Rare Decays and their sensitivity to New Physics.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

LHCb-Babar Meeting 8 April Paul Soler University of Glasgow and Rutherford Appleton Laboratory A first look at B s J/ in LHCb.

Advertisements

26/07/2002C.Palomares / ICHEP02 Search for  b in two-photon collisions with L3 Detector at LEP Carmen Palomares CERN On behalf of L3 Collaboration.

23, June, 2005Beauty2005, Assisi, Italy Electroweak Penguin decays at Belle Akimasa Ishikawa KEK.

Fourth Generation Leptons Linda Carpenter UC Irvine Dec 2010.

9-11 October 2006Flavour in the era of LHC - F.Teubert1 Search for the decay B s  µ + µ - at LHCb Frederic Teubert CERN, PH Department on behalf of the.

Andrey Golutvin Moriond Prospects of search for New Physics in B decays at LHC Andrey Golutvin ITEP / Moscow - In CP - violation - In rare decays.

EPS, July  Dalitz plot of D 0   -  +  0 (EPS-208)  Kinematic distributions in  c   e + (EPS-138)  Decay rate of B 0  K * (892) +  -

CKM03 workshop What I learnt R. Faccini. Beta Lots of importance is given to VV modes Angular analysis could reveal new physics because there are T-odd.

Radiative LHCb Vanya BELYAEVVanya BELYAEV (NIKHEF/Amsterdam & ITEP/Moscow) Vanya BELYAEV On behalf of LHCb Collaboration.

Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.

Federica Legger Polarized radiative  b decays at LHCb.

Measurements of Radiative Penguin B Decays at BaBar Jeffrey Berryhill University of California, Santa Barbara For the BaBar Collaboration 32 nd International.

1 B s  J/  update Lifetime Difference & Mixing phase Avdhesh Chandra for the CDF and DØ collaborations Beauty 2006 University of Oxford, UK.

At LHCb William Reece on behalf of the LHCb collaboration Imperial College London Beauty ‘09, Heidelberg, 7 th -11 th September 2009.

Rare and Radiative B Decays M.-Z. Wang ( 王名儒 ) on behalf of the Belle Collaboration ICFP2005Outline IntroductionIntroduction B → XB → X s γ moments B →B.

B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.

XLIst Rencontres de Moriond: Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories New results from BaBar: Rare Meson Decays and the Search for New Phenomena Jeffrey.

Winter Meeting, Santiago de Compostela Bs  μ+μ- in LHCb PROGRAMA NACIONAL DE BECAS FPU Diego Martínez Santos Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (USC)

Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.

P Spring 2003 L14Richard Kass B mesons and CP violation CP violation has recently ( ) been observed in the decay of mesons containing a b-quark.

Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.

D 0 Measurement in Cu+Cu Collisions at √s=200GeV at STAR using the Silicon Inner Tracker (SVT+SSD) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University For the STAR Collaboration.

1 Recent LHCb results on rare decays ICNFP 2014 Kolymbari, Greece Sajan Easo On behalf of the LHCb collaboration.

Higgs boson spin/CP at LHC N. Godinovic (FESB-Split) on behalf of CMS collaboration Outline: Motivation S CP observables Significane for exclusion non.

1 Inclusive Photoproduction of ρº, K*º and φ Mesons at HERA Andrei Rostovtsev (ITEP) ‏ on behalf of H1 Collaboration Published in H1 Collab., Phys. Lett.

CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.

1 Multi-body B-decays studies in BaBar Ben Lau (Princeton University) On behalf of the B A B AR collaboration The XLIrst Rencontres de Moriond QCD and.

Physical Program of Tau-charm Factory V.P.Druzhinin, Budker INP, Novosibirsk.

Latest Physics Results from ALEPH Paolo Azzurri CERN - July 15, 2003.

WIN-03, Lake Geneva, WisconsinSanjay K Swain Hadronic rare B decays Hadronic rare B-decays Sanjay K Swain Belle collaboration B - -> D cp K (*)- B - ->

1 Rare Bottom and Charm Decays at the Tevatron Dmitri Tsybychev (SUNY at Stony Brook) On behalf of CDF and D0 Collaborations Flavor Physics and CP-Violation.

Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,

ATLAS B-Physics Reach M.Smizanska, Lancaster University, UK

B  K   p  and photon spectrum at Belle Heyoung Yang Seoul National University for Belle Collaboration ICHEP2004.

36th ITEP Winter School of Physics (2008) 1 Bs  μ+μ- in LHCb PROGRAMA NACIONAL DE BECAS FPU Diego Martínez Santos (ДИЕГО МАРТИНЕЗ САНТОC) Universidade.

