Application-Based Network Operations (ABNO) IETF 88 – SDN RG

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intra-Carrier Solutions Enabled by the OIF NNI Erning Ye Nortel Networks.
Advertisements

Achieving Seamless IP Optical Network Integration OIF Interoperability Update Amy Wang, Avici Systems.
Use cases for implementation of the NSI interface Takahiro Miyamoto, Nobutaka Matsumoto KDDI R&D Laboratories Inc. This work is partially supported by.
CCAMP WG, IETF 80th, Prague, Czech Republic draft-gonzalezdedios-subwavelength-framework-00 Framework for GMPLS and path computation support of sub-wavelength.
All rights reserved © 2006, Alcatel Grid Standardization & ETSI (May 2006) B. Berde, Alcatel R & I.
CURRENT APPROACH FOR NETWORK PROVISIONING Umbrella Provisioning System
G : DCM Signaling Mechanism Using GMPLS RSVP-TE ITU-T Workshop on IP-Optical, Chitose, Japan 7/11/2002 Dimitrios Pendarakis, Tellium, Inc. ITU-T.
Multi-service Architecture: Evolution of Network Architecture Keith Knightson Khalid Ahmad Carrier Data Networks Nortel Networks, Canada IP-Networking/Mediacom.
Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching: An Overview of Signaling Enhancements and Recovery Techniques IEEE Communications Magazine July 2001.
A New Paradigm for Inter-Domain Traffic Engineering Adrian Farrel Juniper Networks
Limit for content Do not exceed Limit for content Do not exceed Limit for content Do not exceed Limit for content Do not exceed 1 Aria Networks Multi-domain.
Page 1 iPOP2009, Tokyo, Japan Selecting Domain Paths in Inter-Domain MPLS-TE and GMPLS Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting Daniel King, Old Dog Consulting.
NEW OUTLOOK ON MULTI-DOMAIN AND MULTI-LAYER TRAFFIC ENGINEERING Adrian Farrel
The Impact of SDN On MPLS Networks Adrian Farrel Juniper Networks
A Possible New Dawn for the Future GÉANT Network Architecture
O LD D OG C ONSULTING Optical Networking and Converged Networks Impact and Trends in Standardisation Adrian Farrel
An Architecture for Application-Based Network Operations Adrian Farrel - Old Dog Consulting Daniel King –
Why SDN and MPLS? Saurav Das, Ali Reza Sharafat, Guru Parulkar, Nick McKeown Clean Slate CTO Summit 9 th November, 2011.
SDN-based Control and Operation of the IP Ran in 4G and LTE Environments Huaimo Chen, Quintin Zhao – Huawei
Problem Statement and Architecture for Information Exchange Between Interconnected Traffic Engineered Networks draft-farrel-interconnected-te-info-exchange-03.txt.
N Group0/1: Yangfei WANG z Amrita Manayil z Thangappan Madavan V K z Peng Fu z Shuo Sun z Total Slides :19 In-Operation.
Área: Lorem ipsum Razón Social: Telefónica CAON Standardization Activities Telefónica I+D Juan Fernandez-Palacios Telefonica I+D. CAON co-chair.
Grant agreement n° SDN architectures for orchestration of mobile cloud services with converged control of wireless access and optical transport network.
MPLS - 75th IETF Stockholm1 Composite Transport Group (CTG) Framework and Requirements draft-so-yong-mpls-ctg-framework-requirement-02.txt draft-so-yong-mpls-ctg-framework-requirement-02.txt.
ITU-T Workshop “NGN and its Transport Networks“ Kobe, April 2006 International Telecommunication Union ITU-T Introduction to the Path Computation.
An evolutionary approach to G-MPLS ensuring a smooth migration of legacy networks Ben Martens Alcatel USA.
Draft-chen-i2rs-mpls-ldp-usecases-00/ draft-huang-i2rs-mpls-te-usecase-00 IETF 88 I2RS1 Use Cases for an Interface to MPLS Protocol draft-chen-i2rs-mpls-ldp-usecases-00/
OLD DOG CONSULTING Traffic Engineering or Network Engineering? The transition to dynamic management of multi-layer networks Adrian Farrel Old Dog Consulting.
Draft-li-isdnrg-seamless-mpls-mbh-00IETF 92 SDNRG1 Inter-SDN in Seamless MPLS for Mobile Backhaul Zhenbin Li, Rober Tao Huawei Technologies IETF 92, Dallas,
ONOS Use Cases Tom Tofigh AT&T.
Draft-li-rtgwg-cc-igp-arch-00IETF 88 RTGWG1 An Architecture of Central Controlled Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) draft-li-rtgwg-cc-igp-arch-00 Zhenbin.
