WHICH ANGLE OF HEAD-DOWN TILT BETTER SIMULATES THE INCREASE IN INTRA-OCULAR PRESSURE THAT OCCURS IN MICROGRAVITY? Luís Francisco B. Chotgues, MD Dario.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

Daniel B. Roth, Henry L. Feng, Kunjal K. Modi, Howard F
You have been given a mission and a code. Use the code to complete the mission and you will save the world from obliteration…
Interesting Case(s) -Cartilage-
Blood pressure measurement in primary care
Il controllo circadiano della pressione intraoculare: implicazioni farmacologiche N. ORZALESI, P. FOGAGNOLO Università degli Studi di Milano Ospedale San.
Kapitel 21 Astronomie Autor: Bennett et al. Galaxienentwicklung Kapitel 21 Galaxienentwicklung © Pearson Studium 2010 Folie: 1.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
1 Chapter 40 - Physiology and Pathophysiology of Diuretic Action Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
Prevalence of Obesity* among U.S. Adults BRFSS, 1992 Source: Mokdad AH, et al. J Am Med Assoc 1999;282:16. 15% no data.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
0 - 0.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
MULTIPLICATION EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 3. WHAT EVER YOU DO TO ONE SIDE YOU HAVE TO DO TO THE OTHER 2. DIVIDE BY THE NUMBER IN FRONT OF THE VARIABLE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
ZMQS ZMQS
Ischemic Pre-Conditioning and Athletic Performance
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
Analgesic ACM 7/29/021 Time-Specific Measurements vs. Time-Weighted Average for Pain in Chronic and Acute Analgesia Trials Laura Lu, Ph.D Office of Biostatistics,
Division- the bus stop method
Assessment of an Earlobe Arterialized Blood Collector for use in Microgravity Thais Russomano* Marlise A dos Santos* João Castro* John Whittle** Simon.
Large Deformation Non-Linear Response of Composite Structures C.C. Chamis NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH L. Minnetyan Clarkson University Potsdam,
Cardiac Massage in Microgravity
© S Haughton more than 3?
Twenty Questions Subject: Twenty Questions
Retinal Vein Occlusion 2010 An Evidence-Based Approach Corticosteroids, Implants, and Anti VEGF Therapies Allen C. Ho, MD Professor of Ophthalmology Wills.
Linking Verb? Action Verb or. Question 1 Define the term: action verb.
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
A Wireless, Implantable Intra- Ocular Pressure Sensor for the Management of Glaucoma Gabriel Simon, M.D. Ph.D. Sept 16, 2008 ESCRS.
1 First EMRAS II Technical Meeting IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, 19–23 January 2009.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Subtraction: Adding UP
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Click Here to Begin 1. These are cheeks teeth ears eyebrows.
An assessment of the feasibility and effectiveness of a method of performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation during microgravity. Simon N Evetts, Lisa M.
Week 1.
Number bonds to 10,
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Figure Essential Cell Biology (© Garland Science 2010)
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
Plate tectonics initiation as a random outcome of time-dependent convection Teresa Wong Slava Solomatov Theory of Earth II AGU Fall Meeting 19 December.
Presidential Fitness Program Pull/Push upMile RunShuttle RunSit-UpsV-Sit Stretch.
Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea in Normal- Tension Glaucoma Authors: Leonidas Traipe Ines Cayuqueo Fabiola Cerfogli Claudia Goya Allister Gibbons.
The Microgravity Centre A Pioneer Space Life Sciences Research Centre in Latin America Thais Russomano Head, Microgravity Centre/FENG-PUCRS,
A Prospective Trial Evaluating Scleral Rebound Tonometry Sara Duke, MD, Andrew Logeman, Shuchi Patel, MD Loyola University Chicago, Department of Ophthalmology,
T. Russomano* L. F. B. Chotgues* O. A. Lima de Sá* M. A. dos Santos* J. Ernsting** *Microgravity Laboratory-Brazil / ** King’s College London-UK *Microgravity.
SAMIR AL-MANSOURI, MD. e.g. - cataract - glaucoma - macular degeneration - diabetic retinopathy Chronic = slowly progressive visual loss Major causes:
The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Repeated Intravitreous Ranibizumab Injections for DME and Risk of Sustained IOP Elevation or Need for.
Comparison of the Diaton Transpalpebral Tonometer Versus Goldmann Applanation R. S. Davidson 1 ; N. Faberowski 2 ; R. J. Noecker 3 ; M. Y. Kahook 1 1.
A Prospective Trial Comparing Scleral Pneumotonometry to Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Sara Duke, MD, Usiwoma Abugo, BS, Shuchi Patel MD Loyola University.
TRANSPALPEBRAL TONOMETER APPLICATION DURING INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE EVALUATION IN THE PATIENTS WITH REFRACTION ANOMALY BEFORE AND AFTER KERATOPHOTOREFRACTIVE.
How Do I Know My Glaucoma Treatment is Working? Dr Catherine Green Head: Glaucoma Unit RVEEH.
Alexander J. Brucker, M.D. Protocol Chair
Dr. Abdullah Al-Amri Ophthalmology Consultant
Sponsored by the National Eye Institute,
Effect of Previous Argon Laser Trabeculoplasty on Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty ASCRS 2011 Lawrence F. Jindra, MD Columbia University Winthrop University.
The Efficacy and Safety of the Low Intensity Ultrasound Treatment in Patients with Open Angle Glaucoma Hyoung Won Bae, Gong Je Seong, Chan Yun Kim Institute.
ASCRS 2010 Joseph A. Donnelly Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Presentation transcript:

WHICH ANGLE OF HEAD-DOWN TILT BETTER SIMULATES THE INCREASE IN INTRA-OCULAR PRESSURE THAT OCCURS IN MICROGRAVITY? Luís Francisco B. Chotgues, MD Dario F. G. de Azevedo, Ph.D. Thais Russomano, MD, Ph.D.

Physiology of the eye on Earth Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS Aqueous Humor

Intra-ocular pressure (IOP) in microgravity AUTOMATIC SELF-TONOMETRY 1st German-Russian MIR mission 1992 : 92% IOP rise Schwartz R, Draeger J, Groenhoff S, Flade K D Ophthalmologe 1993 Dec; 90(6): nd German D-2 Spacelab-Mission 1993: 114% IOP rise Draeger J, Schwartz R, Groenhoff S, Stern C Ophthalmologe 1994 Oct; 91(5): Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS

IOP during parabolic flight IOP increased 58% (19 mmHg) during parabolic flight (20 s of µG) compared to baseline values (12 mmHg) ( n =11) Mader TH et al., Am J Ophtalmol Mar 15; 115(3): Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS

IOP during HDT Objectives To determine the angle of head-down tilt that best simulates the increase in IOP after 15 min insertion in microgravityTo determine the angle of head-down tilt that best simulates the increase in IOP after 15 min insertion in microgravity To evaluate the mechanisms involved in the increase in the IOP during microgravity and HDTTo evaluate the mechanisms involved in the increase in the IOP during microgravity and HDT To contribute to the diagnosis and treatment of patients who suffer from glaucomaTo contribute to the diagnosis and treatment of patients who suffer from glaucoma Microgravity Laboratory -PUCRS

IOP during HDT Protocol Number of subjects: 8 (16 eyes)Number of subjects: 8 (16 eyes) Portable aplanation tonometerPortable aplanation tonometer IOP measurements:IOP measurements: –Sitting position (after 5 min - baseline) –4 randomized angles of HDT (after 15 min): 6, 12, 18 and 34 degrees 6, 12, 18 and 34 degrees –Time of day: AM –Test duration per subject: 2 h Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS

IOP during HDT Material and Methods Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS

IOP during HDT Material and Methods Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS

Results Intra-ocular Pressure (mmHg) Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS

IOP during HDT Results Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS

IOP during HDT and Microgravity * Draeger J et al., 1993 ** Schwartz R et al., 1992 Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS

IOP during HDT Conclusion IOP enhanced 110% after 15 min of 34° of HDT 34° of HDT was accepted as the angle that best simulates the acute increase in IOP that occurs in microgravity 6° of HDT did not produce the rise in IOP that has been found during space missions Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS

IOP during HDT Future Studies Increase in IOP in microgravity versus during HDT - Mechanism?Increase in IOP in microgravity versus during HDT - Mechanism? Measurement of venous pressure and IOP during HDTMeasurement of venous pressure and IOP during HDT Increase in IOP = GlaucomaIncrease in IOP = Glaucoma Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS

Central venous pressure in space Buckey J. C. et al, 1996 Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS

Venous pressure in the forehead during HDT Microgravity Laboratory-PUCRS