How To Defend A U.S. Patent Litigation Presented at: Patentgruppen Århus, Denmark Date: October 26, 2011 Presented by: Richard J. Basile Member St. Onge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Patent Infringement Litigation Before the U.S. International Trade Commission By Timothy DeWitt 24IP Law Group USA 12 E. Lake Dr. Annapolis, MD
Advertisements

Patentability StudyFTOTech. SurveyDefensive Publ. Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.20/02/2007 Harnessing Patent Information for Enterprise Competitiveness Olivier.
OVERVIEWEUROPE (EPC)UNITED STATESCONCLUSION Copyright © KATZAROV S.A.23/01/2007 Patent Protection for Software and for Software Based Business Methods.
Recommended Pre-Suit Case Analysis Likelihood of infringement Likelihood of validity Size of potential recovery Likelihood of injunction and its importance.
WISACCA – 2014 Annual Conference
How To Enforce Your U.S. Patent Presented at: Patentgruppen Århus, Denmark Date: October 25, 2011 Presented by: Richard J. Basile Member St. Onge Steward.
Patent Law Overview. Outline Effect of patent protection Effect of patent protection Substantive requirements for patent protection Substantive requirements.
Damages Calculations in Infringement Cases Frank S. Farrell F.S. Farrell, LLC 7101 York Ave., So.; Suite 305 Edina, MN Phone: (952) Fax:
The UPC in the European Patent Litigation landscape
The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases
INTRODUCTION TO PATENT RIGHTS The Business of Intellectual Property
© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dispute Resolution in the United States.
The Process of Litigation. What is the first stage in a civil lawsuit ?  Service of Process (the summons)
© 2005 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Offense as Defense in U.S. Patent Litigation Anthony L. Press Maximizing IP Seminar October 31, 2005.
Patent Portfolio Management By: Michael A. Leonard II.
Experts & Expert Reports  Experts and the FRE  FRCP, Rule 26 and experts  How are experts used in patent litigation?  What belongs in a Rule 26 report?
IPR Litigation System & Recent Case in Korea Hee-Young JEONG Judge of Daejeon District Court, KOREA April 22, 2015.
D ANIELS B AKER Introduction to Patent Law Doug Yerkeson University of Cincinnati Senior Design Class April 6, 2005.
A New Pathway for Follow-on Biologics Presented by: Steve Nash May 7, 2010.
Cochran Law Offices, LLC Patent Procedures Presented by William W. Cochran.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION METHODS
TRIAL INFORMATION Steps, vocabulary.
Patent Litigation in Japan April 7, 2008 Presented by: David W. Hill Partner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
Handling IP Disputes in a Global Economy Huw Evans Norton Rose Fulbright LLP.
Prepared by Douglas Peterson, University of Alberta 2-1 Part 1 – Introduction to the Law Chapter 2 – The Judicial System.
Page 1 Patent Damages Brandon Baum James Pistorino March 26, 2015.
CIVL202 Construction Engineering I Tutorial 7 T1Mon11:00 – 11:50 T2Wed09:00 – 09:50.
Patent Law Presented by: Walker & Mann, LLP Walker & Mann, LLP 9421 Haven Ave., Suite 200 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca Office.
International Conference on Intellectual Property Rights Protection in Europe Prague 22 May 2009 Practical Experience with Intellectual Property Rights.
Hot Issues in Patent Law Steven G. Saunders
Norwegians in American Courts: Strangers in a Strange Land Paul B. Klaas Partner-in-charge (International) Dorsey & Whitney LLP Minneapolis/London.
4-1 Chapter 4— Litigation REED SHEDD PAGNATTARO MOREHEAD F I F T E E N T H E D I T I O N McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies,
18 October 2006 Michel Petite 1 The Legal Service of the European Commission.
1 “Views on the New (or Pending) Patent Reform Legislation” AIPLA Annual Meeting October 18, 2007 Gary L. Griswold President and Chief Intellectual Property.
The American Court System Chapter 3. Why Study Law And Court System? Manager Needs Understanding Managers Involved In Court Cases As Party As Witness.
Intellectual Property Law © 2007 IBM Corporation EUPACO 2 – The European Patent Conference 16 May 2007 Patent Quality Roger Burt IBM Europe.
Basics of Patent Infringement Litigation UC Berkeley Patent Innovation and Strategy Dr. Tal Lavian November 24, 2008.
Open Source, Learning, and Patents Michael Feldstein April 23, 2007.
© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Post Grant Proceedings Before the USPTO and Litigation Strategies Under the AIA Panelists:David.
The New Tool for Patent Defendants - Inter Partes Review Daniel W. McDonald George C. Lewis, P.E. Merchant & Gould, P.C. April 16, 2014 © 2014 Merchant.
1 WIPO-KIPO-KIPA IP Panorama Business School, October 6 to 10, 2008 IP Strategies in Standards Setting Tomoko Miyamoto Senior Counsellor, Patent Law Section.
Patent Cases MM 450 Issues in New Media Theory Steve Baron March 3, 2009.
1 Patent Claim Interpretation under Art. 69 EPC – Should prosecution history be used to interpret the patent? presented at Fordham 19th Annual Conference.
Welcome and Thank You © Gordon & Rees LLP Constitutional Foundation Article 1; Section 8 Congress shall have the Power to... Promote the Progress.
Trends Relating to Patent Infringement Litigation in JAPAN
Jason Murata Axinn, Veltrop & Harkrider LLP Patent Infringement: Round Up of Recent Cases.
© Sara M. Taylor 2002 Rules of Discovery  State  Federal.
Civil Law Civil Law – is also considered private law as it is between individuals. It may also be called “Tort” Law, as a tort is a wrong committed against.
HOT TOPICS IN PATENT LITIGATION ABA – IP Section, April 9, 2011 Committee 601 – Trial and Appellate Rules & Procedures Moderator: David Marcus Speakers:
12/16/07/10 – Preparatory Measures before Trade Fairs in DE HG Preparatory/Preventive Measures before Exhibiting at Trade Fairs in Germany Heinz.
Patent Enforcement & Forum Shopping in China Liu, Shen & Associates: Jun Qiu September 2014.
Patent Information – The Key to Attack and Defend Heinz Mueller Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property / ip-search London IP Summit October.
Welcome to Synoptic IP Synoptic IP, India’s leading Intellectual Property (IP) services and solutions provider focuses on helping organizations across.
Debts Recovery in Romania. INTRODUCTION Recovering a debt can be a complex process everywhere, for every business, regardless of the industry. The Romanian.
How to IRAC a Case Issue Rule Analysis Conclusion.
Charles University – Law Faculty October 2012 © Peter Kolker 2012 Class III
Enhanced Damages for Patent Infringement: Halo v. Pulse
© 2006 Brett J. Trout Patent Reform Act of 2005 © 2006 Brett J. Trout
The Future of Civil Procedure
Pre-Issuance (Third-Party) Submissions
Hon. Victor B. Kenton (Ret.)
Brian M. Buroker, Esq. Hunton & Williams LLP 1900 K Street, N.W.,
Finding and Understanding Patents
Unitary Patent Court: Strategising in advance to maximise IP asset protection London IP Summit – October 2015.
THE BEST DEFENSE CAN BE A GREAT OFFENSE AND SAVE THE EXPENSE OF TRIAL: Develop your game plan now for early disposition as a result of pre-trial motions.
(Outmoded) “Point of Novelty” Test
Chapter 4: Patents and Trade Secrets in the Information Age.
The Federal Court System
Finding and Understanding Patents
Presentation by Seung Woo Ben Hur September 2019
Presentation transcript:

