Howard County, MD Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan October 6, 2011 Howard Saltzman Howard County Department of Public Works.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dorchester County Government Officials Presentation Watershed Implementation Planning Phase II Status Mike Moulds, Local Team Coordinator October 4, 2011.
Advertisements

creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Planning for Our Future:
Water Pollution. Definitions Impaired Waters Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop lists of impaired waters, those that do.
RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Stormwater Rulemaking Briefing US Environmental Protection Agency.
Commonwealth of Virginia Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Russ Baxter, Chesapeake Bay Coordinator.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Chesapeake Bay Largest US estuary Six states + DC 64,000 mi 2 10,000 miles of shoreline Home to 17+ million
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
Introduction to TMDLs for Nutrients Presented by: Dr. Scott Emery January 15, 2009.
Mark Dubin Agricultural Technical Coordinator University of Maryland Extension-College Park Modeling Quarterly Review Meeting April 17, 2012.
Update on the District of Columbia’s Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) for the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) November 18, 2010.
Point Source POLLUTION: CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Jim Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program (EPA) 1 CBP Program Update Citizens Advisory Committee February 27, 2014.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Background and Litigation Jon A. Mueller, Vice President For Litigation Chesapeake Bay Foundation William and Mary,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Status Report: Chesapeake Bay TMDL Clean Up Plan Presented to P otomac Roundtable by Jack E. Frye April 9, 2010.
The Virginia Bar Association October 22, 2009 Richmond, Virginia Reginald Parrish U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Update on.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool CAST Olivia H. Devereux Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin 12/13/2011.
DC Draft Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan Stakeholder Meeting March 1, 2012 Metropolitan Washington Council Of Governments Hamid Karimi Deputy Director.
Update on the Development of EPA’s Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Virginia’s Watershed Implementation Plan Russ Perkinson Potomac Roundtable October 8, 2010.
Virginia Assessment Scenario Tool VAST Developed by: Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin.
Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee Meeting Bay Program Water Quality Goals: Focus on Funding Presented to COG Board of Directors September 10, 2003.
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework: Building Confidence in Delivering on Pollution Reductions to Local Waters Maryland.
VACo Environment and Agriculture Steering Committee VML Environmental Policy Committee June 2, 2010 Charlottesville, VA Chesapeake Bay Watershed Roanoke.
Preserving York County 2010 Municipal Educational Series January 28, 2010 Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Jake Romig, York County Circuit.
URBAN STORMWATER: A PERFECT STORM FOR CHANGE Jon M. Capacasa Director, Water Protection Division EPA Region III.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Caroline County Pilot Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Katheleen Freeman, AICP, Director Caroline County Department of Planning & Codes Leslie Grunden,
76. The central U.S. law regulating water quality is the Clean Water Act (CWA), adopted in The Act initially focused on point sources, which it.
Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program How Trading Works John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Milestones, Progress and the Mid-point Assessment APPROACHING 2017 James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager Department of Environmental Quality.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Innovative Data Management and Planning Strategies for TMDL Compliance
It’s The Final Countdown To The Mid-point Assessment:
Land Use Challenges In Maryland Today
Moving to Phase II: Watershed Implementation Plans
MACo Winter Conference
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
Local Planning Process…
Watershed Implementation Plan
U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office June 1, 2012
Anne Arundel County Maryland
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Maryland’s Phase III WIP Planning for 2025 and beyond
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Chesapeake Bay Suite of Modeling Tools
2018 BMP Verification Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Howard County, MD Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan October 6, 2011 Howard Saltzman Howard County Department of Public Works

Tonight’s Outline What is a TMDL and why is it important? What is a Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP)? Why is it needed? What are the WIP goals? What is the WIP schedule? How will the WIP be developed? What happens after the WIP is written?

What is a TMDL and why is it important? TMDL = Total Maximum Daily Load A TMDL is the maximum amount of pollution, that can be discharged to any given body of water and still allow it to meet water quality criteria. A TMDL is often referred to as a “pollution diet” Clean Water Act of 1972 requires to be set for all impaired water bodies

So, what does that mean for tonight’s discussion? The water body, of particular concern tonight, is the Chesapeake Bay The pollutants in questions are Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Sediment The water quality standards to be met include water clarity and dissolved oxygen – needed to allow aquatic plants, shellfish, and fish to thrive

Benefits of Achieving the Bay TMDL Achieving the Bay nutrient TMDLs will help maintain the Bay: Recreational – boating, fishing , and tourism Economic resource – commercial fishing, crabbing, oysters Improvements in local water quality Job creation (restoration projects)

A little history…. The first interstate agreement to restore the Chesapeake Bay was signed by Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Washington, DC in 1983 There have been additional agreements since 1983.

