One Channel Information Feedback Method for Multi-AP Coordination

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beamformed HE PPDU Date: Authors: May 2015 Month Year
Advertisements

Submission doc.: IEEE /1097r1 September 2015 Narendar Madhavan, ToshibaSlide 1 Reducing Channel Sounding Protocol Overhead for 11ax Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1349r0 November 2015 Sungho Moon, NewracomSlide 1 Sounding for Uplink Transmission Date: Authors:
Multi-STA BA Design Date: Authors: March 2016 Month Year
AP discovery with FILS beacon
Review of Multi-user Wakeup Schemes
Triggering the Broadcast Probe Response
Considerations for WUR Response
Triggering the Broadcast Probe Response
Channel Access for WUR FDMA
Feedback Element Compression for ax
Scanning from Specific Channel
GAS procedure in TGai Date: Authors: Mar 2012 Month Year
ACK operation in TDD SP Date: Authors: MAY 2018 Name
Procedure for Slot Structure Start Time
Spec Text Motion Date: Authors: March 2018 Month Year
Spec Text Motion Date: Authors: July 2018 Month Year
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Multi-BF Procedure for 11ay
Consideration on multi-AP coordination for EHT
Procedure for Slot Structure Start Time
Discussion on CR for CID 5066
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Consideration on multi-AP coordination for EHT
Initial Distributed MU-MIMO Simulations
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning with Simulation Results
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
Considerations for WUR Response
EHT Feature Discussion
Reducing Overhead in Active Scanning with Simulation Results
Multi-BF Procedure for 11ay
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
TGai FILS: GAS/ANQP Signaling Reduction
Generalized Multi-Beamforming for 11ay
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Triggering the Broadcast Probe Response
MIMO phase in MU-MIMO Beamforming
19, Yangjae-daero 11gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul , Korea
Channel Access for WUR FDMA
Sounding-only Support During Ranging
Performance Investigation on Multi-AP Transmission
Efficient Operation for Multi-AP Coordination
Channel Access in Multi-band operation
Capability on Doppler Mode
AP Coordination in EHT Date: Authors: Name Affiliations
Performance Investigation on Multi-AP Transmission
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
Consideration on Multi-AP Sounding
Considerations on feedback overhead
Virtual BSS For Multi AP Coordination
EHT Multi-AP Feature Discussion
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2012
Data Sharing for Multi-AP Coordination
Discussion on Multi-link Setup
Coordinated Beamforming/Null Steering Protocol in be
LC MAC submission – follow up
Consideration on Multi-AP Sounding
Coordinated Spatial Reuse Performance Analysis
A unified transmission procedure for multi-AP coordination
BA Setup for Multi-Link Aggregation
Consideration on Multi-AP Coordination
Multi-AP Transmission Procedure
Consideration on Multi-AP Ack Protocol
Simultaneous Tx/Rx Capability indication for multi-link operation
Consideration on Multi-AP Coordination
Coordinated Spatial Reuse Performance Analysis
Sounding for AP Collaboration
Channel Access Design for Synchronized Multi-Links
BA Setup for Multi-Link Aggregation
Data Sharing for Multi-AP Coordination
Presentation transcript:

One Channel Information Feedback Method for Multi-AP Coordination Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 One Channel Information Feedback Method for Multi-AP Coordination Date: 2019-09-15 Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone email Dandan Liang Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd Huawei Base, Bantian, Shenzhen Dandan.liang@huawei.com Ming Gan Guogang Huang Yu Jian Yuchen Guo John Doe, Some Company