How To Defend A U.S. Patent Litigation Presented at: Patentgruppen Århus, Denmark Date: October 26, 2011 Presented by: Richard J. Basile Member St. Onge Steward Johnston & Reens LLC Stamford, Connecticut, U.S.

Patent Litigation Outline  Why to Avoid Litigation  How to Avoid  Anticipate Litigation  Prepare for Litigation  Defending Litigation  Trends in US Patent Litigation

Why Avoid U.S. Patent Litigation  Legal Costs Average for One Patent $6M  Business Disruption/Internal Costs  3-5 Years Uncertainty  Damages Could be Entire Profit Not Just Royalty, Injunction (no longer automatic)  The Certainty of Settlement Has Value

Patent Litigation Game  30% Change of Unimaginable  Judges Political, No Tech or Patent Experience  Trial Judges Getting Added Burden  More de novo Review on Appeal  Gridlock as Parties Bash Each Other  Patent Scope Legal, Not Technical Question  Courts Pick Most Reasonable Construction

 Build Offensive Portfolio  Less of target if you can counterclaim  Nuclear Deterrent, mutual destruction  Clear Products  New products cleared in light of competitors patents  Patent Design Arounds  Good as non-infringement and DOE defenses  Less space for other competitors to operate  Need To Do All 3 Of Above How To Avoid U.S. Patent Litigation

 Claim What Sells  Claim Who You Would Sue  Claim What you Can Prove Infringes  Claim Maximum Damages Build Offensive Patent Portfolio

 Claim Multiple Points of Novelty  Use All Your Free Independent Claims  Restrictions 1)AB, 8)ACD, 15)ABCD  Elections 1)AB, 8)ABC, 15)ABD  Fig. 1 Shows All Features To Be Claimed Build Offensive Patent Portfolio

 Watch Competitors Products  Watch Customer/Vendor Patents-Natural Expansion  Search Multiple Jurisdictions  Where is product made, used or sold  Location of particular industries  Get an Opinion Clear New Products For No Infringement

 Strengthens No Infringement Argument  Limits Competitors Options  Systems/Software  Application Engineering  Customer Requirements  Light weight carbon fiber  What is competitive commercial advantage  Be Careful What You Say In Specification Patent Your Design Arounds

Anticipate Litigation  Portfolio Imbalance with Competitor  Drop in Competitor’s Market Share  Drop in Overall Market/Economy  Business Phase for Product  Watch Competitor Marketing  new “must have” feature, pushes competitors  Weak No Infringement Argument  Invalidity defense is not sufficient

Prepare For Litigation  Build No Infringement Argument  Invalidity Search as Necessary  Informed Decision, Attorney/Expert Opinion  Preserve Documents  Identify Witnesses  Have a Plan

Defending Patent Litigation  Claim Construction Based on Specification  No Literal Infringement Is Not Enough, DOE  Own Patent on Modified Feature  Negate Novelty For Invalidity  Practice the Prior Art  Hire Good Experts  Corporate Commitment

Defending Patent Litigation (cont.)  Set A Budget  Notify All Departments  Same Argument at Trial as Opinion  Pick Your Battles (claim construction)  Be Ready To Look More For Prior Art  Establish And Maintain Credibility With Court

Patent Litigation Trends  Seagate- Objective Recklessness, Piracy  KSR-Nonobviousness  eBay- Right to Enjoin Not Automatic  E-discovery Rules  New Judges Pilot Program  New Patent Statute

CONCLUSION  Involve Lawyers Early in Process  Expect The Unexpected  There is Value in the Certainty of Settlement