Proposed New Federal Rules Meet and Confer Proposed Rule 26(f): –The parties shall confer…to discuss any issues relating to preservation, disclosure or.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
REFINING YOUR DISCOVERY TACTICS: A PLAINTIFF PERSPECTIVE Amanda A. Farahany Barrett & Farahany, LLP 1401 Peachtree Street, Suite 101 Atlanta, GA
Advertisements

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) and In re Bristol-Myers Squibb Securities Litigation Lina Carreras.
Electronic Discovery Guidelines Meet and Confer - General definition. a requirement of courts that before certain types of motions and/or petitions will.
In re Seroquel Products Liability Litigation September 2007 Middle District of Florida.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2004 District Justice Scheindlin Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC Zubulake V.
FRANK ESPOSITO DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SOUTH PLAINFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT Effective Communication Pathways in Special Education.
Increasing public concern about loss of privacy Broad availability of information stored and exchanged in electronic format Concerns about genetic information.
Through 2008 Season Barry Bonds 762 Home Runs Roger Clemens 354 Wins Alex Rodriguez 553 Home Runs.
E-Discovery New Rules of Civil Procedure Presented by Lucy Isaki January 23, 2007.
INFORMATION WITHOUT BORDERS CONFERENCE February 7, 2013 e-DISCOVERY AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT.
E-Discovery in Government Investigations Jeane Thomas, Crowell & Moring LLP February 9, 2009.
DUE PROCESS DEVELOPMENTS IN TERMINATION AND GRIEVANCES.
William P. Butterfield February 16, Part 1: Why Can’t We Cooperate?
Maine Board of Tax Appeals 1. What we are: An independent Board of three individuals appointed by the Governor to resolve controversies between Taxpayers.
YOUTH ATTORNEY. GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 1:  The primary change in the general provisions article is the establishment of an attorney for children.
Ethical Issues in the Electronic Age Ethical Issues in the Electronic Age Frost Brown Todd LLC Seminar May 24, 2007 Frost Brown.
New Attorney Seminar February 26, OVERVIEW OF PRESENTATION Documents generally Notices of Hearings Motions Proposed Orders.
Document Management Proposed Scanning Solution September 22nd 2008.
To Arbitrate or Not to Arbitrate WINTER EXECUTIVE BOARD 2014.
No Nonsense File Collection Presented by: Pinpoint Labs Presenter: Jon Rowe, CCE, ISFCE Certified Computer Examiner Members: The International Society.
Privilege, Privacy, and Waiver. Privilege Attorney/Client In the law of evidence, a client's privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent any other.
E-Discovery LIMITS ON E-DISCOVERY. No New Preservation Rule When does duty to preserve attach? Reasonably anticipated litigation. Audio sanctions.
W W W. D I N S L A W. C O M E-Discovery and Document Retention Patrick W. Michael, Esq. Dinsmore & Shohl LLP 101 South Fifth Street Louisville, KY
Developing a Records & Information Retention & Disposition Program:
1 E-Discovery Changes to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Concerning Discovery of Electronically Stored Information (ESI) Effective Date: 12/01/2006 October,
Ronald J. Hedges No Judge Left Behind: A Report Card on the E- Discovery Rules April 24, 2007 Austin, Texas National.
Electronic Record Retention and eDiscovery Peter Pepiton eDiscovery Product Manager CA Information Governance.
1 Pre-Hearing Conference November 6-10, 2011 Submissions of BIM on Process Issues.
Get Off of My I-Cloud: Role of Technology in Construction Practice Sanjay Kurian, Esq. Trent Walton, CTO U.S. Legal Support.
* 07/16/96 The production of ESI continues to present challenges in the discovery process even though specific rules have been drafted, commented on, redrafted.
1 1 Interview Practice Within the USPTO. 2 2 Topics Effective Interviews Reaching Agreement Requesting Interviews Issues Discussed Documenting Interviews.
Aguilar v. ICE Division of Homeland Security 255, F.R.D. 350 (S.D.N.Y 2008)
Electronic Discovery refers to the discovery of electronic documents and data…including , web pages, word processing files, computer databases, and.
The Sedona Principles 1-7
Visual Evidence / E-Discovery LLC Visual Evidence / E-Discovery LLC 60th Annual Meeting of the Ohio Regional Association of Law Libraries E-Discovery &
EService Process Descriptions. COSCA/NACM Standards for Electronic Filing Processes Technical and Business Approaches Section 1.2A Court rules may provide.
Discovery III Expert Witness Disclosure And Discovery Motions & Sanctions.
E-Discovery in Health Care Litigation By Tracy Vigness Kolb.
Rewriting the Law in the Digital Age
Employment. Organization Strategy HR and Staffing Strategy Staffing Policies and Programs Staffing System and Retention Management Support Activities.
2009 CHANGES IN CALIFORNIA DISCOVERY RULES The California Electronic Discovery Act Batya Swenson E-discovery Task Force
Meet and Confer Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that “parties must confer as soon as practicable - and in any event at least.
Processing unknowns (mapping.) June, 2015 The new XR-7.
Against: The Liberal Definition and use of Litigation Holds Team 9.
Public Review Committee Linda Sullivan-Colglazier Assistant Attorney General July 28, 2011.
P RINCIPLES 1-7 FOR E LECTRONIC D OCUMENT P RODUCTION Maryanne Post.
The Challenge of Rule 26(f) Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer July 15, 2011.
EDiscovery Preservation, Spoliation, Litigation Holds, Adverse Inferences. September 15, 2008.
United States District Court for the District of Utah Welcome to ECF Attorney Training. Please make sure you have picked up all materials located at the.
United States District Court for the District of Utah Welcome to ECF Attorney Training. Please make sure you have picked up all materials located at the.
Records Management for Paper and ESI Document Retention Policies addressing creation, management and disposition Minimize the risk and exposure Information.
Primary Changes To The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Effective December 1, 2015 Presented By Shuman, McCuskey, & Slicer, PLLC.
The Sedona Principles November 16, Background- What is The Sedona Conference The Sedona Conference is an educational institute, established in 1997,
In Re Seroquel Products Liability Litigation United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2007.
HIPAA Security Final Rule Overview
Electronic Discovery Guidelines Meet and Confer - General definition. a requirement of courts that before certain types of motions and/or petitions will.
Advocacy and Legal Advice Centre - Internal procedures -
1 PRESERVATION: E-Discovery Marketfare Annunciation, LLC, et al. v. United Fire &Casualty Insurance Co.
EDiscovery Also known as “ESI” Discovery of “Electronically Stored Information” Same discovery, new form of storage.
Residential Funding Corp. v. DeGeorge Financial Corp., 306 F.3d 99 (2d. Cir. 2002).
IVRA Conference July 19, 2012  Public Access to Voter Registration Records  Retention Requirements  Reminder: Military and Overseas Voters have special.
Electronic Discovery Guidelines FRCP 26(f) mandates that parties “meaningfully meet and confer” to consider the nature of their respective claims and defenses.
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 7 – Petitioner Reply and Motion to Exclude 1.
Investigations: Strategies and Recommendations (Hints and Tips) Leah Lane, CFE Director, Global Investigations, Texas Instruments, Inc.
HIPAA: So You Think You’re Compliant September 1, 2011 Carolyn Heyman-Layne, J.D.
E-Discovery Copyright 2008 Thomas F. Goldman. WHAT HAVE THEY DONE TO US NOW? OH NO, NOT AGAIN!!!!!!!!!! Overview.
Records Management Reality
Civil Litigation Practice Basics 2016: Pre-Trials and Settlements
Civil Pretrial Practice
Electronic Discovery Sabrina Jones 4/14/2011.
Presentation transcript:

Proposed New Federal Rules Meet and Confer Proposed Rule 26(f): –The parties shall confer…to discuss any issues relating to preservation, disclosure or discovery of electronically stored information including the form in which it should be produced

Preservation Letter Meet & Confer Motion for Sanctions The New Trinity of EDD Strategy The EDD conference is no mere formality

Would you go to a mediation unprepared? Meet & confer merits preparation

Before the Conference At the Conference After the Conference

Before the conference: Requesting Party 1.Examine what you already know about the e-evidence Headers, dates and circulation of key Path data on key documents (e.g., M://mission/marketing/) 2.Know what formats you can manage paper-like production Databases, spreadsheets, voice mail: native production What about application and system metadata?

Before the conference: Requesting Party 3.Communicate issues to be addressed What must your opponent know about systems? Locations Operating systems and applications Back up methods and schedules Native data formats Data volumes Who should be at the conference or available by phone? 4.Know your client’s system Anticipate boomerang discovery 5.Do you need EDD expert with you or available by phone? 6.Consider use of special master or neutral

Before the conference: Producing Party 1.Know your client’s systems Back up systems, unit inventory and location, data volumes, e- mail clients, operating systems, retention policies 2.Know what formats you can preserve/produce Can you preserve application and system metadata? Voice mail? IM? Mobile devices? 3.Communicate issues to be addressed at conference What must your opponent know about their systems? Locations Operating systems and applications Back up methods and schedules Native data formats Data volumes 4.Have an EDD expert with you or available via phone 5.Respond to preservation letter

At the conference: Requesting Party 1.Setting the agenda requires preparation Must know client’s systems, need to research target systems (little knowledge goes long way in insuring candor) What are your goals? What do you need? Can you tier or stagger? 2.Address preservation needs and limits Follow up on preservation letter Must back up tape rotation be suspended? Is there a genuine going forward preservation need? Will periodic (i.e., month end) retention suffice? What are needs with respect to mobile systems, personal systems? What about VM, IM, PDA, phone?

At the conference: Requesting Party 3.Designate production formats File formats Production media 4.Establish deadlines As reviewed vs. all-at-once Seek certification of compliance 5.Forensics Is forensics an issue? No second chances! Who are key players? Which systems (home? mobile? assistants’?) Who will do acquisition? Be sure everyone agrees on process Who will act as custodian? Use shared hashes to insure integrity Cost allocation by agreement?

At the conference: Producing Party 1.Know your capabilities Can you deliver on everything promised? Know compliance costs and man hours 2.Clearly establish what need NOT be preserved Must back up tape rotation be suspended? Is there a genuine going forward preservation need? What are needs with respect to mobile systems, personal systems? What about VM, IM, PDA, phone? 3.Memorialize what’s offered, rejected and agreed upon Make clear what you’ve offered to preserve Make clear what you declined to preserve and shift burden to ReqP 4.Forensics Know key players for forensic imaging Be wary of forensic preservation 5.Lay the groundwork for cost sharing Put on notice re: costs and seek cost sharing agreements (opportune time, as RP anxious for discovery)

After the conference: Requesting Party Memorialize requested, rejected and agreed upon Report Outcome to the court Submit Agreed Preservation Order

After the conference: Producing Party 1.Memorialize what’s offered, rejected and agreed upon Make clear what need not be preserved Make clear what you declined to preserve and shift burden to ReqP 2.Resist preservation order Serious sanctions typically follow violation of court’s orders

Tips: Both Sides 1.Consider a worksheet Remember, it’s still all about the paper trail 2.Consider sampling 3.Glossary Are both sides using terms with same meanings?: E.g., copy, clone, image, Ghost, bitstream 4.Memorialize. Memorialize, Memorialize Put it in writing: every agreement plus declined proposals

Questions?