Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Effective Contract Management Planning
Advertisements

POLICY AND OVERSIGHT DIVISION (POD) February 2014 Documentation of Evaluation for Award 1.
Page Federal Contracting AbilityOne November 8, 2012 Midwest SBLO Meeting.
November 19, 2013 Preparing a Successful RFP to get Desired Results.
Federal Acquisition Service U.S. General Services Administration June 2009 GSA Multiple Award Schedule Contractor Teaming Arrangements Contractor Teaming.
Procurement Integrity Act (PIA) Overview
Policies and Procedures for Proper Use of Non-DoD Contracts September 29, 2004 Deidre Lee Director, Defense Procurement and Policy Office of the Under.
Congress and Contractor Personal Conflicts of Interest May 21, 2008 Jon Etherton Etherton and Associates, Inc.
March 5,  Purpose  How it Works  Review Topics  Review Findings  Tips 2.
Office of Business Development Training
Partnership Agreements Delegation of SBA’s Contract Execution Authority to other Federal Government Agencies.
1 CDBG Procurement Requirements For Local Officials.
MDA OSBP BEST PRACTICES FOR MAXIMIZING SB PARTICIPATION Pre-Award Strategies STEPAgency OSBPAcquiring ActivityBenefit / Rationale 1Establish relationships.
Phase II Training Briefed By [CA insert name] For Quality Assurance Personnel.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e PPNM’s/PNM’s Date: 29 Dec 2006.
1 Army Policy and Procedures for Proper Use of Non-DoD Contracts Ed Cornett Procurement Policy and Support July 13 & 19, 2005 Presented to: Army Requiring.
Incentive Contracts FAR Subpart 16.4 Level II PIP Presentation Ashley McQueen December 6, 2010.
Procurement Engineering and Review Team (PERT) PEER REVIEW PROGRAM Patrick Marmo 2/7/2012 Independent Peer Review Program for Contractor’s Purchasing Systems.
Peer Reviews. 2  Strengths and/or Best Practices across multiple Sites ◦ Internal customers involved in Acq. Planning (3) ◦ Leveraging buying power.
Source Selection. What is Source Selection? Source Selection is the process of conducting competitive negotiations. Source Selection allows the Government.
GWAC Ordering Procedures Overview
Billie Smith GSFC Procurement Operations Division December 8, 2004 Prenegotiation Position and Price Negotiation Memorandums.
DLA-Energy Recurring Maintenance & Minor Repair Program 10 December 2010 US Army Corps Of Engineers Maintenance andDLA-E Repair Program.
1 Report Tile Training & Management Assistance Branch UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT Task Order Competition (TOC) Process.
Jobs Act March 2011  Jobs Bill Updates  Parity  Comp Demo  MAS Set-asides  Misrepresentations  Subcontracting Payments & Plans.
Don Mansfield Professor of Contract Management Defense Acquisition University.
POLICY & OVERSIGHT DIVISION (POD) February 2014 MILESTONE ACQUISITION PLANS TRAINING 1.
FAR Part 10 Market Research. FAR Part 10 - Prescribes policies and procedures for conducting Market Research.
Implementing the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 2 Background The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612) requires Federal agencies to— –Consider the.
Policies and procedures for developing acquisition plans; determining whether to use commercial or Government resources; whether it is more economical.
Federal Aviation Administration 0 0. Federal Aviation Administration 1 1 July 2009 Federal Aviation Administration eFAST Electronic FAA Accelerated and.
Policies and Procedures for Proper Use of Non-DoD Contract Vehicles July 13, 2004 Deidre Lee Director, Defense Procurement and Policy Office of the Under.
The Administration’s Small Business Agenda Contract Bundling: A Strategy for Increasing Federal Contracting Opportunities for Small Business.
1 Comprehensive Tactical Infrastructure Maintenance and Repair (CTIMR) Area 3 Pre-Proposal Site Visit HSBP1015R0040 Sectors EL PASO / BIG BEND, TX
2014 GSFC PMR Preliminary Results Code 210 All Hands August 27, 2014.
Regulation Highlights Kimberly Heifetz May 15, 2012.
Small Business and Subcontracting. Subcontracting for Small Business 6 steps to successful subcontracting 6. Report Contractor performance 1. Consider.
1. 2 Cost & Price Analysis Breakout Session # 312 Beverly Arviso, CPA, Fellow, CPCM, CFCM, Arviso, Inc. Melanie Burgess, CPA, CFCM, Burgess Consulting,
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Ready for Cost Type Contracts - Accounting Systems and Administration Small Business Vendor Day.
DoD Procurement Conference and Training Symposium May 13, 2010 Peer Reviews Dick Ginman Deputy Director, DPAP.
Subcontracting Program Updates Janice Buffler, Associate Director Subcontracting/Regional Councils DoD Office of Small Business Programs 1.
Compliance with CCNA F.S..  Advertisement  Longlist  Shortlist  Request for Proposal  Scope of Services Meeting  Technical Proposal Review.
Presented by NAVSEA, NSWC, for NAVSUP
Evaluating Small Business Participation
Subaward - 2 CFR A formal legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity An award provided by a pass-through entity (PTE) to.
Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides
Consent to Subcontract
Post-Award Compliance
Lessons Learned from Financial Management Reviews
The Administration’s Small Business Agenda
CDBG Procurement Date of Session, 2017 Washington, DC Brian Delvaux
Small Business and Subcontracting.
Subcontracting SBP 210 Lesson 1: Introduction
Uniform Guidance Discussion
Managing Outgoing Subawards April 18, 2017
EVM 202—Lesson 5 EVMS Surveillance
DAU Hot Topics Forum on:
Contracting by Negotiation Process Map – Part 15 (1 of 3)
See next slide for content
Comparison of Major Contract Types
Audit of <insert title and audit #>
ProTech FAR Subpart 16.5 – Indefinite Delivery Contracts
MDA OSBP BEST PRACTICES FOR MAXIMIZING SB PARTICIPATION
How to Prepare a Quality Modification Request
Competition Michael L. Benavides Senior Procurement Analyst
A Pricing Perspective on Contract Cost/Price Analyst
DAU Hot Topics Forum on:
United Nations Voluntary Fund on Disability (UNVFD)
Omnibus IV Contracting Strategy Michael D’Alessandro
SPOT CHECKS 2016.
Presentation transcript:

Contracting Activity Briefing Slide Submission to DASA(P) on Post Award Peer Review

Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides Contracting Activity: _______________ Contract No. XXXXXX-XX-X-XXXX Title of Service: _______________ Name of Submitter: _______________ Position: _______________ Email: _______________ Date: _______________

Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides Purpose To brief the Senior Services Manager (SSM) on the elements addressed during the post award peer review for Contract Number {insert number} for {insert title of service} To satisfactorily complete post award peer review prior to exercising Option Period {insert applicable option}

Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides Team Members {Insert names and positions of contracting activity’s post award peer review participants}

Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides Overview Requirement Description Basic Contract Information Market Research Contractor Performance Maintaining Competition Contractor’s Subcontract Management Staffing of Contract Management and Oversight Functions Assessment of Excessive Pass-Through Charges Contracts for Acquisition Functions Objective Incentives Lessons Learned Best Practices

Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides Requirement Description {Use bullet format when defining requirement}

Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides Basic Contract Information Contract Number: {if multiple award, include contract number and contractor name for each} Contract Type Contractor name Total Estimated Value: {include value of the base and all option periods} Performance Period: {include date and dollar value for the base and each option period IAW example below} Base Period 1 Oct 2016 – 30 Sep 2017 $ 1st Option Period 1 Oct 2017– 30 Sep 2018 $ 2nd Option Period 1 Oct 2018 – 30 Sep 2019 $ 3rd Option Period 1 Oct 2019 – 30 Sep 2020 $

Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides Market Research Based on market research results, exercising the option {insert “is” or “is not”} in the best interest of the Government {Provide rationale to support decision, i.e., discuss conclusions drawn from the market research}

Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides Contractor Performance {Address whether the program meets, exceeds or does not meet established cost, schedule and performance criteria} Cost/Price {For cost type contract, if applicable} {If overruns, list factors attributing to increase, include the aggregate percentage of change since contract award and explain difference} {If savings achieved, describe savings and indicate percentage or amount} {State whether or not contractor’s business systems comply with terms of contract (Cost Accounting Standards, if applicable)} If not in compliance, explain {For firm-fixed price type contracts} {For increases in scope, include the aggregate percentage of change since contract award and explain difference}

Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides Contractor Performance, cont’d Schedule {Address timeliness of performance} Performance {Include contractor’s current rating from Past Performance Information Retrieval System} {Include CDRs/Letters of Concern/Show Cause, if applicable} If applicable, explain official action to take remedy the problem {Include claims/disputes, if applicable}

Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides Maintaining Competition {Applies to Multiple Award IDIQs} {Address whether the appropriate contract type was utilized} {Identify total number of orders issued, their total dollar value, number of orders for which competition was obtained and dollar value of orders for which competition was obtained} {Address whether effective cost and pricing methods are utilized to support negotiation and award of task orders} {Address whether management and oversight mechanisms are in place}

Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides Contractor’s Subcontract Management {If applicable} {Address contractor compliance with Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System reporting} {Address contractor’s use, management and oversight of subcontractors} {Address contractor compliance with subcontracting plan requirements (FAR 19.702} {Address contractor adherence to the subcontracting plan to include requirements of FAR 19.704(a)(10)}

Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides Staffing of Contract Management and Oversight Functions {Address whether there is an appropriate staffing of Government contract management (contracting personnel) and oversight functions to include CORs} {Indicate whether or not the COR monitors contractor performance IAW QASP to ensure contract compliance} {Include contractor’s ratings for the surveillance period} {Indicate whether or not the COR submitted monthly reports} {Indicate whether or not the KO reviewed the COR official file and documented the file}

Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides Assessment of Excessive Pass-Through Charges {IAW FAR 15.408, if applicable} {Indicate whether the Contracting Officer evaluated the contract to determine the extent of any pass-throughs by the contractor} {Indicate whether the Contracting Officer evaluated the contract to determine if any excessive pass-through charges exists by the contractor} {FAR 52.215-22 and FAR 52.215-23) If excessive pass-through charges exists, indicate whether the Government rejected the charges or recouped the amount in the form of a price reduction

Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides Contracts for Acquisition Functions Inherently Governmental Functions {Only applies to contracts under which one contractor provides oversight for services performed by other contractors} {Does the government periodically evaluate the extent of the agency’s reliance on the contractor to perform acquisition functions closely associated with inherently governmental functions as defined in section 2383(b)(3) of title 10, USC. Explain.} Conflicts of Interest (Financial) {Only applies to contracts under which one contractor provides oversight for services performed by other contractors} {Does the Government periodically evaluate the financial interest of any prime contractor performing inherently governmental functions in any contract or subcontract. Explain.}

Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides Objective Incentives {Applies to contracts with award and/or incentive fee} Incentive Fee {if multiple incentive type contract, address both objective incentives and subjective award fee criteria (see Award Fee slide)} {Address whether objective criteria is utilized to measure contract performance (DFARS 216.401-71)} {Address compliance with DFARS 216.405-1 and PGI 216.405-2)} {Address whether incentive fees are paid in a manner consistent with DoD policy (DFARS 216.401-70)}

Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides Objective Incentives Award Fee Plan {Address compliance with DFARS 216.401(e) and PGI 216.401(e); if not in compliance, explain} {Address whether Award Fee pool is properly and timely managed (DFARS 216.405-2(1), AFARS 5116-4(S-92) and AFARS 5116-405-2(b)(2)(B); if not, explain} {Address whether subjective award fee criteria is utilized to measure performance; if not, explain} {Address whether Award Fee Determining Official is properly appointed (AFARS 5116.405-2(b)(2)(C); if not, explain} {Address whether award fees are paid in a manner consistent with DoD policy (DFARS 216.401-70); if not, explain}

Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides Lessons Learned {Identify anything the acquisition team would do differently if the acquisition was re-competed}

Post Award Peer Review Briefing Slides Best Practices {Add any unique practices, procedures, techniques or approaches observed by the Peer Review team}