Intangible Investment and Economic Growth in Japan Presented at the 3 rd World KLEMS Conference at Tokyo on May 19 th Tsutomu Miyagawa (Gakushuin University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 InnovaTion, InvesTment and ImiTation: How Information and Communication Technology Affected European Productivity Performance Bart Los and Marcel Timmer,
Advertisements

THE EU IN THE WORLD ECONOMY By Dale W. Jorgenson Harvard University March 15, European Union.
1 Catching-Up or Getting Stuck? Europes Troubles to Exploit ICTs Productivity Potential Bart van Ark & Robert Inklaar University of Groningen and The Conference.
The Productivity Gap between Europe and the US: Trends and Causes Marcel P. Timmer Groningen Growth and Development Centre The EU KLEMS project is funded.
The Korean KLEMS Database Hak K. Pyo (Seoul National University) Hyunbae Chun (Sogang University) Keun Hee Rhee (Korea Productivity Center) The First World.
From Productivity Analysis in Asia to Creating Asia KLEMS Database The 1 st World KLEMS Conference August 19-20, 2010 Tsutomu Miyagawa (GakushuinUniversity)
Harry X. Wu IER, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo
INTRODUCTION TO THE WORLD KLEMS CONFERENCE By Dale W. Jorgenson, Mun S. Ho, and Jon D. Samuels Harvard.
Economic Growth and Productivity in Brazil: An Industry Perspective (forthcoming GGDC research memorandum) Gaaitzen J. de Vries GGDC and Faculty of Economics.
RUSSIA KLEMS The First WORLD KLEMS Conference. RUSSIA KLEMS STARTED IN 2007 OPERATED BY STATE UNIVERSITY – HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS (MOSCOW) IN COLLABORATION.
World KLEMS initiative Marcel Timmer Groningen Growth and Development Centre University of Groningen (presentation at World KLEMS conference, Harvard,
Strengthening long-term growth in Argentina D. Artana, E. Bour, J.L. Bour y N. Susmel OECD Seminar Beyond the crisis – Returning to sustainable growth.
C L U B E C O N O M I K A 2 O O O Intangible Investments in Bulgaria: Challenges for Measurement Intangible Investments in Bulgaria: Challenges for Measurement.
Is China's Housing Market Caught in a Speculative Bubble Group No. 3: Sherry Lin Thomas Chen Joy Chatterjee Cynthia Montes.
Long-term Estimates of U.S. Productivity and Growth by Dale W. Jorgenson, Mun S. Ho, and Jon D. Samuels ** Harvard University, and ** BEA The views expressed.
Project funded by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Programme, Grant No Intangible Assets and Their Contribution.
Remarks, Policy Roundtable Advancing Knowledge and the Knowledge Economy Carol Corrado, Federal Reserve January 11, 2005.
Intellectual Property & the Economy J. Steven Landefeld, Director New York State Bar Intellectual Property Section Fall Meeting September 14th,
Intangible Investment and Productivity Growth in Sweden Harald Edquist Project funded by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Programme.
Contribution of ICT to Economic Growth in Asia ITS 15 th Biennial Conference Berlin, Germany, September 7, 2004 Takahito Kanamori (Waseda University) Masahiro.
Comments on DATA WATCH: Implementation of a New Architecture for the U.S. National Accounts Bart van Ark The Conference Board January 4th, 2009 www. conference.
The Knowledge Economy, Intangible Investment and Growth
R&D as a Value Creating Asset Emma Edworthy Gavin Wallis.
Intellectual Property & the Economy J. Steven Landefeld, Director “Intangible Assets in Corporate Reporting and National Accounts” A Policy.
1 The Industry Origins of the Second Surge of U.S. Productivity Growth Kevin J. Stiroh* Federal Reserve Bank of New York May 2006 *These comments are the.
The impact of intangible assets on regional productivity disparities in Great Britain Konstantinos Melachroinos & Nigel Spence School of Geography Queen.
Intangible Investment and Economic Growth in Japan Kyoji FUKAO (Hitotsubashi University, RIETI, NISTEP) Tsutomu MIYAGAWA (Gakushuin University, RIETI)
Productivity and Growth of Japanese Prefectures Prepared for the 3 rd World KLEMS Conference, Tokyo, May 19-20, Joji Tokui (Shinshu University and.
Bridging Theory and Practice in National Accounting … with a focus on growth, productivity and intangibles Bart van Ark November 17, 2008 www. conference.
Intangibles, Innovation & Growth; Theory and Evidence Jonathan Haskel Imperial College Business School, Imperial College London COINVEST.
M. Velucchi, A. Viviani, A. Zeli New York University and European University of Rome Università di Firenze ISTAT Roma, November 21, 2011 DETERMINANTS OF.
LABOUR REALLOCATION, INFORMALITY AND PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH IN BRIC S * Ilya B. Voskoboynikov, National Research University Higher School of Economics and.
1 © 2008 The Conference Board, Inc. Name Director, Associate Service The Conference Board Trusted Insights for Business Worldwide.
Total Factor Productivity in Korea and International Comparison - Data Structure and Productivity Estimates of Korea Industrial Productivity (KIP) Database.
Intangibles and innovation Jonathan Haskel Middlesex, 2009.
Measuring ICT Impact on Growth: a Survey of Recent Findings Vincenzo Spiezia Senior Economist Head, ICT Unit Directorate for Science, Technology & Industry.
Production Functions. Students Should Be Able To Use the Cobb-Douglas production function to calculate: 1. Output as a product of inputs 2. marginal and.
Is Manufacturing or Services Most Important for Intangible Investment in Sweden? Harald Edquist Project funded by the European Commission under the Seventh.
Integrated Industry-Level Production Account for the United States: Intellectual Property Products and the 2007 NAICS Matthew Russell, Jon.
IT Revolution’s Implications for the Japanese Economy Kazuyuki Motohashi RCAST, University of Tokyo & RIETI
1 Innovation, Intangibles and Economic Growth: Towards a Comprehensive Accounting of the Knowledge Economy Bart van Ark* University of Groningen and The.
The United States Research and Development Satellite Account: Estimates and Challenges Brent R. Moulton Joint UNECE/Eurostat/OECD Meeting on National Accounts.
Estimating Households’ Non-financial Assets Presentation to the OECD Working Party on Financial Accounts Patrick O’Hagan System of national Accounts, Statistics.
The Knowledge stock of Greek R&D active manufacturing firms: Based on published financial accounts for the period A. Gkypali a, A. Rafailidis.
Organizational Capital, R&D Assets, and Offshore Outsourcing Wendy Li 2015 Society of Economic Measurement Bureau of Economic Analysis July 22, 2015.
KLEMS Database Including Intangible Assets and Productivity Analysis 2 nd Asia KLEMS Conference at Seoul (July 5, 2012) Kyoji Fukao (Hitotsubashi University.
Hyunbae Chun (Sogang University) Hak K. Pyo (Seoul National University) Keun Hee Rhee (Korea Productivity Center) Structural Changes and Productivity Growth.
A PROTOTYPE INDUSTRY-LEVEL PRODUCTION ACCOUNT FOR THE UNITED STATES, Dale Jorgenson, Mun Ho, Jon Samuels Harvard University Asia KLEMS 2012 Data.
China KLEMS Database —— The 2 nd Asia KLEMS Database Management workshop Ren Ruoen Sun Linlin Fan Maoqing Zheng Haitao Li xiaoqin.
On the Next Revisions of the JIP Database -Toward Harmonization with the JSNA- Presented at the 2 nd Asia KLEMS Database Management Workshop on October.
Innovation and Productivity – Evidence from China Jingying Xu, Prof. Andreas Waldkirch Department of Economics ABSTRACT BACKGROUND STRATEGIES CONCLUSION.
U.S. Growth and Productivity using new National Accounts with Intellectual Property Dale Jorgenson, Mun Ho, Jon Samuels ** Harvard University, and ** BEA.
Vu Pham Productivity Comparison and Convergence in East Asia Hak K. Pyo Professor Emeritus School of Economics, Seoul National University Hak K. Pyo Productivity.
Intellectual Property in the Netherlands Murat Tanriseven 1-3 December, 2010 WPNA meeting.
Measurement of Deflators and Real Value Added in the Service Sector Kyoji Fukao (Hitotsubashi University) Taisuke Kameda (Economic and Social Research.
GROWTH AND CRISIS IN THE European Competitiveness
Japan-U.S. Productivity Comparisons: PPPs for Inputs and Outputs
The 3rd Hitotsubashi Summer Institute The Fourth Asia KLEMS Conference
EU-KLEMS project: Progress in Economic Underpinnings and Measurement
NTTS Satellite event 17 February Brussels Hugo de Bondt
ASIA KLEMS HSI 2017 July Tokyo, Japan
Hitotsubashi University and RIETI Hitotsubashi University
Capitalisation of R&D in national accounts
Lecture 11. U.S. Growth Resurgence
Fifth World KLEMS June 4, 2018 Joji Tokui and Takeshi Mizuta
Item 14a: Research and Development
Annarosa Pesole, Imperial College London
Productivity Productivity Erik Veldhuizen.
Presented at the 5th World KLEMS Conference June 4, 2018
Productivity Productivity Erik Veldhuizen.
Presentation transcript:

Intangible Investment and Economic Growth in Japan Presented at the 3 rd World KLEMS Conference at Tokyo on May 19 th Tsutomu Miyagawa (Gakushuin University and RIETI) Konomi Tonogi (Kanagawa University) Shoichi Hisa (Kanagawa University)

IT industries and Intangibles in Japan Jorgenson, Ho, and Stiroh (2005), Inklaar, O’Mahony and Timmer (2005), Fukao, et al. (2012): IT industries are key sectors of economic growth in advanced countries. In Japan, the value added growth and TFP growth in the IT industries have surpassed those in non-IT industries. The growth strategies in Japan have strengthened the utilization in IT.

IT industries and Intangibles in Japan contd. The Economic Report of the President in the US in 2007 emphasized complementarities between IT investment and intangible investment. Corrado, Hulten and Sichel (2009) (hereafter referred to as CHS) measured aggregate intangible investment in the US. Following their approach, we measure the aggregate intangible investment in advanced countries. However, to examine the complementarities between IT investment and intangibles, we need to measure intangible investment by industry. →Chun et al. (2012), Miyagawa and Hisa (2013), Niebel et al. (2013), Crass et al. (2014).

The Measurement of Intangible Investment by Industry in Japan Following the CHS approach, we extended the intangible investment series developed by Chun et al. (2012) and Miyagawa and Hisa (2013) to 2010 by using the JIP database and other primary statistics. The current version of intangible investment data can be found at the following website: ex.html#04-6.

The Measurement of Intangible Investment by Industry in Japan contd. Revised points of 2014 version of Intangible Investment data. (1)As JSNA started to publish data on own account software investment as well as custom and packaged software investment, we use the JSNA data to construct computerized information as much as we can. (2)Copyright and license costs →Entertainment and artistic originals.

The Measurement of Intangible Investment by Industry in Japan contd. The amount of intangible investment in the 2000s is about 40 trillions of JPY. It has declined since the Leaman Shock. In particular, investment in economic competencies has declined since 2000, due to the harsh restructuring that occurred after the financial crisis in Japan. Intangible investment in the IT industries accounts for over 60% of total intangible investment.

Estimated Intangible Investment in Japan

Comparison of Intangible Investment between Japan and Korea The ratio of intangible investment to GVA in Japan is greater than Korea. However, the gap between Japan and Korea has contracted since In some service industries, the intangible investment/GVA ratios in Korea have surpassed those in Japan. In particular, investment in computerized information in service industries is greater than that in Japan.

Intangible Investment/GVA Ratio in Japan and Korea

Intangible Investment/GVA Ratio by Industry in Japan and Korea

Capital Stock in Intangibles in Japan When we construct capital stock in intangibles using the perpetual inventory method, we use two types of depreciation rates; the first type follows Corrado et al. (2013) and the second type is measured from our own survey on intangibles. As Japanese firms expect stock in innovative property to deteriorate rapidly, depreciation rates of assets in innovative property are larger than those measured by Corrado et al. (2013).

Depreciation rates for intangible assets

Capital Stock in Intangibles in Japan contd. The amount of intangible assets in Japan is 167 trillions of JPY, when we use the depreciation rates developed by Corrado et al. (2013). However, the amount of intangible assets using alternative depreciation rates is 124 trillion of JPY in 2010 due to the decrease in assets in innovative property. In both cases, the growth rate in capital stock in intangibles has slowed down since In particular, the growth rate in economic competencies turned negative in the 2000s. In some service industries, the growth rates in intangibles also turned negative in the 2000s.

Capital Stock in Intangible Assets in Japan (Corrado et , al.’s case)

Capital Stock in Intangible Assets in Japan (based on the Japanese survey)

Growth Accounting with Intangibles When we conduct growth accounting with intangibles, the role of intangible assets on economic growth has increased since In particular, accumulation in intangibles plays a key role in economic growth in the service sector and the IT industries. We find that the effects of intangibles on economic growth are concealed in capital accumulation and TFP growth in traditional growth accounting.

Growth Accounting with Intangibles and a Traditional Growth Accounting

Growth Accounting with Intangibles contd. International comparison of growth accounting shows that the contribution of intangibles to labor productivity growth in Japan is the lowest in advanced countries. The growth strategy in Abenomics published last year emphasized that the government supports investment in tangible assets aggressively. However, the Japanese government should support intangible as well as tangible investment to restore the Japanese economy through change in industrial structure.

International Comparison of Growth Accounting

Thank you for your attention!