Two-dimensional Effects on the CSR Interaction Forces for an Energy-Chirped Bunch Rui Li, J. Bisognano, R. Legg, and R. Bosch.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paul Emma SLAC January 14, 2002 BERLIN CSR Benchmark Test-Case Results CSR Workshop.
Advertisements

The scaling of LWFA in the ultra-relativistic blowout regime: Generation of Gev to TeV monoenergetic electron beams W.Lu, M.Tzoufras, F.S.Tsung, C. Joshi,
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Introduction Status of SC simulations at CERN
Beamstrahlung and energy acceptance K. Ohmi (KEK) HF2014, Beijing Oct 9-12, 2014 Thanks to Y. Zhang and D. Shatilov.
CSR calculation in ERL merger section Tsukasa Miyajima KEK, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization 8 November, 2010, 13:30 Mini Workshop on CSR.
Magnetic Compression of High Brightness Beams: Survey of Experimental Results Scott G. Anderson ICFA Sardinia July 2002.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
FEL simulation code FAST Free-Electron Laser at the TESLA Test Facility Generic name FAST stands for a set of codes for ``full physics'' analysis of FEL.
Considerations on Interaction Region design for Muon Collider Muon Collider Design Workshop JLab, December 8-12, 2008 Guimei Wang, Muons,Inc., /ODU/JLab.
The impact of undulators in an ERL Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory FLS 2012, March 2012.
PS Booster Studies with High Intensity Beams Magdalena Kowalska supervised by Elena Benedetto Space Charge Collaboration Meeting May 2014.
Longitudinal transfer function a.k.a. (M 55 ) measurements at the JLab FEL Pavel Evtushenko, JLab  Jlab IR/UV upgrade longitudinal phase space evolution.
Development of Simulation Environment UAL for Spin Studies in EDM Fanglei Lin December
1 By Vladyslav Syrotenko (student of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, School of Physics and Technology) Supervised by P. Piot, T. Sen, F. Ostiguy.
Stability Properties of Field-Reversed Configurations (FRC) E. V. Belova PPPL 2003 International Sherwood Fusion Theory Conference Corpus Christi, TX,
Free Electron Lasers (I)
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Beam Modulation due to Longitudinal Space Charge Zhirong Huang, SLAC Berlin S2E Workshop 8/18/2003.
Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Max Cornacchia, Paul Emma Stanford Linear Accelerator Center  Proposed by M. Cornacchia (Nov.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
SFLASH  SASE interference setup & optics rough estimation 1d estimation 3d estimation summary.
1 Simulations of fast-ion instability in ILC damping ring 12 April ECLOUD 07 workshop Eun-San Kim (KNU) Kazuhito Ohmi (KEK)
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
Comparison between simulations and measurements in the LHC with heavy ions T. Mertens, R. Bruce, J.M. Jowett, H. Damerau,F. Roncarolo.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
Design of the Turnaround Loops for the Drive Beam Decelerators R. Apsimon, J. Esberg CERN, Switzerland.
A.Shapovalov (DESY, Zeuthen) (MEPhI, Moscow, Russia)
S. Molloy, P. Emma, J. Frisch, R. Iverson, M. Ross, D. McCormick, M. Woods, SLAC, CA, USA S. Walston, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, CA, USA V.
