Evaluation of Oral Azacitidine Using Extended Treatment Schedules: A Phase I Study Garcia-Manero G et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 603.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6500.
Advertisements

Phase I/II Trial of the MEK1/2 Inhibitor GSK (GSK212) in Patients with Relapsed/ Refractory Myeloid Malignancies: Evidence of Activity in Pts with.
Allogeneic Transplant Following Brentuximab Vedotin Treatment in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory CD30+ Lymphomas Illidge T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract.
Dose Escalating Safety Study of a New Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor, Dabigatran Etexilate, in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement: BISTRO I Eriksson.
Gopal AK et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4382.
Bendamustine + Rituximab (BR) Chemoimmunotherapy and Maintenance Lenalidomide in Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Small.
Brown JR et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 523.
Phase 1/2 Study of Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Combination with Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients with Previously.
1Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 114.
Novel AKT Inhibitor Afuresertib in Combination with Bortezomib and Dexamethasone Demonstrates Favorable Safety Profile and Significant Clinical Activity.
Richardson PG et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 535.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 446.
Carfilzomib: High Single-Agent Response Rate with Minimal Neuropathy Even in High-Risk Patients 1 Baseline Peripheral Neuropathy Does Not Impact the Efficacy.
LaCasce A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 293.
Roberts AW et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 325.
Results of a Phase II Trial of Brentuximab Vedotin as First Line Salvage Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory HL Prior to AHCT Chen RW et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract.
Results of a Phase 2 Randomised, Open- Label, Study of Lower Doses of Quizartinib (AC220; ASP2689) in Subjects with FLT3-ITD Positive Relapsed or Refractory.
Efficacy of Denileukin Diftitox Retreatment in Patients with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed After Initial Response 1 Identification of an Active,
Carfilzomib, Rituximab and Dexamethasone (CaRD) Is Highly Active and Offers a Neuropathy Sparing Approach for Proteasome-Inhibitor Based Therapy in Waldenstrom’s.
Therapeutic Response to Azacitidine (AZA) in Patients with Secondary Myelodysplastic Syndromes (sMDS) Enrolled in the AVIDA Registry 1 Prospective Trial.
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
Interim Results of an International, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor, Ibrutinib (PCI-32765), in Relapsed or Refractory.
Frontline Therapy with Brentuximab Vedotin Combined with ABVD or AVD in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma Younes A et al. Proc.
Final Results From a Phase I Combination Study of Lenalidomide and Azacitidine in Patients with Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) Sekeres MA.
Weekly MLN9708, an Investigational Oral Proteasome Inhibitor, in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Results from a Phase I Study After Full Enrollment.
Efficacy, Hematologic Effects and Dose of Ruxolitinib in Myelofibrosis Patients with Low Platelet Starting Counts ( x 10 9 /L): A Comparison to Patients.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
A Phase II Study with Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Bringhen S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Ibrutinib, Single Agent or in Combination with Dexamethasone, in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Preliminary Phase.
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
Lenalidomide Is Safe and Active in Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) 1 Updated Results from a Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Phase 1b/2 Study.
Updated Results of a Phase I First-in-Human Study of the BCL-2 Inhibitor ABT-199 (GDC-0199) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic.
Epic: A Phase 3 Trial of Ponatinib Compared with Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CP-CML) Lipton JH.
Byrd JC et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6508.
Dyer MJS et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 1743.
A Phase 3 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Lenalidomide Combined with Melphalan and Prednisone Followed by Continuous Lenalidomide Maintenance.
Locatelli F et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 4378.
Brentuximab Vedotin Administered Concurrently with Multi-Agent Chemotherapy as Frontline Treatment of ALCL and Other CD30-Positive Mature T-Cell and NK-Cell.
A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, International Study (MMY-3021) Comparing Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib in Patients with.
A Phase 1 Study of the Selective Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Delta (PI3Kδ) Inhibitor, Idelalisib (GS- 1101) in Combination with Rituximab and/or Bendamustine.
A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide for Previously Untreated Deletion (del) 5q Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Patients Age 60 or Older Who Are Not Candidates.
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
An Open-Label, Randomized Study of Bendamustine and Rituximab (BR) Compared with Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone (R-CVP) or Rituximab,
Ibrutinib in Combination with Rituximab (iR) Is Well Tolerated and Induces a High Rate of Durable Remissions in Patients with High- Risk Chronic Lymphocytic.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Brentuximab Vedotin in Combination with RCHOP as Front-Line Therapy in Patients with DLBCL: Interim Results from a Phase 2 Study Yasenchak CA et al. Proc.
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
Kantarjian HM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Long-Term Follow-Up of Ongoing Patients in 2 Studies of Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate for Chronic Myeloid.
1 Oliva EN et al Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 91.
Final Results from a Phase 2 Study of Pracinostat in Combination with Azacitidine in Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)1   CC-486 (Oral.
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
DiNardo C et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 327.
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
Oki Y et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 252.
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
5-Azacytidine (AZA) in Combination with Ruxolitinib (RUX) as Therapy for Patients (pts) with Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MDS/MPNs)1  
Goede V et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 3327.
Fenaux P et al. Lancet Oncol 2009;10(3):
Jakubowiak AJ et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 862.
Coiffier B et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 857.
Badoux X et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6508.
Vitolo U et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 777.
Forero-Torres A et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 3711.
Pollyea DA et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6505.
Lyons RM et al. J Clin Oncol 2009;27(11):
Ahmadi T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 266.
Pomalidomide plus Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Myeloma Refractory to Both Bortezomib and Lenalidomide: Comparison of Two Dosing Strategies in Dual-Refractory.
Advani RH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 443.
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation of Oral Azacitidine Using Extended Treatment Schedules: A Phase I Study Garcia-Manero G et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 603.

