Carter, S.Malton

100W/m hands-on limit Losses are mostly due to SR. Beam loss is very small 100W/m Losses are due to SR and beam loss 20mrad 2mrad Losses in ILC extraction line calculated with BDSIM 250GeV Nominal, 0nm offset 45.8kW integr. loss J. Carter

ATF2 extraction line ILC polarimeter chicane LW photon dipoles quadrupoles positron electron BPMs LW photon LW exit port quadrupoles dipole beam pipe window BDSIM Development Also developing an interface to PLACET, for collimator wake-field studies Being used for background calculations, also for laser-wire signal extraction: S.Malton, L. Deacon

Recreate ILC-like background hits on BPM BPM1 s.e. Q = BPM2 s.e. Q = BPM3 s.e. Q = BPM4 s.e. Q = Incident beam spot A. Hartin Developed a simulation of the noise on the IP feedback BPM striplines caused by secondary Electromagnetic shower products that result from beam-beam primaries striking the material inside of the inner IR region. Significant GEANT modelling. Simulated expected noise at ESA T488 experiment, which attempted to mimic the EM environment at ILC  Christine Clarke’s talk in WP7

Laser wire : Measurement precision NOTE: Rapid improvement with better σ y resolution Reconstructed emittance of one train using 5% error on σ y Assumes a 4d diagnostics section With 50% random mismatch of initial optical functions The true emittance is  m  rad The Goal: Beam Matrix Reconstruction I. Agapov, G.Blair, M.Woodely

IP position FB position scan angle scan using luminosity signal position (or angle) scans gain additional luminosity IP intra-train FB performance IP position FB position scan angle scan using luminosity signal marginal luminosity gain from scans (?) G. White J. Lopez

End Station A Optics Major ILC test facility Challenges – Varied optics demands – Strong bends (dispersion suppression, synchrotron radiation) Able to achieve small horizontal and vertical beam sizes vertical beam size 83  m for collimator wakefield tests horizontal beam size 240  m for BPM studies F. Jackson

Luminosity loss due to wake fields MERLIN A. Bungau PLACET & GUINEA-PIG A. Toader

Snowmass 2 mrad design unsatisfactory  redesign with simpler concept aiming to be as short & economical as possible Assumption : other ways than the present spent-beam spectrometry & polarimetry are possible to complement pre-IP measurements New “minimal” extraction line concept Length ~ 300 m dump(s): 0.5 m 3 m QF, SF warm quad & sext QD, SD NbTi (Nb3Sn) SC FDFD 3 warm bends 2 “Panofsky” quads collimators kickers BHEX1 BB1,2 R. Appleby et al

The number of particles inside the laser spot ±100 µm is 44% of its number at IP y offset (600 µm) y’ offset (12 µrad).The number of particles inside the laser spot ±100 µm is 0.1% of its number at IP. Without detector field With detector field 14 mrad baseline extraction optics To compensate the detector effect and to increase the number of particles inside the laser spot size. Include anti-solenoid, anti-DID (for different detector concepts) Include magnetic and beam errors to study the diagnostics performance and effect on beam losses at collimators D.Toprek, R. Appleby

QD0 cryostat cold bores, 2K QF1 cryostat cold bores, 2K ~4m z=4mz=7.3mz=9.3mz=12.5m incoming 0.2m Be part Legend: pump BPM, strip-line flanges kicker, strip-line valve bellows IR vacuum design solution Tubes are TiZrV coated Pumps connected to the tubes close to the cone Beam screen with holes to avoid H 2 instability O. Malyshev ; original sketch of IR region by A.Seryi

What did we achieve in last 3 years? Strong optics and simulation core group : BDS and extraction line lattice design and simulations Key role in 2 mrad design –Comparison of this design with 20 mrad has lead to currently proposed 14 mrad design with anti-DID Significant contributions to start-to-end simulations  Feedback Collimation depths and optics optimisation for better collimation efficiency Effects of collimator wake fields on beam, simulations for ESA beam tests  WP5.3 A complete full simulation tool BDSIM and benchmarking with other codes Simulations for beam diagnostics optics using laser wire Electromagnetic backgrounds simulations Tuning algorithms and procedures for ILC/ATF2 Optics support for ESA test experiments Significant contributions to the RDR

Ongoing and planned studies : LC-ABD2 Performance evaluation of 14 mrad baseline Develop BDSIM for detailed analysis of extraction line losses and back scattering Develop full optics simulations of skew correction and emittance measurement section with realistic errors Complete study of alternative extraction schemes and document Optimisation of collimation optics, include realistic machine and beam errors ATF2 : simulations and beam tests Calculate the average pressure and pressure profiles in the BDS and the extraction lines Decide on the choice of material for the BDS vacuum systems Beam line integration Optics support for ESA (or any other test facility) The work programme fits very well into the evolving WBS for BDS EDR

LC-ABD team has developed a skill base within UK for BDS lattice design and simulations Strong collaborations with LAL, CEA, SLAC, FNAL, KEK, CERN Much more studies, simulations and engineering design details are planned for the EDR phase. Look forward to implementing and testing these studies at ATF2 and other test facilities Summary