Claire Gwenlan (Oxford), Zhonghua Qin (DESY) Andy Buckley (Durham), Alessandro Tricoli (RAL) ATLAS MC Generator Meeting Physics and Performance Week: 26-29.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Joel Goldstein, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Advertisements

SUSY Validation EVGEN validation of Claire Gwenlan UCL October 24, 2007 Physics Validation Meeting.
W.Murray PPD 1 Bill Murray RAL, CCLRC WIN 07, Kolkata 15 th January 2007 What is E-W symmetry breaking What are the known knowns? What.
Discovery Potential in Jets + MET at 10 TeV ? ATLAS Monojets/Dijets Meeting 20 th May 2008 Claire Gwenlan.
Fortran HERWIG Status Report and Validation in Athena rel. 14 By Jon Butterworth (UCL) Claire Gwenlan (Oxford) Alessandro Tricoli (RAL) ATLAS MC Generator.
M.Ball/K.Desch, Experimental Analysis of Neutralino Production in SPS 1a 1 Experimental Study of Neutralino Production in SPS 1a: a First Look Markus Ball.
Quark Compositeness Search with γ +Jet Final State at the LHC Satyaki Bhattacharya, Sushil S. Chauhan, Brajesh Choudhary, Debajyoti Choudhury Department.
Visible and Invisible Higgs Decays at 350 GeV Mark Thomson University of Cambridge =+
ISDM 2005, Kromeriz Kamil Sedlak, Jets in photoproduction at HERA 1 Jets in Photoproduction & at low Q 2 at HERA On behalf of the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations.
Jörgen Sjölin Stockholm University LHC experimental sensitivity to CP violating gtt couplings November, 2002 Page 1 Why CP in gtt? Standard model contribution.
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
Update on Tools FTK Meeting 06/06/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers1 Salavat Abdullin For CMS Collaboration SUSY 2005, July 18-23, 2005 Durham, UK.
Update from the Photons + MET Group Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz / SCIPP 11 March 2010.
1 A Feasibility Study for a Strange Sea Asymmetry Analysis at ATLAS: update II Laura Gilbert and Jeff Tseng 13/12/07.
Data-based background predictions using forward events Victor Pavlunin and David Stuart University of California Santa Barbara July 10, 2008.
1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.
T-CHANNEL MODELING UNCERTAINTIES AND FURTHER QUESTIONS TO TH AND NEW FIDUCIAL MEASUREMENTS Julien Donini, Jose E. Garcia, Dominic Hirschbuehl, Luca Lista,
Quark Compositeness Study and Progress Satyaki Bhattacharya, Sushil S. Chauhan, Brajesh C. Choudhary & Debajyoti Choudhury Department of Physics & Astrophysics.
Monte Carlo event generators for LHC physics
Progress on H/Abb -> 4b’s channel for the FTK physics case ~ 4jets Trigger w/ and w/o FTK ~ Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK.
19/07/20061 Nectarios Ch. Benekos 1, Rosy Nicolaidou 2, Stathes Paganis 3, Kirill Prokofiev 3 for the collaboration among: 1 Max-Planck-Institut für Physik,
AcerMC and ISR/FSR systematics at ATLAS Liza Mijovic, Borut Kersevan Jozef Stefan Inst. Univ. of Ljubljana ATLAS approach: Generator level studies Parameters.
Sensitivity Prospects for Light Charged Higgs at 7 TeV J.L. Lane, P.S. Miyagawa, U.K. Yang (Manchester) M. Klemetti, C.T. Potter (McGill) P. Mal (Arizona)
Status of Muon Trigger Efficiency Measurement for ICHEP Benedikt Hegner, Benjamin Klein, Yvonne Küssel, Patricia Lobelle, Markus Marienfeld, Rahmat Rahmat,
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
QCD and Top backgrounds in W+jets and Rjets Alessandro Tricoli (CERN) on behalf of W+jets and Rjets groups 3 rd May 2013 W+jets and Rjets EB Meeting.
1 ttbar Cross-Section Studies D. Jana*, M. Saleem*, F. Rizatdinova**, P. Gutierrez*, P. Skubic* *University of Oklahoma, **Oklahoma State University.
Martin White – Cambridge ATLAS UK ATLAS Physics Meeting, May 2004.
