Selection Procedure Recommendation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Coexistence Motions for LB84 Comment Resolution
Advertisements

LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
TGn Sync Atlanta Presentation on Confirmation
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
TGu Closing Report Date: Authors: November 2005
March 2014 Election Results
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
3GPP liaison report May 2006 May 2006 Date: Authors:
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
Motions Date: Authors: January 2006
TGp Motions Date: Authors: November 2005 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
Contribution on Location Privacy
JTC1 Ad Hoc Mid-week Report
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: January 2005 January 2005
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
July 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2012
ADS Study Group Mid-week Report
Selection Procedure Recommendation
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
September Opening Report
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
March 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2012
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2007
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2007 Month Year
November Opening Report
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
March Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2011
3GPP2 Liaison Report Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
May 2005 CAPWAP AHC Closing Report
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Liaison Report From Date: Authors: Month Year
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
January Opening Report
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: January 2005 January 2005
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: May 2005 May 2005
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGp Motions Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
May 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: May 2012
Presentation transcript:

Selection Procedure Recommendation March 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.11-05/0300r0 March 2005 Selection Procedure Recommendation Date: 2005-03-17 Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.11. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.11. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http:// ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <stuart.kerry@philips.com> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.11 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <patcom@ieee.org>. Tim Wakeley HP Tim Wakeley HP

March 2005 doc.: IEEE 802.11-05/0300r0 March 2005 Abstract 802.11s selection procedure change that forces a merger of the final 2 proposals if the support for each is at least a 60% to 40% split and the final proposal does not get 75% approval on the 2nd confirmation vote Tim Wakeley HP Tim Wakeley HP

Recommended Change Step 13 March 2005 Recommended Change Step 13 13. If the last remaining proposal fails to receive 75% majority on the second roll call voting round and the last eliminated proposal received at least 40% of the vote, then a merger of the final 2 proposals is required. Otherwise, the process shall return to step 11 at the point where there were two proposals remaining. If the two proposals decide to merge at this point or a proposal withdraws, the next previously eliminated proposal down will be added to provide a total of two proposals on the floor unless there were not two proposals that initially entered step 11. Tim Wakeley HP

Recommended Change to Step 12 March 2005 Recommended Change to Step 12 If the proposal fails to achieve a 75% majority, all members who voted “no” are asked (not required) to provide to the chair their reason(s) for voting “no” and what would be required to change their vote to affirmative. Tim Wakeley HP