Science at Q-band Manchester September 2009

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Circumstellar disks: what can we learn from ALMA? March ARC meeting, CSL.
Advertisements

QR026 High Sensitivity VME Tuner Performance Data
Shunya Takekawa T. Oka, K. Tanaka, K. Miura, H. Suzuta Keio University
QUIET Q/U Imaging ExperimenT Osamu Tajima (KEK) QUIET collaboration 1.
Methanol maser polarization in W3(OH) Lisa Harvey-Smith Collaborators: Vlemmings, Cohen, Soria-Ruiz Joint Institute for VLBI in Europe.
Front-end, Back-end, correlators
Radio Science and PILOT Tony Wong ATNF/UNSW PILOT Workshop 26 March 2003.
CARMA in the ALMA era CARMA is well-suited for mapping large fields, extended objects; unique capabilities at 30 GHz testbed for new instrumentation and.
The Green Bank Telescope a powerful instrument for enhancing ALMA science Unblocked Aperture Low sidelobes gives high dynamic range Resistance to Interference.
SKA TDP Receiver Antenna Interface March 21, 2008 Total system noise contributions Choice of operating temperature Wideband feeds.
BDT Radio – 2b – CMV 2009/10/09 Basic Detection Techniques 2b (2009/10/09): Focal Plane Arrays Case study: WSRT System overview Receiver and.
The Future of the Past Harvard University Astronomy 218 Concluding Lecture, May 4, 2000.
STAR FORMATION STUDIES with the CORNELL-CALTECH ATACAMA TELESCOPE Star Formation/ISM Working Group Paul F. Goldsmith (Cornell) & Neal. J. Evans II (Univ.
Prototype SKA Technologies at Molonglo: 3. Beamformer and Correlator J.D. Bunton Telecommunications and Industrial Physics, CSIRO. Australia. Correlator.
Oxford Astrophysics SIS Mixers Most common front-end element for mm and sub-mm coherent receivers Based on superconducting tunnel junction in planar superconducting.
Millimetron mision sensitivities and instrumentation concept
Dusty star formation at high redshift Chris Willott, HIA/NRC 1. Introductory cosmology 2. Obscured galaxy formation: the view with current facilities,
Definitive Science with Band 3 adapted from the ALMA Design Reference Science Plan (
SLAC, May 12th, 2004J.L. Puget PLANCK J.L. Puget Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale Orsay.
Receiver Systems Suzy Jackson – based on previous talks by Alex Dunning & Graeme Carrad.
Receiver Schematic The figure below shows a schematic of the receiver. Each pixel in the spectrometer comprises a feedhorn that couples the incoming radiation.
Central Development Laboratory (Adapted from John Webber’s Viewgraphs, April 2002 Presented tonight by Skip Thacker) IEEE Tour April 2003.
Cardiff University Astronomy Instrumentation Group IRAM Camera meeting October 13-14, Cardiff University Astronomical Instrumentation Peter Ade.
Star Formation Research Now & With ALMA Debra Shepherd National Radio Astronomy Observatory ALMA Specifications: Today’s (sub)millimeter interferometers.
P olarized R adiation I maging and S pectroscopy M ission Probing cosmic structures and radiation with the ultimate polarimetric spectro-imaging of the.
What is Millimetre-Wave Astronomy and why is it different? Michael Burton University of New South Wales.
10 January 2006AAS EVLA Town Hall Meeting1 The EVLA: A North American Partnership The EVLA Project on the Web
Molecular Gas and Dust in SMGs in COSMOS Left panel is the COSMOS field with overlays of single-dish mm surveys. Right panel is a 0.3 sq degree map at.
Polarization at IRAM Status and Plans S.Guilloteau Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Bordeaux.
QUIET Q/U Imaging ExperimenT. QUIET Project Miami Physics Conference 2009 December 16 Raul Monsalve for the QUIET Collaboration University of Miami QUIET.
The Expanded Very Large Array: Phase I Science and Technical Requirements Rick Perley NRAO - Socorro.