Beam Dynamics Meeting Bolko Beutner, DESY Summary of new FLASH CSR studies Bolko Beutner, DESY Beam Dynamics Meeting
Midwest Accelerator Physics Meeting. Indiana University, March 15-19, ORBIT Electron Cloud Model Andrei Shishlo, Yoichi Sato, Slava Danilov, Jeff.
XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting Bolko Beutner, DESY Velocity Bunching Studies at FLASH Bolko Beutner, DESY XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting
Cesr-TA Simulations: Overview and Status G. Dugan, Cornell University LCWS-08.
R.Chehab/ R&D on positron sources for ILC/ Beijing, GENERATION AND TRANSPORT OF A POSITRON BEAM CREATED BY PHOTONS FROM COMPTON PROCESS R.CHEHAB.
GWENAEL FUBIANI L’OASIS GROUP, LBNL 6D Space charge estimates for dense electron bunches in vacuum W.P. LEEMANS, E. ESAREY, B.A. SHADWICK, J. QIANG, G.
3D codes: TraFiC4 and CSRtrack Torsten Limberg DESY Zeuthen 2003.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Injector Options for CLIC Drive Beam Linac Avni Aksoy Ankara University.
RMS Dynamic Simulation for Electron Cooling Using BETACOOL He Zhang Journal Club Talk, 04/01/2013.
Awake electron beam requirements ParameterBaseline Phase 2Range to check Beam Energy16 MeV MeV Energy spread (  ) 0.5 %< 0.5 % ? Bunch Length (
Intra-Beam scattering studies for CLIC damping rings A. Vivoli* Thanks to : M. Martini, Y. Papaphilippou *
Christopher Gerth & Christopher Behrens Mini-Workshop on Longitudinal Diagnostics for FELs 11/12 March 2013, PSI, Villigen TDS induced energy spread.
Prebunching electron beam and its smearing due to ISR-induced energy diffusion Nikolai Yampolsky Los Alamos National Laboratory Fermilab; February 24,
Fast Ion Instability Study G. Rumolo and D. Schulte CLIC Workshop 2007, General introduction to the physics of the fast ion instability Fastion.
Space Charge and CSR Microwave Physics in a Circulated Electron Cooler Rui Li Jefferson Lab and C-Y. Tsai, D. Douglas, C. Tennant, S. Benson, Ya. Derbenev,
Emittance Growth in the SPPS Chicane P. Emma, P. Krejcik, C. O’Connell, M. Woodley; SLAC, H. Schlarb, F. Stulle; DESY.
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
Non-local Transport of Strongly Coupled Plasmas Satoshi Hamaguchi, Tomoyasu Saigo, and August Wierling Department of Fundamental Energy Science, Kyoto.
IBS and Touschek studies for the ion beam at the SPS F. Antoniou, H. Bartosik, Y. Papaphilippou, T. Bohl.
OPERATED BY STANFORD UNIVERSITY FOR THE U.S. DEPT. OF ENERGY 1 Alexander Novokhatski April 13, 2016 Beam Heating due to Coherent Synchrotron Radiation.
People who attended the meeting:
T. Agoh (KEK) Introduction CSR emitted in wiggler
402.5 MHz Debunching in the Ring
Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
CSR Benchmark Test-Case Results
Time-Resolved Images of Coherent Synchrotron Radiation Effects
Experiments on CSR Effects at CTF II
Linac Diagnostics Patrick Krejcik, SLAC April 24, 2002
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
2. Crosschecking computer codes for AWAKE
Bunch Compression Experiment in VUV-FEL BC3
New VUV-FEL Simulation results
Fanglei Lin MEIC R&D Meeting, JLab, July 16, 2015
Presentation transcript:

