WECC Reliability Management System Tagging Requirements Before the WECC MIS Meeting November 13, 2009 By David Lemmons.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2004 NERC, NPCC & New England Compliance Programs John Norden Manager, Operations Training, Documentation & Compliance August 31, 2003 RC Meeting.
Advertisements

e-Tag Functional Specification
E-Tag 1.8 An industry tutorial. e-Tag 1.8 The basics features of e-Tag 1.8 are much the same as in the current version The tag author uses Agent.
E-Tag 1.8 An industry tutorial.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange Version 1 Standard Revision 1, Draft 5 August, 2005.
E-Tag 1.8 An industry tutorial.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange
Business Practices Subcommittee Update February 1, 2011.
NAESB Coordinate Interchange Standard, Version 1 / 0
WECC Delegation Agreement WECC Board of Directors Meeting December 7-8, 2006.
Dynamic Schedule e-tagging Requirements Criterion WECC-087 (formerly INT-008) ISAS Report January 2012.
Primary Objectives of WIT
Dynamic Transfers Bob WECC MIC Meeting “The Last Hurrah!”
Load Responsibility in the NWPP Footprint
WECC BAL-STD-002 Workshop February 6, 2008
1 Compliance Report WECC Board of Directors Meeting December 7-8, 2006 Steve Rueckert Director, Standards and Compliance.
Interchange Authority Recommendations Board of Directors Meeting December 7, 2007.
Standards Update WECC Board of Directors Technical Session December 5, 2007 Albuquerque, New Mexico Steve Rueckert Director of Standards.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Standards WECC Board of Directors Meeting December 7-8, 2006.
BAL-002-WECC-1 Contingency Reserves
Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Update WECC OC Meeting June 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Marilyn Franz ISAS Chair.
ISAS Liaison Report October 25-26, 2007 MIC Meeting.
MIC/ISAS LIAISON REPORT June 15, 2007 April, 2007 ISAS Meeting Highlights.
Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Update October 2008 Gary Nolan ISAS Vice-Chair.
Intra Hour Tagging/Oasis During System Contingencies The transmission tagging process was initially developed to solve an after the fact accounting issue.
Presented to the WECC MIC June 15, 2007
Gary Nolan Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Chair e-Tag Denial Issue Referred to Joint Guidance Committee.
Brenda Ambrosi Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Chair e-Tag Denial Issue Referred to Joint Guidance Committee.
FERC Order minute Scheduling.
WECC Reliability Management System
Jerry Rust Chair - Underfrequency Load Shedding Criterion Team
MARKET INTERFACE COMMITTEE OC and PCC Approval Items March 6-7, 2008 Albuquerque, New Mexico.
INT Rewrite Projects Presented by Bob Harshbarger January 2012.
ISAS Update August 2, 2011 Market Issues Subcommittee.
ISAS Update Prepared by Brenda Ambrosi ISAS Chair October 14, 2011.
NERC Operating Committee Activities Update September 16-17, 2014 Meeting.
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO] [ENTITY NAME] [FUNCTION CERTIFYING] Certification [LOCATION] – [DATES OF ON-SITE VISIT] [Presenter Name,
Andy Meyers Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Chair Discussion Item: Use of Emergency eTags January 2015 Salt Lake City, UT.
GOP and QSE Relationship Jeff Whitmer Manager, Compliance Assessments Talk with Texas RE June 25, 2012.
BCTC Customer Consultation on Loss Compensation Service January 15, 2007.
Lisa Wood, CISA, CBRM, CBRA Compliance Auditor, Cyber Security
Joint Electric Scheduling Subcommittee Update August 20, 2013.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N WIAB WECC Interchange Authority Backup BY LOU MIRANDA BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION TRANSMISSION.
NERC Congestion Management Congestion Management Option 3 Vendor Meeting Julie Pierce – NERC IDCWG Chair.
Entity Registration Under EPAct 2005 Public Power Council April 6, 2006 Louise McCarren Chief Executive Officer WECC.
Reserves Issue For years there has been disagreement over reserves issues and what constitutes firm power. We’ve been able to function as a market, despite.
Implementing the New Reliability Standards Status of Draft Cyber Security Standards CIP through CIP Larry Bugh ECAR Standard Drafting Team.
Standards Review Subcommittee Update November 2007 – January 2008 February 5, 2008.
Reserves…Where are we??? Service Schedule C Service Schedule C C-3.10 Seller shall be responsible for ensuring that Service Schedule C transactions are.
1 TOP TEN NON- COMPLIANCE ISSUES PRESENTED BY APC COMMITTEE.
JESS May 7-8, JESS Action Items Review e-Tag Test Plan Test URLs Test Dates Set Roll-Over Date –June :00 CDT.
NERC Project S ystem Protection Coordination - PRC-027​ Presentation to the NSRS Conference Call August 17, 2015 Sam Francis Oncor Electric Delivery.
COMPLIANCE ROLLOUT Vann Weldon Compliance Training Administrator March 23, 2005 NERC FUNCTIONAL MODEL REVIEW.
Standards Review Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
Projects System Protection Coordination Draft 2 of TOP Texas Reliability Entity NERC Standards Reliability Subcommittee November 2, 2015.
NOGRR-169 OWG discussion Bill Blevins June 28, 2017.
NERC Entity Registration and Certification in the ERCOT Region
ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee June 2, 2005
Grid Integration of Intermittent Resources
WECC-0118 Removal of Interchange Authority
Review of After-the-Fact (ATF) Tagging Criteria Scheduler’s Meeting May 24, 2016 Raymond will ask the audience what their expectations are in regard to.
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]
Rates & Regulatory Updates
Compliance Open Webinar
Review of After-the-Fact (ATF) Tagging Criteria Scheduler’s Meeting May 24, 2016 Raymond will ask the audience what their expectations are in regard to.
Compliance Open Webinar
R18011 discussion This document prepared for informational purposes only, and does not endorse a specific resolution to the request R18011.
Interchange Authority Function Task Force
WIAB WECC Interchange Authority Backup
Presentation transcript:

WECC Reliability Management System Tagging Requirements Before the WECC MIS Meeting November 13, 2009 By David Lemmons

Background WECC RMS began in 1999 There are 6 Amendments in addition to the original document. The RMS is the first “Mandatory” Reliability Standards with Financial Penalty for failing to maintain compliance with Requirements. Amendment 4 dates August 1, 2003 deals with Tagging

Section M of RMS Section M deals with Tagging Requirements in the WECC. Three separate areas of Requirements –Submission of Tags by Load Serving Purchasing-Selling Entities –Load Control Area (LCA) (Tag Authority) –Intermediate Control Area, Generation Control Area, Transmission Provider, or Transmission Operator- (Tag Approval Entity (TAE))

Submission of Tags by Load Serving Purchasing-Selling Entities Non-compliance Event defined as Failure of the Load Control Area to deny the LSE’s transaction when: –the LSE failed to submit a tag when one was required by NERC or WECC; –the LSE failed to submit a tag when one is required by NERC or WECC in the prescribed timeframe; or –The LSE failed to submit a tag using the E-tag system

Current NERC Standard NERC Standard INT Requirement R1 reads: –Each Receiving Balancing Authority shall confirm Interchange Schedules with the Sending Balancing Authority prior to implementation in the Balancing Authority’s ACE equation. NERC Standard INT Requirement R1 reads: –The Balancing Authority shall provide evidence that Implemented Interchange matches Confirmed Interchange as submitted by the Interchange Authority. NERC Standards INT Requirement R1

Load Control Area (LCA) Non-compliance events are defined as: –The LCA’s authority service has either not implemented E-tag or fails to maintain an availability in accordance with NERC Policy 3. (99.5% availability at the time) –The LCA set a composite status to IMPLEMENT for a transaction despite the denial by a Tag Approval Entity. –The LCA set a composite status to DEAD for a transaction that has been approved by all Tag Approval entities. –The LCA failed to implement a transaction that has an approved E-tag (approved by all Tag Approval entities). –The LCA implemented a transaction without having a tag, even though a tag was required.

Current NERC Standard NERC Standard INT-009-1Requirement R1reads: –The Balancing Authority shall implement Confirmed Interchange as received from the Interchange Authority. NERC Standard INT Requirement R2 reads: –Evidence shall demonstrate that the Interchange was implemented in the Balancing Authority’s Area Control Error (ACE) equation, or the system that calculates the ACE equation.

Tag Approval Entity Non-compliance events are defined as: –The TAE’s approval service has not implemented or fails to maintain availability at least 99.5% of the time during the month. NERC Policy 3 requires that tag approval services maintain high availability (see Policy 3 Appendix 3A3). –The entity did not actively process (approve or deny) at least 75% of the tags received in a month.

Current NERC Standard NERC Standard INT Requirement R1 reads: –Prior to the expiration of the reliability assessment period defined in the timing requirements tables in this standard, Column B, the Balancing Authority and Transmission Service Provider shall respond to each On-time Request for Interchange (RFI), and to each Emergency RFI and Reliability Adjustment RFI from an Interchange Authority to transition an Arranged Interchange to a Confirmed Interchange. NERC Standard INT-008-2/3 could also impact compliance.