More recently The 2000 Bay Agreement said to meet water quality criteria by 2010, otherwise the Bay will be listed as an impaired water and a TMDL will be set Progress has been made, but the Bay’s waters still do not meet water quality standards

The result of not, yet, meeting Bay WQ standards EPA and the States have agreed to a more regulatory approach that includes Baywide TMDLs for nitrogen, phosphorus, and sediment AND Require Watershed Implementation Plans to meet those TMDLs Including milestones and deadlines to measure progress

TMDL and Initial WIP EPA issued the initial Chesapeake Bay TMDL in December 2010 Maryland Department of the Environment prepared the Phase I WIP for meeting the 2010 TMDL Local governments have the opportunity to fine tune the plan as a Phase II WIP

The Bay TMDL was determined from modeling The model determines loads from each state in the Bay watershed based on land use, location, and best management practices (BMP) in place to reduce pollution in storm water runoff More on BMPs in a few minutes

And allocated to the Counties The results of the model were further refined to provide pollutant load allocations by County and major contributing “sector” The major sectors of concern are: Agriculture Urban stormwater Septic systems Wastewater treatment

What are Howard County’s TMDLs

Best Management Practices Pollutant reduction Within each sector nitrogen and phosphorus discharges can be reduced by application of various techniques commonly referred to as: Best Management Practices (BMP)

Examples of BMPs Agriculture Fencing animals out of streams Cover crops More precise fertilizer applications Manure management And lots more…

Wastewater treatment Upgrade treatment process to Enhanced Nutrient Removal (ENR) at Little Patuxent Water Reclamation Plant

Examples of BMPs continued Septic Upgrade of existing septic systems to Best Available Technology designs Connection of existing septic systems to ENR level wastewater treatment plants that provide better nutrient removal

Examples of BMPs continued Urban Stormwater Management New and retrofit SWM ponds Stream restoration Impervious surface reduction Tree planting Street sweeping Rain gardens

Stream Restoration Before After

Stormwater Management Pond Retrofit Before After

Maryland Assessment Scenario Tool (MAST) How do we know what to do? Maryland Assessment Scenario Tool (MAST) A computer model developed by MDE Allows input of percentage of land treated by various BMPs Calculates nutrient loads delivered to the Chesapeake Bay from Howard County Allows for an iterative process to develop one or more scenarios to meet the County’s TMDL allocation

Watershed Implementation Plan Schedule October 14, 2011 Draft WIP II Milestones to MDE October 28, 2011 Draft Local WIP II inputs to MDE   November 18, 2011 Local WIP II Report Narrative to MDE Mid-Dec 2011– Draft Statewide WIP II to EPA March 2012 – Final Statewide WIP II to EPA

Possible actions (through 2017) that will be included in the WIP II Add urban BMPs to provide storm water management treatment of 20% of currently untreated impervious area Approximately 9,000 acres Approximately 2% of untreated acres completed last10 years Upgrade 20% of the 15-20,000 septic systems in the County, Particularly those within 1,000 feet of a perennial stream Currently upgrade less than 10 septic systems per year

Wastewater treatment and agriculture are closer to meeting their goals Upgrade of Little Patuxent WWTP to ENR underway and will be completed in 2012

Agriculture Howard Soil Conservation District and MD Department of Agriculture are preparing the agricultural section of the WIP which will outline BMPs and nutrient management plans to be developed for farms

When does all of this need to be completed? EPA requires that measures needed to achieve 60% of the reductions be in place by 2020 But, Maryland has decided to meet this goal by 2017 All practices to be in place by 2025, but Maryland has agreed to do this by 2020

What will all of this cost? Construction costs are yet to be determined and are likely to be in the $300M to $800M range for urban storm water BMPs and septic system upgrades The wastewater treatment plant ENR upgrade has already been funded at $35M HSCD has existing programs and funding in place to meet the County’s agricultural TMDL allocation

Where will the money come from? Wastewater paid out of the Utility Fund supported by user fees and assessments ENR upgrade also funded by grants from the MD Bay Restoration Fund Agricultural BMPs are substantially funded through existing Federal and State cost sharing programs Septic system upgrades in Howard County are not a priority for funding through the Bay Restoration Fund

More money….. Storm water management BMPs are funded by Howard County out of the general fund or bonds and by grants from MDE (which may include federal monies) Feasibility of a storm water utility is being studied provide a steady and reliable funding source for implementing and maintaining SWM BMPs

What’s Next? Complete the County’s input to the Phase II WIP MDE will compile all the County WIPs into a Draft Maryland Phase II WIP for submission to EPA in December 2011 Maryland’s final WIP II will be submitted to EPA March 2012

And after that…. Implementation of the Phase II WIP proceeds The WIP will include milestones for 2013 and 2015 to be compared to actual implementation progress By 2017 a Phase III WIP will be developed to ensure the 2020 TMDL nutrient pollution limits are met

Howard County’s WIP Team Department of Public Works Department of Planning and Zoning Howard County Health Department Howard Soil Conservation District Howard County Public School System Columbia Association

Questions? For further information contact Howard Saltzman 410-313-6416 Hsaltzman@HowardCountyMD.gov