AEP-Ohio’s Line Inspection Programs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pharmacology and the Nursing Process in LPN Practice
Advertisements

2004 NERC, NPCC & New England Compliance Programs John Norden Manager, Operations Training, Documentation & Compliance August 31, 2003 RC Meeting.
Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program

Managing Compliance Related to Human Subjects Research Review Joseph Sherwin, Ph.D. Office of Regulatory Affairs University of Pennsylvania Fourth Annual.
Chapter 24 Quality Management.
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
RECORD KEEPING Cooperative Development of Operational
AIRWORTHINESS ASPECTS OF AIRCRAFT LEASING
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
1 1 Medicare Marketing Danielle R. Moon, J.D., M.P.A. Director, Medicare Drug & Health Plan Contract Administration Group National Association of Health.
CPIC Training Session: Enterprise Architecture
Foreign Air Operator Validation & Surveillance
METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
1 IMPROVING TRANSPORTATION SERVICES IN EARLY EDUCATION AND CARE SETTINGS EEC Board Meeting – November 8, 2011.
New Prebid Policy and Procedure Division of Construction Management.
Introduction to Auditing
Introduction to Concurrency Management. What is Concurrency? Chapter , F.S. requires Comprehensive Plans to adopt a concurrency management system,
Shared Work Employer Representative Orientation 1.
Key points for the future guidance on direct costing for large infrastructures in Horizon 2020 Brussels, 08 April 2013 Vittorio Morelli RTD.M.1.
IBM Corporate Environmental Affairs and Product Safety
© 2006 TDA Development Draft and subject to amendments from consultation Performance Management Challenge for Schools PM workshops 23 October 2006.
MAKERERE UNIVERSITY DIRECTORATE OF INTERNAL AUDIT ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEMS AND PROCESSES RIDAR HOTEL SEETA 16 TH – 18 TH JUNE 2011 Presented by SAMUEL NATWALUMA.
Effectively applying ISO9001:2000 clauses 6 and 7.
Housing Notice H Use of New Regulation Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) Contracts Residual Receipts to Offset Project-Based Section.
Specialized Service Facilities MAPP (Revised May 17, 2011) 1.
AEMCPAGE Relaunch 1 June 2009.
FAA Office of Airports Airport Fuel Storage and Handling
Subchapter M-Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act Program Part 273-Education Contracts under Johnson-OMalley Act.
January 10, 2008www.infosecurity.ca.gov/1 Role, Responsibility and Authority of New Office Presented by Colleen Pedroza, State Chief Information Security.
1 Regulation of Sponsors and Independent Financial Advisers Joint HKEx / SFC Press Conference 19 October 2004.
1 Department of Medical Assistance Services DD Waiver Provider Training Department of Medical Assistance Services Division.
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
General Permit for Low Hazard Potential Impounding Structures By Robert J. VanLier, P.E. Regional Dam Safety Engineer 900 Natural Resources Drive, Charlottesville,
DISPUTES & INVESTIGATIONS ECONOMICS FINANCIAL ADVISORY MANAGEMENT CONSULTING Early Lessons Learned from DOE-EPRI Framework Experience Melissa Chan MA DPU.
What CQC do CQC are the health and social care regulator for England CQC register and monitor all health and social care providers in the country to ensure.
Sponsoring Organization Requirements. Agenda Monitoring Pre-operational visits Site Reviews Training Edit Checks Civil Rights Requirements Claim 2.
Instructional Hours Required Instructional Time / OAR
The Alcohol and Drug Abuse Administration State Care Coordination 1.
APAI Environmental Workshop FESOP Recordkeeping/Plans James (Jim) Heim, C.T.C., E.P. Bruce Carter Associates, L.L.C February 9, 2012.
1 Licensing in the Energy Sector Georgian National Energy And Water Supply Regulation Commission Nugzar Beridze June 27 – July 3, 2008.
Oregon Public Utility Commission Safety & Reliability Section J.R. Gonzalez, P.E., Manager Jerry Murray, Sr. Utility Analyst Gary Putnam, Utility Analyst.
Impacts of “MAP-21”on the National Bridge Inspection Program Tribal Government Coordination Meeting Date August 7, 2014 Presented by: Gary Moss, P.E. Acting.
Regulatory Assessment Fees 1 Water & Wastewater Reference Manual.
BUREAU OF CHILDREN AND ADULT LICENSING Adult Foster Care and Homes for the Aged Licensing FOR LICENSEES PREPARATION and PROCESSES INTERVIEW & OBSERVATION.
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
Electric Infrastructure Workshop Gulf Power Company January 23, 2006.
SDG&E Electric Reliability Reporting CPUC Workshops May 26-27, 2015.
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People Performance Targets for the Customer Interconnection Process January, 2008.
Presented by: Meg Boyd The Blue Mountains Drinking Water System: DWQMS Overview.
Public Hearing Modifications to the Gated Community Ordinance Board of County Commissioners Presented by the Orange County Public Works Department February.
Owner/Operator Responsibilities in Aircraft Maintenance & TSO’s and PMA’s Aircraft Owners and Operators Jim Niehoff – FAA Safety Team.
IAEC Reliability Webinar Presented by: Regi Goodale and Ethan Hohenadel December 11,
1 Overview of Reliability Requirements XYZ Cooperative Date: abc.
New York State Education Department Charter School Office Initial Statement January 2013.
Utility Engineers, PC.  Generation  Transmission  Distribution.
2011 ReliabilityFirst 693 Compliance Audit Process for 6 Year Audit Cycle Entities Glenn Kaht Senior Consultant - Compliance ReliabilityFirst Corporation.
Glades Electric Cooperative Infrastructure Miles of Line 2,213  Overhead Dist.2,180  UndergroundDist. 33  Transmission 87 16,402 meters Average 7.
2006 Hurricane Preparedness June 5, 2006 Sumter Electric Cooperative, Inc R. Ben Brickhouse: Director of Engineering & IT John J. LaSelva: Director of.
Transition Plan Network Operations Model Change Requests 5/26/2010.
1 Managing Distribution System Reliability at Southern California Edison Robert Tucker Thach “Nicholas” Duong Roger Lee OIR R Workshop May 26.
Application of Northern Virginia Electric Cooperative PUE
Training Appendix Revised January 2018.
Outreach Training Program Requirements
Training Appendix for Adult Protective Services and Employment Supports June 2018.
Outreach Training Program Requirements
Quality Tools Available for Critical Access Hospitals
County Wide Safety Program
New York State Utility Inspection & Testing
Presentation transcript:

AEP-Ohio’s Line Inspection Programs Moving Beyond Compliance EEI Fall 2008 TD&M Conference Seattle, WA October 7, 2008 Robert Ivinskas, AEP-Ohio

Outline The Issue at a Glance The Ohio Electric Service and Safety Standards AEP’s proposed enhanced program Observations and Key Questions October 7, 2008 AEP-Ohio

The Issue at a Glance Today, AEP-Ohio has in place a set of reliability programs that meets the Electric Service and Safety Standards (ESSS) of the Public Utility Commission of Ohio (PUCO) Including a 5-year overhead line general inspection for distribution circuits But three factors mitigate against those programs’ continuing to meet customers’ expectations for power quality and reliability: Customer expectations are increasing (digital economy, etc.) Aging equipment is showing signs of increased failure Material costs are rising rapidly, challenging existing funding levels Therefore, AEP-Ohio has proposed to PUCO an enhanced program to go beyond compliance with the ESSS and to meet customer expectations October 7, 2008 AEP-Ohio

Placeholder slide Bob: consider putting a slide here with graphs of how customer expectations are increasing (or Boyd’s stats about increasingly digital homes, etc), equipment failures are increasing, and material costs are increasing (Boyd’s graph) But we could just as well skip it if people already agree with these points The Ohio ESSS include chapter 27 which prescribes the inspection, maintenance, repair, and replacement programs for T&D facilities October 7, 2008 AEP-Ohio