Garcia-Manero G et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 603. Background Parenteral azacitidine (AZA) has a short half-life in the plasma, and its incorporation into cellular DNA is restricted to the S-phase of the cell cycle. An oral formulation of AZA would allow for chronic daily exposure that may enhance the clinical activity of AZA in a form that is conveniently administered. An initial Phase I study of oral AZA administered on days 1- 7 of a 28-day treatment schedule in patients with MDS and AML demonstrated that the agent was bioavailable, safe and clinically active (Proc ASH 2009;Abstract 117). Current study objective: –Assess the response and safety of extended 14- and 21- day oral AZA treatment schedules in patients with MDS, CMML or AML.

Phase I Study of Extended Treatment Schedules of Oral AZA Sequentially dosed 14-day daily (QD) Starting dose 300 mg 21-day daily (QD) Starting dose 300 mg 14-day twice daily (BID) Starting dose 200 mg 21-day twice daily (BID) Starting dose 200 mg Patients were enrolled in cohorts of 6 and evaluated for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at the end of cycle 1. Patients were monitored continuously for adverse events, and disease response was assessed at the end of every second cycle. Garcia-Manero G et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 603. Eligibility MDS, CMML or AML (not candidates for other therapies) Prior azanucleoside therapy not allowed Hemoglobin 9.0 g/dL AND/OR platelet count 50x10 9 /L AND/OR RBC transfusion dependent Treat to progression 28-day cycles

Baseline Characteristics N = 25 Median age, years (range) 68 (44-87) Male/female 14/11 Number of patients with MDS 13 Number of patients with AML 7 (de novo) 3 (transformed) Number of patients with CMML 2 Prior treatment10 Garcia-Manero G et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 603.

DLT Summary With 14-day QD oral AZA schedule, two DLTs occurred in 1 of 6 DLT-evaluable patients. –Grade 3 nausea and vomiting No DLTs observed in the 21-day QD (n = 6) or in the 14- day BID (n = 6) schedules. Three DLTs occurred in 1 of 6 evaluable patients in the 21- day BID schedule group. –Grade 3 weakness, fatigue and total body pain The maximum tolerated dose has not been reached on any of the schedules. No patient has received greater than 300 mg/dose. Garcia-Manero G et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 603.

Preliminary Response of Oral AZA in MDS/CMML Parameter MDS/CMML Responders/Evaluable Patients 14-day QD 21-day QD 14-day BID 21-day BID Overall response (CR, marrow CR, any hematologic improvement [HI])* 4/63/3 0/3 HI-Erythroid 1/20 0/2 HI-Platelet 1/53/30/30/2 HI-Neutrophil 0/11/10/20/1 Transfusion independence 3/52/22/30 * IMWG 2006 criteria Garcia-Manero G et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 603.

Relevant Grade 3/4 Adverse Events Adverse Event, n (%) 14-day QD (n = 7) 21-day QD (n = 6) 14-day BID (n = 6) 21-day BID (n = 6) Febrile neutropenia 2 (29)4 (67)*2 (33)1 (17) Diarrhea 01 (17)0 Nausea 1 (14)1 (17) Vomiting 1 (14)000 Fatigue 0001 (17) * Observed in three patients with baseline absolute neutrophil count < 0.5 x 10 9 /L and/or AML diagnosis Garcia-Manero G et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 603.

Author Conclusions Prolonged administration of oral AZA is feasible and generally well tolerated. Compared to standard subcutaneous administration, oral AZA 300 mg over 21 days provides a cumulative exposure of approximately 58% per cycle (data not shown). Oral AZA induces global hypomethylation (data not shown). Oral AZA is clinically active in patients with MDS/CMML (67% response rate, 10/15 patients). Studies of oral AZA for the treatment of lower-risk disease are planned. Garcia-Manero G et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 603.

Investigator Commentary: Extended treatment schedules with oral azacitidine Patients often complain about having to visit the clinic seven days a month to receive their shots, and they eventually experience associated skin reactions. Last year, we showed oral azacitidine as being significantly active in patients with MDS, with a CR of almost 60 percent, even at very low PK, and having a good safety profile in patients with AML and MDS. We hypothesized that if we could safely administer the agent for seven days, we could expand the schedule to two or three times per day for 14 or 21 days. We demonstrated quite a bit of activity with some of these schedules, which we found also to be safe, but most importantly, we found that the oral, low-dose approach was extremely effective in both lower- and higher-risk MDS. I am excited about this approach because this could be a major breakthrough in the use of hypomethylating agents, whether in combination with chemotherapy, in maintenance therapy or as treatment for low, intermediate-1 MDS. We are now planning a Phase II analysis of oral azacitidine in low or intermediate-1, non del 5q MDS. Interview with Guillermo Garcia-Manero, MD, January 12, 2011