Atacama Large Millimeter Array October 2004DUSTY041 Scientific requirements of ALMA, and its capabilities for key-projects: extragalactic Carlos.
An I3 funded by the EU through FP6 Alastair G Gunn University of Manchester Jodrell Bank Observatory OPTICON BOARD MEETING – 11 th /12 th October 2004,
Making MOPRA go! Lucyna Kedziora-Chudczer Friend of the telescope (UNSW)
Proposed Versatile 1.2 to 14 GHz Radio Telescope Receiver S. Weinreb, JPL/Caltech, Draft July 5, 2005 Contents 1.Introduction and intended applications.
SPIRE-FTS spectrum of Arp 220, Mrk 231 and NGC Bright CO (J = 4-3 to J = 13-12), water, and atomic fine-structure line transitions are labeled. The.
K band History Science workshop determined efficiency improvements necessary for K Band: weather, observing requests, mapping programs. Only enough funds.
AST 443: Submm & Radio Astronomy November 18, 2003.
Moscow presentation, Sept, 2007 L. Kogan National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Socorro, NM, USA EVLA, ALMA –the most important NRAO projects.
Australian Astronomy MNRF Development of Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuits (MMIC) ATCA Broadband Backend (CABB)
Molecular Clouds in in the LMC at High Resolution: The Importance of Short ALMA Baselines T. Wong 1,2,4, J. B. Whiteoak 1, M. Hunt 2, J. Ott 1, Y.-N. Chin.
Observing Strategies at cm wavelengths Making good decisions Jessica Chapman Synthesis Workshop May 2003.
Construction of a Heterodyne Receiver for Band 1 of ALMA N. Reyes 1, P. Zorzi 1, F. P. Mena 1, C.Granet 2, E. Michael 1, C. Jarufe, F. Colleoni, Francisco.
The Far-Infrared Universe: from the Universe’s oldest light to the birth of its youngest stars Jeremy P. Scott, on behalf of Locke D. Spencer Physics and.
Large Area Surveys - I Large area surveys can answer fundamental questions about the distribution of gas in galaxy clusters, how gas cycles in and out.
A Modular K-Band Focal Plane Array for the Green Bank Telescope Matt Morgan National Radio Astronomy Observatory 9/28/2007.
Centimeter Receiver Design Considerations with a look to the future Steven White National Radio Astronomy Observatory Green Bank, WV.
ALMA Science Examples Min S. Yun (UMass/ANASAC). ALMA Science Requirements  High Fidelity Imaging  Precise Imaging at 0.1” Resolution  Routine Sub-mJy.
K-Band Focal Plane Array Project Engineering Overview Matt Morgan National Radio Astronomy Observatory 2/27/2008.
FIRST LIGHT A selection of future facilities relevant to the formation and evolution of galaxies Wavelength Sensitivity Spatial resolution.
Brent WilloughbyEVLA Front-End CDR – WVR Option 24 April EVLA Front-End CDR Water Vapor Radiometer Option.
GBT Focal Plane Array K band 7 Pixel Steven White Program Manager.
Dr Danielle Kettle1 LNA progress 4 th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008 LNA progress.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
WP8: JRA “APRICOT” All Purpose Radio Imaging Cameras on Telescopes Peter Wilkinson: U. Manchester.
High Redshift Galaxies/Galaxy Surveys ALMA Community Day April 18, 2011 Neal A. Miller University of Maryland.
Transition Observing and Science EVLA Advisory Committee Meeting, March 19-20, 2009 Claire Chandler Deputy AD for Science, NM Ops.
Possible Instrumentation Development Items for SKA at ASIAA Chau-Ching Chiong (ASIAA) and Yuh-Jing Hwang, Homin Jiang, Chao-Te Li.
Introduction to JEM/SMILES
Cosmic Microwave Technology, Inc.
for the KOSMA Detector and
Matt Morgan National Radio Astronomy Observatory
Commissioning of ASTECAM
Phased Array Feeds Wim van Cappellen
Lectures on radio astronomy: 3
Observational Astronomy
Observational Astronomy
Transition Observing and Science
EVLA Advisory Panel Mtg. System Overview
Rick Perley NRAO - Socorro
Presentation transcript:

Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009 APRICOT All Purpose Radio Imaging Cameras On Telescopes Peter Wilkinson U. Manchester Design studies & sub-system prototyping for future large-format Q-band FPA “cameras” on large telescopes 2) MIC + MMIC devices from within Europe. Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

EC Framework7 “RadioNet” Instrumention R&D APRICOT : Q-band camera subsystems + European MIC/MMICs (Caltech/JPL MMIC array spectrographs & NRAO FPA goals overlap with APRICOT) AMSTAR+ : mm/sub-mm cameras subsytems (SIS, MMIC) (W-band FPAs overlaps with APRICOT) (UNIBOARD: multi-purpose digital backends) Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

Some European Q-band telescopes Yebes-40m SRT 64-m Effelsberg-100m (new active 2ry mirror) Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009 Science Strategy “Cameras” enable these telescopes to make new surveys in scientifically rich range 33-50 GHz – In “intermediate” gap between SKA and ALMA Follow-up with EVLA, VLBI, VSOP-2, ALMA Band 1 Continuum and spectroscopy: observations in different weather conditions Complement other mmsub-mm observations Complement CMBR observations e.g. Planck Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009 APRICOT: Basics Operating range: 33-50 GHz spectrally rich + many continuum applications All Stokes parameters + spectroscopy at same time Continuum band split into (n x few GHz) sub-bands for atmospheric & spectral discrimination. Broad-band IF output selected from anywhere within overall band, sent to high-speed digital FTS (UNIBOARD) Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

Molecular Line Spectroscopy Star-forming regions & circumstellar envelopes Imaging plus modelling  temperature & density Many carbon-chain species in the 30-50 GHz band (HCnN n=3,5,7; CnH n=5,6; CnS n=1,3,5) diagnostic of cold dense quiescent gas Other species: SiO (shock tracer); OCS (sulphur sink) CH3CN (hot core species); SO (Zeeman sensitive) SiO masers in CSEs close to the star With large format cameras could survey complete clouds in one day Blind surveys in redshifted CO (1-0) Distances & mass estimates of dusty galaxies Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009 Continuum Studies Surveys for discrete sources (in polarisation) Find new types of AGN e.g. youngest CSOs follow-up with mm-VLBI & VSOP-2 imaging follow-up of GLAST transients Provide net of calibration sources for EVLA and mm-VLBI Support of Planck and all high-sensitivity CMBR experiments Surveys for/of clusters of galaxies via the S-Z effect Surveys of diffuse Galactic emission (in polarisation) Synchrotron; free-free; anomalous dust; thermal dust Need to dissect out the contributions: for ISM astrophysics and CMBR polarised foregrounds In compact regions e.g. YSOs - diagnostics of dust agglomeration in protoplanetary disks Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

Scientific Synergy Surveys with radio cameras link these fields a wealth of astrophysics becomes accessible if we study both galactic and extragalactic foregrounds with precision for progress in cosmology must understand the unpolarized and polarized foregrounds with exquisite precision Surveys with radio cameras link these fields MAS Meeting Pasadena, 27 April 2005 Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

Relevant FPA experience Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009 EMBA: 32 GHz (MPIfR) Dewar interior 7-beam horn array with different properties Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009 FARADAY 18-26 GHz (IRA) 7 feed, hexagonal configuration with central feed 14 x 2 GHz IF outputs right and left polarization; Feeds and LNAs cooled at 20 K; Mechanical de-rotator to track the parallactic angle Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009 OCRA 26-36 GHz (U. MAN) Single polarisation continuum 26-36 GHz Direct detection All-MMIC receiver based on WMAP/Planck- LFI design NGST InP MMICs Horns all cold – behind self-supporting 480mm vacuum window 26-36 GHz 16-beams Continuum (UMAN) Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009 EXPERIENCE...... NGST MMIC performance: very good - ITAR produced great delays MMIC chips to “mass production” of LNAs  extraordinarily long Dewar: many devices, cables, wires, connectors  big, complicated Noise marker and LO distribution: simple in principle but complicated LNA power supply: complicated, huge amount of thin wires Weight: great Maintenance: maybe lots Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

Hence the need for major changes in approach… Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

WP1 Receiver Architecture MPIfR; IRA, UMAN, CAY, TCfA Architectures for highly integrated multi-pixel receivers Modular design with well-defined interfaces Design for mechanical and cryogenic stability Optimise layout for maintenance/fault-fixing Design of monitor, control and calibration systems Integration of direct detection and heterodyne systems LO generation and distribution Design, packaging and integration of RF, IF, LO systems Establish capability to batch-produce RF, IF modules Deliverables are mainly design study reports Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