Outline Problem Statement The Ohio Electric Service and Safety Standards AEP’s proposed enhanced program Observations and Key Questions October 7, 2008 AEP-Ohio

Ohio ESS - Administration 4901:1-10-27* Inspection, maintenance, repair, and replacement of transmission and distribution facilities (circuits and equipment). (A) This rule applies to the inspection, maintenance, repair, and replacement of utility transmission and distribution system facilities (circuits and equipment). The rebuttable presumption that an electric utility is providing adequate service pursuant to paragraph (F) of rule 4901:1-10-2 of the Administrative Code, does not apply to this rule. (emphasis added) (B) Distribution system performance assessment. For electric distribution circuits, the electric utility shall comply with rule 4901:1-10-11 of the Administrative Code. (Section C of the rule then goes on to elaborate a process of performance assessment for Transmission, subject to the “review and acceptance by the director of the consumer services department”) Paragraphs (D) and (E) – see next slides (F) Records. Each electric utility shall maintain records sufficient to demonstrate compliance with its transmission and distribution facilities inspection, maintenance, repair, and replacement programs as required by this rule. History: Effective 9-18-00; 1-1-04… Review dates: 9/30/02, 7/30/03, 11/30/07 Ohio Administrative Code 4901:1-10-27 (emphasis added) http://codes.ohio.gov/oac/4901%3A1-10-27 The Ohio ESSS include chapter 27 which prescribes the inspection, maintenance, repair, and replacement programs for T&D facilities October 7, 2008 AEP-Ohio

Ohio ESS - Inspections (D) Transmission and distribution facilities inspections.* Unless otherwise determined by the commission, each electric utility shall, at a minimum, inspect its electric transmission and distribution facilities (circuits and equipment) to maintain safe and reliable service on the following scheduled basis: (1) Distribution – at least one-fifth of all distribution circuits and equipment shall be inspected annually. All distribution circuits and equipment shall be inspected at least once every five years. (2) Transmission – all transmission circuits and equipment shall be inspected at least once every year. (3) Substations – all transmission and distribution substations and equipment shall be inspected at least once each month. (4) Each electric utility shall file a report on its compliance with the inspection schedule in paragraphs (D)(1) to (D)(3) of this rule no later than ninety days after the end of each calendar year ending December thirty-first. Ohio Administrative Code 4901:1-10-27 (emphasis added) http://codes.ohio.gov/oac/4901%3A1-10-27 The ESSS prescribes the inspection intervals and requires reporting on compliance with the schedule October 7, 2008 AEP-Ohio

Ohio ESS - Programs (E) Transmission and distribution inspection, maintenance, repair, and replacement programs.* (1) Each electric utility shall establish and maintain written programs, procedures and schedules for the inspection, maintenance, repair, and replacement of its transmission and distribution circuits and equipment. These programs shall establish preventative requirements for the electric utility to maintain safe and reliable service. Programs shall include, but are not limited to, the following facilities: (a) Poles and towers; (b) Conductors; (c) Pad-mounted transformers; (d) Line reclosers; (e) Line capacitors; (f) Right-of-way vegetation control; and (g) Substations. Ohio Administrative Code 4901:1-10-27 (emphasis added) http://codes.ohio.gov/oac/4901%3A1-10-27 The ESSS requires documentation of programs, procedures, and schedules for assets by category, e.g., poles, conductor, transformers, capacitors, etc. October 7, 2008 AEP-Ohio

