 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12) Day 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment FOR Learning in theory
Advertisements

The 21st Century Context for
Understanding by Design Stage 3
Mathematics Unit 6 - Getting Ready for the Unit
HDSBs (Elementary) Math Direction Ruth Teszeri Instructional Program Leader.
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Theme-based Curriculum and Task-based Activities: A Language Teacher’s Reflection Yan Zhao.
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades K-5) Day 1.
 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Training Revised (Grades K-5) Day 2.
2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12)
Bringing it all together!
Teaching of Numeracy in the BEP Curriculum. BEP Throughlines Creating Personal Futures Developing Literate and Numerate Citizens Enhancing Skills and.
The Rubric Reality Cobb Keys Classroom Teacher Evaluation System.
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
Orientation to the English Language Arts K to 7 IRP (2006)
WELCOME to WELCOME to Implementation Training for: The Revised Ontario Curriculum for Canadian and World Studies Grades 9 and 10.
1 Backward Design, Assessment, and Rubrics Based on Understanding by Design By Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe.
The mere imparting of information is not education. Above all things, the effort must result in helping a person think and do for himself/herself. Carter.
MULTILINGUAL & MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
CI 754X FALL 2000Mara Alagic Mathematics: Everyone’s future Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (short overview)
NCTM’s Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making.
1 New York State Mathematics Core Curriculum 2005.
MATHEMATICS KLA Years 1 to 10 Understanding the syllabus MATHEMATICS.
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
November 2013 Network Team Institute
T 8.0 Central concepts:  The standards for all lessons should not be treated simply as a “to do” list.  Integration of the disciplines can be effective.
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND READING K-5 Curriculum Overview.
NCTM Overview The Principles and Standards for Teaching Mathematics.
Mathematics Teacher Leader Session 1: The National Mathematics Strategy & Modelling Exemplary Teaching 1.
Delaware Professional Teaching Standards 3.0 Content Knowledge 4.0 Human Development and Learning 5.0 Diverse Learners 6.0 Communication 7.0 Learning Environment.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
Advantages of Using Children’s Literature provides a motivating introduction to complex curriculum topics mathematical vocabulary can be reinforced and.
Teaching a Lesson (and Researching!)  Available online at  Examples and supplemental information in BLUE.
Meaningful Mathematics
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Physical Education Standards Toolkit (4 hours) OCISS Instructional Services Branch.
Using Understanding by Design
Introduction to Curriculum Topic Study – Bridging the Gap Between Standards and Practice.
The Backward Design Process
Standards in Mathematics EDN 322. Standards in Mathematics What do you think about when you hear the term “standards?” What do you think about when you.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
Matthew Birtel EDUC 503 FALL 2012 November 27, 2012.
Balanced Math. Math Philosophy “Teachers are the key to improving mathematics educations…Regardless of the curriculum or the assessment process.
Understanding By Design
3 Stages of Backward Design 1. Identify desired results. 2. Determine acceptable evidence. 3. Plan learning experiences & instruction.
Backwards Design. Activity-Oriented Teaching Many teachers engage in “activity-oriented” teaching.
Understanding by Design Developed by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe Published by the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) A.K.A.
SAS What is a coach to do? Classrooms for the Future/21st Century Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Learning Target Cycles Chris Coombes
Grade 7 & 8 Mathematics Reporter : Richard M. Oco Ph. D. Ed.Mgt-Student.
Session 1 Holy Family Unit Plan Review. Holy Family Unit Plan Subject Area Grade Level Unit Title Estimated Time Student Population.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
The Teacher- Child Interaction Linking Developmentally Appropriate Practices to the Characteristics of Effective Instruction.
The Skill Theme Approach to Physical Education Chapter 9.
Comparing Old to New Science Standards How Have they changed?
Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.
Implementation Training
Adapted from ASCD Materials.  Is a framework for developing units  Begins with looking at the end.  What do we want students to know?  How will they.
“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.
WELCOME to Implementation Training for:
3 Stages of Backward Design
Welcome to the overview session for the Iowa Core Curriculum
UbD: Stages of Backward Design
Teaching Mathematics Finding the most effective way to teach middle school students mathematics.
Presentation transcript:

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 2007 Mississippi Mathematics Framework Revised Training (Grades 6-12) Day 2

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Reading Reflections At your table, discuss important ideas you took from the articles you read. How did the ideas relate to our tasks and discussions from yesterday? How did the ideas relate to our exploration of the curriculum framework? Record your ideas on chart paper.

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Understanding by Design: Step 1 1. Define desired results  a. Establish goals: What relevant goals (such as content, competencies or objectives) will this design address?  b. Understandings: What are the big ideas that students will understand? What specific understandings about them are desired? What misunderstandings are predictable?  c. Essential questions: What questions will foster inquiry, understanding, and transfer of learning?  d. What key knowledge and skills will students acquire as a result of this unit or series of lessons? What should they eventually be able to do as a result of such knowledge and skills?

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Understanding by Design: Step 2 2. Assessment Evidence  a. Performance tasks: Through what authentic performance tasks will students demonstrate the desired understandings? By what criteria will performances of understanding be judged?  b. Other evidence: Through what other evidence (such as quizzes, tests, writing prompts) will students demonstrate achievement of the desired results? How will students reflect upon and self-assess their learning?

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Understanding by Design: Step 3 3. Learning Plan  a. Learning activities: What learning experiences and instruction will enable students to achieve the desired results?

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education 5 Characteristics of Tasks that Affect Student Learning Introduction of new topics with a problem- solving task Use of communication strategies Connections across topics Development over time Tasks that challenge

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Underlying Learning Theory Problem-solving focus Introduction of topics with problem solving Inclusion of non-routine and application problems Use of higher-order thinking questions

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Underlying Learning Theory Use of communication strategies Reading Writing Speaking Critical listening Multiple representations

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Underlying Learning Theory Connections across topics Links to previous understandings Use of threads or strands through all topics Multiple, linked objectives taught concurrently to eliminate isolated and fragmented teaching

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Underlying Learning Theory Allow time to learn 3–8 days of development for a new topic 8–11 days of repetition Problems change qualitatively over time, not the same type repeated

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Underlying Learning Theory Tasks that challenge Use open-ended questions to allow a wide group of students the opportunity to engage in the question or problem

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Curriculum materials Select a chapter in your curriculum materials. Find instances or evidence of the 5 characteristics of learning tasks. Be able to support your examples. Which criteria appear to be missing?

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Solving Equations Solve: 5x – 2 = x

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Solving Equations Solve: 5x – 2 = x A 2 5x = x S 2x 3x = 12 D 3 x = 4 Abbreviations can be used: A  Addition S  Subtraction M  Multiplication D  Division CLT  Combine Like Terms DPMA  Distributive Property of Multiplication over Addition

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Algebra Tile Representations What relationships do you notice among the tiles? Discuss in your group.

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Curriculum Framework Comparison How do these tasks relate to the curriculum framework objectives? How do these tasks relate to the criteria for student learning?

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education

Station 1

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Station 2

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Station 3

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Station 4

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Station 5

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Comparison to framework and materials How does this exploration in transformational geometry relate to the curriculum framework? How does this exploration relate to your curriculum materials?

 2007 Mississippi Department of Education Closing focus questions What are key components of the curriculum framework? Decide at your table what you consider to be critical ideas.