ESEA REAUTHORIZATION An Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

School Improvement Grants Webinar – Tier I and II Schools April 21, 2010.
School Improvement Grants Tier I and Tier II Schools March, 2010.
Superintendents Quarterly Meeting March 13, 2009.
April 15, Through the SIG program, the United States Education Department (USED) requires state educational agencies (SEAs) to use three tiers to.
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION APRIL 27, 2010 VANDERBILT MARRIOTT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION ROLLOUT 1.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment
Alabama State Board of Education PLAN Our Vision Every Child a Graduate – Every Graduate Prepared for College/Work/Adulthood in the 21 st Century.
Carmel Martin Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development - Friday, July 10, U.S. Department of Education ARRA, Race to.
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Indian Education Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Flexibility Request: Summary of Key Provisions.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Focus Schools Conference Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. September 17-18, 2012.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP. This presentation is a product of the Maryland State Department of Education 03/03/10 American Recovery and Reinvestment.
Principals Changing Schools Through Leadership and Advocacy 2009 NAESP-NASSP National Leaders’ Conference.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
2011 Bridge to Excellence Master Plan Annual Update Review Division of Student, Family, and School Support Office of Finance Division of Academic Reform.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
1 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT COHORT 2 LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION APRIL 5, 2011.
Nebraska Department of Education Focus on Effective Instruction and Student Learning Revised Standards and NeSA Nebraska’s P-16 Effort Federal Agenda Fiscal.
FY 2016 BUDGET INVESTING IN AMERICA’S FUTURE. “America thrived in the 20th century because we made high school free, sent a generation of GIs to college,
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION National Teacher Forum U.S. Department of Education April 30, 2009.
Support for the Change, Challenge, and Commitment All Maryland Students College and Career Ready.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: RENEWAL PROCESS November 20, 2014.
1 Tier 1 Education: Review Participant Training January AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training.
Understanding Stimulus Funding and Leveraging Philanthropy to Support Long-Term Education Goals A Webinar for the Foundation Community February 16, 2010.
SAVING AND CREATING JOBS AND REFORMING EDUCATION U.S. Department of Education June 12, 2009.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
Massie Ritsch U.S. Department of Education ESEA REAUTHORIZATION.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
Leveraging Race to the Top to Maximize the Use of Data To Ensure College & Career Readiness Aimee R. Guidera Achieve ADP September 10, 2009.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS (SIG): A New Opportunity for Turning Around Low-Performing High Schools January 29, 2010.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
Eric W. Waldo U.S. Department of Education Deputy Chief of Staff July 2012 U.S. Department of Education Policy Overview.
ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education SECRETARY OF EDUCATION’S PRIORITIES.
Carmel Martin Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development - Tuesday, July 28, U.S. Department of Education Vision and Initiatives.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP.  Maryland’s initiatives are about reform, not simply the money.  Reform efforts will continue with or without.
SAM REDDING ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE CENTER ON INNOVATIONS IN LEARNING CENTER ON SCHOOL TURNAROUND BUILDING STATE CAPACITY AND PRODUCTIVITY CENTER.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW September 26, 2011.
Title I, IDEA Part B and IDEA Part C September 2, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Use of Funds Guidance 1.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 We Can Do Better: Becca Walawender, Deputy Division Director,
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student. Brad Neuenswander, Deputy Commissioner KSDE.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: EDUCATION STAKEHOLDERS FORUM September 29, 2011 Carmel Martin, Assistant Secretary for Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference Crystal City, VA July 30, 2010 Jacqueline Jones, PhD Senior Advisor to the Secretary for Early Learning.
Center on School Turnaround at WestEd. 2 3 Race to the Top School Improvement Grants Alignment of Existing Federal Resources ESEA Flexibility Lowest-
STANDARDS & ASSESSMENTS. HOW TO USE THIS PRESENTATION DECK  This slide deck has been created by the U.S. Department of Education as a resource tool for.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.
1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
TTIPS Model Overview.
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
KAESP 2012 Spring Retreat April 2, /15/2018.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Presentation transcript:

ESEA REAUTHORIZATION An Overview U.S. Department of Education

If an incoming freshman class of 30 represented America… The Challenge If an incoming freshman class of 30 represented America… Four years later, only 23 will graduate high school … Of those, only 15 will enroll in post-secondary education immediately following graduation… Of those, only 9 will earn a 2 or 4 year post-secondary degree before age 27.

Elementary (Grades K-5) Overarching Goal “By 2020, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world.” President Barack Obama, February 24, 2009 A Comprehensive, Cradle – to – Career Strategy Elementary (Grades K-5) Secondary (Grades 6-12) Post-Secondary Early Learning (Birth-grade 3) Goal: All kindergarten students arrive ready to learn and remain on track to 4th grade. Goal: All students enter middle school with foundational skills to tackle advanced subjects. Goal: All students graduate high school ready for college and career. Goal: All graduates have opportunities for success in the 21st century economy.

Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) to: ESEA Goals Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) to: Raise the bar Reward excellence and growth Increase local flexibility Maintain the focus on closing achievement gaps

= NCLB Our Proposal Overview of Changes Too prescriptive Flexibility for results Narrowed curriculum Well-rounded education Focus on gaps & equity = Lowered the bar Raise the bar Too punitive Reward success Achievement gaps: NCLB was right to illuminate achievement gaps. We know that despite some progress over the past 10 years, there are still large achievement gaps between subgroups of students, and we’re going to continue to ask schools, districts, and states to focus on closing those gaps. As you can tell, we’re proposing significant changes from NCLB, and here are some key highlights. Raise the bar. The goal of our PK-12 educational system is simple: every student should graduate from high school prepared for college or a career. Right now too many students don’t finish high school, and those that do aren’t necessarily prepared for the next step. NCLB lowered the bar -- We need to make sure that states set a high, meaningful bar with their standards and help all students reach those standards. Flexibility for results: Our proposal shifts the focus from compliance oriented to results oriented. A re-envisioned federal role means giving states and districts additional flexibility in how they spend federal dollars as long as they are continuing to focus on what matters – improving outcomes for students. Well-rounded education: We’ll provide support for states and districts to build strong instructional systems focused on a complete education, and give states the flexibility to choose to include other subjects in their accountability systems. Reward success: NCLB was a blunt instrument that ignored growth. It mislabeled some schools as failures and didn’t recognize success. We want to start recognizing and rewarding success by providing positive incentives to schools and districts. We want to identify the high-flyers and schools showing the most improvement as models to learn from, and provide them with rewards that help them maintain their high performance.

Strengthen Teaching & Learning College- and career-ready standards, determined by states. Effective instructional supports. High-quality assessments and access to data that informs instruction. Accountability that is fair and rigorous. Multiple sources of data when considering teacher and leader effectiveness. Renew respect for the profession and the effective effort of teachers and leaders.

Preparing Students for College and Career A campground has a large lawn with a soccer field that measures 100 x 50 meters. The park manager decides to keep the field open at night. A E B Therefore, a decision needs to be made about where to place some light posts. Standard lamp posts are 13 meters high and light a circular region with a radius of 50 meters. 13 m 50 m The diagram below (Figure 3) shows the lighting of the field when lights are placed at points D and B. What is the area of the soccer field that is NOT lit when these two light posts are used. Show your work. D F C A E B From the Freudenthal Institute for Science and Mathematics Education/University of Colorado

We need to tackle the challenges of our lowest-performing schools. Fewer than 15% of high schools… …produce half of the nation’s 1.2 million dropouts.

Under NCLB, these schools got worse. Performance of bottom 5 percent elementary and middle schools over last 4 years Percentage of students proficient

Persistent failure is not inevitable – research and real-world examples point to what works. Build a positive culture of high expectations. Ensure strong leadership and staff. Support student achievement by strengthening the instructional program Engage families and communities. Change governance to provide flexibility for needed reforms.

Fairer, flexible, more focused accountability. Target interventions to schools in bottom 5%, next 5%, or with stagnant achievement gaps. Greater flexibility to identify & respond to individual school needs. (1) Fair. Use growth and progress to measure schools. (2) Flexible. Differentiate interventions and support. (3) Focused. Focus on lowest-performers & achievement gaps. Overarching Principles: STEP 1 Local flexibility STEP 2 Reward success STEP 3 Respond to greatest challenges Flexibility and rewards for schools making greatest gains or getting all subgroups on track.