Two-dimensional Effects on the CSR Interaction Forces for an Energy-Chirped Bunch Rui Li, J. Bisognano, R. Legg, and R. Bosch

Outline 1.Introduction 2.Previous 1D and 2D Results for Effective CSR Force 3.Bunch Distribution Variation in a Chicane 4.Retardation for 2D Interaction 5.CSR Forces for a 2D-Bunch Self Interaction 6.Summary

1. Introduction In JLAB FEL, when the bunch is fully compressed by the chicane, beam fragmentation is observed in the second arc which has not been reproduced by 1D CSR model. ( measurement done by D. Douglas, P. Evtushenko) There are some other unexplained observations, such as one emittance measurement (in CTFII) which shows strong dependence of emittance growth on transverse beta function inside the chicane. These motivate us to study the 2D CSR effect, as well as to investigate other possible causes.

Questions In which parameter regime is the 1D model a good approximation ? How does bunch transverse size influence the CSR interaction forces? Goal: full understanding of the CSR effect in bunch compression chicane so as to predict and control its adverse effect. It is hoped that a systematic analysis for a simple Gaussian case can provide some insight of the 2D effects and serve as benchmark for the 2D simulation. (free space, unperturbed Gaussian bunch, circular orbit)

Overview of Basic Formulas for the CSR Interaction on a Curved Orbit Retarded Potential (Lorentz gauge): Electromagnetic Fields: Lorentz Force On each electron: (assuming continuous charge distribution)

Illustration of CSR interaction for a 2D bunch

The CSR interaction influences both the longitudinal and transverse particle dynamics via effective CSR forces (Derbenev, 1996) Electromagnetic Fields: Lorentz Force In dynamic eqn: Rate of kinetic energy loss 2. Previous 1D and 2D Results of Effective CSR Forces Here plays an important role in influencing particle transverse dynamics Effective longitudinal CSR force

1D Assumption and Result (Derbenev, 1996) A O C D B Characteristic distance: 1D assumption: Effective Force in Steady-state: f(z):form factor Feature: no dependence on particles’ x coordinates (Gaussian bunch)

Previous 2D Results for a Gaussian Bunch (Dohlus,2002) As the deflection gets bigger, the CSR force is smaller in amplitude as compared to the rigid-bunch result (with the same projected bunch length)

3.Bunch Distribution Variation in a Chicane (Drawing from P. Krejcik, SLAC) Bunch compression is carried out via Initial correlation correlation in dispersive regions This gives x-z correlation=> bunch deflection in dispersive regions

Linear Optic Transport from s 0 to s Zero uncorrelated spread with initial energy chirp slope of deflection Compression factor x z u=0 for bunch with no deflection.

Example of the Benchmark Chicane

Example of the Benchmark Chicane (assuming zero initial emittance and energy spread)

Need to include evolution of bunch x-z distribution in the CSR force calculation Studies using 1D CSR interaction model is semi-self- consistent (for CSR force calculation: projecting 2D bunch on design orbit and assuming rigid-bunch at retarded time)

4. Retardation for 2D Interaction The CSR force is influenced by the bunch x-z deflection mainly through retardation identify the source particles at retarded time 2D bunch: For each t’, the source particles are on a cross-section with x-s dependence

Retardation for a 2D bunch projected on the design orbit, assuming longitudinal distribution frozen in the past : 1D line bunch

3D Retardation (illustration not to scale) Intersection of the sphere (light cone for 4D space-time) with the 3D bunch Because of dispersion, transverse size is often much bigger than the vertical size, so 2D is often a good approximation.

Perfect initial Gaussian distribution in transverse and longitudinal phase space Initial linear energy chirp Transport by linear optics from external field, bunch is unperturbed by the CSR self-interaction. All CSR interactions take place inside bend 5.CSR Forces for a 2D Bunch Self Interaction Assumptions used in the analytical study of 2D CSR force:

Analytical approach: For CSR force on each test particle in the bunch, solve 2D retardation relation analytically Identify the source particle which emitted field at a source location. Find the phase space distribution of the source particle by propagating initial Gaussian distribution via linear optics to the source location For CSR force on a test particle, integrate contribution from all source particles in the initial distribution. Thin bunch  analytical results General cases  numerical integration of integrands which is an analytical expression involving retardation, linear optics and initial Gaussian distribution

Analytical Result of Effective Longitudinal CSR Force (for a thin Gaussian bunch) agree with Dohlus’ Trafic4 result

Initial beam parameters

Very thin bunch regular bunchVery thick bunch

Illustration of CSR interaction for a 2D bunch

6. Summary of Key Results Delayed response of CSR force from bunch length variation Dependence of CSR force on particles’ transverse distribution around full compression The high frequency field signal generated around full compression and reaches the bunch shortly after Dohlus previous results can be explained as part of the delayed response