WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EO TP3 SAMPLING WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEMS.
Advertisements

ENVIRONMENTAL AND POLLUTION MANAGEMENT by K Subramaniam, PJK [Master Envt; B.Sc.(Hons)(Envt & Occ.Health); Dip.RSH]
Dra. Argelia Castaño Ministry of Science and Technology National Institute Food and Agrarian Research (INIA) Animal Health Research Center (CISA) Dra.
Whole Effluent Toxicity Basics
Carl Wirdak Occidental Petroleum Corporation GEMI Survey Water Use, Issues & Management March 2001.
SWAMP Team Members Contact Information Karen Taberski: , Nelia White:
Presented to: Presented by: Kevin Dischler, Bioassay Lab Director Understanding Offshore Toxicity Testing – Beyond Pass or Fail.
CERP: F2 Experiment Focused on exposing adult mummichogs to 4 levels of contaminated sediments Clean and contaminated food njwrri.rutgers.edu/graduate/
1. Problem addressed Real-life websites usually show less-than- perfect accessibility — even those that strive to be accessible. WCAG Techniques and Failures.
Hours Listening To Music In A Week! David Burgueño, Nestor Garcia, Rodrigo Martinez.
Tara Duffy and Stephen McCormick Conte Anadromous Fish Research Lab, Turners Falls, MA Differential life-stage response to common endocrine disruptors.
What's New for Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Bill Dimond MDEQ Aquatic Toxicology Laboratory.
Whole Effluent Toxicity NPDES Program
Wastewater Systems Effluent Regulations (Draft) Update Mohammed Karim, M.Eng., P.Eng. Senior Water & Wastewater Engineer Southern TC, LFN & UFN meeting.
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Testing Water Quality Standards Workgroup Meeting June 26, 2007.
Clean Water Act Section 402 Issues Facing Kentucky Kentucky Professional Engineers in Mining Seminar September 6, 2013 Lloyd Cress, Kentucky Coal Association.
Low Flow Calculations In NPDES permits the permitted industry or municipality must meet certain requirements with regards to the toxicity of their effluent.
1 Mixing Zones, Reasonable Potential Analysis, and Permit Limits A Quick Overview Steve Schnurbusch Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
CHEE 370 Waste Treatment Processes
Whole Effluent Toxicity
WWTF’s MPCA Permit Renewal January 14,  Our current NPDES permit expired Sept. 30,  NPDES permits are a 5 year term.  Upon expiration,
Effective Strategies for Residual Polymer and Aquatic Toxicity Testing For Dredge Slurry Dewatering Western Dredging Association 2012 Midwest Chapter Randy.
TVA-KINGSTON FLY ASH RELEASE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM MARCH 11 – 12, 2010 RICK M. SHERRARD, Ph.D. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Ecotoxicology Overview.
Ammonia modeling for assessing toxicity to fish species in the Rio Grande, Howard D. Passell Sandia National Laboratories Geosciences and Environment.
Results of Technical Review of USEPA 2001 Cadmium Criteria Document Basic Standards Workgroup September 10, 2004 September 2004.
Methods for Incorporating Aquatic Plant Effects into Community Level Benchmarks EPA Development Team Regional Stakeholder Meetings January 11-22, 2010.
Short-term Chronic Toxicity of Photocatalytic Nanoparticles to Bacteria, Algae, and Zooplankton C. P. Huang University of Delaware Civil and Environmental.
Philip Markle Environmental Scientist
WG 3: Impact assessment ► 9 members – good discussions ► Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle ?? COST 636 Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle – Kick-off.
Dose response relationships –A graph describing the response of an organism, population, or biological community to a range of concentrations of a xenobiotic.
Acute and Chronic Toxicity Testing. Standard Methods  Multiple methods have been standardized (certified) by multiple organizations American Society.
