Plasma Medicine in Vorpal Tech-X Workshop / ICOPS 2012, Edinburgh, UK 8-12 July, 2012 Alexandre Likhanskii Tech-X Corporation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discharge Lamps Chapter 14 part2 1020C.
Advertisements

General Characteristics of Gas Detectors
PyECLOUD G. Iadarola, G. Rumolo Thanks to: F. Zimmermann, G. Arduini, H. Bartosik, C. Bhat, O. Dominguez, M. Driss Mensi, E. Metral, M. Taborelli.
Self consistent ion trajectories in electron shading damage T.G. Madziwa, F.F. Chen & D. Arnush UCLA Electrical Engineering ltptl November 2002.
ION ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS IN INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMAS HAVING A BIASED BOUNDARY ELECTRODE* Michael D. Logue and Mark J. Kushner Dept. of Electrical Engineering.
LIGHTNING PHENOMENON 1. The height of the cloud base above the surrounding ground level may vary from 160 to 9,500 m. The charged centres which are responsible.
Numerical investigations of a cylindrical Hall thruster K. Matyash, R. Schneider, O. Kalentev Greifswald University, Greifswald, D-17487, Germany Y. Raitses,
CONTROL OF ELECTRON ENERGY DISTRIBUTIONS AND FLUX RATIOS IN PULSED CAPACITIVELY COUPLED PLASMAS* Sang-Heon Song a) and Mark J. Kushner b) a) Department.
G.V. Naidis Institute for High Temperatures Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow, Russia Lorentz Center workshop, Leiden, October 2007 Simulation of the.
1 Introduction to Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation Technologies Emmanuel Wirth.
Modeling Generation and Nonlinear Evolution of VLF Waves for Space Applications W.A. Scales Center of Space Science and Engineering Research Virginia Tech.
NUMERICAL INVESTIGATION OF WAVE EFFECTS IN HIGH-FREQUENCY CAPACITIVELY COUPLED PLASMAS* Yang Yang and Mark J. Kushner Department of Electrical and Computer.
Computational Modeling Capabilities for Neutral Gas Injection Wayne Scales and Joseph Wang Virginia Tech Center for Space Science and Engineering.
1 Particle-In-Cell Monte Carlo simulations of a radiation driven plasma Marc van der Velden, Wouter Brok, Vadim Banine, Joost van der Mullen, Gerrit Kroesen.
An Introduction to Breakdown Simulations With PIC Codes C. Nieter, S.A. Veitzer, S. Mahalingam, P. Stoltz Tech-X Corporation MTA RF Workshop 2008 Particle-in-Cell.
Collisional ionization in the beam body  Just behind the front, by continuity  →0 and the three body recombination  (T e,E) is negligible.
THE WAFER- FOCUS RING GAP*
PLASMA DISCHARGE SIMULATIONS IN WATER WITH PRE-EXISTING BUBBLES AND ELECTRIC FIELD RAREFACTION Wei Tian and Mark J. Kushner University of Michigan, Ann.
WAFER EDGE EFFECTS CONSIDERING ION INERTIA IN CAPACITIVELY COUPLED DISCHARGES* Natalia Yu. Babaeva and Mark J. Kushner Iowa State University Department.
EDGE EFFECTS IN REACTIVE ION ETCHING: THE WAFER- FOCUS RING GAP* Natalia Yu. Babaeva and Mark J. Kushner Iowa State University Department of Electrical.
 Poisson’s equation, continuity equations and surface charge are simultaneously solved using a Newton iteration technique.  Electron energy equation.
STREAMER DYNAMICS IN A MEDIA CONTAINING DUST PARTICLES* Natalia Yu. Babaeva and Mark J. Kushner Iowa State University Department of Electrical and Computer.
STREAMER INITIATION AND PROPAGATION IN WATER WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF BUBBLES AND ELECTRIC FIELD INITIATED RAREFACTION Wei Tian a) and Mark J. Kushner b)
Plasma Kinetics around a Dust Grain in an Ion Flow N F Cramer and S V Vladimirov, School of Physics, University of Sydney, S A Maiorov, General Physics.
Aerospace Plasmas Tech-X Workshop / ICOPS 2012, Edinburgh, UK 8-12 July, 2012 Alexandre Likhanskii, Kris Beckwith Tech-X Corporation.
Simulation of streamer propagation using a PIC-MCC code. Application to Sprite discharges. Olivier Chanrion and Torsten Neubert Danish National Space Center.
Time-Dependent Dielectric Barrier Discharge Plasma Actuator Modeling Ben Mertz, Thomas Corke Center for Flow Physics and Control University of Notre Dame,
Jean-Charles Matéo-Vélez, Frédéric Thivet, Pierre Degond * ONERA - Centre de Toulouse * CNRS - Mathématiques pour l'Industrie et la Physique, Toulouse.
