IK 060912 Slide 0 First look at the WCM data from July 2012 September 6 th 2012 Ian Kirkman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Polarized 3 He Target for A1n-A J. P. Chen, June 11, 2013, Hall A Meeting Overview Design Progress Progress in target lab Progress from users.
Advertisements

TDC130: High performance Time to Digital Converter in 130 nm
Using the real lattice and an improved model for the wake field, the extraction jitter can now be calculated more accurately. Assuming an injection jitter.
FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg Short Bunches at FLASH.
Ian Kirkman and Graham Cox July 29 th EMMA commissioning shifts so far June 21 st, 22 nd, 23 rd and July 12 th, 13 th, 14 th, 15 th “Analogue” BPM.
IK March 1st 2012 Slide 0 EMMA: Update on BPM modelling and mapping March 1 st 2012 Ian Kirkman.
Machine Physics at ISIS Proton Meeting 24 th March 11 Dean Adams (On behalf of ISIS Accelerator Groups)
DEELS workshop, ESRF, 12.– 13. May 2014 Friederike Ewald Difficulties to measure the absolute electron beam energy using spin depolarisation at the ESRF.
Beam-based Measurements of HOMs in the HTC Adam Bartnik for ERL Team, Daniel Hall, John Dobbins, Mike Billing, Matthias Liepe, Ivan Bazarov.
INSTITUT MAX VON LAUE - PAUL LANGEVIN Fast Real-time SANS Detectors Charge Division in Individual, 1-D Position- sensitive Gas Detectors Patrick Van Esch.
PIP and the Booster Notch Bob Zwaska October 12, 2011 PIP Meeting.
Monitoring the length of the bunches in the ESRF storage ring using microwave cavity pick ups.
IK/JJ May 6 th 2012 Slide 0 Results from EMMA Injection Line BPM-02 measurements on May 6 th 2012 Ian Kirkman, James Jones.
Linac4 BPM and Phase Pickup L. Søby08/ LINAC4 Beam Position, Phase and intensity Pick-ups.
Slide 1 Diamonds in Flash Steve Schnetzer Rd42 Collaboration Meeting May 14.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Hydrogen Recombination Time (µs) RF Envelope (V) Here So We get Calculated from # of protons per bunch Calculated from energy loss (voltage drop) in the.
UNRELIABLE DATA, SEE FIRST SLIDE WARNING!!! Data taken on these shifts had attenuation factors set incorrectly and problems with faraday cup bunch charge.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Craig Drennan Linac and Booster Beam Diagnostics Proton Source Workshop December 7 and 8, 2010.
Few slides from J. Fox’ talk in last November’s LARP meeting LARP CM
2002/7/02 College, London Muon Phase Rotation at PRISM FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
INTRODUCTION  RECYCLER BPM – Original system not adequate to measure beam position precisely. It is being upgraded to meet the required physics precision.
#3205 Summary Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse power. Laser.
Basic BPM Hardware Theory Jim Steimel. Wall Current Charge in a cylindrical perfectly conducting pipe produces an equal and opposite image charge at the.
#3191, 14 Oct 2012 Cabling installed to allow fast BPM electronics on injector BPMs System is flexible enough to allow different INJ-BPMs to be used (not.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Extending FETS with a Ring Electron models are not sufficient for simulating the beam.
Measurement opportunities with the LHC transverse damper W. Hofle, D. Valuch.
NA62 Gigatracker Working Group Meeting 23 March 2010 Massimiliano Fiorini CERN.
The DRS2 Chip: A 4.5 GHz Waveform Digitizing Chip for the MEG Experiment Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
Paul Derwent 14 Dec 00 1 Stochastic Cooling Paul Derwent 14 Dec 00
1 Geant4 Simulation :MCP PET 4’’(102mm) Scintillator ( LSO) 4’’(102mm) 10mm Glass( Borosilicate) PhotocathodeI(Carbon) Space(Vacuum) MCP(Alumina) Space(Vacumm)
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
A simple formula for calculating the momentum spread from the longitudinal density distribution and RF form Recycler Meeting March 11, 2009 A. Shemyakin.
Accumulator Stacktail Cooling Paul Derwent December 18, 2015.
Bruno Muratori (for the EMMA team) STFC, Daresbury Laboratory EMMA commissioning 02/09/08.
An Electrostatic Storage Ring for Low Energy Electron Collisions T J Reddish †, D R Tessier †, P Hammond *, A J Alderman *, M R Sullivan †, P A Thorn †
A Possibility of Constant Energy Extraction at ATF2 A.Kalinin Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Daresbury Laboratory Warrington UK FONT Meeting.
1 EMMA Tracking Studies Shinji Machida ASTeC/CCLRC/RAL 4 January, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
1 EuroTeV High Bandwidth Wall Current Monitor Alessandro D’Elia AB-BI-PI.
#3205 Summary 6 th Nov 2012 Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse.
Plan for Beam Extraction using strip-line kicker with pulse bump orbit Present extraction kicker system Strip-line kicker system for ILC Beam extraction.
2016/3/31 Fast kicker Experiment at ATF ATF2 - 40nm beam production, measurement Extraction kicker The difficulty of the beam extraction is that the kick.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
The Lead Glass Detector Overview, Experience and Direction.
U. Raich CERN Accelerator School on Digital Signal Processing Sigtuna Digital Signal processing in Beam Diagnostics Lecture 1 Ulrich Raich CERN.
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
#3205 Summary Studying beam instabilities along bunch train 3 observables – INJ-BPM-01 fast bunch electronics – INJ FCUP-01 – Laser pulse power. Laser.
1Ben ConstanceCTF3 working meeting – 09/01/2012 Known issues Inconsistency between BPMs and BPIs Response of BPIs is non-linear along the pulse Note –
ApEx needs for CeC PoP Experiment December 11, 2015.
ELI PHOTOINJECTOR PARAMETERS: PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS AND SIMULATIONS C. RONSIVALLE.
In-pulse-average: Search for multiples of t rf and t DAQ which “coincide”: 1891 t DAQ = ns ~ =41 t rf Calculate sample mean over blocks of.
HEADTAIL simulation during the accelerating ramp in the PS S. Aumon - EPFL & CERN Acknowledgement to B. Salvant, G. Rumolo.
Re-design of extraction line for single stage BC
EUROTeV Diagnostics WP5
Phase Feed-Forward Piotr Skowroński (CERN)
Status of the MAX IV Short Pulse Facility
Sara Thorin, MAX IV Laboratory
PSB Injection scheme in the Linac 4 era
Junji Urakawa (KEK) for ATF International Collaboration
New Discriminator Board Test
Overview Multi Bunch Beam Dynamics at XFEL
Bunch Tiltmeter Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass July 16, 2001 Update date
NanoBPM Status and Multibunch Mark Slater, Cambridge University
Soft X-Ray pulse length measurement
The Fill Pattern Monitor For the Australian Synchrotron
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
Fast kicker beam dynamics simulations
Pulsed electron beam cooling experiments: data & preliminary results
Presentation transcript:

IK Slide 0 First look at the WCM data from July 2012 September 6 th 2012 Ian Kirkman

Data taken night of July 18 th 2012 Multiple turns established. Wall current monitor in ring (located in cell 37) monitored from ACR using emmascope3 Whole series of response matrix measurements made: F-14 moving by ± 1mm D-14 moving by ± 1mm (relative to standard offsets of all quads = +2mm) But data shown here taken with F-14 and D-14 at standard +2mm offset Effective momentum = 18.1 MeV/c Bunch charge not recorded in the log Can reasonably presume standard 40pC in injection line? IK Measurements Slide 1

One turn transformer, magnetic core 40mm aperture, 100mm length 4 equally spaced pick-off points give reasonably position independent response Frequency cut-off in beam tube ~ 4.4 GHz Bandwidth: 15KHz to 4GHz, which implies ~40 ps “sigma t” (equates to ~ 94 ps FWHM response to an infinitely short real pulse) IK Wall current monitor basics (extracted from Jim Crisp presentation, December 2007) Slide 2 Therefore not expected to be able to resolve the bunch structure for an anticipated 3-10ps sigma bunch length

WCM oscilloscope trace LeCroy ‘scope “emmascope3”; 40 GS/s sampling rate Ξ 25 ps interval between points WCM “sits on” long background due to septum pickup WCM also suffers from significant Kicker 1 pickup noise for 1st dozen or so turns, plus ringing after that This shows 177 turns over 10 µs Slide 3IK

Pulse profiles after background subtraction Slide 4 IK

Comments on pulse profiles Dataset ( points) split into 177 files and each separately background subtracted Consistent reduction in the peak signal from first to last turn (~ factor of 10) Consistent broadening of the WCM pulse from first to last turn (~ factor of 10) Asymmetric pulse shapes, getting more asymmetric with turn number Leading edge of the bunch remains reasonably sharp Most of the “spread” occurs behind the leading edge Small pre-pulse about 350 ps in front of the main pulse ?? By turn 170 have full pulse width at base of ~ 5 ns (10% of the orbit) This is ~ 200 digitised points, can pulse shape can easily be resolved TOF based on leading edge ≈ ns TOF based on mean pulse positions ≈ ns (both based on the internal oscilloscope clock, not the RF) Slide 5IK

Pulse height Slide 6IK Cleaned-up version of oscilloscope trace Follows an exponential decay very closely

Pulse FWHM Good overall fit to linear increase turns < 10, FWHM flattens out at ~175 ps, and WCM appears not to be fast enough for initial bunch length of σ =10 ps, this implies WCM response function σ ≈ 70 ps cf Jim Crisp value (2007) of σ = 40ps for 4GHz cut-off Slide 7IK

Pulse integrated area “Peaks” below ~ turn 12 are artefacts of fitting and/or WCM slow response Reasonably flat response for turns (~ an 8% drop) Slide 8IK

END IK Slide 9

More work Calibrate WCMs properly against the BPMs / Faraday cup (?) Check WCM linearity Look at WCM pulse in the EMMA injection line : Repeatability Width cf pulse seen in ring cell 37 (WCMs too slow) Total charge (relative) Momentum spread Suggestions IK Slide 10