and Environmental Risk Assessment
Toxicity Test Methods Chapter 4. Introduction Working knowledge of standard test methods very important in understanding the field of environmental toxicology.
Toxicity Testing II P erforming a toxicity test. Toxicity testing Acute toxicity test –Short time frame exposure (96h) –“kill ‘em and count ‘em” –LC 50,
Paonia/Collbran Low Flow Presentation Water Quality Work Group Meeting June 9, 2004.
WQBELs Karen Holligan May 6, WQBELs – A Four-Piece Puzzle Numerical criteria (toxic pollutants) Water body quality Effluent fraction Bioavailable.
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) “The Canary in Your Coal Mine” 27 th Annual Region VI Pretreatment Workshop Irving, TX August 1-4, 2011 Paul Juarez, 6WQ-PP.
Copyright 2008 © Silliker, All Rights Reserved Collection of Samples for Chemical Analysis.
Charge Question 4-1: Please comment on the ecotoxicity studies selected to represent the most sensitive species in each of the risk scenarios (acute aquatic,
Guide to Selecting Qualified WET Laboratories Robert N. Brent, Ph.D. DynCorp Science and Engineering Group.
ENVE 420 Industrial Pollution Control Sources and Characteristics of Wastewaters Industrial Waste Survey Dr. Aslıhan Kerç.
ERT 417/3 WASTE TREATMENT IN BIOPROCESS INDUSTRY SEM 1 (2009/2010) ‘Toxicology of Waste Material’ By; Mrs Hafiza Binti Shukor.
Cooperative Agricultural Monitoring on California’s Central Coast: An Integrated, Innovative Approach Karen Worcester, Staff Environmental Scientist Alison.
Leaching of Alternative Chemical Treated Wood & Aquatic Toxicity of Alternative Chemical Treated Wood Leachates Update: July 9, 2001.
1 Dr. Richard Reiss Sciences International, Inc. October 20, 2005 Environmental Safety of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients.
WET Permitting and Limits Phillip Jennings (6WQ-PO) Whole Effluent Toxicity Coordinator US EPA Region Ross Ave. Dallas, TX P F
Leaching of Alternative Chemical Treated Wood and Aquatic Toxicity of Alternative Chemical Treated Wood Leachates.
EPA’s WET Interlaboratory Variability Study Findings Marion Kelly USEPA Office of Science & Technology Office of Water.
ENVE 201 Environmental Engineering Chemistry 1 Sampling – Sampling Types Dr. Aslıhan Kerç.
The effects of progesterone and synthetic derivatives on Fathead Minnow (Pimphales promelas) embryos. JA Stine and DB Huggett, Ph.D. Department of Biological.
BEAM Bridging Effect Assessment of Mixtures to ecosystem situations and regulation University of Bremen, Germany University of Göteborg, Sweden University.
Connie Brower NC DENR Division of Water Resources.
WQBELs Karen Holligan September 23, WQBELs – A Four-Piece Puzzle Numerical criteria (toxic pollutants) Water body quality Effluent fraction Bioavailable.
MEASUREMENT OF TOXICITY By, Dr. M. David Department of Zoology, Karnatak University Dharwad.
Sustainable Development Goal for Water: Indicator 6.3.2
Selenium: The Curse of the West
Presented to Citizens Advisory Council June 21, 2016
Whole Effluent Toxicity Basics
Ecotoxicology Day 2. Adam Peters and Graham Merrington 2017.
Human Health & Aquatic Life Criteria
Ambient Water Toxicity Surveys
Acute and Chronic Toxicity Testing
Characteristics of mixed stock
Low Flow Calculations In NPDES permits the permitted industry or municipality must meet certain requirements with regards to the toxicity of their effluent.
Marine Biotechnology Lab
Update on Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET)
Update on Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET)
Incorporating metal bioavailability into permitting – UK experience
Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET)
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Presentation transcript:

WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY

WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY What is whole effluent toxicity? testing a wastewater discharge with aquatic organisms to assess the discharge's toxicity WET is a standardized protocol (ex the Standard Methods

WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY Understanding WET - An effluent may be complying with all the individual parameter limits but does it guarantee that it will not cause any detrimental effects of the aquatic organisms? WET attempts to answer this question and quantify the effects WET is an aquatic toxicity/bioassay test

WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY Understanding WET Acute test (24 to 96 hrs) Chronic test (~ 7 days)

WET Freshwater Chronic Test Species Invertebrates: Ceriodaphnia dubia Fish Pimephales promelas - Fathead Minnow Algae Selenastrum capricornutum Though algae are contained in the program, they are not used.

Test Data Typical dose response where mortality increases as the concentration of effluent in the mixture increases. LC50 would be somewhere between 25% effluent and 50% effluent. calculated point estimate or a Pass fail test where a concentration, usually that which is considered a critical concentration of effluent in the recieving water or ambient toxicity test measured against a control Examples of Pass/Fail Acute test Instream waste concentration equals 75% statistical evaluation using a student-t test compares mortality rates of ambient or IWC sample against a control Is there a “significant statistical difference between the two results” 6.25 % Effluent 12.5 % Effluent 25.0% Effluent 50.0% Effluent 100.0% Effluent Control 0% Mortality 0% mortality 20 % Mortality 40% Mortality 80% Mortality 100% Mortality New Jersey Saline Acute Test Species

Test Result Examples of Pass/Fail Acute test Calculated point estimate or a Pass fail test where a concentration, usually that which is considered a critical concentration of effluent in the receiving water or ambient toxicity test measured against a control Examples of Pass/Fail Acute test Instream waste concentration (IWC) = 75% statistical evaluation using a student-t test compares mortality rates of ambient or IWC sample against a control. Is there a “significant statistical difference between the two results” calculated point estimate or a Pass fail test where a concentration, usually that which is considered a critical concentration of effluent in the recieving water or ambient toxicity test measured against a control Examples of Pass/Fail Acute test Instream waste concentration equals 75% statistical evaluation using a student-t test compares mortality rates of ambient or IWC sample against a control Is there a “significant statistical difference between the two results” New Jersey Saline Acute Test Species

Grab vs. Composite Grab samples offer “snap shot” of effluent Composite samples offer “average view” of effluent NJDEP requires sampling based on discharge type Continuous discharge – 24 hour composite sample Intermittent discharge – grab or composite each day that is representative of discharge Type of sample and frequency of collection is dependent upon the use of the data and the discharge the test is intended to represent. Samples are not to be used after they have been held for 72 hours. Samples are to be chilled during or immediately upon collection to 4oC.

Grab vs. Composite Type of sample and frequency of collection is dependent upon the use of the data and the discharge the test is intended to represent. Samples are not to be used after they have been held for 72 hours. Samples are to be chilled during or immediately upon collection to 4oC. Type of sample and frequency of collection is dependent upon the use of the data and the discharge the test is intended to represent. Samples are not to be used after they have been held for 72 hours. Samples are to be chilled during or immediately upon collection to 4oC.

WET Monitoring a fathead minnow test Opossum Shrimp Pimephales promelas

WET Procedures

Pimephales promelas Adults are small fish typically 43 mm to 102 mm, and aceraging about 50 mm, in total length. Widely distributed in North America. In muddy brooks, streams creeks, ponds and small lakes, is uncommon or absent in streams of moderate and high gradients and in most of the larger and deeper impoundments, and is tolerant of high temperature and turbidity, and low oxygen concentrations. bait fish breeding males develop a conspicuous, narrow, elongated, gray, fleshy pad of spongy tubercles on the back, anterior to the dorsal fin, and two or three rows of strong nuptial tubercles across the snout. Adults are small fish typically 43 mm to 102 mm, and averaging about 50 mm, in total length. Photo by Karen McCabe from Animal Soup

Tests Results in Canada http://www.ec.gc.ca/