Teachers have a dramatic impact on students, but our policies treat them as if they’re interchangeable... Evaluation systems don’t reflect differences in teacher effectiveness or give useful feedback to teachers and school leaders. “Satisfactory” 99%

…so we spend money in ways that don’t identify and support teacher needs or focus on equity. District spending of $3.0b in federal Title IIA funding goes overwhelmingly to class size reduction and professional development, with little evidence of results. 12% Other 10% Incentives, mentoring, advancement 42% Professional development 36% Class size reduction

Great Teachers and Great Leaders Meaningful feedback & support at every stage of career, informed by fair, rigorous evaluation systems. Targeted recruitment and high-quality teacher and leader preparation (1) Teachers and leaders matter. (2) Focus on outcomes. (3) Every teacher & leader deserves feedback & support. (4) Every student deserves effective teachers & leaders. Overarching Principles: Induction Professional development Advancement opportunities Time for collaboration Recognition & rewards

Investing in capacity-building and reform throughout the system. Strengthen foundational support for historically underserved children Low-income students Students with disabilities Other historically underserved students Build supports to meet students’ comprehensive needs Community and family focus Non-academic student supports Implement systemic reforms and pioneer new models “Race to the Top” “Investing in Innovation” Expanded learning time Innovative uses of technology English Learners

Education is the civil rights issue of our generation… Education is the civil rights issue of our generation…. Great teaching is about so much more than education; it is a daily fight for social justice. Secretary Arne Duncan, October 9, 2009

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT Office of Elementary and Secondary Education

A National Problem There are approximately 5,000 chronically underperforming schools in America, roughly 5 percent of all the schools in the country.  About half are in big cities, about a third are in rural areas, and the rest are in suburbs and medium-sized towns.  As Secretary Duncan has said, “This is a national problem—urban, rural, and suburban.”  --“Turning Around the Bottom Five Percent,” Speech by U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, June 22, 2009

School Improvement Grants (SIG) $4.1 billion to improve low-achieving schools nationally $3 billion appropriated through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) $546 million appropriated through the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2009 $546 million appropriated through the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 Authorized under section 1003(g) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA)

Distribution of SIG Funds ED to State educational agencies (SEAs): Formula grants based on each State’s share of funds under Title I, Parts A, C, and D SEAs to local educational agencies (LEAs): Competitive grants LEAs to schools: $50,000 - $2 million per school

FOUR SIG SCHOOL INTERVENTION MODELS Turnaround Restart Closure Transformation

Transformation Model Overview Teachers and Leaders Replace principal Implement new evaluation system Developed with staff Uses student growth as a significant factor Identify and reward staff who are increasing student outcomes; support and then remove those who are not Implement strategies to recruit, place, and retain staff Instructional and Support Strategies Select and implement an instructional model based on student needs Provide job-embedded professional development designed to build capacity and support staff Ensure continuous use of data to inform and differentiate instruction Time and Support Provide increased learning time Staff and students Provide ongoing mechanism for community and family engagement Partner to provide social-emotional and community-oriented services and supports Governance Provide sufficient operating flexibility to implement reform Ensure ongoing technical assistance An LEA with nine or more Tier I and Tier II schools may not implement the Transformation Model in more than 50% of those schools.

Turnaround Model Overview Teachers and Leaders Replace principal Use locally adopted “turnaround” competencies to review and select staff for school (rehire no more than 50% of existing staff) Implement strategies to recruit, place, and retain staff Instructional and Support Strategies Select and implement an instructional model based on student needs Provide job-embedded PD designed to build capacity and support staff Ensure continuous use of data to inform and differentiate instruction Time and Support Provide increased learning time Staff and students Social-emotional and community- oriented services and supports Governance New governance structure Grant operating flexibility to school leader May also implement any of the required or permissible strategies under the Transformation Model

Model Selection in SIG Awarded Schools N=49 states, DC, and BIE (Information unavailable for HI)

FY09 SIG Award Highlights States have identified 2153 Tier I and II schools ~2% of all schools across the nation Number of Tier I and II schools in a State ranged from 5 to 198 50 States + DC, BIE, and Puerto Rico have received SIG awards 831 Tier I and II schools have received awards (N=49 States, DC and BIE) 416 Tier III schools have received awards (N=49 States, DC and BIE)

SIG Awarded Schools by Grade Level and Type School Type   Elementary Schools Middle Schools High Schools % Regular School 96.0% 96.3% 85.7% % Charter 3.5% 1.8% 6.4% % Alternative 0.0% 1.1% 5.6% % Special Education 0.5% 0.7% 0.6% % Vocational 1.6% N=49 states, DC, and BIE (Information unavailable for HI)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION http://www.ed.gov/programs/sif/index.html School Improvement Grant Guidance (FAQs) Final Requirements SEA Application Fact sheets/Examples State by State budget tables Links to videos highlighting successful turnaround efforts http://dww.ed.gov/topic/?T_ID=21 “What Works Clearinghouse” – Resources for Turning Around Chronically Low Performing Schools www.centerii.org Handbook on Effective Implementation of SIGs Six Recorded Webinars “What LEAs are Doing” Planning & Implementation Tools/Resources www.massinsight.org/turnaround New Resource: “State Policies that can Support Turnaround”