WP2: passive components IRA; MPIfR, UMAN Highly integrated chain with OMT, hybrids, transmission sections etc Low-loss, low size/weight, low cost, ease of manufacture Standard waveguide technology too expensive Needs technology shift  Planar technology, microstrip transmission lines and filters etc Deliverables - design study reports - few pixels hardware comparing performance of conventional and “innovative” approaches (with WP1 and WP3) Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

WP3: MIC/MMIC development UMAN; IRA; MPIfR; CAY; URomeTV To develop and secure European supply of world-standard MMIC devices for astronomy To seek improved noise performance: TLNA stuck at 5-6 x Quantum Limit for >10 years: why? To explore/achieve increased levels of integration & multi-function capability within a MMIC circuit. Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009 MIC/MMIC producers Fraunhofer Institute (IAF) Freiburg 100 & 50 nm GaAs mHEMT technology Multi-function MMICs Experimental 35nm processes Now interested in low-noise at cryo temps Link with AMSTAR+ U. Manchester 100nm InP HEMT technology innovation in materials and architecture for low-noise rapid response to new design inputs OMMIC company 70nm GaAs mHEMT technology Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009 WP4: Device Testing CAY; UMAN; MPIfR, IRA; URomeTV Accurate measurement of noise temperature and gain fluctuation of devices at cryo temperatures not easy Results from well-respected labs often differ ! CAY have lots of experience in this arena from LNA work for Herschel (HIFI), ALMA, IRAM, ESOC etc Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

Synergy with “MMIC Array Spectrographs” Caltech/JPL: aims similar to APRICOT/AMSTAR+ Push for lowering InP pHEMT noise closer to quantum limit in collaboration with NGST Why don’t MICs and MMICs perform the same from wafer to wafer? Why don’t MMICs in modules perform as well as expected ? (QUIET experience) Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009 WP5: Data handling TCfA: UMAN, IRA, MPIfR Develop and test algorithms using the full range of multi-pixel and multi-spectral data to reduce effects of 1/f noise and atmosphere without spatial switching, (“on the fly-mapping” – strongly affects receiver concept) Develop and test figures-of-merit to support queue- scheduling of the receiver in both continuum and spectroscopic modes Combine knowledge with other mm-wave users Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009 Emerging Specification Npixels and configuration 25100 Limits from optics: SRT ~30 beams for 0.5db loss Configuration affects survey efficiency: hexagonal may not be best for beam-beam switching Tsys <50K RX temperature <25K + sky ~ 25K . Higher Tsys (>5 K) could be tolerated for larger Npix Total RF Bandwidth 33-50 GHz Waveguide band: Goal is 17 GHz BW to backend Which few GHz is least important? Polarisation type LCP/RCP or X/Y Needs detailed discussion Polarisation purity 30dB Set by science demands Hard to maintain 30 db over 46% BW with circular? Continuum channels per pixel 8 For atmospheric diagnosis and instant spectra. Critical requirement for the architecture Spectroscopic coverage 17 GHz instant >2 GHz RF bands Architecture possible to deliver all RF band, split in channels per pixel, to spectrometer with no tuning Gain stability /knee frequency ??? Acceptability? Depends on observation technique Rapid scan rates allow on-the-fly mapping major issue for WP5 simulations Spectroscopic channels per pixel 64k for each 2 GHz band Demand on backend to UNIBOARD Resolution ~30 kHz – science “would like” 15 kHz Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009

Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009 Advice requested Bandwidth goal is 17 GHz (46%) split into ~8 continuum bands - which end is scientifically more important if compromises needed? Receiver is simpler if the internal switching schemes are minimised/nil – challenge is observing with 1/f gain variations and weather – experience on antenna driving requirements ? Pixel calibration: - acceptable variation between pixels? Spectroscopy - is ~2 GHz instantaneous enough? - is spectral resolution of 15 kHz = 0.1km/sec within a 2 GHz band OK? - what is the specification on bandpass ripple within channels? Polarisation specifications: - linear or circular – any comments? - separation purity: 30 dB ?- maybe hard to maintain withm circular polarisation across a 46% BW) Science at Q-band Manchester 14-15 September 2009