‘Trials and Tribulations’ An RCT with the DCSF Carole Torgerson, Andy Wiggins and Hannah Ainsworth.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EU Presidency Conference Effective policies for the development of competencies of youth in Europe Warsaw, November 2011 Improving basic skills in.
Advertisements

© Crown copyright 2008 Assessing Pupils Progress Spring 2009.
Strategy managers / Curriculum managers network meeting 4 th November 2009.
Introduction to VET Quality Assurance in the UK Mark Novels 6 th December 2011 Quality Assurance in Technical and Vocational Education and Skills Study.
1 1 Next Generation Accountability Model Lou Fabrizio, Ph.D. NCDPI Collaborative Conference for Student Achievement April 19, 2011.
1. 2 Why are Result & Impact Indicators Needed? To better understand the positive/negative results of EC aid. The main questions are: 1.What change is.
WHO training courses on family violence prevention | February 21, 2014 February 21, |1 | Strengthening capacity for the prevention of family violence.
0 - 0.
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Addition Facts
SEN Governors Meetings Jackie Hibbert, School Development Adviser, SEN and Inclusion David Herd, School Development Adviser, SEN and Inclusion Charlie.
Objective Helping Children to understand………………. The concept of Multiplication. Multiplication as a repeated addition Teaching table through multiplication.
The suitability of using RCTs in educational research Dr Carole Torgerson Senior Research Fellow Institute for Effective Education University of York ESRC.
SADC Course in Statistics Choosing appropriate methods for data collection.
Supporting schools in Greater Manchester – the strategy, the story and the impact! Janet Woods –National College Lead Professional Associate, and DfE Adviser.
Family literacy, language and numeracy Family learning impact funding – Family Numeracy Family Numeracy CPD Module 1: Planning and Delivering Family Numeracy.
Skills for Life Support Programme T: F: E: W: The Skills for Life.
Supporting managers: assessment and the learner journey
Cross-National Survey of School Principal Daniel Pop Education Support Program Open Society Institute.
Afterschool Programs That Follow Evidence- based Practices to Promote Social and Emotional Development Are Effective Roger P. Weissberg, University of.
Dual Credit Policy/Procedures and Data Regional Planning Team Training November 8,
1 What works for pupils with literacy difficulties? Presentation to Reading Association of Ireland St Patricks College Drumcondra 9 February 2009 Greg.
TRANSFORMING EDUCATION THROUGH EVIDENCE. The Centre for Effective Education SCHOOL OF Education Conducting Educational Randomised Control Trials in Disadvantaged.
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
© S Haughton more than 3?
1 Directed Depth First Search Adjacency Lists A: F G B: A H C: A D D: C F E: C D G F: E: G: : H: B: I: H: F A B C G D E H I.
The use of the CEFR at national level in the member states of the Council of Europe Waldek Martyniuk José Noijons Language Policy Forum 2007.
Overview Securing School Improvement. Welcome and introduction AIM Understanding the Ofsted Inspection Framework To give some insight into how some of.
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
Addition 1’s to 20.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents
Key Stage 3 National Strategy Standards and assessment: session 3.
25 seconds left…...
Only 2% felt the responsibility for education belonged wholly to the school, 58% of parents interviewed felt they were equally responsible. Williams et.
Local Support for Council Tax The Consultation Document.
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Doubles Facts Doubles with Pictures Doubles without Pictures Pictures Only.
11 = This is the fact family. You say: 8+3=11 and 3+8=11
Week 1.
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
About the Child Care Workforce. 2 Presentation Overview The Institute The Myths The Truths The Research My Knowledge.
∂ What works…and who listens? Encouraging the experimental evidence base in education and the social sciences RCTs in the Social Sciences 9 th Annual Conference.
Experimental evaluation in education Professor Carole Torgerson School of Education, Durham University, United Kingdom International.
Adapting Designs Professor David Torgerson University of York Professor Carole Torgerson Durham University.
Conference for EEF evaluators: Building evidence in education Hannah Ainsworth, York Trials Unit, University of York Professor David Torgerson, York Trials.
Building Evidence in Education: Conference for EEF Evaluators 11 th July: Theory 12 th July: Practice
A randomised controlled trial to improve writing quality during the transition between primary and secondary school Natasha Mitchell, Research Fellow Hannah.
Narrowing the gap and the effective use of the Pupil and Service Premium with SEN young people Glyn Wright Autumn Term 2013.
Research evidence and effective use of the Pupil Premium Professor Steve Higgins, School of Education, Durham
Briefing on a New Education Service for Pupils with Medical Needs including Mental Health Needs 24 th October :00 – 13:00 John Wigan Room, Oakwood.
APP and Maths, One Model, of whole school implementation Tower Hamlets Case Study.
ARROW Trial Design Professor Greg Brooks, Sheffield University, Ed Studies Dr Jeremy Miles York University, Trials Unit Carole Torgerson, York University,
Managing, mapping and evaluating successful intervention programmes. Provision Management.
Clerks to Governing Bodies One to One Tuition Overview.
Randomised Controlled Trials: What, why and how? Pam Hanley 22 March 2013.
Intervention and Support Inclusion Questions. Early and Strategic  How does the school provide purposeful early intervention and support to lift the.
Regional Implementation of the Proposed Specific Learning Difficulties (SpLD) Support Model For Primary and Post Primary Schools 07/06/20161.
TCAI: Lessons from first Endline TCAI Development Partners Feb 27, 2013.
A randomised controlled trial to improve writing quality during the transition between primary and secondary school Natasha Mitchell, Research Fellow Hannah.
The HEalthy Adolescent Relationships Training Study (HEARTS) is a project to evaluate the ArielTrust’s ‘FaceUp’ programme.
Effective Use of TA Support
Presentation transcript:

‘Trials and Tribulations’ An RCT with the DCSF Carole Torgerson, Andy Wiggins and Hannah Ainsworth

3 parts – Context, Design, Issues Part 1…. –Who’s who –Policy Background –What is ECC –Key Research questions –Why an RCT –Some of our tribulations –and then over to Hannah……

ECC Evaluation - Who’s who Carole Torgerson Hannah Ainsworth Andy Wiggins Patrick Barmby and…

Policy Background Context - an overall improvement in primary maths over the last 10 years, however the level of attainment for the bottom 5% has not improved at all. Every Child Counts seeks to address the needs of this ‘bottom’ 5%.

ECC – What is it? One to One (or Small Group 2 or 3) programme each day for a term By experienced trained teachers Accreditation and Support system Initial Diagnosis - followed by…. A targeted and highly structured programme

Key Research Questions Primary outcome Level of initial impact of the one to one and small group models Secondary outcomes include Which children is it most effective for Economic evaluation Long term impact

So why an RCT? Isolate cause and effect Minimise bias Detect small effects

.…but a bit tricky RCT Complexity Social Policies Fields of Wheat Bottles of Pills Every Child Counts

Some of our ‘tribulations’…. Teacher knows best…. Enthusiastic adopters…. The burden on schools…. Fair to all…. Programme inherent measures…. Natures course…. Long term.…

Research design and working with the schools Hannah Ainsworth IEE

Methods Trial 1How effective is Numbers Count compared with normal classroom teaching Trial 2: Pairs Is there a difference in effectiveness when Numbers Count is delivered to an individual child and when Numbers Count is adapted and is delivered to children taught in pairs? Trial 2: Triplets Is there a difference in effectiveness when Numbers Count is delivered to an individual child and when Numbers Count is adapted and is delivered to children taught in triplets?

Trial 1 Has been designed to ensure that all children who would normally receive Numbers Count will do so. 12 children selected by the School are randomly allocated into 3 groups: Group1 (4 children) will receive the intervention in the Autumn term Group 2 (4 children) will receive the intervention in the Spring term Group 3 (4 children) will receive the intervention in the Summer term

Trial 2: Pairs 12, 13 or 14 children selected by the School are randomly allocated into 5 groups: Group 1 (1 child) will receive the intervention individually in the Autumn term Group 2 (4 children) will receive the intervention in pairs in the Autumn term Group 3 (1 child) will receive the intervention individually in the Spring term Group 4 (4 children) will receive the intervention in pairs in the Spring term Group 5 (2, 3 or 4 children) will receive the intervention individually in the Summer term

Trial 2: Triplets 16, 17 or 18 children selected by the School are randomly allocated into 6 groups: Group 1 (1 child) will receive the intervention individually in the Autumn term Group 2 (6 children) will receive the intervention in triplets in the Autumn term Group 3 (1 children) will receive the intervention individually in the Spring term Group 4 (6 children) will receive the intervention in triplets in the Spring term Group 5 (2, 3 or 4 children) will receive the intervention individually in the Summer term Group 6 (4 children) allocated as ‘funded by Barclays’ – will receive Numbers Count individually whenever the school decides – after random allocation no longer in the trial.

Discussion