Introduction The Multi-AP coordination sounding has been discussed in [1]-[3], [1] analyzed different options of collecting channel information: Opt1: each AP collects its own channel information (such as: Compressed Beamforming Report (BFR)) i.e., AP1 collects BFR (AP1STA1, AP1STA2), AP2 collects BFR (AP2STA1, AP2STA2). Opt2: each AP collects BFR only from its associated STA(s), then the BFR needs to be exchanged between APs. i.e., AP1 collects BFR (AP1STA1, AP2STA1), AP2 collects BFR (AP1STA2, AP2STA2). Opt3: master AP collects BFR for all the APs, then channel information needs to be exchanged between APs.AP1STA2), AP2 collects CSI (AP2STA1, AP2STA2). Opt2: each AP collects CSI only from its associated STA(s), then the channel information needs to be exchanged between APs. i.e., AP1 collects CSI (AP1STA1, AP2STA1), AP2 collects CSI (AP1STA2, AP2, STA2). Opt3: master AP collects CSI for all the Aps, then then channel information needs to be exchanged between APs. AP 1 – the master AP, AP2 - the slave AP If AP1 collects all BFR among each APs to each STAs, the overhead of BFR feedback will be a serious problem. Hence, the method of reducing channel information feedback for Multi-AP coordination shall be designed.

Our proposed method For reducing the channel information (such as: compressed beamforming report (BFR)) feedback, we propose one potential method that based on the channel quality, the STA feedbacks BFR selectively. More explicitly, because the STA knows its channel quality to APs, so If the channel quality between the STA and the AP is good, the STA feedbacks BFR to the AP. If the channel quality between the STA and the AP is not good, the STA does not feedback BFR to the AP.

Option 1 Option 1 Proposal: only BFR of the selected AP is fed back Feedback method 1 Feedback method 2 Sounding Procedure Data sharing/transmission between the selected APs AP1 AP2 AP3 BFR 1 + BFR 2 BFR 1 BFR 2 STA Option 1 Proposal: only BFR of the selected AP is fed back APs send NDPA and NDP (Note that NDPs can send sequentially or in parallel.) The STA measures the channel with different APs, then the STA feedbacks BFR selectively. For example: Feedback method 1: when the channel quality is bad between AP3 and the STA, the STA broadcasts BFR1 and BFR2 to AP1 and AP2, which also means that AP1 and AP2 will attend next data sharing/transmission stage. Feedback method 2: when the channel quality is bad between AP3 and the STA, the STA feedbacks BFR1 and BFR2 to AP1 and AP2 sequentially, which also means that AP1 and AP2 will attend next data sharing/transmission stage.

Option 2 Feedback method 1 Feedback method 2 Sounding Procedure Data sharing/transmission between the selected APs AP1 AP2 AP3 BFR 1 + BFR 2 + CQI 3 BFR 1 BFR 2 CQI 3 STA Option 2 Proposal: Both BFR of the selected AP and CQI of the non-selected AP is fed back APs send NDPA and NDP (Note NDPs can send sequentially or in parallel.) The STA measures the channel with different APs, then the STA feedbacks BFR to the selected APs and the CQI to the non-selected APs. For example: Feedback method 1: when the channel quality is bad between AP3 and the STA, the STA broadcasts BFRs to AP1 and AP2 and CQI to AP3, which also means that AP1 and AP2 will attend next data sharing/transmission stage. Feedback method 2: when the channel quality is bad between AP3 and the STA, the STA feedbacks BFRs to AP1 and AP2 and CQI to AP3 sequentially, which also means that AP1 and AP2 will attend next data sharing/transmission stage.

Conclusion In this contribution, we propose that the STA can feedback the channel information selectively for reducing channel feedback overhead in Multi-AP coordination system. Option 1: Only BFR of the selected AP is fed back by the STA Option 2: Both BFR of the selected AP and CQI of the non-selected AP is fed back by the STA

References [1] IEEE 802.11-19/1097r0 <Sounding Procedure in AP collaboration>, Ross Jian Yu, Huawei Technologies. [2] IEEE 802.11-19/1134r1<Consideration on Multi-AP Sounding>, Kosuke Aio, Sony Corporation. [3] IEEE 802.11-19/0488r1<Multi-AP Transmission Procedure>, Sungjin Park, LG Electronics.

Straw Poll 1 Do you support the proposed channel feedback method that STA can feedback channel information selectively? Y N A

Straw Poll 2 Which option of the proposed channel feedback method for Multi-AP Coordination is preferred? Option 1: Option 2: Both Option 1 and Option 2: