Electronic Discovery Guidelines Meet and Confer - General definition. a requirement of courts that before certain types of motions and/or petitions will.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) and In re Bristol-Myers Squibb Securities Litigation Lina Carreras.
Advertisements

Williams v. Sprint/United Management Co.
Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC “Zubulake IV”
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 2004 District Justice Scheindlin Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC Zubulake V.
Qualcomm Incorporated, v. Broadcom Corporation.  U.S. Federal Court Rules of Civil Procedure – amended rules December 1, 2006 to include electronically.
Responding to Subpoenas Springfield Metropolitan Bar Association Doug Healy March 25, 2013.
C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality1 Professional Responsibility Ch. 4 The Lawyer’s Duty of Confidentiality Ch. 4 The Lawyer’s Duty of Confidentiality.
© The McCoy Law Firm 2012 James McCoy The McCoy Law Firm Coit Rd., Ste. 560 Dallas, Texas (214)
1 As of April 2014 Proposed Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP)
E-Discovery New Rules of Civil Procedure Presented by Lucy Isaki January 23, 2007.
Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O’Lakes, Inc.  Motion Hearing before a Magistrate Judge in Federal Court  District of Colorado  Decided in 2007.
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Litigation and Procedure Discovery: Overview and Interrogatories Litigation and Procedure.
Ethical Issues in Data Security Breach Cases Presented by Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
Strategies for Preserving the Attorney-Client Privilege in the World of Electronic Discovery Beth Rose Ford Motor Company.
Ethical Issues in the Electronic Age Ethical Issues in the Electronic Age Frost Brown Todd LLC Seminar May 24, 2007 Frost Brown.
W W W. D I N S L A W. C O M E-Discovery and Document Retention Patrick W. Michael, Esq. Dinsmore & Shohl LLP 101 South Fifth Street Louisville, KY
1 Best Practices in Legal Holds Effectively Managing the e-Discovery Process and Associated Costs.
Decided May 13, 2003 By the United States Court for the Southern District of New York.
17th Annual ARMA Metro Maryland Spring Seminar Confidentiality, Access, and Use of Electronic Records.
Ronald J. Hedges No Judge Left Behind: A Report Card on the E- Discovery Rules April 24, 2007 Austin, Texas National.
N ORTHERN M ARIANA I SLANDS R ULES FOR M ANDATORY A LTERNATIVE D ISPUTE R ESOLUTION.
Investigating & Preserving Evidence in Data Security Incidents Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
E-Discovery PA230: Unit 9.
230 F.R.D. 640 (D. Kan. 2005).  Shirley Williams is a former employee of Sprint/United Management Co.  Her employment was terminated during a Reduction-in-
The Sedona Principles 1-7
Attorney-Client Privilege and Privacy Considerations Between US Corporations & Foreign Affiliates General Counsel Conference, Washington, D.C. October.
E-Discovery in Health Care Litigation By Tracy Vigness Kolb.
FRCP 26(f) Sedona Principle 3 & Commentaries Ryann M. Buckman Electronic Discovery September 21, 2009 Details of FRCP 26(f) Details of Sedona Principle.
E-Discovery: Understanding the 2006 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure amendments, continuing complaints, and speculation about more rule changes to come.
2009 CHANGES IN CALIFORNIA DISCOVERY RULES The California Electronic Discovery Act Batya Swenson E-discovery Task Force
Data Mining Opinions Rita Assetto E-Discovery Fall 2009.
Against: The Liberal Definition and use of Litigation Holds Team 9.
P RINCIPLES 1-7 FOR E LECTRONIC D OCUMENT P RODUCTION Maryanne Post.
© 2010 Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. A Healthy Dose of E-Discovery: A Review of Electronic Discovery Laws for the Healthcare Industry.
The Challenge of Rule 26(f) Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer July 15, 2011.
Metadata – A Summary of Important Concepts and Opinions.
PITFALLS IN E-DISCOVERY Operating Ethically under the Rules David A. Chaumette, De la Rosa & Chaumette State Bar of Texas, Winning Before Trial 2009.
Summary Judgment and Summary Adjudication LA 310.
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 20 DISCOVERY I Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 7, 2005.
The Risks of Waiver and the Costs of Pre- Production Privilege Review of Electronic Data 232 F.R.D. 228 (D. Md. 2005) Magistrate Judge, Grimm.
Primary Changes To The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Effective December 1, 2015 Presented By Shuman, McCuskey, & Slicer, PLLC.
Copyright © 2015 Bradley & Riley PC - All rights reserved. October 30, 2015 IA ACC 2 nd Annual Corp. Counsel Forum Timothy J. Hill Laura M. Hyer N EW F.
The Sedona Principles November 16, Background- What is The Sedona Conference The Sedona Conference is an educational institute, established in 1997,
In Re Seroquel Products Liability Litigation United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida 2007.
E-Discovery And why it matters to a SSA. What is E-Discovery? E-Discovery is the process during litigation of discovering information relevant to litigation.
Electronic Discovery Guidelines Meet and Confer - General definition. a requirement of courts that before certain types of motions and/or petitions will.
U.S. District Court Southern District of New York 229 F.R.D. 422 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)
CIVIL PROCEDURE CLASS 17 Professor Fischer Columbus School of Law The Catholic University of America October 4, 2002.
RULES. After five years of discussion and public comment the proposed amendments took effect on December 1, 2006…specifically changing language in six.
Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC 217 F.R.D. 309 (S.D.N.Y. 2003), 236 United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
Title of Presentation Technology and the Attorney-Client Relationship: Risks and Opportunities Jay Glunt, Ogletree DeakinsJohn Unice, Covestro LLC Jennifer.
© Sara M. Taylor 2002 Rules of Discovery  State  Federal.
Heartland Surgical Specialty Hospital, LLC v. Midwest Division, Inc 2007 WL (D. Kan. Apr. 9, 2007)
Residential Funding Corp. v. DeGeorge Financial Corp., 306 F.3d 99 (2d. Cir. 2002).
CIVIL PROCEDURE FALL 2005 SECTIONS C & F CLASS 21 DISCOVERY II October 11, 2005.
Electronic Discovery Guidelines FRCP 26(f) mandates that parties “meaningfully meet and confer” to consider the nature of their respective claims and defenses.
PTAB Litigation 2016 Part 5 – Motions Practice, Discovery, and Trial Management Issues 1.
1 Ethical Lawyering Spring 2006 Class 8. 2 Rest. 68 Except as otherwise provided in this Restatement, the attorney-client privilege may be invoked as.
When the law firm is the client Handling legal holds, document collections and productions of your own firm’s documents.
The Applicability of Patent-Agent Privilege After In re Queen’s University at Kingston Presented by Rachel Perry © 2016 Workman Nydegger.
Tues., Nov. 11.
Sponsored by Kroll Ontrack Inc.
The Future of Discovery Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
Presented by: Rachael Zichella of Taylor English Duma LLP
Limited Scope Representation
Bonnie Weiss McLeod Cooley LLP
WHERE WE ARE & WHAT WE’RE DOING
Class III Objectives Subject Matter:
Class IV Objectives Subject Matter:
Electronic Discovery Sabrina Jones 4/14/2011.
Presentation transcript:

Electronic Discovery Guidelines Meet and Confer - General definition. a requirement of courts that before certain types of motions and/or petitions will be heard by the judge, the lawyers (and sometimes their clients) must "meet and confer" to try to resolve the matter or at least determine the points of conflict. This has the beneficial effect of resolving many matters, reducing the time for arguments and making the lawyers and clients face up to the realities of their positions.

Existence of Electronic Information Prior to the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, Counsel should become knowledgeable about their clients information management systems and their operation, including how information is stored and received. In addition, counsel should make a reasonable attempt to review their clients electronic information files to ascertain their contents, including archival, backup, and legacy data (outdated formats or media)

Duty to disclose Counsel shall review with their clients the clients electronic information files, including current files as well as back-up, archival, and legacy computer files, to determine what information may used to support claims or defenses. If disclosures of electronic information are being made, counsel shall also identify those individuals with knowledge of their clients electronic information systems who can facilitate the location and identification of discoverable electronic information

Duty to notify A party seeking discovery of computer-based information shall notify the opposing party of that fact immediately, and, if known at the time of the Fed.R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, shall identify as clearly as possible the categories of information that may be sought.

Duty to meet and confer regarding electronic information During the Fed.R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference the parties shall confer regarding the following matters: 1.Counsel shall attempt to agree on steps the parties will take to segregate and preserve computer based information in order to avoid accusations of spoliation. Counsel shall also attempt to agree on the steps the parties will take to comply with the decisions and rules requiring the preservation of potentially relevant information after litigation has commenced.

Duty to meet and confer regarding electronic information Counsel shall attempt to agree on the scope of discovery and search protocol 3. Deleted information. Counsel shall attempt to agree on whether deleted information still exists, the extent to which restoration of deleted information is needed, and who will bear the costs of restoration.

Duty to meet and confer regarding electronic information 4. Back-up and archival data. Counsel shall attempt to agree on whether back up and archival data exists, the extent to which it is needed and who will bear the cost of obtaining such data. 5. Costs. Counsel shall discuss the anticipated scope, cost and time required for disclosure or production of data beyond what is reasonably available to the parties in the ordinary course of business, and shall attempt to agree on the allocation of cost

Duty to meet and confer regarding electronic information 6. Format and media. Counsel shall discuss and attempt to agree on the format and media to be used in the production of electronic material. 7. Privileged material. Counsel shall attempt to reach an agreement regarding what will happen in the event privileged material or information is inadvertently disclosed Sources: USCourts.gov Texas and Kansas

Class Assignment- 09/12/05 Teams to meet and confer with opposing teams in anticipation of preparing a joint electronic discovery plan for Worldwide LawnScape. Teams should select spokespersons to present the results of their conferences with the class. (graded).