Taikan Suehara et al., TILC09 in Tsukuba, 2009/04/18 page 1 Tau and SUSY study in ILD Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo Jenny List, Daniela Kaefer.
Validation for PythiaVPhoton10 Jiahang Zhong (Academia Sinica)
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 13/09/2012.
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 24/01/2013.
Current Analysis Activity/Results (Only brief overview) Sunil Bansal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Approved results marked.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using radiative Z decays (update) E.Yu.Soldatov 1, 1 National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI” Outline:
1 Update on tt-bar signal and background simulation Stan Bentvelsen.
The “Comparator” Atlfast vs. Full Reco Automated Comparison Chris Collins-Tooth 19 th February 2006.
Hggs-D meeting MPI 11/20061 Higgs Physics – Activities in Bonn/Siegen Jörn Große-Knetter ATLAS-Higgs-D Treffen München,
On the possibility of stop mass determination in photon-photon and e + e - collisions at ILC A.Bartl (Univ. of Vienna) W.Majerotto HEPHY (Vienna) K.Moenig.
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
WIN 05, Delphi, Greece, June 2005Filip Moortgat, CERN WIN 05 Inclusive signatures: discovery, fast but not unambiguous Exclusive final states & long term.
A search for the ZZ signal in the 3 lepton channel Azeddine Kasmi Robert Kehoe Southern Methodist University Thanks to: H. Ma, M. Aharrouche.
Signatures of lepton-jet production at the LHC Eva Halkiadakis (Rutgers University) with Adam Falkowski, Yuri Gershtein (Rutgers University) Josh Ruderman.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.
Study of tt production at NLO Stan Bentvelsen Edwin Bos.
Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinZEUS Collaboration Meeting, Oct. 21st Analysis Update: Mean Charged Multiplicity in.
LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group: Vector Boson Fusion Sinead Farrington University of Oxford Co-contacts: A. Denner, C. Hackstein, D. Rebuzzi, C.
10 January 2008Neil Collins - University of Birmingham 1 Tau Trigger Performance Neil Collins ATLAS UK Physics Meeting Thursday 10 th January 2008.
Responsibles: Jon Butterworth (UCL), Claire Gwenlan (Oxford), Daniela Rebuzzi (Pavia, INFN) ATLAS MC Validation Meeting, 24 May 2011 HERWIG validation.
Belle General meeting Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation.
20 October 2005 LCG Generator Services monthly meeting, CERN Validation of GENSER & News on GENSER Alexander Toropin LCG Generator Services monthly meeting.
Ellie Dobson Z→ee and missing Et resolution In collaboration with Paul Prichard (Liverpool), Tony Weidberg (Oxford) Files produced.
1 D *+ production Alexandr Kozlinskiy Thomas Bauer Vanya Belyaev
I'm concerned that the OS requirement for the signal is inefficient as the charge of the TeV scale leptons can be easily mis-assigned. As a result we do.
Marcello Barisonzi First results of AOD analysis on t-channel Single Top DAD 30/05/2005 Page 1 AOD on Single Top Marcello Barisonzi.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
AOD Analysis of the DC2 Coannihilation Model Sample Davide Costanzo Nov 5 th 2004 V. 3.0.
Top physics during ATLAS commissioning
New Developments in Herwig++
Measurement of SM V+gamma by ATLAS
SUSY Particle Mass Measurement with the Contransverse Mass Dan Tovey, University of Sheffield 1.
Stop->4 bodies signal samples with 2 leptons in final state
Higgs → t+t- in Vector Boson Fusion
Alan Barr Claire Gwenlan
PDF Uncertainties on W+Jets
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
Dilepton Mass. Progress report.
Sparticle reconstruction in final states with di-leptons
& Searches for Squarks and Gluinos at the Tevatron
Presentation transcript:

Claire Gwenlan (Oxford), Zhonghua Qin (DESY) Andy Buckley (Durham), Alessandro Tricoli (RAL) ATLAS MC Generator Meeting Physics and Performance Week: August 2008 HERWIG vs. HERWIG++ - SUSY: SU3 comparison - with many thanks to Peter Richardson for helpful discussion!!!

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 Intro/Aims This is still very much work in progress!! (as you will see, several observed features remain to be understood … and we are currently working together with the authors in this …) As well as some SM prod., fortran Herwig (fHerwig) currently used in ATLAS as main generator for SUSY signal processes  are we ready to begin the transition to Herwig++? QUESTIONS:  Can we now easily use Herwig++ in Athena for SUSY production?  What is current functionality in Herwig++ cf. fHerwig (for SUSY?)  Can we reproduce fHerwig results with Herwig++ - or at least understand where any differences are coming from? Validation/comparison process now started:- first comparisons of fHerwig vs. Herwig++ for SUSY signal process presented here …

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 SUSY Comparison Process Chose ATLAS SU3 benchmark SUSY point for first comparisons : [m 0 =100GeV,m 1/2 =300GeV,A 0 =-300GeV,tan(Beta)=6,sign(mu)=+1] fHerwig samples for reference: - jobOption: CSC SU3_jimmy_susy.py - format: official validation sample AODs, produced with jobTransform csc_evgenTruthJetMet_trf.py (“sampleB’s”) within Athena Samples: Still to add details here about our Herwig++ JO

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 Created ours to be equivalent to dc1new.txt, as used in fHerwig reference -> used ISAJET7.64+ISAWIG (versions used in order to correspond to dc1new.txt) -> … with ISALHA.f and ISALHD.f as add-ons to get spectrum and decay files in SLHA format (available from ) SLHA Spectrum/Decay File Resulting spectrum+decay file - ISAJETSU3.spc - available in cvs: Herwig++ needs sparticle spectrum/decay file in SUSY les Houches Accord (SLHA) format [corresponding SLHA files for other ATLAS benchmark points also created, and will be checked into cvs soon…] (files were created corresponding to both “old” and ‘new”-styles (using versions ISAJET7.64 and 7.75 respectively))

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 Differences in defaults: fHerwig: two-loop alphas, scale = 2s’t’u’/(s’ 2 +t’ 2 +u’ 2 ) [s’=s-m 2 LSP,…] Herwig++: LO alphas, scale (for PDFs, alphas) = s ^ ^ SU3: Hard Process Cross Section SU3 Cross Section (pb) fHerwig18.6 Herwig From jobOptions, as described on previous slides: (fHerwig: CSC SU3_jimmy_susy.py; Herwig++: jobOptions.herwigpp-SusySU3.py) good agreement, within known differences between generators (NB. Implementation of two-loop alphas does exist in Herwig++, but default is LO) NOTE: Peter Richardson has sent us a “fix”, such that a scale of m T 2 =2stu/(s 2 +t 2 +u 2 ) is used in Herwig++ instead of s (we have not had time to look at this yet, but it should make the cross sections agree even more closely) – this scale will also be included in the next Herwig++ release ^ ^^^ ^ ^ ^

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 SU3 Plots: Truth Jets (CN4) P T >20 GeV First Look: Herwig++ has more truth jets than fHerwig (– mainly concentrated at lowish-p T and central eta) BUT, from discussions with Peter, found out that… ->

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 Since there are some remaining differences, have also performed some checks (not shown here) with eg. different UE parameters, … - but variations looked at so far give very similar results NOTE: for “best physics”, SUSY showering should be switched ON … Herwig++ includes a treatment of SUSY showering (fHerwig has no such treatment): for comparison with fHerwig, switch it OFF (controlled in MSSM.model) SU3 Plots: Truth Jets (CN4) P T >20 GeV -> distributions become more similar

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 SU3 Plots: Final State Leptons First Look: Herwig++ gives more stable, final-state leptons than fHerwig (– mainly concentrated at lowish-p T ) [situation same for muons] (see backups for more plots) final-state electrons P T >20 GeV

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 SU3 Plots: dilepton masses P T >20 GeV First Look: higher number of final-state leptons in Herwig++ can also be seen in dilepton masses [but spectrum file looks sensible - i.e. dilepton edge in the right place!! ]