TRIGGERING EXCIMER LASERS BY PHOTOIONIZATION FROM A CORONA DISCHARGE* Zhongmin Xiong and Mark J. Kushner University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI USA.
Speed-Current Relation in Lightning Return Strokes Ryan Evans, Student - Mostafa Hemmati, Advisor Department of Physical Sciences Arkansas Tech University.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under grants , , , the Specialized.
Introduction to the Particle In Cell Scheme for Gyrokinetic Plasma Simulation in Tokamak a Korea National Fusion Research Institute b Courant Institute,
Dynamics of the breakdown of the discharge gap at high overvoltage A. Shvydky (University of Toledo, OH), V.N. Khudik (Plasma Dynamics Corp., OH), V.P.
Photos placed in horizontal position with even amount of white space between photos and header Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory.
Why plasma processing? (1) UCLA Accurate etching of fine features.
OPTIMIZING PULSE WAVEFORMS IN PLASMA JETS FOR REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES (ROS) PRODUCTION* Seth A. Norberg a), Natalia Yu. Babaeva b) and Mark J. Kushner.
PDE simulations with adaptive grid refinement for negative streamers in nitrogen Carolynne Montijn Work done in cooperation with: U. Ebert W. Hundsdorfer.
SiO2 ETCH PROPERTIES AND ION ENERGY DISTRIBUTION IN PULSED CAPACITIVELY COUPLED PLASMAS SUSTAINED IN Ar/CF4/O2* Sang-Heon Songa) and Mark J. Kushnerb)
ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE PLASMA TRANSFER OF JETS AND BULLETS ACROSS DIELECTRIC TUBES AND CHANNELS* Zhongmin Xiong (a), Eric Robert (b), Vanessa Sarron (b)
Ionization Detectors Basic operation
D. Tskhakaya et al. 1 (13) PSI 18, Toledo July 2008 Kinetic simulations of the parallel transport in the JET Scrape-off Layer D. Tskhakaya, R.
Edge-SOL Plasma Transport Simulation for the KSTAR
Damping of the dust particle oscillations at very low neutral pressure M. Pustylnik, N. Ohno, S.Takamura, R. Smirnov.
Physics of electron cloud build up Principle of the multi-bunch multipacting. No need to be on resonance, wide ranges of parameters allow for the electron.
IPM EM Simulations 9 th DITANET Topical Workshop on Non-Invasive Beam Size Measurement for High Brightness Proton and Heavy Ion Accelerators April.
Lecture 3. Full statistical description of the system of N particles is given by the many particle distribution function: in the phase space of 6N dimensions.
of magnetized discharge plasmas: fluid electrons + particle ions
Streamers, sprites, leaders, lightning: from micro- to macroscales Workshop, Oct. 8-12, 2007, Lorentz Centre Organizers: Ute Ebert (CWI Amsterdam, TU Eindhoven),
Theory of dilute electrolyte solutions and ionized gases
Particle and fluid models for streamers: comparison and spatial coupling Li Chao 1 in cooperation with:, U. Ebert 1,2, W. Hundsdorfer 1, W.J.M. Brok 2.
An Estimation of Critical Electron Density at Just Starting Breakdown in Gases Mase. H Professor Emeritus of Ibaraki University.
Generation of anomalously energetic suprathermal electrons by an electron beam interacting with a nonuniform plasma Dmytro Sydorenko University of Alberta,
Simulation of the Interaction Between Two Counterflowing Rarefied Jets
PLASMA DYNAMICS AT THE IONIZATION FRONT OF HIGH
DOE Plasma Science Center Control of Plasma Kinetics
DOE Plasma Science Center Control of Plasma Kinetics
Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Amsterdam
ELECTRIC FIELD MEASUREMENTS IN ns ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE AIR PLASMA
SUPPRESSING NONLINEARLY-DRIVEN INHOMOGENEITIES IN HIGH FREQUENCY CCP’s
Introduction Motivation Objective
DOE Plasma Science Center Control of Plasma Kinetics
Sub-Ns Electric Field Measurements
DOE Plasma Science Center Control of Plasma Kinetics
PLASMA PROPAGATION THROUGH POROUS BONE SCAFFOLDING*
Amanda M. Lietz, Seth A. Norberg, and Mark J. Kushner
Model: Electric sensor
V.P. Nagorny, V.N. Khudik Plasma Dynamics Corporation, USA
SURFACE CORONA-BAR DISCHARGES
CONTROL OF ION ACTIVATION ENERGY TO SURFACES IN ATMO-
Presentation transcript:

Plasma Medicine in Vorpal Tech-X Workshop / ICOPS 2012, Edinburgh, UK 8-12 July, 2012 Alexandre Likhanskii Tech-X Corporation

Fluid plasma models need artificial seed electrons to launch streamers J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43 (2010) Motivation

Charged species number density – from m -3 to m -3 Typical sheath size – 10 microns Typical grid size for accurate resolution – 1 micron Validity of Fluid approach – Maxwellian EEDF Consider one 3D cell with 1 micron grid size One electron per one cell -> m -3 Is fluid approach valid for description of low density plasma phenomena at micron scales? Is it possible to resolve 3D structure using fluid code? Can fluid model accurately resolve streamers?

Poisson or full Maxwell equations for electric field Track motion of macroparticles (groups of charged particles) instead of considering number densities MC collision model for all relevant plasma processes Kinetic effects can be captured using PIC approach: AdvantageMore accurate physics DisadvantageSlow speed for many particles

Poisson equation is solved using biconjugate gradient method with algebraic multigrid preconditioner (in Trilinos package) Plasma model includes kinetic electrons, kinetic nitrogen and oxygen molecular ions, fluid neutral molecular nitrogen and oxygen Several types of collisions: inelastic collisions, ionization, excitation, charge exchange, recombination, attachment Serial/Parallel 2D/3D simulations VORPAL has a comprehensive PIC-DSMC plasma model

Area weighting preserves charge exactly e e e e e Particles are pushed using standard FDTD algorithm

Exponential growth of number of particles due to avalanche ionization -> significant increase in computational time for PIC e e i e e i e e i e …… 1000 Why are atmospheric pressure discharges so challenging for PIC codes?

e e i e e i e e i e Consider different stages of discharge for one cell Small ND Need PIC Moderate ND PIC -> Fluid transition Large ND PIC is not feasible Need Fluid code Why are atmospheric pressure discharges so challenging for PIC codes?

PIC code -> particles are represented via macroparticles 1 macroparticle = N (nominal number) regular particles Introduce weight W of macroparticle -> one macroparticle contains W*N regular particles How does VORPAL handle the problem of exponential particle growth?