Transport SDN: Key Drivers & Elements
Abstraction and Control of Transport Networks (ACTN) BoF
Evolution of Path Computation Towards Generalized Resource Computation Adrian Farrel Old Dog Consulting
IETF68 CCAMP1 GMPLS Control of Ethernet Forwarding Don Fedyk Loa Andersson
MPLS - 73nd IETF Minneaplis1 Composite Transport Group (CTG) Framework and Requirements draft-so-yong-mpls-ctg-framework-requirement-00.txt draft-so-yong-mpls-ctg-framework-requirement-00.txt.
Interoperable Intelligent Optical Networking: Key to future network services and applications OIF Carrier Group Interoperability: Key issue for carriers.
Model-based Programmable Networks
PACE Workshop on New Uses of PCE Key Points Arising Notes from the PACE Workshop Vilanova i La Geltú 16 June 2014.
Interface to the Routing System
Connect. Communicate. Collaborate VPNs in GÉANT2 Otto Kreiter, DANTE UKERNA Networkshop 34 4th - 6th April 2006.
PiPEs Server Discovery – Adding NDT testing to the piPEs architecture Rich Carlson Internet2 April 20, 2004.
OIF NNI: The Roadmap to Non- Disruptive Control Plane Interoperability Dimitrios Pendarakis
Lucy Yong Young Lee IETF CCAMP WG GMPLS Extension for Reservation and Time based Bandwidth Service.
Application-oriented Stateful PCE Architecture and Use-cases for Transport Networks Young Lee, Xian Zhang, Haomian Zhang, Dhruv Dhody (Huawei), Guoying.
1 | © 2015 Infinera Open SDN in Metro P-OTS Networks Sten Nordell CTO Metro Business Group
Draft-oki-pce-vntm-def-00.txt 1 Definition of Virtual Network Topology Manager (VNTM) for PCE-based Inter-Layer MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering draft-oki-pce-vntm-def-00.txt.
Use Cases for High Bandwidth Query and Control of Core Networks Greg Bernstein, Grotto Networking Young Lee, Huawei draft-bernstein-alto-large-bandwidth-cases-00.txt.
PCE 64 th IETF PCE Policy Architecture draft-berger-pce-policy-architecture-00.txt Lou Berger Igor Bryskin Dimitri Papadimitriou.
Limit for content Do not exceed Limit for content Do not exceed Limit for content Do not exceed Limit for content Do not exceed Page 1 © The.
1 Revision to DOE proposal Resource Optimization in Hybrid Core Networks with 100G Links Original submission: April 30, 2009 Date: May 4, 2009 PI: Malathi.
The Application of the Path Computation Element Architecture to the Determination of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS & GMPLS draft-ietf-pce-hierarchy-fwk-00.txt.
The Application of the Path Computation Element Architecture to the Determination of a Sequence of Domains in MPLS & GMPLS draft-king-pce-hierarchy-fwk-01.txt.
Introduction to Avaya’s SDN Architecture February 2015.
© 2013, CYAN, INC. 11 Software Defined Metro Networks TNC2013 Virtualization and Innovation Robin Massey SE Manager EMEA
MPLS Introduction How MPLS Works ?? MPLS - The Motivation MPLS Application MPLS Advantages Conclusion.
SDN controllers App Network elements has two components: OpenFlow client, forwarding hardware with flow tables. The SDN controller must implement the network.
An evolutionary approach to G-MPLS ensuring a smooth migration of legacy networks Ben Martens Alcatel USA.
Multi-layer Multi-domain Inter-op Test based on ACTN Architecture
Daniel King, Old Dog Consulting Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting
Zhenbin Li, Kai Lu Huawei Technologies IETF 98, Chicago, USA
PCE Applicability for Inter-Layer MPLS and GMPLS Traffic Engineering draft-oki-pce-inter-layer-app-00.txt Mar. 20, 2006 Eiji Oki (NTT) Jean-Louis Le.
Requirements for Ring Protection in MPLS-TP
Daniel King, Old Dog Consulting Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting
MPLS-TP Survivability Framework
Daniel King, Old Dog Consulting Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting
ACTN Information Model
ONOS Drake Release September 2015.
Network Virtualisation for Packet Optical Networks
Presentation transcript:

Application-Based Network Operations (ABNO) IETF 88 – SDN RG Daniel King (Editor) Adrian Farrel (Editor) Quintin Zhao Victor Lopez Ramon Casellas Yuji Kamite Yosuke Tanaka Ina Minei Young Lee

Control of Today’s Networks InternetVoiceCDNCloudBusiness Application Network OSS Metro OSS NMS Vendor A IP Core OSS Optical OSS Umbrella OSS NMS Vendor B NMS Vendor C NMS Vendor D NMS Vendor E NMS Vendor C NMS Vendor A NMS Vendor B Metro Node Vendor A Metro Node Vendor A IP Node Vendor C IP Node Vendor C IP Node Vendor C Optical Node Vendor B Optical Node Vendor B Optical Node Vendor B Network Nodes Current network operation is not adapted to flexible networking Multiple manual configuration actions are needed for network nodes Network solutions from different vendors typically use specific OSS/NMS implementations Very long provisioning times Lack of network bandwidth flexibility and inefficient use of inherent function

The network does not need to be seen any longer as a composition of individual elements Applications need to be capable of interaction with the network Support of the next generation of variable and dynamic transport characteristics Automated deployment and operation of services. “Create a new transport connection for me” “Reoptimize my network after restoration switching” “Respond to how my network is being used” “Schedule these services” “Resize tunnels” Network Operation Requirements

Network Operation Framework Building Blocks Avoiding the mistake of a single “controller” architecture As it encourages the expansion and use of specific protocols Discovery of network resources Network resource abstraction, and presentation Routing and path computation Multi-layer coordination and interworking Multi-domain & multi-vendor network resources provisioning through different control mechanisms (e.g., Optical, OpenFlow, GMPLS, MPLS) Policy Control OAM and performance monitoring Leveraging existing technologies What is currently available? Must integrate with existing and developing standards

Application-Based Network Operations (ABNO) InternetVoiceCDNCloudBusiness ABNO Optical signaling mechanisms running over network nodes enabling flexible networking and automated network provisioning over different network segments (metro, core IP, optical transport) including multiple vendors Metro Node Vendor A Metro Node Vendor B IP Node Vendor C IP Node Vendor D IP Node Vendor E Optical Node Vendor A Optical Node Vendor B Optical Node Vendor C Service Management Systems Network Controller Optical Network Nodes OSS NMS Application-Based Network Operation (ABNO) framework. “A PCE-based Architecture for Application-based Network Operations” draft-farrkingel-pce-abno-architecture

Application-Based Network Operation (ABNO) “Standardized” components and co-operation. Policy Management Network Topology LSP-DB TED Inventory Management Path Computation and Traffic Engineering PCE, PCC Stateful & Stateless Online & Offline P2P, P2MP, MP2MP Multi-layer Coordination Virtual Network Topology Manager Network Signaling & Programming RSVP-TE ForCES and OpenFlow Interface to the Routing System (I2RS)

ABNO Use Cases The following slides present various use cases shaping the development of ABNO: Multi-layer Path Provisioning Multi-layer Restoration Network Optimization after Restoration

ABNO - Multi-layer Path Provisioning (Path) 1.OSS requests for a path between two L3 nodes. 2.ABNO controller verifies OSS user rights using the Policy Manager. 3.ABNO controller requests to L3-PCE (active) for a path between both locations. 4.As L3-PCE finds a path, it configures L3 nodes using Provisioning Manager. 5.Provisioning manager configures L3 nodes using the required interface (RSVP-TE, OpenFlow, etc.). 6.OSS is notified that the connection has been set-up. OSS ABNO Controller OAM Handler Policy Agent ALTO Server Databases TED LSP-DB Provisioning Manager Client Network Layer (L3) Server Network Layer (L0) I2RS Client L3 PCE VNT M L0 PCE 2 6 5

ABNO - Multi-Layer Restoration 1.Upon network failure, the OSS notifies the ABNO controller of all failed E-2-E connection and possible root cause. 2.NMS requests a new E-2-E connection. 3.ABNO controller verifies request via the Policy Manager. 4.ABNO controller requests to L3-PCE (active) for a path between both locations. 5.As L3-PCE finds a path, it configures L3 nodes using Provisioning Manager. 6.Provisioning Manager configures L3 nodes using the required interface (RSVP-TE, OpenFlow, etc.) 7.OAM Handler verifies new connectivity. 8.OSS is notified that the new IP links are up and tested (SNMP, etc.). OSS ABNO Controller OAM Handler Policy Agent ALTO Server Databases TED LSP-DB Provisioning Manager Client Network Layer (L3) Server Network Layer (L0) I2RS Client L3 PCE VNTM L0 PCE

Next Steps for ABNO Further discussion on key components Policy Capability discovery and registration Resilience North-bound Interfaces Use of Common Network Models Continued development and polishing of Use Cases Prototyping -European Commission Project FP7 IDEALIST