M.N MinardAspen Winter Meeting LHCb Physics Program On behalf of LHCb collaboration M.N Minard (LAPP) Status LHCb ( R.Jacobson) Single arm spectrometer.

Lake Louise Winter Institute Outlook:  Introduction  LHCb performance  Radiative decays: CP violation Bs  Φγ  Backward-forward Asymmetry B 

1 Electroweak Physics Lecture 2. 2 Last Lecture Use EW Lagrangian to make predictions for width of Z boson: Relate this to what we can measure: σ(e+e−

Single Top Quark Studies, L. Li (UC Riverside) ICHEP 08, July Liang Li University of California, Riverside for the CDF, DØ and H1 Collaborations.

LHCb performance for B s  J/   and B d  J/  K s decays Jeroen van Hunen.

1 Sinéad M. Farrington University of Oxford for the CDF Collaboration HQL 15 th October 2010 Rare B and D Decays at CDF.

Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.

Nita Sinha The Institute of Mathematical Sciences Chennai.

Vanina Ruhlmann-Kleider DAPNIA/SPP (Saclay) V.Ruhlmann-KleiderPhysics at LHC, Praha Review of Higgs boson searches at LEP Introduction The SM Higgs.

Sinéad M. Farrington University of Liverpool for the CDF Collaboration ICHEP 28 th July 2006 Rare B Decays at CDF.

1 The use of control channels in the analysis of the B s  μ + μ - decay Tuesday Meeting, 2 June 2009.

P Spring 2002 L16Richard Kass B mesons and CP violation CP violation has recently ( ) been observed in the decay of mesons containing a b-quark.

Prospects for at LHCb William Reece Imperial College London Physics at the LHC, 3 rd October 2008.

1 Inclusive B → X c l Decays Moments of hadronic mass and lepton energy PR D69,111103, PR D69, Fits to energy dependence of moments based on HQE.

Beauty and charm at the LHC, Jeroen van Tilburg, FOM Veldhoven 2014 Jeroen van Tilburg Beauty and charm at the LHC: searches for TeV scale phenomena in.

12/15/06 B. Casey 1  s and  s at the Tevatron Gernot Weber Mainz University On behalf of Brendan Casey Brown University and the DØ and CDF collaborations.

CLEO-c Workshop 1 Data Assumptions Tagging Rare decays D mixing CP violation Off The Wall Beyond SM Physics at a CLEO Charm Factory (some food for thought)

Mats Selen, HEP Measuring Strong Phases, Charm Mixing, and DCSD at CLEO-c Mats Selen, University of Illinois HEP 2005, July 22, Lisboa, Portugal.

Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.

Imperial College London Rare decays in LHCb Ulrik Egede Third Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology and Experiments in Heavy Flavour Physics 5-7 July 2010.

D0 mixing and charm CP violation

B meson studies - from commissioning to new physics effects.

Jeffrey Berryhill (UC Santa Barbara) for the BaBar Collaboration

Measurement of the phase of Bs mixing with Bs ϕϕ

Martin Heck, for the CDF II collaboration

Heavy Flavor Results from CMS

Bs  μ+μ- in LHCb Diego Martínez Santos

RAA predictions show enhancement highly sensitive to jet quenching

CP violation in the charm and beauty systems at LHCb

B  at B-factories Guglielmo De Nardo Universita’ and INFN Napoli

D0 Mixing and CP Violation from Belle

Bs  μ+μ- in LHCb Diego Martínez Santos

University of Tsukuba, Japan Particle Physics Phenomenology,

LHCb Rare Decays Status

LHCb Rare Decays Status

Presentation transcript:

Rare Decays and their sensitivity to New Physics

Klassiker: hep-ph/ mSUGRA Parameter:

Light chargino bounds from LEP, Radiative EWSB LSP not neutral hep-ph/

< 5.8· % CL 2 fb -1 arXiv: to PRL < 9.3· % CL D0 Note 5344-Conf (2007)

Problem: Untergrundunterdrückung Invariante Masse keine ausreichende Diskriminate Multivariate Analyse

Lifetime of B Muon Impact Parameter Sign. B s Impact Parameter DOCA between muons Isolation Geometry Likelihood Muon Pion Likelihood ( LL) Muon Kaon Likelihood ( LL) PID Likelihood signal bb inclusive b b B c J/

signal bb inclusive 3-dim. Binning: 4 Bins in Geometry LL 3 Bins in PID LL 5 Bin in invarianter Masse Untergrund Ereignisse/Bin Signalereignisse/Bin (BR) Sensitivität