PIC code -> particles are represented via macroparticles 1 macroparticle = N (nominal number) regular particles Introduce weight W of macroparticle -> one macroparticle contains W*N regular particles How does it work? How does VORPAL handle the problem of exponential particle growth?

PIC code -> particles are represented via macroparticles 1 macroparticle = N (nominal number) regular particles Introduce weight W of macroparticle -> one macroparticle contains W*N regular particles Step 1: Have 6 macroparticles with W=1 each How does it work?

How does VORPAL handle the problem of exponential particle growth? PIC code -> particles are represented via macroparticles 1 macroparticle = N (nominal number) regular particles Introduce weight W of macroparticle -> one macroparticle contains W*N regular particles Step 1: Have 6 macroparticles with W=1 each Step 2: Combine pairs of particles How does it work?

Step 1: Have 6 macroparticles with W=1 each Step 2: Combine pairs of particles Step 3: End up with 3 macroparticles with W=2 each How does VORPAL handle the problem of exponential particle growth? PIC code -> particles are represented via macroparticles 1 macroparticle = N (nominal number) regular particles Introduce weight W of macroparticle -> one macroparticle contains W*N regular particles How does it work?

Different sorting algorithms Threshold number of macroparticles per cell for the combining Maximum weight of macroparticles How does VORPAL handle the problem of exponential particle growth? PIC code -> particles are represented via macroparticles 1 macroparticle = N (nominal number) regular particles Introduce weight W of macroparticle -> one macroparticle contains W*N regular particles What can be assigned?

What happens during plasma decay stage? PIC code -> particles are represented via macroparticles 1 macroparticle = N (nominal number) regular particles Introduce weight W of macroparticle -> one macroparticle contains W*N regular particles How does it work? Step 1: Start with 3 macroparticles with W=2 each

What happens during plasma decay stage? PIC code -> particles are represented via macroparticles 1 macroparticle = N (nominal number) regular particles Introduce weight W of macroparticle -> one macroparticle contains W*N regular particles How does it work? Step 1: Start with 3 macroparticles with W=2 each Step 2: Split particles Into pairs

What happens during plasma decay stage? PIC code -> particles are represented via macroparticles 1 macroparticle = N (nominal number) regular particles Introduce weight W of macroparticle -> one macroparticle contains W*N regular particles How does it work? Step 1: Start with 3 macroparticles with W=2 each Step 2: Split particles Into pairs Step 3: End up with 6 macroparticles with W=1 each

3.3 ns We performed studies of surface discharge propagation with different combination parameters and observed no visible difference Does it really work? 2D Ex, V/m Set 1Set 2 1D Ex, V/m

Simulation Domain – 1cm x 1cm Grid – 5000 x 5000 (2µm grid size) Time step = 75 fs 1 macroparticle = 4*10 4 particles/m Threshold number of particles in cell for combining is 5 Gas – atmospheric air (Oxygen/Nitrogen mixture) Collisions – ionizations, excitation, elastic Boundary conditions – bottom electrode is grounded, Negative voltage of -30kV (with 0.1ns rise time) is applied to top electrode Relative dielectric permittivity of tissue is 20 Initial electrons are randomly seeded near top electrode Tissue surface acts as an absorber for charged species Back to plasma medicine: Simulation parameters

Evolution of electron number density

Streamers are independently generated, but start to overlap during propagation If streamer is close to the tissue, it propagates faster and tends to shield/deviate neighboring streamer Once one streamer touches the surface, surface discharge starts to propagate Evolution of electron number density

Evolution of electric potential

Electric potential is quasi-uniform within the streamer body When plasma touches the tissue, the electric potential of the tissue is mainly defined by the thickness and permittivity of top dielectric Evolution of electric potential

Electric field inside streamer body is 1-2 orders of magnitude lower than outside the streamer The is an enhancement of electric field near the tissue when streamer approaches the tissue When streamer touches the tissue surface, strong electric field penetrates into the tissue Evolution of vertical component of electric field