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 SU3 Plots: Final State Leptons Test: Stable Particles? at the moment, unable to set minimum lifetime for particles to be set stable in Herwig++ (“pltcut” for fHerwig) (This is coming in next Herwig++ release …) In our first iterations we ignored it - effect on final state leptons? [ATLAS common cut: pltcut=3.33x (used to make Ks and Lambda particles stable)] -> For now, can explicitly set these particles stable in Herwig++ To set stable, add lines to JO: cmds.append(“set /Herwig/Particles/K_S0:Stable Stable”) cmds.append(“set /Herwig/Particles/Lambda0:Stable Stable”) However, this did not have significant impact on the lepton distributions (some visible impact was observed for leptons with p T <20GeV (see backups), but it’s insufficient to explain differences)

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 SU3 Plots: Final State Leptons Some Other Tests: look at final- state leptons from HP BUT: - 1. exclude those from taus (differences between Herwig++ and TAUOLA?) - 2. exclude those from c,b decays (differences in heavy quark hadronisation?) P T >20 GeV Suggests differences due to b-quark hadronisation? - this is under investigation… -> good agreement found when b-decays excluded [effect of c- and tau-decays not significant (- see backups)]

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 SU3 Plots: Final State Photons P T >20 GeV Herwig++ also gives more stable final-state photons than fHerwig, and with a softer p T -spectrum

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 SU3 Plots: Missing-Et Some differences (particularly at small MET and small SumET) remaining to be understood (- presumably due to the observed differences in particle multiplicities) MET SumET

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 Summary  Can we now easily use Herwig++ in Athena for SUSY production? Example jobOptions (jobOptions.herwigpp-SusySU3.py) are in cvs: [along with files ISAJETSU3.spc, MSSM.model - which are also needed]: Can be used now (e.g. use with athena jobTransforms/jobOptions …) NOTE: should checkout and compile the following tags to get most recent versions: Generators/Herwigpp_i , External/Herwigpp , External/ThePEG Yes!!  What is current functionality in Herwig++ c.f. fHerwig (for SUSY)? Herwig++ already has (most of)* the functionality of fHerwig for SUSY AND also has additional features not present in fHerwig (most particularly, an implementation of SUSY showering) (Cont.)

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 Summary * Only found a couple of things that we currently use, which are not yet implemented: - pltcut (“minimum lifetime for particles to be set stable”) (:- however, it is possible to set any particular particles stable) - spin correlations for three-body (or four-body) decays (in current release these are decayed according to phase space) Both of these things will be available in next release Next Herwig++ release: estimated for end of September (then, all functionality of fHerwig should be present - and more!)  Can we reproduce fHerwig results with Herwig++ - or at least understand where any differences are coming from? Herwig++ distributions all look reasonable, but some features wrt fHerwig still need to be fully understood (eg. - higher number of low-p T leptons,…) -> we are working (alongside the authors) on understanding these things Getting there!! (Also happy to take suggestions from the floor!!!)

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 Backups

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 SU3 Plots: Final State Leptons final-state muons FIRST LOOK: Herwig++ gives more stable, final-state leptons than fHerwig (– mainly concentrated at lowish-p T ) P T >20 GeV

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 Requiring Ks,lambda to be stable, does reduce number of low-P T leptons, but effect is not significant enough to explain differences SU3 Plots: Final State Leptons final-state electrons (no pT-cut) Herwig++ gives more stable, final-state leptons than fHerwig [situation same for muons]

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 SU3 Plots: Final State Leptons Test: Look at final-state leptons from the hard subprocess BUT: - exclude those from taus (differences between Herwig++ and TAUOLA?) P T >20 GeV More electrons still seen in Herwig++ [situation same for muons] final-state electrons from HP

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 SU3 Plots: Final State Leptons Test: Look at final-state leptons from the hard subprocess BUT: - exclude those from c decays P T >20 GeV final-state electrons from HP More electrons still seen in Herwig++ [situation same for muons]

HERWIG vs. Herwig++: SUSY comparison  Claire Gwenlan26 August 08 SU3 Plots: Final State Leptons Test: Look at final-state leptons from the hard subprocess BUT: - exclude those from b decays P T >20 GeV final-state electrons from HP Much closer agreement between fHerwig and Herwig++ [situation same for muons]