Ohio ESS – Review by staff (E) Transmission and distribution inspection, maintenance, repair, and replacement programs. (continued) (2) Inspection, maintenance, repair, and replacement program review. (a) Each electric utility operating during the year 2000 shall submit a plan for the inspection, maintenance, repair, and replacement of circuits and equipment as stated in paragraph (E)(1) of this rule for review and acceptance by the director of the consumer services department or the director’s designee no later than January 1, 2001. The electric utility’s submittal shall include supporting justification and rationale based upon historical practices and procedures used by the electric utility over the past five years. Any new electric utility commencing operation … (b) If the electric utility and the director of the consumer services department or the director’s designee cannot agree on the details and contents of the utility’s plan, the electric utility shall file, within one hundred twenty days after the submission of its plan, with the commission for a hearing, file a written report and documentation supporting its plan. (c) Revisions to a previously accepted plan shall be submitted for review and acceptance as outlined in paragraph (E)(2)(a) of this rule, no later than ninety days prior to the beginning of the next succeeding calendar year. Ohio Administrative Code 4901:1-10-27 (emphasis added) http://codes.ohio.gov/oac/4901%3A1-10-27 The Director of the Consumer Services Department has an extensive staff dedicated to monitoring and ensuring compliance with the rules October 7, 2008 AEP-Ohio

Outline Problem Statement The Ohio Electric Service and Safety Standards AEP’s proposed enhanced program Observations and Key Questions October 7, 2008 AEP-Ohio

Our Proposed Enhanced Program AEP-Ohio’s proposed enhanced program for power quality and reliability improvement has four key elements: Enhanced overhead line inspection approach, targeting specific asset modernization/replacements and reliability enhancements Enhanced vegetation management (right-of-way clearing) Targeted distribution automation Targeted URD cable replacement and rejuvenation Our focus for this presentation AEP-Ohio’s proposed enhanced program has four key elements, of which one is an enhanced approach to overhead line inspection October 7, 2008 AEP-Ohio

What’s the difference? The enhanced overhead line inspection and repair/replace program differs from the current compliant program in a number of ways: Current program Enhanced program General inspection, which could include driving by Comprehensive inspection, to include walking and inspection via climbing or bucket Visual inspection Visual plus selective infrared or EMI General, without regard to specific assets Targeted to address specific assets 20% per year (5-year) Unchanged Pole inspection and treatment or reinforce/replace (10-year) AEP-Ohio’s proposed enhanced program has four key elements, of which one is an enhanced approach to overhead line inspection October 7, 2008 AEP-Ohio

Additional slides The targeted assets: cutouts, arresters, reclosers, 34.5, and FDIs The expected results in terms of reduction of outages Work unit counts by year Incremental costs (percent only maybe?, and not by CSP & OP, because EEI audience doesn’t care) Three-year horizon – for now October 7, 2008 AEP-Ohio

Outline Problem Statement The Ohio Electric Service and Safety Standards AEP’s proposed enhanced program Observations and Key Questions October 7, 2008 AEP-Ohio

What have we learned? Observations Key Questions Without a change in the funding of these programs, AEP-Ohio would be hard pressed to meet rising customer expectations for power quality and reliability in the face of aging infrastructure and rising material costs The PUCO’s ESSS provide a good starting point for line inspection, and AEP-Ohio is now compliant with the rules, but the situation requires a creative new approach that goes beyond compliance With the proper funding, AEP-Ohio can meet the triple challenge and work with the PUCO to provide the level of service required Key Questions Will regulators recognize the need for an enhanced program and its attendant rate recovery? Would this program have been deemed too expensive before the recent rise in energy costs? If so, how do oil prices imply less reliability? Are we stuck in a quandary, or is there a better way out, a win-win for all concerned? AEP-Ohio has proposed an enhanced program to creatively meet the challenges of a new era in providing electric T&D service October 7, 2008 AEP-Ohio

For more information For more information, contact: Robert J. (Bob) Ivinskas Engineering Support Manager AEP Ohio 850 Tech Center Drive Gahanna, OH 43230 Phone: 614-883-6800 E-mail: rjivinskas@aep.com AEP wishes to thank Dan O’Neill of O’Neill Management Consulting, LLC for his assistance with this presentation October 7, 2008 AEP-Ohio