BR excluded at 90 % CL, i.e. only background is observed BR observed or discovered. Exclude the interesting region between and SM with little Lumi (~0.5 fb -1 ) Observe (discover) SM BR with 3 (5 ) after ~2 (~6) fb -1

Events after preselection cuts in 600 ( 60) MeV mass window

Radiative b s decays Standard Model b s (b s ): LH s-quark (RH s-quark) LH (RH) photons BSM physics (SUSY, LR Models) could lead to appreciable RH component photon helicity probes BSM physics Probing photon helicity: (Photon conversion) Time dependent A CP : Parity-odd triple correlations between photon and 2 out of 3 hadrons in B ( K + + ) decays b (X)

B 0 s [1] hep-ph/ [2] arXiv:hep-ex/ v1 Erste Beobachtung von B s (Ball et al.)

sensitive to NP SMNP polarization predominantly left handed right handed components CPV in decay < 1 % 10%-40% Inclusive decays : theory experiment Exclusive decays theory experiment CPV in interference mixing decay B 0 (B 0 bar) X 0 very small B 0 (B 0 bar) X 0 Could be large Why this decay ?

Expected for one year of measurement ( 2 fb -1 ) have to fight background very good PID necessary, 0 rejection proper time resolution (Time dependent CPV polarization) high trigger efficiency good offline selection What do we expect at LHCb ?

two body kinematics geometrical cuts on pp-interaction PV and B-decay SV Selection mainly based on Selection criteria maximize with = S: signal evts B: background evts K-K- K+K+ PV SV Reconstruction and Selection

Photon selection 2 body kinematics hard E T ( ) spectrum from numerous 0 decay soft Require E T ( ) > 2.8 GeV On the way to the Charged tracks must NOT come from PV ( of B) K + K - should come from SV Some selection criteria…

On the way to the B p B = p p should point to PV use B ( allow rather large B as the SV resolution is not good because of Ks !) PV SV B reconstructed p flight path Some selection criteria…

large background from B 0 s und B K* 0 use vector meson polarization helicity of for B 0 s for B 0 s define helicity angle H sin 2 H distribution for signals cos 2 H distribution for correlated bkg flat for combinatorial bkg K+K+ K-K- B H Background…

Expect 68k signal events for 2 fb -1 with B/S < 0.6 red: true events blue : comb. bkg. And finally one gets… B 0 Expect 11.5k signal events for 2 fb -1 with B/S < 0.6 B s

from b s predominantly left-handed (SM: V-A coupling of W boson) e.g. in MSSM can be largely right-handed ( doesnt effect incl. radiative decay rate predicted by SM) helicity measurement via time-dependent CP asymmetry, … Polarization

amplitudes Relative amount of wrong photon polarization Weak phases (CP odd)

Time dependent decay rate Standard Model:

The CP asymmetry From the time dependent decay rate one gets CP Asymmetry The measurement of A determines the fraction of different-polarized photons ! LHCb Toy study:for 2 fb -1

Asymmetrie: Interesting observable: Muon forward-backward Asymmetry

Zero crossing point: hep-ph/

Generator Studie: 6.5 M Ereignisse. Change in order to which Wilson coefficients are calculated.

A. Ali et al. hep-ph/ SM SUGRA MIA SUSY (lower lines = pure short distance components) M 2 mass distributiuonForward backward asymmetry SM SUGRA MIA SUSY MIA SUSY C 10 >0 Upper/lower lines C 7 0 MIA = Flavor violating SUSY, mass insertion approx.

Non-resonant background: Upper limit: BR < events / 2 fb -1 irreducible Asymmetry In kinematischer Region II erwartet man gleiche Afb wie für K*ll

Q 2 Verteilung für Daten-Set von 2 fb -1 : signal Untergrund (fluktuiert), flach in M Bemerkung: Nicht-resonanter Untergrund wird vernachlässigt. Signal Ereignisse: Untergund: (non-res ignoriert)

Statistische Signifikanz des Zero-Crossing Punktes: Kein Untergrund: 0.41 GeV 2 Mit Untergrund (kein non-res): 0.46 GeV 2 / 0.27 GeV 2 Standardmodell: s 0 2 = GeV 2 Systematische Effekte sind bisher noch nicht untersucht !! (aus toy Experimenten) A FB s=m 2 [GeV 2 ] 2 fb -1 (s 0 ) = 0.46 (s 0 ) = 0.27 (10 fb -1 )